THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

IDEOLOGY VERSUS LIVING FREE | 2006-02-17

We are so used to living in an ideological world that we cannot get used to the idea that technology is making it out of date.

Throughout human history and before, we lived where we could make a living. So you were surrounded by people who wanted to live their own way. Some wanted a Leader, some wanted very few restrictions, some wanted the schools to teqach creationism, some evolution.

But they all had to live side-by-side, where their job was or where the good hunting grounds were.

That is going away.

So in the future we will adapt to that.

It took decades before anybody realized that the Industrial Revolution was making a new society and a new politics. We are having the same problem.

If you HAVE to live side-by-side where you make your living, then you have to have a single form of government. That is why you have ideolgies.

But if you do NOT have to live together in the best hunting grounds or near the steel plants, you don't need ideology to live in a place that operates the way you like it.

You just GO there.

We don't NEED ideolgy any more.

So let's get rid of it. Let's stop building our lives around it.

Right now the whole world is living in the past. Everybody is trying to UNITE. Ther European Union and the United Nations are relics of the past.

It will take a long time for people to catch on to this, just as it took generations for ideology to catch up with the Industrial Revolution.

A PLOY WORKED ON YOU. YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED! | 2011-04-05

I was happy when I saw 33 comments in response to my seventieth birthday article.

Then I was disappointed to find that many if not most of them were wasted in a debate about whether BUGSers are personally virtuous by having enough children.

This is another old tactic. Remember that the other side wants to get on ANYTHING except the Mantra. So they say you should be out having big families if you really care about your race and forget this Mantra thing.

How much good for the future of our race would it do if the few Mantra whites had huge families and did not concentrate on the Mantra? It wouldn't do our race any good, but talking about it sure helps the anti-whites.

I can't BELIEVE you wasted so much time on that!

At least one commenter caught the ploy and exposed it.

But the whole seminar gets a string of Fs for letting this crap roll on.

Another indicator is when someone refers to "Bob Whitaker's writings." You can read Dave and tell at once that he is referring to SPECIFIC points I made.

I cut off the black guy because he was not READING our point of view.

By definition, a COMMENT is on something one has READ.

But let's return to the basic topic here:

That string of Fs for letting someone get you off topic by arguing you are not a good kid if you don't have lots of kids.

How in the HELL did you fall for that!?

The old North Carolina saying has a deep meaning here:

You're ugly, your feet stink, and you don't love Jesus." It is a false quote that makes a point.

The point is that a stupid person reacts to any opinion he dislikes by assuming that the disagreer is evil in all ways. What we are dealing with here is a related point: a person trying to justify HIMSELF rather than his POINT. So this person attacks White Rabbit on not having children:

"Are you a REAL, a GOOD white person?"

NEVER fall into that trap.

The point is not WR. The point is not about Bob Whitaker being a saint or a scumbag.

The point is the Mantra. And when you allow yourself to get off white genocide and onto whether you are good or fecund or your feet stink, you are being a friggin' MORON.

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS OR REAL HISTORY? | 2000-08-19

Before World War II, the settlement of America was looked upon by most historians as one more phase of this long, long westward movement of the "Aryans" or Indo-Europeans which began thousands of years ago.

In fact, descriptions of the Celtic and Germanic "barbarians" moving down toward Rome sound very familiar today. Those gigantic wagon trains looked a lot like older versions of the Conestoga wagons that reached California. They were.

Nothing that the Romans ever wore is as familiar to us as the pants and shirts the Celtic invaders wore. And the houses they built two millennia ago look very much like European housing a century ago. They were the same types of houses we have today.

Before World War II, the millennia of Indo-European wagon trains was routinely referred to by historians as "the great racial movement." The settlement of America was routinely referred to as simply an extension of the thousands of years of "racial movement." It moved from some unknown starting place of the Indo-European people somewhere east and north of today's Iran, and it conquered India and Western Europe. In fact, it conquered Western Europe many times, in wave after wave.

"Barbarians" rolling in from the east brought the original Romans - the speakers of "Italic languages." Then came the Celts.

Then came the Germans. Then the Slavs. As far as we know, they all came from same place because their languages are so closely related at the base. And the base of their languages is the also base of today's Hindi and Persian languages.

This real history of the push west, across half the globe, was a titanic adventure. It involved thousands of years of adventure.

The REAL HISTORY of OUR CHILDREN'S ancestors is absolutely fascinating, and the wagon trains of the Old West were simply an extension of it. That would FASCINATE our children. If today's history students could hear it, they wouldn't be bored sick in class. So why is it taboo?

The usual reason: mention of it now makes you anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

Hitler talked about Aryans and Aryan supremacy. So any discussion of the real history behind Western Civilization, exciting as it would be, is now condemned as Nazism.

Why do I bring all this up? First and foremost, I bring this up because a Nice Person is absolutely forbidden to discuss it. As you well know, I love offending the rigid taboos of our day, just for the fun of it if nothing else.

But, as always, I offend these taboos with a purpose in mind. It is to show why the history we have has so little to do with reality.

Instead of this great adventure, history talks about Aztec pottery and Incan pictures as if they were a part of real history. Any real history leading to modern society would be based on the thousands of years of our forgotten westward trek. But anything that is not Nazism has to show that all history comes more or less equally from All Mankind.

To keep from being naziswhowanttokillsixmillionjews, much of our history seldom touches on reality and is tortuous boredom for our children.

SIEGECRAFT: EXPLAINING MY OPTIMISM | nationalsalvation.net

Thinking over "The Good Old Days" below, a revelation occurred to me:

I now realize why I am so optimistic and others aren't.

It goes back to an old saying of mine:

"All things come to him who waits....."

"Provided that he worketh like hell while he waiteth."

You see, all the other old-timers have been pushing the same tomes about Jews for the last forty years. They have seen nothing but things getting worse.

The group that calls itself The Greatest Generation left me a world in which Nazism had been destroyed and Communism ruled a third of mankind. There was no pressure to the right, no fascist power, but there was enormous pressure for movement to the left. Everything was aimed at a compromise between Communism and capitalism. All was Wordism. "Modern" Christianity accepted Marxism. Any argument for the survival of my race was out of the question.

Now the Soviet Empire is GONE. I helped dig its grave, and the bitter old men are still trying to sell the same old tomes. They shriek that all is lost, and they will fight for all is lost more than they ever fought for anything useful.

I won one.

Secondly, even the New York Times admits that the hopeless cause I spent so much time on, getting rid of "Modern anthropologists have proven that all races are equal in inherited abilities" is as dead as the USSR. I fought it when it was ABSOLUTE.

I won TWO.

After the group that calls itself The Greatest Generation got through giving a third of humanity to the Reds, all the sides that were left (both ways) had one thing in common, they all worshipped the Middle East. Marxism depends on the old Ex Oriente Lux history, Marx knew no other. "Christianity," Old Timey and Modernist, trace the former call The Holy Land, good solid idolatry, and the latter see as the basis of Marxist-Bible agreement.

But I inherited a world in which the group that calls itself The Greatest Generation had made the Middle East the Holy Land of all "intellectual" faiths and the "Judeo-Christian" faith. My race was just a bunch of jumped-up Africans.

In this case I was not instrumental. Carbon dating and serious study are tearing the Ex Oriente Lux crap to pieces.

But in a sense, I may have been instrumental. When I was coming up, there was absolutely NO fight against "Modern anthropologists have proven that all races are equal in inherited abilities." ALL opposition was fringe opposition, printed in cheap little pamphlets. Now Jensen and others write cover articles for mainline, THE mainline, psychology journals.

When the liberals, with their escort of shrieking respectable conservatives, started yelling that "Race does not exist!" there was a major difference only I noticed. The "racial realists" are already a major force in academia. They are not confined to ragged little private publications the way we were back when I got into this fight.

I do not know how much my fight for heresy helped the frontal assault on Ex Oriente Lux.

But if I didn't win THREE, I SAW three victories, while the bitter young men became bitter old men.

The bitter old men say things are getting worse. OF COURSE they are! If you get into my way of thinking, you will look for the obvious explanation. It's called filter down.

Stable societies do not change overnight. It took over a century for Franz Boas and his whole group of anthropologists to move society into his way of thinking. He died in 1942 as an old man when his ideas were just beginning to take hold.

And history simply does not repeat itself exactly. In the new age, ideas will not become policy through the old political system. If you obsess over print media, you will find it has not changed a bit politically. You will also find it is dying. If you look at CBS, NBC ABC and PBS you will see they are the same or worse.

But the only people who LOOK at them are people who can't afford cable.

I have seen many victories and I know what they mean. So the real choice is between my kind of thinking and becoming a bitter old man, even if you are young.