THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

Z AND LEADERSHIP | 2008-04-02

You bring up more good points. I think the IQ debate is another major waste of time. I do think the black on white crime issue has a place for "entry level" pro-Whites or as an issue to get peoples attention to the race issue.

But for us at BUGS, and for others who understand the situation, we must stay focused on the genocide issue. This is not to say that people shouldn't be studying the IQ issue, for this there are specialists, like the people who go to Amren conferences.

But BUGS must focus on the reversal of the genocide against the White race.

The one thing I wonder about is the future of BUGS? Will BUGS ever evolve into something else besides an Internet learning session and base of Mantra spreading operations? What is our role once Whites do start resisting their genocide in larger numbers? Is this something we can even plan for? Or do we just keeping on how we are and allow nature to take its course?

The best I can tell is BUGS is training us for future leadership. So its not that BUGS will turn into some membership organization, but its students will be better prepared to lead Whites in the future.

Maybe Bob can give us his vision? Bob, what is your main objective for US, the students of BUGS? Are we purely Internet activists, or are we leaders in training? What should we be visualizing ourselves as in the future?

At what point will you feel like BUGS was/is a success?

-- Z

Z, there was a short, best-selling book in the 1960s by the man who made Avis a success. In one section he dealt quickly with "job descriptions" for senior executives. He said,

"If a senior executive needs a job description, fire him."

At that level, if a man can't figure out for himself what needs to be done, he should be down in the ranks with the other people whose job descriptions HE makes up.

I want you to DO the Mantra, priority One, and meanwhile expand on Mantra thinking. Mantra thinking is stepping back and looking at the whole picture. Instead of answering each argument of the other side, you step back and put THEIR case in plain English. More often than not, that alone destroys their whole Cult stand.

This training is indispensable for leadership.

What IS a "leader?" A leader, as opposed to the rank and file I mentioned above, is one who looks at the whole picture and fits others into it. He leads because he sees a way through the details.

I get a quiet laugh out at the words, "Training for leadership." That's an oxymoron.

Socrates did not TRAIN Plato. Socrates never got a PhD and he never cared whether his teaching was a success or not.

I am giving you exercise in a way of thinking that is indispensable for leadership. But I can't train you for leadership, or I WOULD HAVE ALREADY GONE WHERE YOU WOULD LEAD.

DAVE | 2007-04-27

The UK Defense Ministry's Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre recently issued a new report:

"The middle classes could become a revolutionary class. The growing gap between themselves and a small number of highly visible super-rich individuals might fuel disillusion with meritocracy, while the growing urban under-classes are likely to pose an increasing threat... Faced by these twin challenges, the world's middle-classes might unite, using access to knowledge, resources and skills to shape transnational processes in their own class interest."

The report argues that the era of major wars between nation states is over, but that cooperation among nation states on policies that produce ever greater disparities of wealth will usher in an era of class warfare between classes of citizens across national boarders.

Substitute the word "white race" for "middle classes" and "class interest" and the Concepts and Doctrine Centre may have it right.

Comment by Dave

SEZ WHO? | 2016-07-24

At least thirty years ago I was making a set of confirmation calls checking to be sure that my list had a proper perspective about how an issue was to be handled when we all came to the meeting, I was telling them what was to be "our" approach on a question.

One guy I called was no vaguer than most.

He called me back and in the course of this second talk he told me I had the wrong person.

I asked why he had not told me that before and he replied, "It was very interesting, so I got interested."

This confirmed a couple of things for me. The first was that you have a Sophisticated Conspiracy going, include me OUT.

The second was that I routinely bring complicated things down to a level of understanding that makes complicated stuff clear enough for an intelligent generalist to get the whole question, a point which really disgusts those whose ambition is to be one of the snobs.

Given all this, I find it sadly humorous when someone decides I am withholding information in some complicated way.

Accusing an old man on disability of being a Machiavellian is much like accusing a wheelchair person of climbing up into your high rise in the dead of night.

It hurts. It has long since ceased to be funny and it hurts.

I have to keep checking the page to try to remember who this is going to.

I am beyond embarrassment on that point.

I have more than once expressed my distrust of X in a note that turned out to be going to X.

My sole concern is that it might hurt X's feelings, which I did not want.

On the other hand, it does clear the air.

But "Honesty" and "Frankness" is not an excuse to offend or hurt someone. "Frank" and Honest" is no excuse for cruelty. Those who say God forbids untruthfulness need to go back and read that Commandment.

Honest sadism is still sadism.

Yes, I will be dishonest in that I may try to avoid saying something that may hurt someone who values my opinion. To me, that is simple humanity.

But no, there is no way I am withholding things from you in some subtle way.

I can't and I won't.

It hurts me to hurt people. It is especially agonizing for me to hurt someone who especially values my opinion of them.

It is a cripple who stumbled. Only White Trash would consider that funny.

BASICS: QUANTUM OF SOLACE | nationalsalvation.net

Quantum of Solace was Ian Fleming's one short-story attempt to get out of the James Bond mold.

Why he gave up on it can be seen from the ads for the movie, which start with "James Bond is Back!"

Since everything relates, his message in Quantum of Solace can be applied to the preset day. His theme in this domestic drama as that there is a difference between selfishness and having not a Quantum of concern of the other person. The victimized husband finally reacted totally when the wife showed a merciless heart that showed not het tiniest bit, a quantum, of concern for him.

The Mantra makes it clear that the establishment has not a quantum of concern for any white feelings for simple survival. In Quantum of Solace, the real story, you ask yourself if there is ANYTHING the man will not and smile while he's taking it. But when the worm turns is absolutely without mercy.

I was reading an editorial quoted in This Week where the writer pointed out that America's disasters today come from the fact that American leadership on all sides has no feeling, not a quantum of solace, for other people's feelings of IDENTITY.

America today GENIUNELY cannot understand how Iraqis feel invaded. America is doing all the Wordist things, Freedom, Democracy, economic betterment, but the ground feeling there is that simply that Iraqis want us OUT.

Absolutely no previous group of humans or of social animal would have any trouble understanding the Iraqi point of view. Like Fleming's real Quantum of Solace, this is one of those observations that is so obvious it is hard to get. To sell the movie, you forget the point and just yell "James Bond!"

That editorial made the point that American has not a quantum of concern for people's IDENTITY. It is exactly like the rejection of ALL supply and demand that wrecked the Soviet Union. You cannot be totally blind to a basic reality and run a society.

Or a foreign policy.

This factor is enormously important. We find it impossible to believe that our leadership can have NO concept of loyalty in human beings, the reality that an Arab could reject Love, Brotherhood, Democracy and Prosperity just to be ruled by his OWN prejudices and superstitions of his OWN people.

What is important to BUGS is for us to realize that the new generation is not being tricky. It has a real, a genuine blind spot.