THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

REPUBLICAN MODERATION IS THE ULTIMATE COMPROMISE | 2002-08-24

The Republican Party exists to obtain 1) benefits for large corporations and 2) mucho, mucho military expenditure. In hard core, real-world politics, the rumors are true. In return for more bombers and a macho foreign policy, Republicans are happy to let liberals have their racial quotas, their busing, and anything else they want on the social policy side.

So the real meaning of "middle of the road" in America is that both the military-industrial establishment and the education-welfare establishment get what they really insist on. There is no room in this compromise for the people to get anything.

Washington, DC, took over America to an unimagined extent in the period between 1953 and 1977. During two-thirds of that critical period moderate Republicans held the White House. That period began with Eisenhower creating the Department of Health, Education and Welfare and ended with Reagan being defeated by Ford at the Republican Convention Of 1976.

Liberals sponsored most of the Washington power grabs between 1953 and 1977.

But it was moderate Republicans who prevented any real opposition from forming against them.

BASICS: JUMPED-UP WHITE TRASH | nationalsalvation.net

The "society" column is not what it used to be. There is a section of the paper usually dedicated to "Society," but now it means society in the anthropological sense. "Society" used to be run by certain people who were known as uppah clahss.

The major last book about this kind of Society was written by Cleveland Amory in the 1950s. It was entitled, "Who Killed Society?" Amory was a New York-Washington liberal - no other writers let their politics be known in the 1950s - so one of his conclusions was particularly surprising. He concluded that the only place where an upper class "society" existed was in Charleston, South Carolina!

He almost said it in plain English, "Charleston has an aristocracy. Everybody else has turned into jumped-up white trash."

One of the most amusing (and least emphasized) examples he gave was when the Four Hundred Book Publisher came to Charleston. There had been a book describing the four hundred families who made up Society in New York, then another on the four hundred families who made up Society in Philadelphia.

Being popular, this Four Hundred Book idea spread to Chicago, Boston and on down the population scale. Then they showed up in Charleston. The scout who was to find out about the four hundred in Charleston was directed, of course, to a little old lady on the Battery. He went to her and he told her about the book, which everywhere else had met with gushing enthusiasm.

The Charleston lady was not grateful, she was puzzled, "Why are you doing this?"

The man replied, "So people in Charleston will know who the leading families here are."

The lady replied, "We know that."

There was never a South Carolina Four Hundred.

When integration came, our Charleston Society led the fight against it. When Kennedy invaded Mississippi, the Charleston paper said, "We should fight on the campus, we should fight them in the trenches. This is war."

The New York Times took the other side. The Atlanta Journal took the other side. Charleston didn't give a damn. And being so confident of your loyalties that you don't give a damn what others think is one of the major factors that separates aristocrats from naciocrats.

Everywhere else, the "upper class" in Atlanta or New Orleans fought for integration. They wanted the kind of approval that comes from New Yorkers who published the Four Hundred.

In Britain, the Queen says all you need to live in the UK is to be loyal to HER. Her birth as Queen is important. The average Brit being born on the island doesn't mean a damned thing. All peasants are equal.

The son of the Prince (Elector) of Liechtenstein came to America and married a black woman.

Charlestonians, the only real aristocrats left, were leaders of THEIR people, which is what aristocracy is all about. Louis Andrews, an old ally of mine who publishes the web page, "Tracking the Wild Taboo" is one of the last of that breed. I am sure that the rest of the Charleston "upper crust" has joined Atlanta and New York.

So what we call aristocracy and the uppah clahss today is jumped-up white trash.

WHY JANUARY 1? | 2009-12-31

Does anybody know why January 1 is New Year's Day?

We know a lot more about Christmas, though we never think about it. It was the birthday of Mithras established by Constantine. No one ever THINKS about that, they just recite it, as they do all history Mommy Professor didn't hammer in. They get classes dedicated to the birthday of Saint Martin Luther the King, but Mithras is mentioned in case they play Trivial Pursuits.

The beginning of the New Year was probably the first major piece of real knowledge the shamans actually possessed. Every year the Northern world got colder and colder and death surrounded them. Only when information passed from one generation to another did those who did that discover that the sun came back every year.

Then they discovered the DATE at which the sun began to come back. This was not as obvious as one may at first think.

After all, while the northern hemisphere does indeed reach its maximum distance from the sun at Winter Solstice, the weather keep getting colder right into February. So it was quite an intellectual achievement when, looking forward to an even deader January and February, our forefathers CELEBRATED December 21 or 22.

In fact, dates were something ancient Wise Men took very seriously, because it was about the only solid information they had. This makes it mysterious, at least to the two or three people on earth who actually THINK about, that the Magi would have changed the date to December 25.

In fact, there is probably an even simpler explanation as why January 1 was set as New Year's Day. I just have no idea what it was.

Have you ever noticed how January 1 is ONLY traditional date that no one ever celebrated. Even the Jews dug around in their history and found the Festival of Lights at Christmas. Thanksgiving was celebrated in England regularly before the Pilgrims were the first settlement and invented it.

Jamestown had Thanksgiving, but Jamestown didn't exist. THINKING about history can make one what the PCs and blacks call Ignunt. May Day was pagan and I am willing to bet every Semitic religion had its own version of Passover.

All dates have predecessors.

Except New Year's.

REPLY TO PETER, THANKS TO TIM | 2005-11-29

Peter asks,

"When our government finishes its fall, how do we make sure we have something wonderful to replace it? Do we wish to be in the same mess that Russia is in now or like the afterbirths that Spain and England are? Granted the most important thing is making sure it falls flat but there will be more moves ahead on the chess board. "

Tim said,

"I also gave them the old BW line—"they are not talking about flooding Africa with non-Africans and

Asia with Non-Asians. They are only flooding White countries and ONLY White

countries with Non-Whites. This is genocide." (I say this stuff in my sleep these days)"

And Tim is my answer to Peter.

Petger, if you are a Christian, do the work that is before you, as Tim is doing. Tim's constant repetition of the fundamental fact SHOULD be what you repeat in your sleep.

It WORKS.

We can have a healthy future if we plant the seeds of decency in people's minds. No Plan is going to do it.

You plant the seeds and some healthy soil will make it prosper. But you HAVE to plant the seeds, which is a repetitious busines in every case.

The trouble with a person with a Plan is that he thinks his Plan will make a nation thrive. So he writes a Book and tries to create yet another group of Wordists who will save the world. That is path whitakeronline.org leads AWAY from.

If you get people realizing that we are facing simple, blatant genocide it destroys thir worship of Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Reilly and all the rest. If they are white, this makes them THINK.

And that, Peter, is ALL we ask of OUR people. We want them to finally see how insane things are and that courage does not consist of obedience, but of MORAL courage. We want them to start using their OWN minds. Aryans do not dream of a worlsdin which all the other Aryans run around on a golden leash.

We want a world where Aryans squabble over what is RIGHT, not over what is written. And, unlike blacks or browns or Orientals, we want OUR PEOPLE to take over, not to obey whatever creed we come up with.

If you want our people to stop being fools and cowards, you do what Tim is doing. You keep hammering in "Don't be a fool" by refusing to question just plain genocide. You stop being a coward by avoiding the subject that is obviously in our rulers' minds.

Get our people to thinking. Get our people to questioning. Make defiance the mark of heroism.

Do what Tim is doing.