THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

THE MONKEY GRIP | 1999-07-10

You have probably noticed that television and movies now show people holding pistols sideways. They hold the gun in the same way a monkey would grab one.

Look at all the tapes of live action shooting that have ever been taken. You will never see one single person using this monkey grip on a real gun in a real fighting situation.

In the movies, everybody who has a pistol is an expert. According to television, anyone can hit his target if it's close. Anyone can therefore afford to hold his gun sideways in a fighting situation. Actually, no matter how often you have done it, you can miss anything in a fighting situation.

That is why, in the real world, a professional will use a two-handed grip on his pistol.

That is why, in the real world, nobody uses the monkey grip.

IQ TELLS US LITTLE ABOUT DIFFERENCES IN RACIAL HISTORY | 2001-11-24

Japan recently went right up to the economic level reached in the West, and Japan is now stagnating.

Throughout history, Mongoloids have reached a certain level and then stagnated. Japan did it quicker because history moves faster today.

I discussed this point on July 7, 2001 -- THE WHEEL IS NOT A PRIMITIVE INVENTION. My opinion is that without the white race, humanity will stagnate and fall back.

White empires only go down when they turn brown.

Leftists, who never get anything right, assure us all this is naïve, unsophisticated and everything else they say about things that turn out later to be right. They demand that respectable conservatives agree with them or they will not be respectable.

Respectable conservatives agree with liberals on this, as they do on everything liberals insist on.

IQ-obsessed people whom liberals call racists also agree with this. They say that Mongoloids have high IQs so you don't need whites.

I don't agree because that is not the way the world looks to me. In the end, everybody bases his worldview on how things look to him no matter how much time he spends marshaling his facts to prove it.

BASICS: TREASON IS SO-CALLED "LOYALTY" | nationalsalvation.net

In the Partisan Dictionary I wrote regularly for the Southern Partisan over twenty years ago I defined, sort of, the melting pot:

Melting pot - n., by definition, a melting pot is nothing specific. Anyone who can be deeply loyal to nothing specific is desperate need of psychiatric care.

Lenin kicked one of his female admirers out of his luxury home in Switzerland in 1914 when she said she understood Russians who felt patriotism with the beginning of the War. Lenin declared that patriotism had no place, no place whatsoever, in Communism.

Lenin carried this principle to an extreme no one else would have imagined. When JEWS showed up at the International saying that all nationalism was evil, and then insisted, of course, on sitting as a bloc, Lenin did not even let THEM do it! This is fanaticism no one today would understand.

In 1941 when Germany invaded Russia, Communists declared the struggle against Germany The Great Patriotic War. Most Russian refugees who came back to fight fought on this Patriotic side. The very name of the War shows that Russians, at home or abroad, would not have fought that hard for Communism, but only for Mother Russia.

But Soviet Russia was not Russia, and those who fought for it got what they deserved. As soon as the war ended, Russians who had come back to fight for the USSR were rounded up and sent to the Gulag.

These refugees assumed that the takeover by aliens had to be by force. So they saw the Germans, and only the Germans, as alien occupiers, just as Churchill saw only Germany as an invader of Poland. Fighting for ANY alien occupation is treason. Mommy Professor is as much of an alien occupier as Arab terrorists.

We have this same problem with most of those who are presently engaged in genocide against the white race. They think that as long as you can't smell gas ovens going, it isn't genocide. But just as an alien occupier doesn't have to do it by force, genocide does not require killing. You can get rid of a people, which is what genocide is, in many ways.

It is still genocide.

By the same token, any loyalty you have, any whatsoever, to the present occupation, is treason. I have no loyalty whatever to a nation of immigrants. I have no loyalty whatsoever to the institutions which use the name of Christ.

My family was in the Methodist Church since Wesley. We didn't leave it. It left us. We were all Democrats in the Solid South until the Democrats left us. Those who went with the aliens must be made to answer for it.

When the very existences of people who look like us in jeopardy, there is no room for loyalty to any other cause. Man is a visual animal, white people most of all, and you can SEE what is being done. As Dave says, it is so obvious that we have to be brainwashed not to notice it. So there is no room for any other cause. Every institution is hostile to our race's existence. Any loyalty to them, a dime in a collection plate, is treason.

Treason today is mostly an indifference to what is being done. If you help any institution that joins in that indifference, evangelical or Catholic, that is treason. If you join a movement just to maintain the borders of a melting pot, that is treason.

We can go back to bitching about theocrats and "patriotism" when OUR Great Patriotic War is over.

COMPROMISING WITH INSANITY IS INSANITY | 2003-05-03

Conservatives and sometimes liberals like to say that America's foreign policy should be dictated by America's national interests. But the first thing you notice is that America is the only country in the world that pays little or no attention to its own self-interest.

South Korea hates our guts. The only time we get any response from South Korea is when we threaten to pull our 35,000 troops out. We get nothing out of keeping our troops there. In fact, as long as those troops are there South Korea, Japan and China will look on North Korea as our problem.

Our interest dictates that we make South Korea and Japan pay plenty for our troops being there or we pull them out.

Making them pay to keep us there would be a better strategy, too. Japan, South Korea and China can have an effect on North Korea, but they don't bother. American troops are in South Korea, so it's our problem. That could be fatal attitude.

So why, in the name of sanity, would a rational country never even seriously consider pulling out troops out?

Well, the problem here is that liberals would pull all troops out of everywhere when they threaten Communist countries like North Korea. Meanwhile, however much they mouth the words "national self-interest", respectable conservatives have to compromise with liberals to stay respectable. So Bush ends up begging the liberals to LET us keep troops in South Korea South Korea sees how to blackmail us, so Bush ends up begging them to please let us keep our troops there because they know we are desperate.

National self-interest would the best possible policy for a person who was genuinely interest in our self-interest. But we cannot consider that because we must compromise with liberals.

In other words our foreign policy represents a compromise between American self-interest and a compromise with liberals who hate America. They really do, though no respectable conservative would say "liberals hate America." Conservatives say that liberals "Blame America first." If someone said "Blame Jews first", don't you think conservatives would say they were anti-Semitic?

But to be a respectable conservative you have to insist that liberals are patriotic.

Meanwhile, back on earth, liberals are anti-American and anti-white..

So we have a compromise between those who hate us and those who claim to be in favor of our national self-interest, as any rational country is. So we get a sick foreign policy.

This is what is called compromise. This is what is called listening to both sides. This is what is considered moderate and adult.

Meanwhile back in the real world giving liberals half of the national dialogue is exactly like negotiating with terrorists.