THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

JASON, TURNABOUT IS THE ONLY WAY TO PLAY | 2013-08-29

In the Working Thread, Jason says:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jnhj7z_EdUs

An episode of Dragnet pushing Anti-Whitism almost 50 years ago. Sgt Friday was protecting from those Nazis ... i.e. those who oppose school integration.

MY REPLY:

Jason, I remember that episode.  As I said, we didn't have a hell of a lot to do in the sand hills.

Bonanza had an episode that wasn't broadcast down South where they railed against the law in Nevada in the Old West Days that prevented their cook Hop Sing from marrying a fair haired girl.

This Message Movie and propaganda crap, fifty years later, is VERY important.  It demonstrates that there are NO LIMITS to where you put in the Mantra and the Minis.

Anti-whites have NEVER let any watcher's right to enjoy entertainment or private discussion to get in the way of shoving their message down our throats.

Anyone who complains about your putting our message absolutely anywhere has no right whatsoever to do so.  And you have no right to respect any such complaint.

The FCC has required every broadcast license  for some eighty years to include "Public Service Ads" free for hours each week.   A "public service ad" can and does include straight anti-white propaganda.

As Rowan Atkins said in attacking Britain's Hate Speech Laws, "Please offend me."

Let the AMPWs and other losers be inoffensive.

Saving our race is more important than being respectable, and that's the way anti-whites beat these losers in the first place.

Â

UNIFORMITY | 2010-01-23

Dave's observation about my war on the costume fetish did what I read comments for, to maker me think. A free person is paranoid about anything that separates the people from Government. Nothing does that like a uniform.

My fate is to be decided by twelve of my peers and a god. I can do without the god, thank you.

What the hell is a judge doing in DRESS? This is a guy who is deciding life and death and he is dressing like a Superhero! NOBODY in a court of law should think of himself as more than a man.

And it is the nature of the human animal that what he wears affects his judgment. In European countries which were totalitarian and theocratic throughout their histories, there are only judges in their robes and little hats. The JURY is a purely Anglo-Saxon artifact. It was probably an expression of Britain's loss of faith in its own people when judges and lawyers put on wigs.

Free people have a different relationship with those who govern them, one inn which costumes have no role. Try to imagine how the Founding Fathers would have reacted to Presidential Robes.

The Commander in Chief has no uniform.

In the fifteenth century most monarchs tried hard to keep all arms in the hands of nobles and soldiers. As with the jury system, England was a WILD exception. It is the only country I know of that ever punished PEASANTS for NOT having weapons!

It wasn't much of a punishment, but after Crecy England's military might depended on the longbow. That n turn depended on one's having a longbow and practicing with it. It takes time and effort, and as more and more forms of amusement came along, fewer and fewer English peasants stuck to it.

A bowling lane has ten pins today because "nine pins" became so popular it was taking the peasants away from archery practice. They added a pin to make it legal.

But behind that little story is a bigger one. The kind and Parliament were actually trying to FORCE peasants to own and become expert with a weapon that killed armored knights. This was not the kind of thinking that was any more usual then than it is in Europe or blue states today.

What did the kings and the nobles really depend on in England? They lived and died by POLITICS. As I said, politics is life. The depended on their own popularity so completely that they tried to FORCE the people to have weapons that could kill them.

For obvious reasons you'll have to wait a long time before any Mommy Professor mentions this historical oddity.

TEMPORAL PROVINCIALISM AND THE UPPAH CLAHSS | 2010-05-08

Anyone who is not a liberal in our society is a "conservative." There is the Established Church and there are the Others. This can get confusing.

If you are the sort of moron who is easily confused.

The fact that there was an Established Church and Others in England does not make a Baptist the same thing as a Catholic. But if you are a truly dumb rube of the kind Cambridge pours out, you could easily not know the difference.

They used to turn out Established Church Anglicans who thought that it would be Lowah Clahss to know the difference between a Baptist and a Presbyterian. Established Church Political Correctness has the same attitude.

You are either Us or you are Them. If you are Them, the only distinction is between those who know how to grovel to their Betters, now called respectable conservatives, and those who simply don't know their Place.

This is not a special observation. One reason I see the world so clearly is because I recognize that some things represent no change at all. It is part of the Established Religion to really believe that people in 2010, Modern People, are really different from those in 1910.

The most common argument for Political Correctness is simply to say "This is 2010." That fogs your mind, it draws a curtain over a simple understanding of humanity.

Yesterday's self-styled Better Clahss thought of themselves as Aristocrats or Captains of Industry. Today's think of themselves as Idealists and Intellectuals. Your mind has to be pretty far gone in the "This is the Magic 2010" not to see that nothing has changed.

The Propah Attitude of the Uppah Clahss has changed. Now to prove you went to college you have to have the propah outlook. If you really think that because the propah attitudes have changed this is a New Age, you really have to have your head in the sand.

It has been truly said that a major reason so many Southerners are liberal is because they are one generation from white trash. At least Mommy Professor defined their parents as white trash, meaning they did not finish college.

So the guy rejects Mommy and Daddy's ideas for this big, smart Mommy Professor's. Mommy Professor has never been anywhere or done anything, but he tells them he's Educated, just as the Slave Generation's Sergeant told them he was Tough.

Man is a very suggestible animal. Morons are the most suggestible of all. It is more interesting to talk with a tape recorder than with one of Mommy Professor's Southerners.

But he really thinks he's being Uppah Clahss.

Mommy Professor, like their ideals in New York City, call all Southerners "hillbillies." I remember one referring to CAJUNS as "hillbillies." Most Cajuns historically lived and died without SEEING a hill.

Not only does the Uppah Clahss not know this, they are PROUD of not knowing it, in the same way their direct forebears would be proud not to understand Cockney. A Southern liberal is proud to pretend not to know the difference between a hillbilly and a Cajun.

As usual, the way to deal with them is to show them how silly they look. That is, after all, all they care about. And it's FUN!

No matter how creative you would like to be, you simply can't say, "Well, that IS the standard opinion" often enough. They got those ideas from Smart People whose ideas are original, not like their white trash parents who never went to college.

They really BELIEVE that. But when you burst their bubble, they know enough now to know what your attitude toward them is.

And, to repeat, that is all they really care about.

PCs are very often reduced almost literally to TEARS when you insist that everything they say is what it is, pure standard and packaged Yuppie stuff.

And the truer what you say is, the more it rocks them.

LIFE AFTER MAN | 2009-09-30

"Life After Man" hints that man disappears from the earth because of a catastrophe. I wrote an article about the end of the SST (Supersonic Transport) but I forgot to explain WHY I wrote it. This relates to the likelihood of man disappearing from the earth, not with a bang, but without any noise at all.

It also relates to primitive islanders who believe that dreams are just as real as waking life. Social anthropologists and psychologists for a while thought this was a Great Insight.

One major reason dreams are not the same as waking life is that you can dream of destroying the world and it won't make any difference when you wake up. Cut to the nub, this means that dreams are real to YOU, but they are not real to me. In other words, the big difference between reality and dreams is actually a matter of COMMUNICATION.

Historically, reality has been moving faster, among other things. Since the beginning of flight daredevils and test planes would break a speed barrier, and in a decade or two that new speed would be routine.

Until the SST. The SST took passengers across the Atlantic at a maximum speed of 2.2 times the speed of sound, a good three times as fast as jet aircraft did routinely. But instead of becoming routine, as speed records has been before, transoceanic aircraft went back to the 500 mph speed they had had for decades and there is no sign anyone is looking for anything faster.

The reason for this goes back to the fact that reality is primarily a means of communication. The reason ocean liners were replaced by planes was because people needed to get across the ocean in less than a week or two. But there was not adequate need for human beings to get across in a few less hours.

If you need to communicate with somebody that fast, you use light speed communications.

All those cities that "Life After Man" showed collapsing exist simply because people NEEDED to be near each other. Note the past tense. A century ago the central city was the place of the future because the inevitable future of industrial society required people to live close together.

Actually one phase of Life After Man was here over a generation ago. Harlem, which was a very upper class area when the New York Metro was build often looks like what is depicted a century after Man disappeared in the documentary. The area around the University of Chicago turned into the same kind of ruin from being totally upper crust in the same period.

In fact the main reason we have any trace left of worrying about where anybody is because computer speeds are so low.

Let's take a concrete example. It used to be that a detective wanted to be on the scene." Now being "on the scene" means very little compared to getting photos and samples for the lab. Eye witnesses used to be everything. Now photos are essential and far more valuable.

In fact, the trouble with Big Foot is that we have eyewitnesses but no photos, and all the eye witnesses on earth are no substitute for one photo. Photos don't take psychedelic drugs like shamans. Photos don't get schizophrenic and have voices talking to them

Above all, photos have no imagination at all. They are pure communication, at least as compared to what we used to think of as pure communication. If someone takes the SST to Europe to talk to somebody, you can bet he will insist on recording what is said.

Spending a fortune to talk face to face is not much use if the results will not be believed unless they are recorded. It is easier to record light speed communications.

In the 1950's the epitome of Modern Man, "The Man in the Grey Flannel Suit," lived in Connecticut. Every morning He got up at the break of dawn, put on his coat and tie, drove some miles to the train station, took the train to Grand Central Station, then took the subway many miles to his place of work.

Every day he walked from his office to the subway, took the subway to the train station, and spent an hour or two going back to Connecticut, walked to his car and drove it back home. He got home in time to hit the sack.

Dawn to late night, every day. Very few people do that today, though I am sure many still do. When "The Man in the Grey Flannel Suit" was written, this was considered the Way of The Future.

When computer speeds get to a certain level, you will be able to see, smell and taste at long distance, with the sort of advantages a photo has over a memory. Where would "we" BE then?

I cannot predict where our physical bodies will be then. They probably won't be in any tall buildings.

This is a continuing theme of this blog. "Progressivism" depends absolutely on a PREDICTABLE Future. And the LAST thing the future ever is is predictable.

Actually that is not strictly true. History shows that the future of a BROWN civilization is as predictable as the life span of an ant colony. Every time you look at the ruins of a civilization that went down and stayed down the people there have brown skins, black hair, and brown eyes, which is what we call Diversity. There are no such places in the white world.

If the progressives have the future they demand, it WILL be predictable.