THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

DAVE | 2007-05-01

"Most people who think they have power are not really that interested in power. Their illusion of power comes from carefully keeping the good opinion of others."

This is a priceless quote from BW. In it he has fully explained everything there is to know about Asian society.

Extreme consciousness about issues of organizational rank. Personal autonomy not allowed.

BW is like a bouncer I used to know: He was questioned about blooding up a couple of Marines. He replied: "The Marines are trained to fight. I FIGHT EVERY DAY. Big difference."

Comment by Dave

This "pro-us" stance is key. It is "the force in being" BW has talked about. We saw it earlier several months ago in the severe backlash Miller Brewing Co. endured when it was discovered Miller Brewing Co. backed an immigrant rights event.

Miller Brewing Co. was severely chastened and it shows in its new "our posterity" orientation in advertisements and race based product orientation. Miller firmly got the message that multiculturalism is pure crap and it had to divide itself explicitly on a product spectrum based on race.

Miller Brewing Co. agrees with BW: It sees a world divided forever. This view is central to its basic long-term strategy. Even more significant, it has made this view explicit and public.

Accordingly, racism is going corporate, mainstream, and public.

This is the mirror reverse of the message corporate America got from the 1990s Texaco scandal when a whistleblower caught some line executives making racists comments on tape.

Texaco then lost its black customer base and a significant piece of market share.

It was then that all of corporate America jumped on the bandwagon that blacks are just whites with a different color of skin.

This is now over and it means a new world has been born and that world is strictly racial and divided.

Only college kids and Mommy Professor is not aware of this. Our corporate command has moved on.

Comment by Dave

MARTYR, SECOND CLASS | 2005-10-17

After my second nervous breakdown the friends I still had in Washington were all Catholics.

Hard-core Catholics.

Conservative Catholics? That is one hell of an understatement.

I have no use for anybody who believes in an omnipotent God of Heaven and Hell and then tries to make this concept reasonable and acceptable to Modern Thought. He is speaking a language that means nothing to me.

If there is no Heaven or Hell religion is silly.

And believe me, at that point in my life I could believe in Hell. You think I am joking?

DEFINITELY no joke.

In my state "Creo in Deo Crudel," "I believe in a cruel God," made perfect sense to me. I gave it a one percent chance of being true.

Being true FOREVER.

At that time I was also very interested in the Shroud of Turin. It was inexplicable, and I was ready to be convinced.

One never wholly sheds the faith he was raised in.

So I went to the only religious friends I had. Calvinists required a faith I could not mustger.

Myy friends were so Catholic they weren't Catholics any more. All of them had decided that, since Vatican II, the pope wasn't really Catholic any more.

You think I'm joking, don't you?

Paul Weyrich and the others had gone to the Eastern Rite. They would have gone to the Orthodox Church if the theologians had not stood in the door blocking their way.

So I joined Paul's church, in which he later became a deacon. That is the order just below priest.

Jesus forgave the repentent thief, so the idea that he had passed on the power to forgive sins made sense to me.

Politics is everything.

By my connections, I got a benefit. To become a member of this sort of church normally requires a year as a catechumen. It took me three months, which was the amount of time I had in DC during that particular assignment.

I spent a lot of my time worrying about the "tonsure." In order to join you had to have a new baptism and a "tonsure."

I kept thinking about going around with a monkish haircut, the whole top of my head bald, until the hair grew back.

It turn out this was a fortunate. In fact, the "tonsure" was just cutting a tiny bit of hair off. I still have the hair along with my baptismal certificate. But worrying about weeks with a bald head kept me from minding the baptism too much.

And the baptism was something else.

The Orthodox baptism makes you Baptists look like a bunch of amateurs. I was staying with my ex-wife, and on the day of my baptism I put on a bathing suit. I had to explain to her that I was being baptised.

Being a good Odinist, she had a little trouble understanding why you had to wear a bathing suit when being baptized.

Oh well, you know how ignorant these heathens are.

In the Orthodox Church and the Melkite Church you are not just immersed in water the way the Baptists do it. You are taken to the huge font which is filled with oil and water -- you can certainly feel the oil, Lord knows how much they put in -- and you are shoved under three times.

Which is just the start.

Over your bathing suit you are given a thin white robe to wear. You are soaking wet and your hair is oily.

There is more ceremony, then you have to stand in front of an icon during the entire church service with a wooden cross in one hand and a burning candle in the other.

Did I mention you are soaking wet and you don't comb your hair?

Have you ever stood motionless for a solid hour with candle in one hand while you are soaking wet?

Probably not.

For one thing, the candle drips. Having wax on a hand is like having a nose itch. But you have a cross in your other hand.

Have you ever stood for a solid hour, soaking wet, while your nose itches and both hands are full and you have to think nothing but Elevated Thoughts because you have just been baptized and you really want to be good and earn the trust the priest and Paul Weyrich have placed in you by giving you a short catechumen?

Probably not.

At the end of the hour, the service ends with the taking of the bread and wine. The priest had told me that the catechumen was served FIRST, even if a bishop was present.

I wanted to have my Holy Supper soonest for purely spiritual reasons. But the physical part of me was anxious too. It wanted to stop standing there with the nose itch and both hands full as soon as it could.

The priest totally forgot I was there. So I stood there while everybody else went up front and took the bread and wine. Finally I just put down my burden and got to the back of the line.

I never reminded the priest he had forgotten me.

I also never demanded what I should have gotten for this ordeal:

A medal that declared me a Martyr, Second Class.

3-D FUTUROLOGY | 2013-05-02

I read a lot of old history books. The fascination of this is its 3-D nature. The writers are talking about people in their past, and what I am getting is a view of what they thought in their time.

One writer wrote that something was "as modern as Marx, as timely as the Webbs." The Webbs founded the old British Labor Party, with its absurd nationalizations. Even neo-Marxists look upon Marx as ridiculously outdated.

But that was the future as a very mainline writer around 1955 saw it.

I am now watching episodes from "Science Fiction Theater," a TV show from 1955 to 1957. See a few of those or read some old history books and you will laugh out loud at the "inevitable future" on race or anything else.

But SF Theater was a good show and it tried to be realistic.

As I have pointed out and from my experience will have to repeat a dozen times before anybody starts thinking about the point, membership organizations must say what people want to hear. Their assumptions about the future must jibe with what their members want it to be.

From all my thought about the future, the only thing that one can implant that will definitely affect the future is an attitude. It is hard for most people to believe how firmly the idea that the white race had to be wiped out was implanted.

Now, due to us, this attitude is largely exploded. We are well on the way to making the preservation of our race one of the givens of the future.

DAVE ON MANTRA THINKING | 2013-01-24

DAVE SAYS:

"Robert Whitaker really did a number on us with the Mantra. Its IMPLICATIONS are bigger than even he knows. He lifted the veil off the whole damn thing. He reconnected white people with reality."

It is one thing to hear me theorize about Mantra Thinking. As Dave says, it is another thing entirely when you finally start DOING it.

It seems contradictory that I demand that BUGSERS concentrate on the Mantra, and the Mantra alone, with a Prussian discipline, yet I myself talk about a range of subjects.

Prussian discipline WORKS.

Our tiny but disciplined effort has had tremendous effects. I may be in a better position to see a lot of it but commenters comment on it regularly. I notice, as one small example, that the original standard replies all pro-whites got at first have, after fifty years, actually changed. The statement that whites do not exist, once omnipresent, has gone down vastly.

This means that even people who have not actually heard the Mantra itself have been effected by it.

The Mantra has attracted enormous attention. I keep reminding you that the enemy's single weapon is and always has been The Silence, that is, they no longer have white supremacists on TV talk shows, but act as if they don't exist.

A new Prussian officer was as disciplined as he forced his men to be. A junior officer did not discuss general strategy. An officer was trained to keep all eyes on the fight while he was selected for promotion. As time passed, some of these officers evolved into some of the greatest ground war strategists who ever lived.

We must keep our discipline but at the same time absorb how to fight as the fight changes. What I must do is give you some training in strategic thinking without encouraging BUGS to degenerate into a TOQ or Stormfront general discussion group. Your practical discussions, especially in the real work group, and Dave's quote above shows I have done a pretty good job of this.

Especially considering that for many, many years, I was the ONLY person who understood what needed to be done. I am the ONLY person who has done any job of this.

I cannot define what Mantra Thinking is. I made it indispensable in the fall of the USSR, in saving the Space Telescope, and in other practical -- to say the least -- matters.

Nor am I doing this with a clear idea of where it is going. In fact, an integral part of any real world strategy is NOT assuming you know the future.

People usually declare what the future will be in order to encourage themselves. I am comfortable NOT taking that tranquillizer because I have actually WON a lot of fights, and if the Names in each decade had gone along with me I would have won more.

Dave cuts to the point: This is a way of thinking.

I have complained that commenters always lose the point I am making by leaping on some historical incident or news event I mention or giving out their World View.

Well, it's better than silence but I would trade almost all of our standard comments for one like Dave's. What I want understood is a way of thinking, a way of looking at things.