THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

WHERE MYTHOLOGY RULES, FREEDOM DIES | 2004-04-17

Freedom is based on a very unromantic idea. It says people should do what they want to.

The easiest way to destroy freedom is to trivialize it. You just say "We could avoid a lot of accidents if we did this, and the reason for not doing it is because somebody just WANTS to do something else, for no reason at all."

You go straight from there to the Marxist myth of Social Progress, which the term "progressive" is now based on, and from there you go to dictatorship. If we have a Higher Mission, there is no room for Freedom.

Every totalitarian society worships The Law.

When the Supreme Court overrules the will of the American people, it says it is "interpreting the Constitution." If you "interpret" the Constitution, you ARE the Constitution.

Barry Goldwater pointed out in his 1958 book, "The Conscience of a Conservative," that EVERY public official has to interpret the Constitution. He takes an oath to uphold the Constitution against all enemies, including an enemy in a black dress.

Who said the courts were supposed to be the Constitution? Certainly not the Constitution itself. If it meant that, it would have said it.

Who gave the Supreme Court the right to be the Constitution?

The Supreme Court did.

If one branch of government IS the Constitution, then the balance of powers between the different branches of government simply does not exist.

HOW HYPOCRITICAL CAN YOU GET? | 2005-05-24

I can't BELIEVE it!!!

To fight embryonic stem cell research, President Bush has children produced by in vitro fertilization on. I remember when those SAME pro-lifers were trying to OUTLAW in vitro fertilization and desperately fighting to keep those SAME children from being born!

They wanted people who could not have children normally NOT to have children through in vitro. They wanted them to adopt third-world children! Now they are using those SAME children to fight for their new battle against humanity!

I remember it very well. I told my congressman that, if he wanted me to help fight in vitro, I would resign. He said he never really considered it. John Ashbrook was totally pro-life, but he would never take part in this kind of anti-life action.

LISTEN TO ME!

These people are UNSPEAKABLE.

STOP THE LUNCHEONEERS NOW! | 2016-11-20

A respected veteran BUGSER made an observation that he considered just interesting but that scared the dog poo out of me:

He pointed out that since the election, more and more people on the internet are going back to the old respectable conservative -- he  didn't even say "cuckservative" -- line.

This is one way a victory is turned into a defeat.

You will not hear the slightest hint from any old pro-White or from any cuckservative that they were simply WRONG.

The same thing happened when "Reagan Democrat" suddenly and totally replaced their "Wallace Democrat" mantra.

The only reference to their old fixation was a truly filthy and therefore routine National Review caption under a picture of William Rusher.  Rush and I had guided the Party to those "Wallace" Democrats.

But neither the Old Right nor today's old pro-White Luncheoneer has the slightest room for the plain truth.

So the picture showing Rusher had the caption that Rusher is realizing he was wrong in doubting the Republican Party had a future. Rusher was the REASON the Republicans GOT a future at Election 1980.

Let us take a quick look at how those respectable conservatives and the old pro-Whites go about their substitute for seeing the truth. Just like the old country club Republicans, the old pro-Whites are going to use the dirtiest kind of trick to avoid simply saying "We were wrong."

Look at this: There are two things a Luncheoneer pro-White can describe Trump's victory.

One, is the "Look what a good boy I am" approach. One way is to admit that their last ditch stand against Old Conservatives - calling White Genocide by its name was just plain wrong and go on with this lesson. This is an honorable productive approach the old cuckservatives -- and apparently the old pro-Whites -- cannot even consider. It is the honorable approach they love to talk about and never use.

The 1980 cuckservatives tore history right out of its sockets. They wanted to reassure the liberals who allowed them to be the Established Opposition. In order to get the establishment to keep giving them a half way respectable image, they keep the establishment's love by saying that nothing has really HAPPENED.

Luncheoneers want to say, "The American people did not rise up and give you the kick in the teeth traitors deserve."

They want the establishment to know they still see the old pro-Whites as those it is safe to go to lunch with.

The Luncheoneers are going to help the establishment quote them and say there was no grass roots revolt.

I can give you two examples of this right off the top of my head.

In 1980 conservatives wanted desperately to avoid being associated with the dirty old working people against their suddenly loving liberal buddies. Finally they turned the voter revolt into something they were courting could account: The Religious Right.

Yes, that is how busing was abandoned and abortion became practically the only issue conservatives led the preachers and their faithful behind. Cuckservatives stuck with Big Money's Open Borders for Cheap Labor mantra.

Another choice between honor and decency and satisfying cuckservatives' desperation to get invited to lunch with the Galbraithers came with the fall of the Soviet Empire.

It was time to expose all the bullshit about the working class. It was time to point out the undeniable fact that "workers' paradises" were prisons.

I remember in one interview when a conservative was talking to some major name leftist who might take him to lunch.

It was straight and to the point. The potential Lunch Sponsor said to the desperate little respectable:  "So you are not saying that what is wrong with leftists is part of the whole."

"You are saying that they needed some improvement?"

"Yes! Yes! Yes!"  screamed the little conservative as he saw endless vistas of photos showing him with Prominent Figures Having Lunch Together.

The fact that all Communist states were prisons for working people, that busing was chasing down White people, the whole things it was about went right out the window.

And is happening again.

The new cuckservatives look to me to be a lot like the Old Cuckservatives.

They do not want to sound like some Luncheoneer Person who points out that this rebellion happened because they are our people' ENEMIES.

That is the lesson, so that must be avoided at all costs.

The sellout in 1980 was quiet: simply giving Bush the Vice Presidency, which was not big in the news.

This path by which we have lost our country right out of the jaws of victory has not changed. It will be sold in the same old way: by those on our side who were against the strategy that won becoming The Good Guys, the Lunchable Gentlemen who once again try to avoid "Race issues" and "immigration" and "diversity.

This cuckservative offensive by the failed old pro-whites is a repeat of the ones when they almost got Trump to do the routine backing away from the real crimes of the establishment that the rebellion WAS AGAINST.

Back into battle. The victory is not won.

5/28/05 INSIDER LETTER | 2005-05-28

(Reprinted to Blog from email list of 5/28/05)

*** Bob's Insider's Message ***

My team leader told me to write an Insider Letter on my topic for this week's Saturday Internet broadcast at

Stormfront.org Townhall Forum

"But, Bob, this is WhitakerOnline.ORG. Surely WHITAKER gives orders to everybody else!"

No way.

When I was on Capitol Hill I would write a speech for one of the congressmen I worked for. My highly-paid secretary would type it up, but she would not let me TOUCH the original. She made me wait until she had made copies and she would trust me with one of the copies.

Like her, my team boss is responsible for giving ME orders. I can overrule him, but I very seldom do. I do what I do, and I assigned him the responsibility for making it work. He takes the responsibility, so he must have the authority.

When I was in Washington, I fired people. If you have ever done that, you know how hard it is. But when I "delegated," I did more than that. I said,

"I don't delegate, I DUMP."

I had a reputation for not hesitating to fire people. But at least two people offered to take PAY CUTS to work for me. Why? Because they were the kind of people who longed to have a boss who would give them an assignment, take the heat for any mistake they made, and let them alone to do the job.

My motto was, "I will take responsibility for any mistake you make, but I will NOT take responsibility for your NOT doing it."

Good people LOVE that. Good people go nuts over that opportunity.

Did I mention they offered to take pay CUTS?

As to what my show will be about, I plan to talk some about the New Orleans Conference I spoke at. It was sponsored by Stormfront, headed by David Duke and run by James Kelso, who does the nitty-gritty running of Stormfront.

But my main topic will be Wordism and its first cousin, classism. These are both strategies used against the survival of our race.

A country can be organized on the lines of race and kinship, as the United States was. Or it can be based on loyalty to someone's version of a Holy Book, as Islam is. It makes no difference what The Book is that the person is giving his version of. It can be an obedient little brown Moslem country or an obedient little brown Latin American country whose only uniting principle is the Catholic Church or, in recent years, an Evangelical Church.

The least-known fact of modern history is how serious evangelicals have replaced tired old Catholic hierarchies in running South America.

But Moslem, evangelical, Catholic or Moslem, the basis of Wordism is the tyranny of the Word, somebody's version of The Final Truth. Anyone who disagrees with this Final Truth is a traitor. In a Wordist society, there can be no freedom of thought or freedom of speech.

Only a society based on kinship, on what is called "racism," as America was, can have freedom of belief.

READBOB.COM

Bob