THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

RICHARD AND THE MILITARY-ISRAELI ESTABLISHMENT | 2008-03-25

Bob, I was reading your Stormfront thread aimed at 'shakazulu'. Although I think you demean yourself by trying to 'debate' with the likes of him, I'm glad you did, because you produced a little gem of a phrase -

"The Military-Israeli Complex".

Perfect.

The leftists will like it, because it updates their old favourite 'military-industrial complex'.

Pro-Whites will like it, because it sums things up perfectly and sounds less crazy than 'ZOG'.

Conservatives of the McCain type will hate it.

I'll be using it from now on.

MY COMMENTERS' REVOLUTION | 2006-06-08

Joe, Peter Pain, Tim, Elizabeth, Shari, Anonowitz and all the rest of you, I am not so proud of you as I am of Bob.

It isn't that you comment, but that you realize how superior you are to the tens of millions who have not outgrown their college "educations."

When you look down on them, when you LAUGH at them, you are realizing a spirit that my life has , after many years of thought and experience, been devoted to.

All those years they have blocked intellectual developement. All those years they have used the shallowest devices to stop reasonable thought in its tracks. It has been an agony for me to spend my life trying desperately to get the simplest piece of logic through.

It is a special pain to know that you are dealing with retards who are put on pedestals.

I don't care about the pedestals. If they could be like European royalty, clothes horses nobody took seriously, I could just laugh and go on.

But the judges running around in black dresses are really, seriously considered to be The Constitution of the United States. Those Harvard professors are really regarded as INTELLECTUALS.

Those preachers and priests waving their arms over disgusting mixed couples are really looked at as Confirming God's Covenant.

The O'Reillys and the Colmses are really regarded as Both Sides in some kind of National Debate.

And it is MY country they are Both Sides of.

There is no debate here.

It is your world or it is their world.

Everybody knows that.

There is no debate over the Iraq War. It is product of decades of silly reactions by silly people.

Schools have FAILED.

It has all FAILED.

SAY so.

Revolution.

THE TRUTH IS A DEVASTATING ARGUMENT | 2006-08-25

Ten years ago, when all I did on the Internet was to fight it out in what were then called Newsgroups, I naturally gravitated to the ones about race.

I soon found that "Newsgroup" had nothing to do with news. It was a bunch of places that ranged from people exchanging information about their favorite TV program ( mine was Married With Children) to where people duked it out over political issues.

After all my whining and bitching about how you don't put Bob's Mantra in "newsgroups," Shari finally made me realize that they may not EXIST in that form any more.

Again, I just admitted I may have made a mistake. I do that a lot in Bob's Blog.

You know, an old man like me loves to wow you with my wisdom. But the mistakes I make and have made are of at least as much value to you.

I rememeber a line from "Married With Children" that said, "I did what Custer SHOULD have done. I sent scouts."

Why should YOU make a mistake which your old scout Bob has already made. Or, if you are kicking yourself for doing something stupid, why shouldn't Old Bob tell you he did the same thing?

Twice.

Back to the Newsgroups.

In one of them a white woman was telling us all that she had a black husband and three children.

I said, "Poor kids. They are going to have to go through life being UGLY!"

She pitched a fit, and my answer was, "All I am saying is what everybody in this newsgroup is THINKING."

Now let me tell you the amazing part. Remember that more than half of the newsgroup consisted of fanatically anti-white whites. I knew I was telling the truth, but I was absolutely amazed when NOT ONE of them disagreed with me!

I had just said that everybody there was thinking that a white woman who produces mulatto children is condemning them to ugliness for the rest of their lives.

But I was ALSO saying that that was what everybody there was thinking.

One anti-white white said an almost fond, "Oh, Bob, what you said!" But not ONE of them said, "I think mulatto children are beautiful!"

Nobody even said, "Well I, for one, was NOT thinking that."

The fact is that, in a close-up argument like that, being silly gets you laughed at.

Truth is outlawed. It is outlawed because it is effective.

PEROTS PEAK AND OUR 2016 CAMPAIGN | 2015-05-24

If you want to see The Silence at work, look at Wikipedia's piece on Ross Perot.

It is a long series of put-downs and awkward incidents in Perot's life.

If you mention Perot to anyone today, he will either not recognize the name or repeat one of those put-downs.

You can tell it causes real pain for Wikipedia to repeat the one unique thing in Perot's life that The Silence wants minimized.

They do not devote a sentence to it. It is part of the sentence: "In June of 1992, national polls showed Perot leading the sitting President and the Democratic nominee with 39 percent of the popular vote!"

This never happened before or since.

But because of the cloud of crap everybody throws out when Perot's name is mentioned, The Silence covers this critical history with drivel.

And everybody repeats it.

Perot came out of nowhere. In an interview on Larry King at CNN, King asked him why he himself did not run for president.

Larry King was not a popular show back then, but the mail this question generated was overwhelming, with demands for Perot to go on the ballot.

The idea did not come from Perot.

Wikipedia then makes up a figure of gigillions of his own dollars the power-mad Perot put into his campaign.

A man who had no idea he was going to be drafted is portrayed as power mad.

But others have spent more than Perot did without any effect at all.

To someone who is as familiar with MediaSpeak as I am, Wikipedia gave out the usual dirt to cover the one point The Silence must avoid:

In June of 1992, national polls showed Perot leading the sitting President and the Democratic nominee with 39 percent of the popular vote!

Nothing is as important as this is to a Party seeking to overthrow the establishment.

When Perot got up to 39 percent, the Almighty USSR had simply fallen apart.

"Not with a blast but with a whimper."

In fact, not even a whimper!

Perot's platform was Saying the Unsayable.

He refused to accept Business As Usual in politics.

He Said the Unsayable to both the left and the kept "opposition."

In the national debate, both Perot and his vice presidential candidate were asked about abortion.

Instead of trying to get the "dissatisfied" vote of anti-abortionists, they said what most voters think: It's not an issue with them.

At a time when the Internet was new, Perot proposed to do something that scared politicians half to death: Perot wanted issues to be subjected to a spontaneous poll online. He wanted the PEOPLE to get in on it!

Perot's Lesson is hidden behind bits of dirt about him just as grassroots rebellion is hidden under Abortion and the chasing down of Whites is hidden behind details about Hitler's mustache.

The only other real threat to the ruling parties was Wallace in 1968. He got less than 14 percent of the vote, but his American Party is still more active than other third parties.

Perot's party was destroyed by Pat Buchanan. It gave him its nomination in 2000.

Buchanan had won the New Hampshire primary against Bush.

Then Buchanan turned into a harmless theocrat.

He accepted the Perot Party nomination and then spent all his time attacking abortion and evolution.

His polls started up at a respectable – for a third party – several percent of the vote and then dropped like a rock.

He ended with a vote down where the Prohibition Party gets today, and falling.

The American Freedom Party can become important only if its theme is: "We ain't going to take it anymore!"

Perot was gotten out of the campaign by the thugs going after his daughter, something any BUGSER can clearly understand.

No Marxists. No theocrats.

Samizdat.

https://youtu.be/PfMW3xYhitQ