THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

PETER PAIN | 2006-08-29

NOT SPAM

The volume of responses in that link Al found is impressive! I was not aware so many people knew who Bob is and read his book!

I have a neat Newsreader and spent a few days finding a free service that allows posting. I just posted the following in about 50 Newsgroups. I had fun making up different Subject headings for each. The big newsgroups change frequently and will require repetition.

Here it is:

Liberals and respectable Conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and "assimilating" with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to assimilate, i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable Conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

http://whitakeronline.org

Comment by Pain

ME:

Thank you. This is like rain on a parched desert. This is the FIRST TIME that two commenters have had crosstalk about how they both went out and DID something!

They went out there and brought something back to the seminar.

"Seek and ye shall find" was old when it appeared inthe Bible.

"Seek and ye shall find" is the reason we have oil, the reason people found gold. More important it is where our entire white man's technology came from. Reading the old stuff is useful, but nobody makes a real contribution if all he does is read the old stuff.

You USE the old stuff to go out and get NEW experiences.

NEW great insights made the old stuff, and NEW practical insights will make the stuff later generations need to read.

Al and Pain are out there bringing us back things I DON'T know.

Go thou and do likewise.

THE MAGIC CLOCK | 2014-05-16

Some time ago a big advertising magazine had a lead article, "Objections to intermarriage in 2014?"

Like any magazine editor, it expressed shock that mere consumers would dare object to a Quaker Oats (?) ad featuring a mulatto child going from his white mother to his black dad.

The first irony here is what ADVERTISING is all about.

Advertising is supposed to be the science of KNOWING public opinion, not of JUDGING it.

Like any other big magazine, this publication hired an editor from the pool of carbon copies produced by the magazine bureaucracy.

But in advertising, astonishment at real public attitudes is not a mistake of the public, but of the advertising industry.

Advertisers are hired to KNOW public opinion, not to be astonished by it.

Let me explain this further: The magazine editor bureaucracy produces editors who tell the public what it SHOULD think.

Advertising is about what the public DOES think.

So the carbon copy editor did not come up through the advertising industry.

In real advertising, the question is "What do people prefer?" not "In the Year 2014 on the Magic Clock, this is what the public SHOULD think."

No editor, least of all in advertising, would hire ugly models. Models for ads are not representative of the public. No matter how often you repeat, "Real people don't look like that," there is no way this side of Hell that advertisers are going to hire fat, ugly models.

To most White people, the kid looks like every other mulatto.

In real world advertising, you don't tell people that ugly is lovely. That is fine for mainline magazines.

But in the real world real consumers don't LIKE ugly. Period.

LORD NELSON'S DEBATE | 2009-07-04

A few months ago I was invited to a debate with a rabid Anti-White.

She kicked off the debate by telling everyone how much she felt compelled to stand to 'racists' like me, especially because she had two White kids.

So I had some fun demanding that this Anti-White give reasons as to why her own children should be replaced with the children of North African Muslims, as the new majority population of the UK.

I kept threatening to call HER a racist if she did not comply.

And so when she did betray her own kids, with talk about how 'we all bleed red' and 'the White race is just a social construct' etc. etc. I then switched it around. And demanded to know if she would use those same arguments to justify the replacement of Black children in African countries. And that I would think she was racist against Black Africans if she did.

She could not go there. And she had to admit it was only her own she was using this logic to against.

At this point GAME OVER! She lost all credibility and became a bit of a laughing stock to all who were there.

(Trust me, you had to be there) It woke up everyone who witnessed our little debate.

The point is, That's Mantra Thinking! If I had talked about 'Black crime stats' 'scheming Jews' and 'our beautiful White race' I would still be there now. Being used like everyone's favorite verbal punch bag.

COVERED AND COVERED | 2007-05-06

Jamestown WAS covered in the media, so I really put my foot in my mouth there.

But it was also covered over by Cinco de Mayo.

The Queen's visit and prechmentof diversity was covered. Most countries would discuss the foundation date. But people will keep talking about the Pilgrim Fathers because what should have been a great month in our history has been forgotten.