THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

MARK | 2006-08-15

NOT SPAM

"There were more Holocausts than the one Mrs. Hart kept emphasizing, and if Jews want to save themselves, they will have to get on board with preserving US."

Bob can you elaborate on this? I've never heard this reasoning before. If the jews declare loyalty to the preservation of the white race, won't they end up backstabbing us like they always have done? And, can't we save ourselves w/o having the jewish race tied us?

Comment by Mark

OBSERVATIONS

I was detailing to Mrs. Hart Stalin's holocausts, Mao Tse-Tung's greater holocaust, and pointing out that Jews, like other whites, simply ignored them because they we just killing Russians and, least of all, a buch of Orientals. I pointed out that this racist attitude was so ingrained that it wasn't even noticed.

I have not never heard anyone explain to a Jew that their obsession with the Holocaust was racist. She was a bit shocked and sort of reluctantly agreed.

On your last paragraph, since you made that comment I have gone into enormous detail about the statement you made, that we cannot ally with Jews. I thought of doing it becuase of you and another commenter.

I really need you to make me go into points like this.

Commenters are a real pain, but you are essential to me.

Just think of yourselves as hypodermic needles.

I will not specify the part of my body where I feel you hypodermics are being used.

ONLY THE GOVERNMENT CAN STOP SPACE EXPLORATION | 2004-06-20

A tiny private group is sending a little rocket into space. They are doing it to win a prize.

Before long, space exploration will be done privately at far less expense than the giant government projects. Technology is moving fast and satellites have proven there is big money out there.

Only the government can get in the way. If the government can make regulations to protect anyone who takes a rocket into space, they can make it enormously expensive. Today's government would never have allowed Lindbergh to cross the Atlantic. Several men had already died trying it, and he was in an overloaded craft.

The government would have stopped Lindbergh for his own good.

The government can set up requirements to make sure that only very expensive craft can be sent up, for the pilots' own good.

And what happens when it comes back down? When governments sent up thousands of space craft, no one said they couldn't do it because they could kill somebody when they came down, but private people sending up such craft is an entirely different matter.

This will be a lawyer's bonanza. Soon there will be lawsuits requiring hugely expensive precautions to be sure those crafts come down in predictable places. Even dropping them in the sea might not do it. What about endangered animals?

Does this sound like a joke? I remember when the idea that California was considering denying benefits to illegal aliens was looked upon a joke. Before then it never occurred to anybody that illegal aliens had a right to public benefits.

The government and the lawyers can force anyone going into space to spend huge sums on pilot safety, affirmative action, flight paths for re-entry, and a long list of other things. By piling up regulations, government and lawyers can make space exploration prohibitively expensive for small businesses.

For their own good, of course.

ROSIE LAMB | 2006-08-16

There are two threads I started on Stormfront that is VERY instructive about dealing with antis and fatal mistakes in dealing with them.

I attacked Bush for using hte old "disarm the public" tactic for dealing with terrorism. Lamb then recited the standard list of European countries that have low murder rates and strict gun control. That was such an old gambit I had forgotten the obvious answer to it.

Swiss citizens are PRIVATELY armed to the teeth. Their government REQUIRES it. Their murder rate is as low as any other European country's.

This is a good exchange for determining whether you are dealing with an anti who has any honesty. Normally even the most militant will drop that low European murder rate fast. Rosie is now arguing that Britain or Japan or whoever she picked is more like us, so Switzerland doesn't matter.

Her argument was the old one that Europeans have less murders and gun control, so gun control worked. She left our Switzerland the way they all do. But most of them simply get off the subject. Some very few even admit they were wrong.

Rosie identified herself by simply refusing to admit that Mommy Professor's argument was just plain wrong.

So we simply have someone who is fanatically anti-white and pro-gun control and doesn't mind lying to keep from admitting any pro-white can be right about anything. We are Evil, so how can we have anything to SAY? That is their justification for JAILING us rather than letting us speak. So no true anti can admit we make ANY points.

Hence Rosie's desperation.

More important than another fanatical anti-white is the reaction of STORMFRONTERS. Instead of holding her feet to the fire, they went right down every avenue she tried to escape to. One of our smartest people started arguing about whether Switzerland was actually more like the US!

I was astonished at this talented person's making that slip, but only because HE is above the average pro-white in wisdom. I have to deal with my COMRADES all the time when I have an enemy nailed down and they help anti-whites slip out.

Rosie is not important. What is important is how PRO-WHITES do what respectable conservatives get PAID to do: Let the other side wriggle out when it's caught dead to rights. The way anti-whites keep from being exposed is by declaring neoconservatives and respectable conservatives RESPECTABLE. No conservative EVER objects to our being suppressed or jailed. In fact, they are proud to lead the lynch mob.

Thet are PAID to lead the lynch mob.

And when you get off of Bob's Mantra or simple destructive arguments like Switzerland, you are aiding and abetting the enemy.

PERIOD!

AN AWFUL MAN IS CAPTURED, AND AWFUL PEOPLE CARE | 2003-12-27

The capture of Saddam Hussein will allow the Bush Administration to put more men in uniform in Iraq. Our own borders remain wide open. Congress just agreed to give the Iraqis more billions of our dollars.

If Hussein hadn't been captured, liberals would have had another weapon in their struggle to turn over American policy to the United Nations. Leftists used our failure to catch Saddam to prove that France was right. They call it "cooperating with our Allies," but it means France.

Liberals love the France that gave Parisian citizenship to the American cop-killer.

Nothing a decent American could care about is being dealt with in Iraq. Capturing Saddam disappointed the French and their kind. The United Nations was hurt by the capture. Liberals hate any American success. That was the nice thing about Saddam's capture.

Now let's talk about something that matters.

Saddam's capture just demonstrates again that America is very, very powerful. The critical question is not who controls Iraq, but who controls America. The evil people in America fight each other over who controls Iraq.

We must keep our eye on the real goal. We must defeat both the neoconservatives in the White House who want to use America for things like controlling the Middle East AND we must defeat the leftists.

This will not be done by frantic e-mails about the Ten Commandments or Saddam or Bush or whatever other issue is the big fad of the moment.