THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

MARK'S WELCOME COMMENT | 2005-12-12

Mark says, starting with a quote from me,

"Congratulations, gang. We won one."

"Actually Bob I believe we are about to win a lot more of them as things worsen for the white race. Just looking at what heroic Australians have done earlier this week gives me hope, even tho the Aussie PC press reports differently. With anti-white crime on the rise across the world I believe there will be more Cal Thomas's dropping bombs on our liberal and respectable conservative detractors. Is that the view you has as well or am I wearing my rose colored spectacles too tightly about my head again? "

You cannot imagine what a relief what Mark said is!

I have spent literally hundreds if not thousands of hours listening to our people saying, "Oh, God, all is LOST! They are so strong and we are so weak."

Instead of talking about how to fight for our people, they go on endlessly to prove the whole thing is useless. They go on about how it's everybody else's fault, and how hard they try but no one listens and so and on and on.

Anything I say in response is treated as heresy. They spend ten times the effort arguing desperately about how hopless things are than they ever devoted to anything constructive.

I even have a bit of hope that Mark demonstrates that my message is getting across: No, we are not goig to return to some Good Old Days, but we are also not facing an Inevitable Future. Whoever is in power is going to go out of power.

Our job is to position ourselves for changes we cannot foresee.

As a professional, it is painful for me to have to deal with people who think the world is some kind of reverse cowboy movie where the black hats are perfect and the black hats always win.

In their weird little world, we make mistakes but the other side is perfect. In their world view the other side is made up entirely of dedicated idealists, agents of Satan who are undeviatingly dedicated to the pursuit of evil. Spending fifty years of listening to this drivel is not the least of sacrifices I have had to make for our cause.

This world-view is not just insane, it makes you stupid. In order to win any battle you must know the enemy's WEAKNESSES.

In the real world people who hold positions of power get out of touch. I've been there. Trying to convince someone who just won an election that they didn't do everything right is not only very hard to do, it makes you unpopular.

I just gave a perfect example of this syndrome. Israel, which is as popular today as a drunk at a Prohibition meeting, is now throwing its weight around and has just made enemies not only of the whole nation of Ukraine but is turning the whole internet community against itself.

You can't position yourself in political reality if your entire attention is devoted to "All is lost!"

As I have said many times, the enemy's best asset is not the soldier in his own ranks but the defeatist in yours. They used to shoot defeatists as a matter of course.

Mark deserves a medal.

SIEGECRAFT: A FORCE IN BEING | nationalsalvation.net

On the SF Supporting Member's Thread, someone asked whether SF was growing or not.

I have explained the A-C Rule. It is time I explained the Force in Being Rule. Practical Men talk endlessly, but they never listen to themselves.

They keep saying that in the Real World, public enthusiasm waxes and wanes. They keep telling us that what is popular today will be nothing tomorrow. When someone says, "We are growing," the Practical Men say, "You are not REALLY growing." Right now.

The purpose of the Practical Man is to prove he is a Practical Man, the very embodiment of Wisdom and Realism.

So when Stormfront says, "We are growing," the Practical Man wants to prove that he represents Realism. He tries to prove that, while the Pollyannas want to say they are growing, he, the Master of Reality, knows the facts.

No one remembers that his Practical Fact Number One was that none of that matters. Public enthusiasm waxes and wanes.

In 1927, the National Socialist Party of Germany was at the bottom of the barrel. They hit a peak at the 1923 Pusch and went down from there. In 1927, no matter what argument they made for themselves, the Practical Man would have said their cause was hopeless.

By 1933, they were in power. Which confirmed the basic wisdom of the Practical Man's statement that political enthusiasm waxes and wanes. But the Practical Man always wants to appear macho and wise RIGHT NOW.

Godfather II has it exactly right.

On December 31, 1958, Fulgencio Batista was the Strong Man in absolute control of Cuba. Fidel Castro was a Force in Being. You could go and meet him in the hills. He was a minor celebrity. Only a true nutcase would have met with him. No Practical Man would. Sometime in the afternoon of December 31, 1958, Batista's forces began to desert to Castro.

Batista, an expert on power, immediately recognized that his position was, to use the word we inherited from the Norman Conquest and which is good Spanish, untenable. That was one hell of shock to all the Practical Men of the Mafia, of AT&T, of all of them. But for Batista it was not a matter of theory. It was life and death.

Once the power of Castro's Force in Being waxed, Batista had to get out to stay alive.

On December 31, 1958, the Practical Men would have laughed at the idea that the Batista Regime that had an iron grip on Cuba would be gone overnight.

In 1981 not a single professional Sovietologist could have imagine that the Soviet Union would be gone in ten years.

And these are the same people who always tell us that popular opinion waxes and wanes.

So the same Practical Man who wonders whether SF is waxing or waning at this moment pays no attention to the fact that SF is a Force in Being.

A Force is Being is ready to take power.

OBSERVATION | 1998-12-12

Heard anything in the media about conditions in South Africa lately? Me neither. Now, if things were spiralling downhill under black majority rule the way us rightists said it would, the media would report it, right? Sure they would.

THE HINDUS IN ROMAN PALESTINE | 2000-10-21

Jesus said, "No man reaches the Father but by me." In other words, according to Jesus, you were either a Christian or you were not.

But many people assure us that when He said that, He did not mean that it applied to the Jews. Jews are special, Jews are an exception, and a Jewish homeland has a right -- because of our religion -- to claim Christian lives and money to defend it.

Which brings up an interesting question. When Jesus said that no man reaches the Father but by Him, who exactly was He talking to? Those who tell us he did not include the Jews know their Bible very well, so obviously He was talking to somebody else besides Jews.

That means that Jesus was talking to non-Jews. When Jesus went through Palestine, no Jews heard Him. The place was obviously full of Hindus and Buddhists.

Obviously, those who have made this great historical breakthrough need to explain it to those of us who didn't know that, at the time of Christ, Israel was full of Hindus.