THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

I TOLD YOU SO! | 2004-09-18

I doubt seriously whether the Kerry campaign will recover. Democratic Senator Zell Miller, a keynote speaker at the Republican convention, probably single-handedly derailed the Kerry campaign.

There is something fatal about nominating a liberal Democrat from Massachusetts and then having him campaign nationally for weeks. With the Bush Administration in so much trouble, the Democrats might have elected Edwards of North Carolina.

And Clinton wouldn't have minded Edwards as the presidential candidate in 2004. Whatever happened, if Edwards had a less Clinton-like Northerner as his VP nominee, the Clintons might not have stabbed him in the back.

I may be paranoid, but I know power politics. I know Bill Clinton does NOT want Kerry to win. I know that the media doesn't subtly turn against Kerry this way, leaving him lone and shouting and looking like it, entirely by accident.

So the star of the Republican show was a Southern Democrat. Damn, he was GOOD!

You may have thought that Republicans had a monopoly on stupidity. As long as they keep nominating presidential candidates from Massachusetts, stupidity remains safely duopolistic.

THERE IS BIG MONEY IN PREDICTIONS, BUT NOT IN ACCURATE PREDICTIONS | 2003-11-01

Experts on Wall Street get paid billions for their predictions about stock trends. The predictions of these experts have repeatedly been put up against such things as monkeys hitting buttons randomly. The monkeys are always neck and neck with the experts.

We still pay those experts a fortune, not because they do anything useful, but because they have Experience.

There is a whole industry called Futurology. It is financed by grant money. Nobody ever asks a Futurologist if he was ever right. To be a professional futurologist you must make predictions that sound right to the people who control the grants.

The only prediction that matters to a Futurologist is whether Professor Fuzz, who is on the Grants Committee, will want a Marxist Future or a Progressive Future.

If a Futurology applicant can come up with a good case for Global Warming, the grants committees will feed him well for the rest of his life.

If you look at an application for a job as a Futurologist you will not find one word in it about any accurate prediction that the applicant ever made. He will say he has studied Futurology, and he will detail how many years he has spent in whatever field he is going to tell the future of.

BASICS: HOW WHITE SUPREMACIST CAN YOU GET? | nationalsalvation.net

"Again, with the Asian example, are we supreme over Asians, or do we just want them to stay in their own countries?"

Comment by Z

BW:

The simple answer to your question is the latter.

By definition, a white nationalist accepts the existence of other nations.

What I now have to say sounds like a quibble, but it is not. IN MY OPINION, it is a worldview your question does not reflect.

Non-whites can stay in their own countries or move to other non-white countries, this is not our concern while our survival is at stake.

One thing I saw, but that the media did not talk about, was that millions of Indians and Arabs who had lived in Africa for generations were driven out when blacks took power. The result was a loss of hard workers ands relatively intelligent people that is now causing literal starvation millions of Africans. This does not concern the media because it does not concern their real aims.

AS A PRO-White it does not concern me. It concerned me because I have seen and SMELLED real starvation. Yes it has a SMELL. I knew a lot of those Arabs and Indians the "humanitarians' forget existed, but from a white survivalist viewpoint, this none of our business.

We ask only our own place to survive. From a white nationalist point of view, and purely THAT point of view, whether non-whites stay home or go to other non-white countries is not relevant to our ideology.

To answer your question as you mean it, we only want them to "stay home," meaning inside the non-white world.

Our problem is that they don't WANT to. They want the benefits and stability a white country provides. The fly in that ointment is that when they get here they destroy those benefits. That is what is so obviously wrong with the libertarian "free movement of goods, capital AND LABOR" argument.

Non-white "leaders" keep demanding that whites not object to intermarriage and that non-whites be allowed into white countries. They blame the problems of the whole world on whites wanting to be separate. THAT is white supremacy, the idea that you can't have an education unless non-white kids sit beside white kids.

As one official in charge of school busing said, "White children are a precious resource. They must be distributed carefully."

How white supremacist can you GET?

White supremacy is not an ideology. It is a simple fact of world thinking today. IN THAT SENSE, it is the major force behind the drive to destroy us. "Nondiscrimination" is the battle cry behind the worldwide offensive behind the drive to assimilate whites off the Planet.

And in the real world, "nondiscrimination" means that there is to be no place on earth where whites are allowed to have as their own.

SOMETIMES THE WORST POSSIBLE ATTITUDE IS GRATITUDE | 2001-12-14

"He who would sup with the Devil should carry a long spoon."

Today the establishment is pushing Patriotism big time. That means we have to be very, very careful about what they are trying to get over in the name of "patriotism."

Definitions are usually quibbles used by people who don't have reality on their side. But in this case the definition of the word "establishment" is critical.

The establishment is the group that owns the present system and the means of persuasion and violence (which is another means of persuasion) that enforces it. To you and me, "patriotism" means loyalty to a particular land and people.

To the establishment, patriotism has nothing whatsoever to do with either this land or this people. To the establishment, "patriotism" means loyalty to the system. To them, loyalty equals obedience, and "patriotism" means a willingness to obey.

Please follow me carefully here, for this is critical: To you and me the word "patriotism" means that you and I are being loyal to our own people and to ourselves. That is the absolute opposite of what the word "patriotism" means to the media, the government, and other ruling institutions.

To you and me, patriotism is the principle stated in the only statement of purpose Americans ever adopted, the Preamble to the United States Constitution. America, it says, is "We the people," and its only purpose is to obtain liberty and the pursuit of happiness for ourselves and our posterity.

There could not be a clearer statement of what the establishment says patriotism is NOT than the Preamble to the United States Constitution. To understand this clearly, we need only look at the definition of the "establishment" again.

"The establishment is the group that owns the present system and the means of persuasion and violence (which is another means of persuasion) that enforces it."

The establishment insists that American freedom and prosperity have nothing to do with you and me. American freedom and prosperity exists entirely because of the system we live under, the one that belongs to the establishment.

So America is not a great place to live because of you and me. America is a great place to live because of the SYSTEM you and I live UNDER.

With this firmly in mind, if you listen carefully to the present drumbeat for "patriotism" you will see what I mean.

Today's patriotism means that you and I and the rest of our people are not free and prosperous and the target of massive immigration because you and I and other Americans have, as a people, any special qualities. No one who immigrates needs to be grateful to US. We are NOT blessed because we live in the country that we rule.

Today's "patriotism" directs all loyalty to the System. Today's "patriotism" directs all gratitude to the System. All hail the System! Today's "patriotism" declares that we are a nation of immigrants. This means that any group of people who happen to live under this System would do just as well. All we are is people who are lucky enough to live under their System.

To the establishment, the Constitution has nothing to do with "We the people." In fact, to the establishment the Constitution is the exact opposite of "We the People." If you listen to what they tell you every day, the media says that the Constitution is the means by which judges overrule the people. Under their idea of the Constitution an alien is as good as a citizen, and the only difference is some documents, as in "undocumented aliens."

If you listen closely you will notice that when the establishment uses the word "patriot," it always means the exact opposite of what you and I and the Founding Fathers always took that word to mean.