THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

WHEN EVERYBODY'S SOMEBODY, NOBODY'S ANYBODY | 2005-01-29

The website for Brainwashing 101 has a discussion forum. It gives a glimpse of how completely the professors have destroyed critical thinking. The self-styled "conservatives" rail at the self-styled "liberals" by calling them "racists" and accusing them of not fully embracing Martin Luther King, Jr. The liberals reply with incoherent Marxist gibberish.

One of the "liberals" wrote, "On being a racist, we're all inherently and subconsciously racist deep down. Don't you think?" I replied that if everybody is something, i.e. "racist," then the term is meaningless.

"Racism" is not a meaningful construct, but a religious epithet. It is akin to "heretic" in the Christian religion, except that a heresy (which means to choose between) can be defined against a fixed creed or dogma. A heretic is one who picks and chooses which of the doctrines he will accept and abide by. "Racism" has such a wide range of use and meaning that it is impossible to know what the standard is.

The creed or doctrine of the religion of Political Correctness is made up on the fly by its priesthood. That is why we have the ever-growing list of "hate crimes," speech codes, and "institutional biases," etc., etc.

It might be better related to the caste "Untouchable" in the Hindu religion. But one is born into a Hindu caste. A "racist" becomes "Untouchable" by decree of the priesthood.

If one is declared a "racist" then he does not have to be addressed as a human being, i.e. with reason, logic, and what Christians would call forbearance, but is worse than a leper in ancient times.

When "racism" entails everything from whistling Dixie (which even Lincoln had played at the formal surrender of the Confederacy) to discussing different physical or intellectual traits between races (i.e. "White men can't jump," etc.) to non-white on white crime (the FBI formally classifies Hispanics only as victims in crime statistics - when they commit crimes they are then classified as white), to "institutional racism" to "unconscious racism" to who knows what else, how can the concept be meaningful?

THE PLOT GOES DEEPER! | 2006-03-10

Now that I have exposed Libanon, I have had a revelation that goes even deeper.

In the 1980s I had a piece in the New York Times Review of Books.

Writers' egos being what they are, the front page of the Review listed the names of authors writing in that issue.

Of about ten names, nine of them were not merely Jewish, but obviously Jewish, like Goldberg or Finkelstein.

And right in the middle of that parade of Jewish names was:

"Robert Walker Whitaker," with even my middle name spelled out to emphasize the triple-barreled Anglo-Saxon name.

Now you know and I know EXACTLY what every single person who saw that front page was thinking:

"Yea. Right. I'll just bet that's his REAL name."

So here I am, exposed to the world as an obvious ADL plant.

But, as a good Jew, another question occurs to me.

I have been in this movement for fifty years. I have just discovered that all that time I was an ADL plant.

FIFTY YEARS!

So where the HELL is my back pay?

WOULD AFRIKANERS MAKE GOOD AUSTRALIANS? | 2003-09-27

If you think America's old Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) never enforced the law, you are dead wrong. Hard-working Afrikaners settled in the United States and the old INS (with new names) is fighting to deport them.

Australia is the size of the continental United States, but three-quarters of its population is in the cities. Afrikaners would be just the people they need to settle the Outback, but don't hold your breath.

The respectable conservatives who now rule Australia brag endlessly about how they got rid of Australia's "whites only" immigration policy. There must be no place on earth to which whites can escape, and Australian conservatives have made sure their country is no exception.

The Boers still in Cape Town are largely colored, a mix of white and the Hottentots race the Boers saved. But the Boers who went on the Great Trek, the ones who would settle the countryside of Australia, are white.

Of course the fact that the Boers who would make good Australians are actually white is the reason Australia would not dare take them. So the Boers whose forefathers went on the trek now have nowhere to go.

The Boers trusted their respectable conservatives and they are trapped in a nightmare. Substitute the word "white Americans" for "Boers" in that sentence, and you may be writing the history of America's future history as we are writing it today.

We are building a country our children will want to escape from.

And nobody will take them.

JAMES | 2006-06-20

Note what James said that his lovely young wife plans to do to honor me:

Dani has fallen in love with you. She has not stopped talking about you since Saturday night and wants to buy a dog and name it "B.W.," in your honor. Do you have this effect on all women?

- James

Since the dog will be named for a man, I assume it will be male.

So there will be another son of a bitch named Bob Whitaker.

That seems appropriate.