THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

STORMFRONT EXCHANGE ON "AGENTS" | 2006-10-14

You might want to read "Agents" below to see what the subject is. I pointed out that my experience with runors about someone being an "agent" has been entirely negative. When I put this on Stormfront all the commenters but one wholeheartedly agreed that their experience was the same, and I got a number of rep points for saying this.

But one respondent decided that I was actually one of the "agents."

This is my exchange with him:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baldy

I've edited this post many times, Bob, because of your close connections to SF. I did not know of your dubious past.....

To say that there are not agents and active informers in here and in every "WN" group is dangerous and foolish.

Too many of us have been dragged through the federal coals based on false information from lunatic anti-White federal agents and their lap dogs. We have many prisoners who have been framed by the feds and their faggot informers.

I don't know what else to say, Bob. You seem to be trying to convince everyone that it is totally safe to say anything because agents and informers don't really exist.

Well, they do. They really, really do and if anyone does not believe that simple fact will end up in prison.

ME:

My "dubious" background was in the Cold War working against the Reds.

The trouble with your post is that it concentrates entirely on Bob Whitaker's One Man Cospiracy and has nothing PRACTICAL in it.

How, exactly, do these agents operate?

I personally never run into anything in our movement that could be EXPOSED. My time is spent trying to get information about what we are doing and what we have to say tot he public through the media blackout. if you have useful, SPECIFIC warnings, then you should concentrate on THOSE.

I would be interested in practical information.

To get to the real point here, do you know of any case where "outing" agents actually WORKED? HOW did it work? Every case I know of a panic over some "agent" served only to destroy a comrade's effectiveness in our movement.

If there are agents, then in my limited experience, we are doing a really loousy job of dealing with them. Can YOU give us something to IMPROVE on that performance, or do you just want to sit around re-editing posts that insult a lifelong battler for our cause?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baldy

I've edited this post many times, Bob, because of your close connections to SF. I did not know of your dubious past.....

To say that there are not agents and active informers in here and in every "WN" group is dangerous and foolish.

Too many of us have been dragged through the federal coals based on false information from lunatic anti-White federal agents and their lap dogs. We have many prisoners who have been framed by the feds and their faggot informers.

I don't know what else to say, Bob. You seem to be trying to convince everyone that it is totally safe to say anything because agents and informers don't really exist.

Well, they do. They really, really do and if anyone does not believe that simple fact will end up in prison.

__________________

ANYONE WHO SAYS "RACIST" IS A BULLY AND A COWARD | 2015-10-21

My latest interview with a San Francisco radio station demonstrates why I don't get invited twice.

In fact this time they actually hung up on me.

I kept asking the interviewer what the word "racist" means.

He said, "You've asked me that four times."

I replied, "You use the word Racist all the time, so I ask you what it means"

He asked me what I thought it meant.

I replied, it doesn't mean anything.   It's just a word that is supposed to scare people into silence.

He said nothing, of course.

I used that moment to say "Respectable conservatives never have the guts to ask that question."

Racist means "Shut up!"

Racist means grovel.

Racist means "Pee in your pants."

Racist is word that is never used by anyone but a bully and a coward.

It scares grovelers and cowards.

Voice 071 - About his interview on iheart radio october 20 and avoiding being labeled making our own points

TOUGH GUYS VERSUS REALITY | 2007-08-30

I keep asking you to consider WHY any information is PRODUCED.

This is very different from asking you to DOUBT. It goes deeper, and should take MORE time. The Tough Guy approach is to learn "both sides," to aggressively Question. But he is already into step two. His big concern is LOOKING doubtful, not in analyzing reality. If you "study the question," that means YOU know all about it.

And for the Tough Guy, everybody seeing that you know it all is where the process stops. What good does any Wisdom do if it doesn't show how wise YOU are?

Please note that I began here by analyzing WHY the Tough Guy says what he says, not by casting doubt on it from my endless fund of information about all aspects of the question. Why do ***I*** use this approach? Because the Tough Guy is aiming to look tough. I, on the other hand, am interested solely in power in the real world.

Look at that word "real." Do you think it is accidental that whenever we hear the word "reality" it means something awful? But you could do this for YOURSELF: WHY does the word "reality" always mean something awful? It is because the person using that word is saying,

1) ***I*** really know what reality is, because of my virtues.

2) ***I*** have "been there."

3) ***I*** am tough and experienced.

In other words, the person who defines "reality" is talking entirely about HIMSELF, which is precisely what reality is NOT about.

The most Tough Guy things I have ever done were a COVER. If you have papers to show you are working with a sewing machine company and someone figures out that you are actually a combat merc, they stop looking. To look any further would be like finding someone is covering up an armed robbery and then saying, "Well, this must be a cover for something SERIOUS."

Like acting the Dumb Southerner in DC, this analysis of reality has a very, VERY practical side. That is WHY it is REALITY. That someone may be using being a merc as a cover simply doesn't occur to people. Why?

Because the information people are used to from Tough Guys is aimed at making Tough Guys look TOUGH. Merc is the toughest so merc is the end of the chain.

In other words, "reality" begins and ends with his being a Tough Guy.

KEEP IN THE VOTE! | 2000-10-28

The governing parties in France are very upset. They put a plebiscite before their people and nobody came.

Actually, thirty percent of the electorate came, but for obedient Europeans, that is an unbelievably minuscule turnout. American media point to the fact that ninety percent of Europeans turn out for every European election, even when there is absolutely no real choice offered. They want us to be like that.

So the French electorate, as always, approved what their rulers wanted in the plebiscite. But a thirty percent turnout did not say, "Yes, Master!" with the traditional European enthusiasm.

The fact is that the French Constitution, written for Charles DeGaulle, is out of date. To make matters worse, huge segments of public opinion, such as LaPenn's Party which wants to cut down on immigration, get no attention at all. That is fifteen percent of the vote that is simply written off as naziswhowanttokillsixmillionjews.

So the "reform" proposed for the plebiscite -- reducing the presidential term from seven to five years -- had absolutely nothing to do with the real problems there. Normally that would not matter, and Europeans would all troop to the polls anyway. But this time, faced with no choice that mattered, the French did what Americans would have done. They said to hell with it and stayed home.

Refusing to take part in meaningless political ritual is very, very unEuropean. In Western Europe, ninety percent of voters show up for the most meaningless exercise. Behind the Iron Curtain the people have been what our "Get Out the Vote" media would call even Better Citizens. Over ninety-nine percent of the voters showed up at the polls for every Communist "election." In North Korea, they once claimed one hundred percent participation in the voting, including those on deathbeds and in comas.

Nobody on earth has as low a voter turnout as America does. So, according to the "Get Out the Vote" philosophy, the worst citizens in the world are in the United States, and the best citizens in the world are in North Korea.

If you don't know the details about what Communists call elections, you've missed a good laugh. Here is what happens.

The Good Citizen, or Comrade, walks into the polling place. A Party official marks his name off the list and hands him a ballot. The ballot is already filled out, one line for each office, and the Communist Party candidate's name is the only one beside each office.

Standing there in front of a Party official, the voter now has two choices.

First, the voter may do what absolutely everybody else does and take the already-filled-out ballot directly to the box and drop it in, thereby voting a straight Communist ticket. Please remember that he is standing in front of a Party official who has just gotten his name and who is sitting there with pencil poised to put down further information beside his name.

Keeping that in mind, our voter in a Progressive People's Peace-Loving Democratic Republic can take the ballot and scratch out some names and substitute others. If he goes back to scratch and substitute that way, you can bet he will get a visit from some other Party functionaries who will want to congratulate him on his independent spirit.

So, as in America, the ideal of the Progressive People's Peace-Loving Democratic Republics is for all the voters to show up and make whatever "choice" they are told to. That is the essence of "getting out the vote."

I say keep it in.