THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

SOME PHYSICS WITHOUT THE ARITHMETIC | 2013-09-20

We exist in a four-dimensional solid block.

We only LIVE because we can move in three of those dimensions, but the fourth one, time, only allows us to move within it at a certain, unchanging speed.

Before you say this sounds New Age or philosophical, let me hasten to point out that it is not only the basis of Einsteinian Theory, but it is also the basis of C.S. Lewis's theology.  There is not a radical word in it.

This four-dimensional picture is solid and conservative.   It is AFTER we accept it and start babbling conclusions that we begin sounding like Aristotle at his dumbest talking about why women are born to have less teeth than men.

There was an interesting overlap between Einstein's four-dimensional physics and C.S. Lewis' use of it for theology when Einstein attacked quantum physics by saying that "God does not play dice with the universe."

Quantum physics said that the tiniest particles in our universe pop back and forth from out a four-dimensional box into other four-dimensional regularly, but so many of them do it that statistically our universe remains stable.

But if you admit this, you are saying that there are other universes for these particles to pop in and out of.   Einstein calls this THE universe, the universe of which his God is the master.

String theory has come along to reconcile quantum physics and Einsteinian physics.   I am not about to try to explain THAT until I understand it.

And I have my doubts about string theory for reasons that have nothing to do with the math all this is cloaked in.

I suspect string theory BECAUSE it so conveniently bridges the gap between Relativity and Quantum Theory.   I doubt seriously whether anybody else would imagine such a thing.

FIVE WORDS AND EMMA LAZARUS | 1998-10-31

A little while back, Dr. Rolandi sent out a copy of an email from a leftist who declared neo-Confederates to be traitors, I found one particular line fascinating

"Our group, by studying the neo-Confederates and realizing their hostility to the Statue of Liberty, the Declaration of Independence, and American democratic values in general have also come to realize one thing. RACISM=TREASON."

What is there about the Declaration of Independence or the Statue of Liberty that we are supposed to be hostile to?

Is this anti-Confederate saying we denounce the thousands of words directed against King George in the Declaration? Clearly not. Is he saying neo-Confederates object to the mention of God in the Declaration? Clearly not.

That is almost the whole Declaration, and we have denounced none of that.

What he means by "the Declaration of Independence" is actually a grand total of five words: "all men are created equal."

What he means by The Statue of Liberty is not the representation of a white woman inviting Europeans to come to America. He is talking about the inscription on that statue written by Emma Lazarus, a dedicated Zionist. Emma was giving away a country inhabited by goyim, while she dreamed of a homeland reserved for her and her fellow Jews.

If one denounces Emma Lazarus for giving America to any of the goyim who wanted it, while dreaming of her own land for Jews only, one is being "unpatriotic."

RABBIT TRACKS | 2013-05-02

I can't quite believe it!   At

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKDeyuM0-Og&feature=youtu.be

White Rabbit's AntiRacist Hitler, I read some 116,000 hits, four thousand thumbs up and NO thumbs down!

The anti-whites have seen these huge thumbs up our You Tubes keep getting, and the warning has gone out.

Since then, I have see only one of our YouTubes where the thumbs down have gotten a thin majority.

I looked at one of the sites one of  with the pretty girls reciting the Mantra (out of purely intellectual concern, of course), and found it had 160,000 views, 4000 thumbs up and NO thumbs down!

Am I reading this wrong?  What has happened to the anti-white Chain of Command, or Robot Board?

WHITAKERISM: A PROPOSITIONAL STATE CANNOT ALLOW FREE SPEECH | nationalsalvation.net

Like, the truth of this becomes clear almost as soon as you state it.

If a state's existence is based on a proposition, it cannot allow the proposition to be seriously questioned.

In a propositional state, all loyalty is based on the absolute conviction that one is loyal to an Only True Faith. History shows us that the one thing that will change where there is free speech is the Only True Faith of a time before.

You can look at "When the Wagons Rolled West" to see what America was based before very questionable adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment.

America was seen as part of the movement of the white race, which had moved in, wave after wave, into Europe by succeeding groups of Indo-Europeans, Celts, Germans, Scandinavians, Doric, Ionic, Latin. America was part of that age old tradition.

Even after the Thirteenth Amendment was adopted, the Dred Scot Decision, "A black man has no rights that white men need respect," was still official. Only on July 20, 1868, when the Radical Republicans declared the amendment imposed by their military dictatorship to have been ratified, the Dred Scot Decision was the Law of the Land.

This is so buried that it is said that the only amendment adopted to reverse a decision of the Supreme Court was the one allowing a national income tax. Every historian states that. Every historian MUST say that.

Why?

Because, as in all authoritarian states, history must conform to the doctrine, the proposition.

If the economic statistics did not confirm to the doctrine that they were thriving and growing, an economist who deferred from that line lost not just his job but his life.

Any historian who questions the proposition that for the first ninety years of its existence America was dedicated to the proposition that all men were created equal is out on his ass.

A state based on natural loyalties does not have to enforce any particular proposition.

And the proposition can be Freedom.

Another Whitakerism: a capital letter word is always the exact opposite of the same word in the lower case.

The Inquisition practiced Mercy, because slowly burning a heretic alive gave him his only chance to repent and be speared Eternal Hellfire. Torture is part and parcel of True Mercy.

When one says that America is dedicated to Freedom, it means that if anyone questions True Equality they are an enemy of True Freedom.

The result that anyone who recites actual history is a traitor to the Propositional State.

The lower case freedom cannot allow a doctrine of any kind to be the basis of the state.

The Constitution dedicates America to " secure the blessings of Liberty to ourselves and OUR Posterity."

By DEFINITION, the blessing of freedom means that you do NOT state the doctrine that is best for yourselves and your posterity.