THE "CENTRAL PARK JOGGER" CASE IN PLAIN ENGLISH | 2003-08-09
Blacks are rioting because of the horrible injustice of the Central Park jogger case. It turns out that the white jogger was raped and tortured and disfigured in Central Park by a black repeat torturer and rapist who was on the streets again.
The black kids who were convicted of raping and torturing her were innocent of the rape. Instead they were out doing what they do every night, "terrorizing"-- beating and robbing -- white people in Central Park. The black community is outraged at this false conviction, and all decent white people are apologizing desperately.
The Central Park jogger herself was a New York Yuppie, just the sort of person who would fight to get a torturer-rapist released from prison and to allow black kids to be back out beating whites.
BASICS: ENEMIES DO NOT CREATE YOUR WEAKNESSES, THEY EXPLOIT THEM | nationalsalvation.net
No one can find a single word in the Old Testament that even vaguely advocates the chastity that early Christians were so fanatical about. So they just don't THINK about it. No "Christian" thinks about it because he would have to think about the ORIGIN, the REAL origin, of his faith.
But he is REQUIRED to look for every bit of the origin of Christianity in the Old Testament.
If it's not there, he stops looking for it.
For two thousand years, the absence of this anti-sexual obsession SHOULD have stood out like a sore thumb. It took a heritage of rigid thought control to avoid it.
This is also where our concept of Jews as Supermen comes from.
Here we are, a perfect white Christian society with Traditional Values, and along comes somebody, Satan or the Jews or both, to CAUSE every single weakness and absurdity we carry with us. They did not just take advantage of some obvious weaknesses in our mentality. We were perfect, so they had to CREATE all what was wrong.
This is childish. Enemies do not create your weaknesses. They exploit them. It is up to you to REALIZE what your weaknesses are, even if doing so is HERESY to the Perfect People crowd.
In 1870 France had a bigger army than that of Prussia, but the Prussians won because they moved faster and from unexpected directions.
In 1914 France had a larger available army than Germany, which was fighting on two fronts. But the Germans moved faster and from unexpected directions so the entire war was fought deep inside France. In 1940 France had forces the size of the Wehrmacht, but the Germans moved faster and in unexpected directions and took France again.
I am sure the French General Staff waved their fists at the Germans and talked about how MEAN the Devil Huns were. Because they see Germans as the Devil, the next war would be exactly the same.
In 1775 at Breed's Hill, the British were slaughtered because they marched in formation European-style while the Americans hunkered down and shot them to pieces. Two wars and almost exactly forty years later, the British were slaughtered at New Orleans because they marched in formation European-style while the Americans hunkered down and shot them to pieces.
British generals told each other that Americans were just DEVILS.
The obsession with chastity came from an old, degenerate version of the Aryan religion called Zoroastrianism, then in its death throes. The idea that it is holy for us to not have children lives on in today's environmentalism and was instrumental in our Zero Population Growth movement.
Today having children is denounced by NOW as evil. All that matters is that the couple is in a State of Love when copulation occurs. The idea that destroying one's own race is the holiest of missions certainly did not come from Jews. They exploited what was already in our culture.
The Jews did not CREATE this mental illness. They EXPLOITED it.
To Zoroastrians the God of THIS World, Ahriman, was evil, the God of the Next, Ahura Mazda, was good. As Zoroastrianism degenerated, all thoughts of continuing the people pf THIS world became evil.
Or we can keep searching in the Old Testament for some hint that sterility is holy.
And worship Jews as Evil Gods.
Be sure there's someone around to drive you home from Kindergarten.
SHOOT THEM OR SHUT UP | 2003-04-05
The most famous quote from President Ronald Reagan is, "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!"
While Reagan's Berlin Wall speech was being finalized, Reagan's staff removed that line from the speech THREE TIMES! It was blunt and unsophisticated and everybody but Reagan agreed that an American President shouldn't say a thing like that.
On Capitol Hill I worked for John Ashbrook, a conservative Republican from Ohio. John Ashbrook was a pain in the hinder parts to moderate Republicans. He was such a pain to moderates that Republican Ohio legislatures redistricted him three times trying to get rid of him.
But John Ashbrook kept winning even as his district became more and more Democratic. The reason Ashbrook kept winning even in districts designed to defeat him was because, like Ronald Reagan and Harry Truman at their best, he spoke plain English.
Right after a hurricane in Florida, Ashbrook demanded that looters be shot on sight. The local liberal newspaper went ballistic. It said that shooting looters was evil and primitive and out of date. Then they took a poll of their readers, mostly liberals. Eighty-three percent of their own readers agreed with John Ashbrook.
Shooting looters is the routine thing people have always done. It is not out of date. It is the only way to retain civilization in an emergency.
Shooting soldiers who are caught out of uniform is routine.
Using human shields gets you shot the same way.
If the Iraqis are killing American soldiers by such tactics, we should shoot any Iraqi soldiers caught out of uniform or using human shields and we should let the world know we are doing it. Do it or shut up about how they are being bad boys.
Do it like a war and you won't make any enemies you don't already have. You might even get some respect for it.
Or do it like a game. But don't play a game and call it war.
PARTIES: TAKING A CLEAR-CUT STAND | nationalsalvation.net
Left right is the establishment's code for the race war that is growing.
Today's' Republicans are the EXACT equivalent of the Whig Party that died in the 1850s.
It would not face the issue of the EXPANSION - NOT the existence - of slavery. The Republican Party completely replaced it almost overnight.
If you read the Republican platform, they bent over backwards insisting that the slave states had a right to their slaves. But, unlike the Whigs, they stood absolutely against the admission of any more slave states.
The Republican Party was formed in 1854 and it controlled the House of Representatives in 1855.
Let's bring this up to date.
Democrats are dead right. At this moment the Republicans have a solidly white constituency and it gets whiter at every election. Even as the white proportion of the electorate has shrunk, Republicans have gone from a minority to a majority.
Anyone who reads the history of the 1850s will wonder what the Whigs were DOING.
Anyone reading the history of our time will wonder what the Republicans were DOING.
The only group that took up the real issue before 1854 was the tiny Free Soil Party. It split from the tiny Liberty Party dedicated to abolition. The biggest weapon against the Free Soil Party was the word "Abolitionist!" just as the same effect is obtained today by calling us "Racist!"
We help out by ACTING like a tiny minority, aiming at a tiny split-off from the melting pot. We call that white nationalism. But this does nothing about the threat more and more people every day see against our entire race.
We must insist on the right of our whole race to EXIST.
We must take the leadership in something that is in everyone's minds, just as stopping the EXTENSION of slavery was in everybody's mind in the 1850s. We must get off the defensive.
Every day the feeling that every white country is being overrun is growing.
Back in the 1850s this obvious winning position was stopped by screams of Abolitionism.
Today the obvious winning position is stopped by cries of "Racism."
The group that takes a solid and defiant position on the REAL issue, and on nothing else, is poised to win.
In 1852 there was no free soil major party. By 1855 it organized the House.
The difference was that someone finally took the stand, AND TOOK IT CLEARLY.
The next civil war will began just as the last one did. A party will make a reasonable stand and those who cannot bear it will secede. THEY will turn it from a reasonable political strategy into a revolution.
The rioting minorities will turn OUR reasonable stance into a revolution. But first we have to make a stand.