THANK GOD FOR PHIL! | 2002-10-19

Liberals want everybody to forget everything that liberals used to predict. They used to say that socialism was inevitable and efficient. Now not only do they not say that, their respectable conservative helpers forget they ever said that. They used to say that genetics had no effect on human action. With DNA and gene-tracking, respectable conservatives must forget liberals ever said that.

Pretty well everything that every Liberal Intellectual used to shout loudly is forgotten. So that CNN attempt to "news hook" the sniper for gun control was a reminder that no respectable conservative is going to mention.

In fact, Phil Donahue is the only regular reminder we have of at least a part of what the liberal faith used to be when there was no one to laugh at it. With Arab terrorists killing thousands, Donahue's only concern is that Arabs may be profiled. Even blacks, the liberals' most slavish supporters, favor profiling Arabs more than whites do.

Chris Matthews, who is on MSNBC just before Phil Donahue, is openly complaining that Phil could destroy his program. Old Phil is singing the old song and wagging his head in that way that always used to convince the housewives, but he is trying to sell that crap to an intellectually mature audience that was raised with all of Donahue's favorite social policies in action.

I hate Phil Donahue, but he is a great counterbalance to the pro-liberal efforts of respectable conservatives. He still truly believes that if you are nice to criminals they will be nice, too. He truly believes that bureaucrats and college professors are the only people who know how to run the economy and the only people not driven by guilt. He maintains his faith that, despite its disastrous failure in the past, educational experimentation will be a big success in the future.

As long as respectable conservatives rule the opposition, the only reminders we have of the old "Truly Intellectual" knee-jerk left are those who will never learn,like CNN and Phil.

JUSTICE IS ***NOT*** FOR SALE | 2000-08-26

Watching rich people get away with things while the poor are executed, the media like to say that, in America, "Justice is for sale." It is very important to understand why this is not true, and what that means.

What is for sale in America is ACQUITTALS, not JUSTICE.

If you spend lots of money on lawyers, as OJ Simpson did, you can get acquitted. But acquittals are not justice.

When the media say that JUSTICE is for sale, they are saying that, if we spent more money on judges and lawyers, we would have more justice.

Meanwhile, back in the real world, you could spend the entire national income of this country on lawyers and judges and have no more JUSTICE. Lawyers learn all those technical legal points and the latest Opinions of courts, but there is not the slightest bit of evidence that all that rigmarole provides any more justice than a simpler procedure would. All the stuff that lawyers learn has nothing to do with justice, and nobody claims that it does.

More lawyers mean more acquittals, not more justice. There is no evidence whatsoever that any of those procedures or legal papers or motions or Opinions provide the slightest bit of JUSTICE.

The bottom line is

1) We don't demand justice, therefore

2) We don't get any.


Everybody talks about how minorities vote for the left, but one thing nobody ever mentions is that whites are moving to the right.

Everyone knows that the minority vote is increasing by leaps and bounds and that it is solidly liberal. But Republicans have a higher percentage of the vote ACROSS THE BOARD than they have had since 1930. Where did all those votes come from?

Obviously, the WHITE move to Republicanism is enormous, or Republicans would be back to the permanent minority they were from 1960-1980, when moderates ruled the Party and they were "appealing to minorities."

In Maryland, the first Republican Governor since the 1960s was elected. He was elected because WHITE women voted 56% Republican for the first time in living memory in that state. Even more devastating for the usual theories, they rejected a female Democrat. Worst of all, they rejected Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, a woman who was kin to St. John of Kennedy Himself!

As only WhitakerOnline.ORG ever points out, politics will be an entirely different thing as whites come to REALIZE that they are a threatened minority. That is what is happening now. The liberal media is still in lockdown control of all OPEN discussion. Respectable conservatives are in lockdown control of all conservative discussion. So nobody but WhitakerOnline.ORG will ever mention this.

But the trend is there or there would be no Republican Party by now.

We need and we can get the white vote, so naturally all respectable conservatives want Republicans to be for open borders and integration and ignore whites.

That would get rid of the support we have. Republicans now have a solid majority of WHITE union votes. If we had stuck with the old moderate-respectable conservative line, we would have stopped complaining about things like busing, fought to keep the budget balanced, and the white union vote would have stayed where it was.

So we need to do exactly what liberals accuse us of doing. We must be "appealing only to the white vote." Horrors!

Liberals say that is appealing to fear.

They're right. White people are learning to fear LIBERALS. They have every reason to.


The one big difference between my view of our opposition and that of the Leaders is that I regard our opponents as muddled morons. That is certainly the view of them our opponents want LEAST.

Respectable conservatives are actually chosen as the official opposition because they regard the established powers as Geniuses. They don't even call them Evil Geniuses, as the far right does. Respectable conservatives look up to leftists.

As National Review founding Publisher William Rusher said, "People on National Review do not believe anything unless it is in the New York Times."

Remember that respectable conservatives are the ones the left feels comfortable with. That term respectable is handed out like the New York Times Best Seller List, which is published before the sales statistics are complete or even begun. Respectability means one keeps within bounds that are comfortable to those who control the media.

This is not necessarily a conscious choice, much less a Conspiracy. It is based on what makes the voice of the establishment COMFORTABLE. That is strictly a judgment call, and least of all is it a Secret List agreed at midnight between Conspiracy Members.

Who would a liberal rather debate, Sean Hannity or Bob Whitaker? I would make it clear that he is out of date, a part of the herd. And not smart enough to challenge anything basic. Hannity would call them well-meaning, almost get into tears about their vast intellect, and say he would agree with them except that he Hears the Voice of God.

That is how you get paid the big bucks. You show the establishment that you make it look good to the yokels. It's much like a magic act, where two different groups see two different things.

You make the yokels think you are exposing leftist error, but you make the leftists look good, too.

The reason there is so much competition for respectable status is because it PAYS. Respectability is worth big money.

But like all markets, it is subject to supply and demand.

I pointed out in another article that Senator Hollings let it all out about the Israeli Lobby owning Capitol Hill in his last major speech because he had sacrificed many years in the Senate by being a Southern turncoat , but for decades he had not even gotten mentioned for a Vice Presidential nomination in return.

Hollings' problem was that the establishment has more Southern turncoats than it knows what to do with, and every day another thousand show up expecting to be rewarded for it.

From the moderate Republicans to the Tea Party, the competition for respectable status is vicious. Nobody tries harder than respectable conservatives to thwart grassroots upstarts, and there is no way a pro-white word will ever be spoken at a Tea Party rally, because those seeking respectability would turn them in faster than a Soviet informer.