THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

IMMIGRATION LAW IS DISCRIMINATION | 2006-04-29

Jared Taylor said at the AR Conference that he was a liberal until he realized a simple fact:

The answer to "Can't we all along together?" is

"NO."

I LOVE short, straight statements like that.

I would like some American Renaissance member to judge whether this Bob's Blog entry is a pretty good summary of AR's view:

-- Immigration Law IS Discrimination

President Carter's head of the INS stated flatly that, is it were up to her, she would let everybody intot he United States without restrictions.

Nobody objected.

NOBODY objected.

Remember that this was in the late 1970s, when Pat Buchanan was saying that Americans died in World War II specifically to open Europe up to third world immigration, Joe Sobran was pro-immigration, and the official conservative doctrine was "free movement of good, services, and LABOR."

What if somebody were being appointed to the Civil Rights Commmission and said that, as far as they were concerned, slavery was OK.

Do you think anybody would mention it?

They would say, as they have said in hearing after hearing, "You can't enforce civil rights law if you don't really BELIEVE in it."

Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that, to be a true American, you must believe that we are a nation of immigrants.

Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that a true American agrees that all mankind is ONE.

In fact, the official doctrine is that we are " a nation founded on the principle that all men are created equal." That's the PURPOSE of America.

Immigration law is founded onthe idea that WE have a right a right to be here and THEY don't.

Immigration law is founded on the principle that there IS a "we" and a "they."

So how can Real Americans and all the Little Americans in Europe who insist on the same ideas of "democracy" America does turn around and keep "them" out?

From the Wordist point of view, the "undocumented workers" marching to demand that all of Mexicobe allowed into the United States are true Americans.

All who oppose them are NOT true Americans.

We don't BELONG here.

They do.

Remember, from the liberal and respectable conservatives' REQUIRED view of what constitutes an American, there IS no "us" and "them."

You cannot argue for immigration restrictions and at the same time be a "real American" from the Wordist point of view. According to liberals and respectable conservatives you are unAmerican if you do not believe that an American is somebody who sincerely believes that this nation is dedicated to the proposition that all men are created, that all men are ONE.

Immigration law is based on the Preamble to the United States Constitution: "We the people of the United States and OUR posterity."

In July of 1863 Abraham Lincoln changed that preamble and substitute the preamble to the Declaration for it: "All men are created equal."

For Lincoln, tha is what the Civil War was about: "We are now engaged in a great civil war to test whether a nation so dedicated can long endure."

National Review practically has a hernia insisting that it is Lincoln Magazine. Liberals swear by Lincoln's words.

Then NR expressses outrage and puzzlement that US immigration law is not enforced.

In Lincoln's day, there were no immigration laws. In the Gettysburg Address, he tacitly promised there never WOULD be.

How in the HELL can Big America and all the Little America's who insist they are just as multiracial enforce immigration laws?

Immigration law requires an "us" and a "them."

There will be no "us" and "them" until we learn to DISCRIMINATE again.

ICTHYSAURI | 2005-11-18

The dolphins you see at Seaworld are mammals.

Tens of millions of years ago the dolphines were small, furry, four-footed animals I had one as a pet.

So dolphins are mammals who adapted, spectacularly, to live in the sea whence all our ancestors came.

Exactly the same thing happened in the dinosaur era. The icthysaur was a land dinosaurs that evolved to go back into the sea for its entire life. Like the dolphin, it could no longer live on land.

Here is the problem: the icthysaurus became extinct at the same time the dinosaur did. This blows ALL of the theories about dinosaur extinction out of the water, so to speak.

One thing you always hear when the extinction of dinosaurs is discussed is that they died and mammals survived because mammals were little and dinosaurs were big.

'Fraid not. There were many tiny dinosaurs and one does not see them around any more either.

Other theories run up against the icthysaur. They explain what happened to the dinosaurs on land, but they don't explain what happened to the ones in the sea. If all the land plants dinosaurs ate died, it would not affect the ones in the sea.

A lot of documentaries have glib explanations like size or why the land dinosaurs died out. I am tired of the ones that would obviously be absurd if little dinosaurs and sea dinosaurs.

It's like he constant repetition in the 1970s when a new older human ancestor was found. Even the scientific publications would say, "The earliest ancestor of man was in ... " and then a whole new set of theories would pour out based on that find. A few months later another earliest ancestor would be found and another whole set of theories would pour forth.

Every set was wrong, but that didn't matter. Each set got a lot of professors quoted and published, so they got their promotions and their list pf publications went up. Professors just look at the publications list, not whether what was written made any sense or not.

I stopped that by writing in Science News, to my own astonishment. But Science News reaches millions, so this won't do it.

DAVE | 2008-10-31

Prometheus,

That is what I remember too. 2001 bored me because it was just another one of those pieces about tyranny that offered no real insight into tyranny.

You are supposed to be impressed by HAL exercising conscious volition. In art, these are tricks by "artists" to promote themselves, to get an audience. Real art is utilitarian. It does something to improve your life. Personally if its only function is to hang there and impress you it annoys the hell out of me.

Robert Whitaker wrote this:

"I am a priest, my job is to keep you from Sin, which I define."

"I am a doctor, my job is to keep your heart beating."

"I am a professor, my job is to provide you with an Education, which I define."

"I am a guru, my job is to help you escape the Wheel of Life."

"If you ask anyone you PAY about making life worth living, they will laugh out loud."

"That is NOT their table."

That is what the "inevitable future" is, just another trick. Just another hustler inducing you to buy a ticket for something that delivers no real value.

That is what all the McCain and Obama supporters are doing when they take the effort to punch their ballot. Purchasing a ticket that offers no real value. All of them are believers in "the inevitable future".

BUGS: A CONSPIRACY TO TELL THE TRUTH | 2011-05-27

I am always terrified that enthusiasm may run out in GC 7.

I was in seventh heaven reading comments on my piece, "It is Time for Heresy!"

At age 70, I finally have my army!

The comments on the Heresy article and in GC7 are a dream come true for me.

At last, here is a group of people who don't wander off into the News and Jews and general declarations. AT LAST, here is a group of pro-whites who are doing what I did ALONE for so long: explaining the simple TRUTH.

The trick is that there is nothing simple about it.

Just as there is nothing less "common" than common sense, there is nothing that is less simple than simple truth.

Even my many enemies admit that I am highly intelligent and have been there and done that, but I am still discovering new "common sense" ideas and new "simple truths" every DAY.

I have met many, many geniuses like William Shockley, who invented the transistor, and every one of them sounds like he just arrived on Planet Earth yesterday. They are always talking breathlessly about a new idea they have run into.

These real geniuses couldn't be less like the popular idea of a Scholar, Mommy Professor's Intellectual.. The Scholar is pictured as repeating Aristotle or Ancient Wisdom or Political Correctness. Real intellectuals are the exact opposite.

Our comments on "It is Time for Heresy" and GC7 are the same way.

No one is trying to impress anybody. There are no big words.

One thing that is funny is that we all look down on Conspiracy mongers.

But, in the truest sense of the word, we ARE a Conspiracy. We are in cahoots and in collusion.

We are a conspiracy to tell the truth.

And it IS a conspiracy. We are getting together and conspiring about how to change the world. That is the very definition of a conspiracy.

After all, the "secrets" of white advancement have always been so simple no one could figure them out. The Romans found that a hundred men who acted as a unit could defeat any number of men attacking randomly.

The "secret" of Western science is that one takes a basic idea and follows it with a rigidity no Eastern philosopher can even imagine. Newton took gravity and explained the universe, but it was because he excluded everything BUT gravity.

Face it, gang, YOU are the only REAL, WORKING Conspiracy around