THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

REPLY TO COMMENTS | 2005-08-18

Comments on the blog interest me more than what I have to say.

Naturally I hope this is not true for most of my readers, since boring people is a writer's nightmare. It is my hope that I am just used to what I have been thinking about, so my comments sound to me like more of my same old same old while commenters give a new life to the dialogue.

If I become boring to YOU because my comments start sounding to YOU like more of the same old same old, you owe it to me to tell me so.

There is nothing wrong with the same old same old if it is a consistent point of view applied to interesting new situations. Most of my readers read this stuff to hear Bob's take on different situations.

But keep me consistent and keep me interesting. There is nothing quite as pathetic as an old guy who keeps saying the same thing over and over and I do NOT want to be that old man.

My blog entry about LOTR being a repeat of the Neibelingenlied led to an interesting little exchange which I quote in full. In this dialogue I answered the first comment, and I will answer H.S. at the bottom.

Here 'tis:

"You might find this interesting: '[Wagner's] overall religious views are somewhat ambiguous, not in nature or of his devotion, but of what he believed. Wagner was an enthusiast for Jesus Christ, but insisted he was of Greek origin and not Jewish. He also insisted the Old Testament of the Bible had nothing to do with the New Testament, and that the God of Israel was not the same God he believed was the father of Jesus. Wagner criticised the Ten Commandants, claiming it lacked the mercy and love of Christian teachings' (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Wagner). "

Comment by Alejandro — 8/15/2005 @ 6:50 pm | Edit This

"Wagner sounds exactly like me."

"The Old Russian Orthodox Church had exactly the same view of Jesus' Father versus the Old Testament Jehovah."

Comment by Bob — 8/15/2005 @ 8:55 pm | Edit This

Bob,

How "old" do you consider to be "old?" When the communists took over? Before that? The original split from the orthodox creedal belief sets?

Comment by H.S. — 8/16/2005 @ 3:30 pm | Edit This

H.S., I ran across this belief of the "old" Orthodox Church in reading biographies of Peter the Great. That was the Orthodox Church creed when Peter the Great came to power. As you know Peter the Great tried to make everything in Russia conform to Western standards. He even tried to make Dutch the national language.

Peter changed the ritual of the Orthodox Church, but I have been unable to find out whether this particular doctrine, that the Old Testament was completely wiped out by the Coming of Christ, was among the changes he made or whether this came later or if it is still an allowable concept within today's Russian Orthodox Church.

As usual, any information on this would be appreciated.

AL PARKER | 2007-05-16

AFKAN, I was stunned to see that you answered Bob's response to your comment with almost the exact same comment and did not address his suggestions. You seem to be looking for an intellectual position in the pro-white field rather than a hands-on working position. If that's the case I don't blame you because no professor would want to teach those who are hostile or don't want to listen.

On another note, I think there is no way today to eliminate the need for making arguments at length. I think there are many who simply don't trust arguments that are short and sweet (despite the fact that the shortest proofs are the most elegant). They want to know if the "smart people" believe this stuff too, and they want the bibliographies to see what other smart people believe in it. I don't see a substitute for a thick book by an author with name recognition to supplement a given mantra.

As far as Harold Covington goes, he is a One True Way man who burned out years ago and spends almost all of his time complaining about the movement (or non-movement) and attacking its leadership and rank-and-file (I guess what you would call a "Webb"). He would surely attack you, AFKAN, for TALKING about his "analytical framework" instead of putting your stuff in a van and heading to the northwest.

Comment by Al Parker

NEITHER ANGELS NOR DEVILS ARE HUMAN BEINGS | 2005-05-28

Some Amish are being accused of child molestation.

This did not get reported earlier because the Amish were looked upon as angels.

The same thing happened to Catholics priests and bishops. Boy-rape (not "child" molestation) took decades to expose because Catholic priests were looked upon as angels.

When the boy rapes by priests and the bishops' perpetuating it became public, all Catholic priests became suspect. If you make someone an angel, you are going to make them devils eventually. They are never just humans who have some bad apples.

Jews have the same problem. Since Nazi Germany, Jews have been treated as angels.

Alan Dershowitz is openly dedicated to two things:

1) Whites must be wiped out by interracial marriage, and

2) Jews must be preserved by avoiding interfaith marriages.

This is a common Jewish attitude, but nobody DARES say it is wild hypocrisy. If Jews are openly hypocritical, nobody can say so.

Why? Because since Hitler, who made all Jews devils, Jews have been looked upon as angels.

To Modern Thought, Jews cannot be mere human beings. They must be angels or devils.

Nazis and Modern Thought agree:

Jews are not human.

DAVE III | 2007-05-05

Note that I said in Dave II that the Chilean Communist Allende was elected in a THREE-WAY election. That is the way Lincoln was elected.

I need to get the importance of this across to you:

The days of "Stop Immigration!" and "The Evil Conspiracy took the world from us, let's EXPOSE them!" are OVER. That was the strategy of a TWO-WAY election: White Supremacy versus THEM.

In a two-way world, we are overwhelmed. But in the three-way world I see so clearly, THEY are a MESS.

Let's go back to Dave II:

I keep telling you about the simple strategy, twenty years of it, that I followed. Everybody said they were for it after it succeeded. But it is critical for me to remind you that the Conspirators and the Respectables fought me for two decades on this.

In other words, I have been here before. The very idea that Republicans spent decades trying to get "The Negro Vote" is so absurd today that nobody even MENTIONS it now. They STILL rule the Republican Party.

Once you are "made man" in the libservative establishment being right or wrong has no meaning. They "have a life." Blaming professionals for mistakes of the past demeans all professionals

Which leaves US. What "professionals" say about us is no our concern. What matters to us fanatics is this:

I knew it THEN. They admitted it AFTER the battle was won.

Everyone has carefully forgotten that the collapse of the Soviet Empire was then considered an absurd dream. Now everybody KNEW it would happen.

SO:

Here we go again, to almost quote Reagan's "There you go again." to Carter in the presidential debates in 1980..

The days of the old White Supremacy are over. But, if you wake up and smell the roses, there has never been a time when white supremacy was taken for granted so completely as it is today.

The relevance of the old "Who took the world away from US?" is over. WE owned the world but WE said "Ex Oriente Luc" and we said that All Mankind had a right to the Heritage of All Mankind. We slaughtered each other in the World Wars and lost everything we had a right to.

That's OVER.

We didn't lose.

No one took it AWAY from us.

No Jew was ever as fanatical about killing our racial brethren as WE were.

So cut the crap.

One thing they are right about is blaming everything on US.

How white supremacist can you GET!?

The only people who are NOT white supremacist today are the Conspiracy freaks.

Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, this is the situation:

1) Everybody agrees on white supremacy;

2) In a two-way race between the old white supremacy and everybody else, we lose. Even if you EXPOSE all our enemies.

3) in a THREE-WAY race, the ENEMY'S position is hopeless.

We must learn how to handle a THREE Way race.

Those whose function is to speak for the white race will rule.

In the future, if I am successful , everybody would have known that all along.