THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

WORDISM: THE TOTALITARIAN MINDSET | nationalsalvation.net

Someone on the anti thread on Stormfront objected to my putting antis all in one category and said, "How would you react if an anti put you in one category?"

I replied that they do it all the time, but it doesn't bother me because I don't have any respect for antis so I don't CARE what they say about me personally.

Another anti then demanded why, if I have no respect for antis, I keep debating with them.

My rely makes some important points:

A few antis swing over to our side. The rest are very useful because you would be hard to believe if you weren't here in person.

Over and over and over and over, antis never read the anti threads before revealing unto us the arguments Mommy Professor told them would devastating us irrational, evil racists.

Every one of you, HUNDREDS of you, come in here with the same tired old line, without even a little variation in it.

We can describe you to each other till we drop, but nobody would BELIEVE that a literate adult would come in with the same canned crap, over and over, and over, and think it's NEW. Only SEEING is believing.

In order to counter you out in the real world, we have to realize how incredibly shallow you are. We keep thinking, "All that education, all those big names, can this possibly, really be ALL there is to it?

Stripping ourselves of every shred of respect for antis is the first essential step in learning how to deal with them.

The whole anti power is certainly not based on anything you have to SAY.

It is based ENTIRELY on the universal authority and power of the PhDs and public officials and now the respectable conservatives and the European police who have been ranged, without allowing a single break in the solid front, on the anti side.

Respect for this oppressive bunch of morons is ALL that you have left.

If you are in a police state, you don't have to respect them, but you sure as hell have to DEAL with them, as I have to deal with your intellectual police state.

But I HAVE lived in a regular police state, and I DESPISED the police.

And I despise you.

In a police state, people like you genuinely cannot understand anything that contradicts orthodoxy.

Good Communists in Communist states believed they had freedom of speech, because one could say anything one SHOULD be allowed to say.

We are in the same position. You are convinced that one is allowed to say anything one SHOULD say, so you cannot understand anything that is outside of those bounds.

You retreat behind: "You don't make sense."

That is routine for the totalitarian mindset.

I do NOT respect the totalitarian mindset, especially when it is incapable of realizing what it is.

HOW TO LOOK AT HISTORY COGENTLY | 2001-12-14

Every few days another magazine article breathlessly reports that the Chinese had invented printing long before the West had it. Then someone else, for the thousandth time, informs us that China had explosive black powder long, long ago.

Apparently no matter how many times this is repeated it is big news.

Another piece of history which is at least not repeated so often that I cringe when I hear it is that the Incas did not have the wheel for their everyday life, but their children did have wheels on their toys.

All the stunning excitement that greets the zillionth repetition of these facts helps us to ignore the real point

So what?

Having the wheel is a big deal to us, but it obviously meant nothing to the Incas. The Koreans had a phonetic alphabet and moveable type long before we did, but again, so what? The invention of printing was a big deal in the West because the minute we got it we began a revolution with it. In Asia, it just laid there.

When the West got the printing press it made a revolution. When China got it they made some playing cards. That is the difference that matters.

We have recently found huge clockworks on sunken ships from the Mediterranean before the time of Christ, and we know the Greeks had a little steam engine. I just heard for the hundredth time that Babylonians probably had electroplating and maybe even ground a lens for a telescope.

All our pictures depicting the Cro-Magnon men who made the cave paintings 30,000 years ago in Europe show them in ragged caveman animal hides. It turns out they probably dressed very well and neatly. A form of textile weaving that was supposed to have been invented two thousand years ago was being worn by all the Caucasoid mummies found in China from over twice that long ago.

The vast slave empires of the Egyptians and the Chinese and other water empires built a lot of big stuff and we find things left behind in the rotted corpses those civilizations left behind that do not appear in living lands. So history long assumed that since the oldest wheels were in Egypt, the wheel must have been invented there. Now we know that Egypt got the wheel very late and built the pyramids without it.

Naturally we are going to find the oldest examples of many inventions in the ruins of dead slave empires. What is tragic about this is that it gives us the idea that slave empires are therefore the places where things are created.

Our accepted history literally thinks that the rotting-away process is the creative process.

BLACK PILOTS | 2006-06-08

I wrote this in the Blog before, but here it is from Stormfront:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The great blessing of Stormfront to Old, OLD Bob is that you give me a license to meander.

When I was in Intelligence, the first rule was to send Bob to the worst places imaginable. So I got onto planes in Africa which contained blacks carrying live CHICKENS on board.

I do nor normally defend African intelligence, but there was a reason for this. If they had taken any form of chicken MEAT on board, frozen or otherwise, they ran into regulations.

A lot of whites laughed at the live chickens and pigs on board, but they made sense inthe circumstances.

Black IQ is not hte highest, but they, unlike the Europeans laughing at them, understood that all government regulations made sense.

But there came a time when it was decided that blacks had to be introduced into the cockpit. You can't have Trans-Africa Airlines, a comination fo Free African States' official civivl aviation section, if all the pilots are white.

So they introduced a few black COpilots.

People refused to fly on the planes.

Guess who refused to fly on those planes?

Whites knew what a copilot was.

Blacks only saw a black man up in the cockpit where a white man was supposed to guarantee them safety.

I don't know what happened in more civilized areas. Maybe the cockpits in the New South Africa are all black.

Back then even the Civilized, Progressive areas wouldn't allow black pilots.

That was not where they sent Ole Bob.

Oddly enough, I felt SAFER with a black co-pilot where they sent ME.

In the areas where they sent ME, every plane contained at least one white person who flew his own plane.

In the bush, bush pilots are common. The blacks did not want to go up with a black in the cockpit because they didn't feel SAFE with a black up there.

The blacks, chickens and all, trooped off the plane when a BLACK man went up front. Every one of them voted a straight African Liberation ticket. Every one of them was convinced that black men would run the government for THEM.

But going up on a PLANE with a black man in the cockpit?

You gotta be NUTS!

I GOT RICHARD WRONG | 2004-11-23

I misstated Richard's position on Jews being especially saved.

As Jimbo says, I am an idiot on theology.

We really do need a discussion on why Jesus didn't speak Persian in Israel, though.

I wouldn't touch theology if people stopped preaching at me. But if you reserve the right to preach creationism or on stem cells or Holy Israel, I am going to preach back.

If you don't want me to talk religion at you, you don't have a license to preach at me.

Period.