THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

ANSWERS TO COMMENTS | 2004-11-27

In an earlier article, I said that Wagner said that Odin gave an eye for love of his wife Freya.

People wrote back that I got the names wrong.

I was quoting Wagner.

I was quoting a romantic who got the whole thing wrong. No, Wagner did not know the proper names.

None of which is the point. I am too old to nitpick. I am not speaking from Authority as an Odinist theologian. I am saying that romantic Odinists are silly. I am saying that the real thought of the old German religion is fundamental to the entire basis of our going to the stars.

A good way not to get what I am talking about is to show off your knowledge of details.

CHEAP FORGIVENESS IS FATAL | 2007-10-22

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am very familiar with the fact that people simply WILL NOT change tactics.

In 1870 the French Army was bigger than the Prussian one. The Prussians moved fast, outflanked the French, and won.

In 1914 the available French Army was bigger than the German one, which had a two-front war. The Germans moved faster, outflanked the French, and the rest of the war was fought deep in French territory.

In 1940 the French depended on the immobile Maginot Line and the French Army was comparable in size to the Wehrmacht. The Germans used the Blitzkrieg, a brand new thing where they moved faster and outflanked the French.

Unless we get fanatical about real contrition, anti-PC forces are beginning exactly the same repeats.

Conservatives were desperate for respectability. So when the Neos, who had exploited liberalism at its high tide, deigned to take their titles and publications over to the anti-liberal side, conservatives welcomed them in as heroes. That was the end of conservatism.

Conservatives welcomed neos in the tradition of the Confessions of Saint Augustine and today's evangelical ministers. Preachers always tell us what terrible sinners they were before they Found the Lord. Most, being psychopaths, probably WERE horrible people, but it wasn't the sex and alcohol they moan about that made them that way. Most of them are worse today they were then.

So neos came in BRAGGING about what bit liberals they used to be. But there is a crucial difference. Liberals are PROUD of it. They look upon their years as liberals as pure righteousness. Now professional conservatism does too.

Look at the French example above and ask yourself, HOW MANY TIMES are we going to make this mistake?

I am interested in people conversion stories, but I am not ABOUT to excuse them. When someone writes about what a neutral he was or enemy he REALLY was to his own race, I want to hear some self-criticism, some denunciation, not a "Oh, well, it was just a phase" crap.

I LIVED through those "phases" you son of a bitch, I SUFFERED through them as you betrayed us. Forgiveness depends on true contrition. If you regard it as "just a normal phase," then you are as bas as you were.

Conservatives ignored the PRACTICAL lesson that history's most successful religion could teach them. When you are dealing with an institution that has been wildly successful in the real world like Christianity, you have to pay attention to its lessons. One of them is the insistence o contrition.

TOTAL contrition, as in St. Augustine.

We saw what happened to conservatism when it forgot about contrition.

Forgiveness must be EARNED. Cheap forgiveness is fatal.

_____________________________

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE CoUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

" It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries."

"The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them."

"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites."

"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"

"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?"

"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"

"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."

THIS SEMINAR IS STARTING TO COOK! | 2006-04-30

Let me repeat: In order to get what you need out of this Blog, you have to READ THE COMMENTS.

Crosstalk is now developing, but it is the kind of crosstalk intelligent people with common sense know how to engage in.

That sounds easy, doesn't it?

It's not.

It's simple but it is NOT easy.

Our experienced commenters disagree with me and with each other. But they express what they have to say clearly.

I have not gone against those who disagree with me most of the time because what they give me is a POINT.

It would be pitiful if a man got to be my age and didn't know that he COULD be just plain WRONG.

Thee is only one kind of disagreement I hate, and that is the standard crap some anti learned from Mommy Professor.

For some odd reason the people who stick with this Blog never talk like Mommy Professor.

My commenters give me the freedom I have begged for. If I miss something, they fill it in. If there is a point to go ahead from, they go ahead with it.

I make brave, flat statements. The reason they are brave is because I risk making a fool of myself.

If I do, my commenters point it out.

If we keep this up we are going to develop a well-rounded seminar.

We will be unique. In grad school a real seminar is a thing of the past. We may be reawakening the dead here.

But the bottom line is that you cannot get the lessons of Bob's Seminar unless you read the COMMENTS.

THE LEFT-RIGHT CODE | 2006-05-08

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Left-right is the establishment's code for the race war that is growing.

Todays' Republicans are the EXACT equivalent of the Whig Party that died in the 1850s.

It would not face the issue of the EXPANSION -- NOT the existence -- of slavery. The Republican Party completely replaced it almost overnight.

If you read the Republican platform, they bent over backwards insisting that the salve states had a right to their slaves. But, unlike the Whigs, they stood absoltely against the admission of any more slave states.

The Republican Party was formed in 1854 and it controlled the House of Representatives in 1855.

Let's bring this up to date.

Democrats are dead right. At this moment the Republicans have a solidly white consituency and it gets whiter are every election.

Even as the white proportion of the electorate has shrunk, Republcians have gonef rom a minority to a majority.

Anyone who reads he history of hte 1850s will wonder what the Whigs were DOING.

Anyone reading the history of our time will wonder waht the Republicans were DOING.

The only group that took up the real issue before 1854 was the tiny Free Soil Party. It split from the tiny Liberty Party dedicated to abolition. The biggest weapon against the Free Soil Party was the word "Abolitionist!" just as the same effect is obtained today by calling us "Racist!"

We help out by ACTING like a tiny minority, aiming at a tiny split-off from the melting pot. We call that white nationalism.

But this does nothing about the threat more and more people every day see against our entire race.

We must insist on the right of our whole race to EXIST.

We must take the leadership in something that is in everyone's minds, just as stopping the EXTENSION of slavery was in everybody's mind in the 1850s. We must get off the defensive.

Every day the feeling that every white country is being overrun is growing.

Bakc in the 1850s this obvious winning position as stopped by screams of Abolitionism. Today the obvious winning position is stopped by cries of "Racism."

The group that takes a solid and defiant position onthe REAL issue, and on nothing else, is poised to win.

In 1852 there was no free soil major party. By 1855 it organized the House.

The difference was that someone finally took the stand, AND TOOK IT CLEARLY.

The next civil war will began just as the last one did. A party will make a reasonable stand and those who cannot bear it will secede. THEY will turn it from a reasonable political straategy intoa revolution.

The rioting minorities will turn OUR reasonable stance into a revolution.

But first we have to make a stand.