THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

DECEMBER 7 | 2005-12-07

Despite my obsession with answering the comments that have poured in, I have to say something about December 7.

I have taken a vacation from watching TV because it was part of my duties as a political pro. So this year's vacation has included a lot of DVDs (in case you think I'm getting sophisticated on you) and little use of cable TV news.

But I watched on November 22 and I am going to watch tonight.

November 22 was a day of Blessed Silence.

For forty years, every November 22 was dedicated to St. John The Kennedy. It was the day he was shot in 1963.

The media went Shakespearian on us:

"OH, for the Glorious Days of Camelot, when a fresh-faced young man from the Northeast led the march into the Inevitable Future of Liberalism!"

Forty years of that gets a bit tiresome.

The silence this year was wonderful.

On December 7 the group that modestly calls itself The Greatest Generation pays people to slap them on the back and talk about how they Saved The World by turning a third of the world over tot eh tender mercies of Mao-Tse-Tung and Our Hero and Glorious Comrade, "Uncle Joe" Stalin.

They found a world where the white man strode the world like a colussus and left a world in which white males are required to ditry their diapers and grovel. And they expected not only lifelong benefits, but worship for that.

And they got it.

I have listened to those clowns slapping themselves on the back for sixty years. But as they die out the sound of the paid-for slapping gets fainter, and I long for blessed silence there, too.

A STARK CHOICE | 2005-03-19

I am tired to death of dealing with "conservatives" who say their first loyalty is to Christ, by which they mean their version of Christianity. I am sick to death of soldiers who will kill Americans to enforce anything the court decides is the Constitution this week.

That is what media conservatives and preachers say the American flag stands for.

You know as well as I do that not one of the Founding Fathers would disagree with me. They had just gotten rid of blind loyalty of that same kind to their King and Country in Britain. The one thing they agreed to was that a blind loyalty to a flag was treason.

It still is.

Are you loyal to everything Jerry Falwell or Professor Nitwit or Judge Goldberg says your flag stands for or are you loyal to your own race, your own interests?

Loyalty to the United States is NOT loyalty to abstract principles like a melting pot or diversity. As I pointed out many years ago

"By definition, a melting pot is nothing specific. Anybody who is deeply loyal to nothing specific is in desperate need of psychiatric help."

Loyalty to "We the people of the United States of America and OUR posterity" is the exact opposite of loyalty to these manufactured "abstract principles."

Faithfulness to "We the People" is loyalty to your OWN interests, your OWN preferences, your OWN beliefs.

And your OWN, your WHITE prejudices.

I am proud that our Founding Fathers dedicated a country to its people, and nothing else.

No Divine Right. No King in robes. No all-powerful judges in robes who can tell every state and every other branch of the Federal government what to do.

America was founded to be a nation which is made up of its people. No claims to perfection. No "rule by law, not by mere men." No excuses.

That's America.

Anything else is treason.

WHEN WILL HISPANICS SHOOT BORDER GUARDS IN THE BACK? | 2004-09-21

The media says that the Republicans lost California once and for all when they tried to stop giving welfare benefits to illegal aliens.

This assumes that Hispanics born in the United States are loyal to their fellow Hispanics who are illegal aliens than they are to other American citizens. The vote shows that is true.

In fact, every political expert assumes that Hispanic loyalties are to Hispanics, not to America, no matter where they were born or their grandparents were born or what citizenship they hold. That is a simple fact of political life.

So the American border guards and the INS or whatever it is called now are regarded as enemies by Hispanics. Most big cities openly refuse to cooperate with Federal immigration officials or enforce Federal law because of their growing Hispanic vote.

Today the way real Hispanic loyalty shows itself is the way every other anti-white sentiment shows itself. Both liberals and conservatives look to interracial marriage as the final solution to the white problem, which they call "the race problem."

They propose no such immigration and integration solution to any "race problem" in Asia or Africa. There is no "race problem" in non-white countries. Solving the race problem means solving the white problem, in the same sense that Hitler referred to solving the Jewish Problem.

As I say, liberals and conservatives agree that the white problem must be solved once and for all.

But liberals are more outspokenly ANTI-white, and they want to take money from the whites and give it to the coloreds. So Hispanics, like every other minority, show their loyalty by using their votes to make California a solidly Democratic state. Schwarzenegger is a fluke.

To repeat, so far Hispanics are the liberals' Faithful Colored Companions. But as Hispanics become a majority, they are not going to stand for that Anglo border that splits the Hipanic majorities -- or potential majorities -- away from each other at the Rio Grande.

So far, Hispanics have been pretty meek about the whole thing. But the time will soon come when they stop being nothing but Faithful Colored Companions to white liberals.

They will start ambushing their INS enemies.

That is the next logical step after major cities have declared that the INS is the enemy.

WHATEVER ELSE YOU DO AT HIGH TIDE, KEEP THE MONEY PUNISHMENT | 2012-05-16

Out of the eight or nine Crusades, only one was at all successful. More interesting is the fact that, in two or three of them, the Crusaders were on the verge of victory, their numbers were there and all enemy fortresses and forces had been dispersed.

In every one of those cases, the different leaders got down to disputing who was The Leader and how to proceed with the attack on that basis. In all two or three cases the Moslems had time to completely recover and totally defeat and in one case almost wipe out the Crusaders.

In one huge battle between a German tribe and Rome, the Germans were doing fine until one of their great leaders died. They then proceeded to go into official mourning, right there in the middle of the battle. It was a matter of Principle or Morality or whatever the hell else nitwits used to justify something besides fighting to win.

The Romans, surprisingly, did not go along with this quaint custom. They went out for a good old fashioned slaughter while the Germans were weeping.

I don't CARE about Justice. I care about winning.

The traitors who are destroying us deserve no mercy, and the person saying this has been in through world wars. I am only interested in saying what is most effective to win and, once we gain the advantage, don't follow the history of those dumbass Germans or the Crusaders.

As one commenter said, even the Tribunals demanded by the most chest beating glorifier will miss a LOT of the enemy. In the real world, most of the guilty will buy their way out, and, above all, the search will end.

Almost my sole interest is that we USE the money method our enemies have worked out so well.

Believe it or not, what I am most afraid is not Tribunals, but that once the tribunals are over, you'll forget all about the pay system to keep people researching who and whose heirs must keep paying, not just after the tribunals are over, but ten years from now and a century from now.

Yes, yes, we are talking about Mere Money versus Human Life and all the rest. But in the real world and in the long term, all that chest-beating crap amounts to getting all the steam off.

Nobody remembers the Nuremberg Trials. Nobody is afraid of being called to a Tribunal in the real world. The Holocaust is remembered every day because it pays out billions of dollars each year.

As I just pointed out, professional conservatives are still decrying Hitler and none of them are asking that any Communist crime be punished for the simple reason that they will lost their JOBS if they get off the Holocaust-racist message.

Whatever else you do when the time COMES, please do not STOP with tribunals.

Keep the steam on.

With mere, dirty old MONEY.

This is more important to me than the whole question of your dramatic tribunals. I disavow tribunals now because they get us off the subject. I am even more worried that having anything that dramatic will blow off the steam and lead to the just as dramatic Love Fest afterwards.

WHATEVER YOU DO, KEEP ON THE STEAM!!!