THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

TO END TERRORISM, LET PERMIT HOLDERS CARRY GUNS ON PLANES | 2006-03-14

Every time I take off my belt at airport security, I keep thinking that the terrorists should send the security personnel a letter of thanks. If they didn't do that, the terrorists would like to.

What all that airport security guarantees is that if a terrorist wants to take over a plane, everyone on board is absolutely helpless against him.

The hundreds of thousands of people who have held concealed weapons permits for over a decade now have a MUCH better record with their guns than ANY police agency does. If you ever saw one permit holder do something stupid with his gun it would be on the front page coast-to-coast.

How many times have you seen or seen it reported the POLICE used their guns recklessly?

Why is this true?

Police work often destroys the nerves. A permit holder is not subject to the constant pressure a policeman is.

Ask any police psychiatrist whether every policeman he knows is fit to be armed twenty-four hours of every day.

They are all REQUIRED to be so armed. Look at THAT before you panic over "Letting citizens carry guns."

If terrorists are enough of a threat to make strip-searching grandmothers and all the rest necessary, the simple fact is that permit holders are demonstrably FAR less dangerous than that.

And even the possibility of ONE permit holder with a gun would destroy all the plans a terrorist can make.

BASICS: BRIBERY STEALS THE HEART | nationalsalvation.net

What is so sobering, is that it's bribery that steals the heart, not religion.

Comment by Shari

BW:

Building on Shari's statement above, I thought about the faith that drives US.

Shari said, "What is so sobering, is that it's bribery that steals the heart, not religion."

Ours is not a religion, but it is a faith.

All truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident. - Arthur Schopenhauer, philosopher, 1788-1860

Ours is not a faith in things in things unseen, but of seeing things others do not see.

When Shari and Simmons hammer away at the Chronicles of Culture, their faith is tested in a way people do not understand.

They hammer away at the simple truth and get what history shows us all prophets face: They get ridiculed and ignored. That is the first stage of every revolution. Everyone who reads history can see this in retrospect, but no one can see it when it is happening.

All we say here interrelates.

I have repeatedly pointed out that Jesus never said "Praise God."

Groups like the PTL (Praise the Lord) Club always go the way of the original Pilgrim Church in Massachusetts: They end up Unitarian (or in Israel worship), because they are going back to the essentially pagan God of the Old Testament. Like JHWH, that deity needed constant attention and praise.

Christ preached a Father for whom the simple Lord's Prayer was enough. That is a different concept entirely. You asked for what you needed from the Father and then you went out and PLANTED SEEDS.

Jesus told his followers to plant the seeds and some of them will grow.

They grew.

As Shari says, the rest is just bribes.

A lot of Russian dissidents said, after the USSR fell, that they were actually happier in a society where their samizdats, their illegal publications, got them jailed instead of living in a society where their opinions are ignored in the avalanche of different ideas. Being taken seriously by those in power is a reward, a BRIBE, no matter how much it may seem like a punishment.

Respectable conservatives were so happy at being agreed with by liberals who Were Somebody, Neoconservatives, that they threw their whole movement away to bask in approval.

When you get tired of hammering away at the Mantra and say something about Obama or Ron Paul, you get hit with fury and arguments. That is a relief after the ridicule and silence.

That is a BRIBE.

But you simply cannot compare the importance of the Mantra and the thinking that goes with it to one more comment about Ron Paul or Obama.

Old Testament fanatics always demand that the world end or Creationism to be proven.

NOW.

I am sure that, two thousand years ago, a lot of listeners were disappointed when Christ said that they should plant the seeds and some of them would grow.

EVENTUALLY.

And when Jesus died reviled on the cross and even Peter denied him three times, they were sure that their point was proven. Those were the respectable conservatives of their day.

TIM | 2006-06-09

Tim asked specifically for feedback on this one, so I'll start with it. Believe me, Tim old buddy, I know what it feels like to ask for comment and get comments on everything but.

As Elizabeth said, it is the height of frustration to deal with people who don't LISTEN.

Tim says:

Not Spam.

"Joe, with all gratitude, please try to remember that I did not CHOOSE to be born in an age of intellectual midgets."

BW please. We all know you should have been born in Antiquity. You could be busy talking with Solon about the Origins of the White Race.

By the way, I read this impressive article about human life coming from another planet. They talked about all the histories of our origins being the same no matter where you went in the world. White Gods gave them Civilization. The point was it could NOT all be random that all these differant tribes around the world say the same thing without ever being around each other.

The most more fascinating part came from the Sumerian legends about the Gods who desended from Heaven on a Golden rope and then created man. These Gods then fought for control of Earth!! Of course, I do NOT have to tell you what color these Gods were. The fact that they were fighting for control of the earth says it all.

Someone else please chime in on this. But last I read, White origins are still a mystery. The last big report I read said Separation and Natural Selection alone did not create White people. Maybe we are from another planet??? Gawd I hope it's true. It explains BW!! The fact that they are not contacting us as of yet—tells me they know about the Jews down here.

Comment by Tim

My fund of informati0n on this is huge, and one can start anywhere.

It occurred that when I was in grammar school up to 1952, we were taught an Indian leggend in two different grades. It was the Indian story of how they first got corn. The Corn God who owned corn was the color of corn.

An Indian hero fought him for it and killed him. I wonder if anybody under the of 60 has ever heard of this legend that used to be repeated constantly as a story from Indian sources.

Corn was selectively bred from the inch-long cobs you sometimes see in Chinese food. It took a long time to travel north to Indians in today's United States. It is easy to tell when it got there because they began to get dental problems from the sweet corn.

The plant they used in the Midwest before corn made a disgusting meal compared to corn, but it was healthier for the teeth. Teeth survive, so this is easy to trace.

I have pointed out repeatedly that the complex business of breeding aquatic rice from the dry land rice that is natural was done entirel in white India, not China.

Corn was developed in the same part of the Indian world that thought the blong Cortez was the return of their blond AND BEARDED god who came from the east. Lew Wallace, who wrote Ben Hur, also wrote another book about Cortez called The Fair God. Like the Indian corn legend, that one has fallen into the Memory Hole.

What impresses me is that Indians did NOT have beards, but their Fair God not only was blond, the color of form, but he had a heavy BEARD, which takes the thing beyond coincidence.

Thor Heyerdahl's 1950 (?)book Kon Tiki described his expedition as an attempt to prove that the red-headed god Kon Tiki was depicted much the same in the South America as the statues in South America. All of the statues Easter Island is famous for had red blocks on their heads.

Kon Tiki is one of the best reads you will ever pick up. You OUGHT to get a copy at a university or through Amazon, etc. One you start reading it you simply won't stop reading.

It would still be standard reading today is the cry "anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews!" hadn't made it verboten, like The Fair God.

Nobody disputes the FACTS in either book, though Heyerdahl, I understand, made a ritual apology.

I have a LOT more to say about this, for example, the Black Sea idea of the point of Aryan origin, which I'll get to later.

Right now I am responding to your specific request for feedback.

A FUTURE OF SMALLNESS: THE SPECIAL POTENTIAL | 2006-05-07

Most of the Great Inevitables on which Political Correctness is based require a future based on bigness.

They took over the electronic media and its three networks. They took over publishing. They took over the University Industry, the largest monopoly in human history.

The guerrilla war of the internet caught them completely unprepared in their world of unquestioned Giant Inevitabilities.

Even satellites allowed a diversity that upset them terribly.

One decade a few Jews in New York controlled every means of communication and were making their control ever tighter. Then people found whole new methods of reaching each other.

Communications satellites took the place of the moon program. The moon program had been a planned national effort of the sort that the Inevitable Future required. But in a decade or two it was replaced by smaller and smaller programs of shooting satellites into space as technology got better.

It is true that 3-D movies failed. But things are no longer done on the scale they had to be done when 3-D came in. Back then you needed a fundamenteal change inthe whole movie industry for 3-D to succeed.

More and more, as things like improved satellite technology and the internet divide things up, the Great Big Planned World of Political Correctness is falling apart.

So there is room for the developement of Virtual Reality when the time comes and for SOME people to make a go of it. It will not require a National Effort.

And some will choose to live there, and some will not. If it is good, more people will choose to live there.

We no longer have to decide beteween One Great Big Planned Multiculture and Anarchy.

Which leads us to a fundamental point. We have had it driven deeply into our psyche that there will be a SINGLE World of the Future.

Meanwhile the real world is advancing in the exact opposite direction.

And we are still debating the Old Giant Inevitability.

The debate is, in other words, entirely in the wrong world.