THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

WORDISM: "INSIDE EVERY COLORED MAN THERE'S A WHITE MAN TRYING TO GET OUT" | nationalsalvation.net

Referring to Wordists who insist that the entire world will be fine if we multiracially follow their Book, Simmons says:

"Its because the white PCers think everyone is white, and it only need be brought out with properly applied Marxism."

To paraphrase what is said of fat people, "Inside every colored man is a white man trying to get out."

Once again, a Whitakerism:

Please note that the Australian program is trying to prove what colored people want proven: that there is NO difference between a white man and a colored man.

As CS Lewis said, no one shouts equality if they think THEY are equal. So the "no difference" crowd is assuming, correctly, that non-whites are willing to fight for the proposition that any difference between white and non-white will reflect badly on the non-whites.

The ideal is white, and they are arguing they are white.

Which leads to another Whitakerism:

Blacks are the most white supremacist people on earth.

SIEGECRAFT: THE DAY OF FITTING IN IS PAST!! | nationalsalvation.net

If you READ THE COMMENTS, you will find Dave and Simmons dovetailing on the point that it is time for us to stop fitting into some long-vanished political Right or whatever.

For example, I am getting very, very tired of reading people in Stormfront talking about protecting Obamastan's borders. They are militant about keeping the Hispanics here who vote for their Brother Hispanics right to come here.

Hell, at least THOSE Hispanics have a set of consistent loyalties I can understand. There are already PLENTY of nonwhites here to make an end to whites through the Glorious Assimilation conservatives worship, so why in the Hell should I back some anti-whites in camouflage jackets protecting this ridiculous border?

The horse is out of the friggin' BARN, for God's sake. But we have all these people yelling about closing the door.

The new politics cannot be aimed at the imaginary alliance I fought for in the pre-Reagan days. That did its job. It destroyed the USSR.

But the new job is to save our race. This is a new age. There is no coalition here. We must become spokesmen for the powerful white minority.

The turning point for the Communist Party in Russia came when the Czar had fallen and the elected Duma represented conservatism and the Soviet represented the "workers." A compromise was in the works. The President of the Soviet, which then contained a huge number of revolutionary parties, asked what he thought was a rhetorical question: He said, "We must compromise. After all, is there any party here that would be willing to take on full responsibility on itself alone?"

Lenin, head of the small Bolshevik delegation, stood up and said, "There IS such a party!" From that day, it was Lenin versus non-Lenin.

I played the coalition game when it was relevant. Anyone who reads about the period knows I was a major player in it.

I tell you the Day of the Coalition is OVER.

Someone must speak for the white race, beginning with its SURVIVAL, beginning with the Mantra.

Fitting In is Yesterday. "There is such a party" is Tomorrow.

CNN DISCLAIMER | 1999-07-03

You can tell Bosnia was a liberal war from the solid support it got in the press. Reporters would always begin a report from Serbia by saying Serbia limited their freedom to report. They would have a standard announcement that Serbian authorities limited where reporters could go and what they could say.

You know, it's funny, but they never said a word about any limitations when they were reporting from a COMMUNIST country. There were a lot of restrictions on reporting from Communist countries, but no reporter ever mentioned them.

Aleksander Solzhenitsyn spent many years in Siberia facing Communist guards, guns, barbed wire and guard dogs. He laughed at the fake courage of the American press. He said that the American press acted very brave when it was dealing with American authorities. He said they didn't act so brave in Communist countries. He pointed out that these brave American reporters hopped to attention and obeyed when some nasty little Red Guard in China told them to.

Now that's odd. I never heard any reporter talk about problems in Red China, from the the Red Guard or anybody else. They never complained about the ever-present travel restrictions in any Communist country. The press didn't want to make the Communists look bad. Liberals did want to make Serbia look bad.

American media are only interested in freedom of the press when it serves the liberal cause.

A POINT RESPECTABLE CONSERVATIVES CANNOT UNDERSTAND: OUT IS NOT IN | 2002-05-18

The Likud Party just voted that it will never ever accept a separate sovereign Palestinian state under any conditions whatsoever. It did that despite the vehement opposition of its own ruling Prime Minister Sharon, who is not exactly a noted moderate himself.

Netanyahu is likely to be the next Prime Minister of Israel, and he is attacking the rightist Sharon from Sharon's RIGHT. Netanyahu proposes to build a wall to keep Palestinians OUT of Israel.

First let me explain that that word OUT is in caps for a very good reason. A wall to keep people OUT is a right-wing solution. Walls to keep people IN are a leftist solution. Libertarians and respectable conservatives are too dumb to know the difference, so let me explain it again very briefly.

Our kind of rightist policy WORKS. It produces a place that everybody wants to GET INTO, like the United States. Leftist countries are run on policies that never WORK, so everybody wants OUT.

Communist countries always have walls to kill people for trying to get OUT. The United States has a Border Patrol and walls on its southern border to keep Mexicans from getting IN. Libertarians state loudly that there is no difference keeping people OUT and keeping people IN.

Prison walls keep prisoners IN and non-felons OUT. Guards keep the cons INSIDE, but they will also keep you from going IN. Nonetheless, there is a difference between being IN prison and OUT OF prison.

Please note I have to belabor this difference, which no child would have any trouble with, because libertarians STILL cannot understand it.