THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

SIEGECRAFT: POPULIST FORUM HISTORY | nationalsalvation.net

The UK Defense Ministry's Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre recently issued a new report:

"The middle classes could become a revolutionary class. The growing gap between themselves and a small number of highly visible super-rich individuals might fuel disillusion with meritocracy, while the growing urban under-classes are likely to pose an increasing threat... Faced by these twin challenges, the world's middle-classes might unite, using access to knowledge, resources and skills to shape transnational processes in their own class interest."

The report argues that the era of major wars between nation states is over, but that cooperation among nation states on policies that produce ever greater disparities of wealth will usher in an era of class warfare between classes of citizens across national boarders.

Substitute the word "white race" for "middle classes" and "class interest" and the Concepts and Doctrine Centre may have it right.

Comment by Dave

ME:

Dave is describing something very close to the Middle American Radicals (MARs) talked about below.

In Argentina, it was the independent truckers who put down the Communist Allende who had been elected in a three-way race and installed Pinochet. The independent truckers owned their own trucks, and were the "petit Bourgeois" described by Marxists as the basis is fascism.

They are also the "kulaks" that Stalin destroyed in his Ukrainian slaughter. They are working people who have earned something of their own. They are what WE call "the middle class." They are the Americans I worked with.

And this is what Donald I. Warren saw. The problem with any form of Wordism, including "progressivism" and Marxism, is that it is a STATIC answer to the Inevitable Future of Man. These last two are based on the Ex Oriente Lux view, which cannot escape its Middle Eastern roots. It sees society as pyramid shaped, with the rich on top and the exploited, illiterate, hopeless masses on the bottom.

And, as always, this means no form of Wordism WORKS. Marx predicted that, as industry grew, the masses would become more and more helpless and their income would go down to subsistence level.

Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, there has been a growing petit bourgeois, kulak, middle class in the West. But to explain this, I must first get by what every whiner loves to whine, "The rich get richer the poor get poorer." Just please keep that whine back a bit.

Dave highlighted the growing class tension that ACTUALLY exists. It goes back to a quote from Charles Issawi, an Egyptian-American professor. It said that America is NOT pyramid-shaped, it is EGG-shaped. Instead of a pyramid where the huge bottom is at odds with the peak, we and every other Western country have a situating where the MIDDLE is big and the poor on the bottom and the rich make common cause in a war on the middle majority.

This violates everything on which progressivism and Marxism base their Middle Eastern World View. The revolutionary class is normally very conservative. Nothing is more conservative than a man who has worked his tail off and now owns his own truck or a woman who has worked her tail off and owns a beauty shop.

So the armchair whiner said I caused no revolution in my key role of helping Wallace become a major force and then making Wallace Democrats into Reagan Democrats. But, FOR THEM, the most conservative element of society, it was a revolution. They will never be the same again, though they lapse back into the Silent Majority Mode regularly. That is GENERIC conservatism. It was an inertia that took ME two decades to break, though the armchair strategist thought he could have done it with a limp wave of his hand.

He didn't. I did.

But the realization is coming once again upon our kulaks that the very rich, of whom the Hollywood Elite is only the tip of the iceberg, are their ENEMY, and the welfare class is also their enemy. To radicalize the most naturally conservative element in society can only be done by a titanic effort, one that the forces of Political Correctness are putting forth by making our petit bourgeoisie, the hated "white guy in front of the TV in a sweatshirt with a beer in his hand" the nigger and kike of our society.

As Dave shrewdly notes, revolutions always BEGIN by using the terminology of the society they are beginning to overthrow. So this has always been put in terms of a CLASS struggle, the language of Political Correctness, progressivism, and Marxism.

Since Donald I. Warren's day, it is harder and harder for people under the radar to suppress the obvious fact that now, since the in pouring of the third world into EVERY white country, a RACE struggle.

THE TEA PARTY IS THE LAST GASP OF WHITE SUPREMACY | 2010-11-25

I had a conversation with one of my kin that made an impression on me. I had made the point to him many, many times that for all the talk about how civilizations rise and fall, the fact is that no civilization falls unless it becomes brown-skinned.

A lot of people will say that they are pro-white but some of their families disagree. That is not true in MY family. All of them get the Mantra.

It WORKS.

But when I brought this up he said, "I have been thinking about WHY whites become brown." He knows a lot about India, and he pointed out that White India, from which China got its rice and we got our numbers, began to become non-white when it had the coloreds the Aryans had conquered under absolute control.

They stopped fighting as allies against the coloreds they had conquered and began to consider their only real enemies to be each other.

I have played around that realization a lot but no one had put in out as a naked truth the way he did.

It made me think of the way we have destroyed ourselves.

All of us ask ourselves how in God's name Europeans massacred each other by the millions in the trenches of World War I when they together controlled the world. The simple fact is that by 1914 whites had such complete rule of the colored world that they felt that their only competitors were other Europeans.

Today, when coloreds are conquering Europe, this looks as insane as it was. But back then, if you told a Brit that he had any real enemy but "the Hun," that his colonials would rule his descendants, he would have had you committed.

White India had been white since the Aryan takeover a thousand years before. But Buddha and the like condemned the caste system. Asoka spread Buddhism all the way to Iraq and beyond.

The top two castes switched place. Tshatriya, the warrior class, ceased to be the top group. The Brahma, the priestly class, took their place. My guess, from THINKING about what my young kin said, was that White India forgot the conquest and began to war with each other.

Buddha condemned the caste, which in Sanskrit is the "color," system.

Flash forward to today. Our ancestors fought the Indians and the English and the French in a common cause: They wanted America for 1) whites and 2) AMERICAN whites. New England brought in black slaves and sold them to Southerners.

Then we became absolutely dominant and we began to fight each other.

Now we insist that whatever the issue is, it is NOT racial.

There are Big Spenders and their headline opposition is the Tea Party. They compete with each other in insisting that the third world and immigration and assimilation is NOT the problem

They all take it for granted that the problem is what OTHER white people think.

They, like White India, take white supremacy as a given. It is impossible for them to realize that what they take for granted is in fact white supremacy.

They think what the Founding Fathers fought for was a philosophy.

THINK is a misnomer.

The Tea Party is the last headline rebellion that insists that none of our real problems are racial.

The Tea Party is the last gasp of the assumption of white supremacy.

GREAT CIVILIZATION THEORY SAYS THAT MAN IS A VERY LARGE ANT | 2003-09-20

Conservatives are sophomores, "wise fools." They always say things they think will make them look Intellectual.

And when conservatives get that puffed-up look and start to pontificate, they are always wrong.

For fifty years I have seen that puffed up look appear on conservative faces when they said, "We are going to get the Negro vote this time." It's the "African-American" vote now, of course, but the goofy look on conservatives' faces is still exactly the same.

Another statement that goes with that Intellectual, constipated look is, "As Milton Friedman says, open borders would be fine if there were no welfare."

You import tens of millions of bloc voters for socialism, and there is still no welfare?

Labor VOTES, you idiot!

Conservatives are true retards!

Another theme of this conservative retard version of smarts is talk about Great Civilizations. Ibn Khaldoun came up with this Great Civilization crap in the eleventh century, but he was probably the hundredth Great Mind to come up with it.

Khaldoun and Spengler and all their predecessors said that each Great Civilization rises, does everything important, and then dies. It's all predictable, and all Great Civilizations are created equal.

Ants form colonies that are perfectly predictable and all ant colonies are created equal. According to conservatives, human beings are the same way. People like the Scorpion King set up Great Civilizations which then mature, build a lot of big stuff, and then die away.

NO NEED TO RESTATE THE OBVIOUS | 2004-06-20

Please, have mercy on an a old man! My latest book, "Why Johnny Can't Think, America's Professor-Priesthood," does NOT "show there is leftist bias on campus."

I recently got some clippings from two different female relatives that "say what you said," that there is a leftist bias on college campuses."

No, I did NOT "say that there is a leftist bias on campus." No, Einstein did NOT "say that the speed of light is real fast," No, Isaac Newton did NOT "say there is something called gravity."

What would Einstein have done if someone had said "I think light moves real slow. You got to prove light moves fast." He would have called the loony bin. What would Isaac Newton have done if somebody said, "There ain't no such thing as gravity." He would have acted like the guy didn't exist and then hit him in the face if the fellow got in his way.

I do not try to prove that light moves real fast, or that gravity exists or that college campuses have a fanatical leftist bias. If you actually open the pages of "Why Johnny Can't Think," you will find that I say that that is the kind of thing dumbass respectable conservatives dedicate books to, not intelligent people.

Every sane person knows that light moves fast. Every sane person knows there is such a thing as gravity. Every sane person know that colleges are fanatically biased to the left.

PLEASE don't insult me by saying I am trying to prove any of those things. Please don't send me forwards and news paper clippings to show how morons are trying to prove these things.

No intelligent person will spend one minute "saying what you said, that there is a leftist bias on college campuses."

If you waste time debating that, you are too much of a fool to get any real point made.

If you want to see how to cover that whole argument in two minutes, you will want to READ "Why Johnny Can't Think."