THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

PASTORS AND MASTERS | nationalsalvation.net

An education that teaches us not how but what to think is an education that calls for a governing class of pastors and masters. But the very idea of leading somebody is anti-social and anti-spiritual. To the man who exercises it, leadership brings gratification of the craving for power. To those who are led, it brings the gratification of the desire for certainty and security.

But, surely, it is not the voice of reality. For the voice of reality must come to you. It cannot be appealed to, you cannot pray to it. You cannot entice it into your little cage by placating it, by suppressing yourself or emulating others. That which you ask for you get. But it is not the truth. If you want, and if you petition, you will receive, but you will pay for it in the end.

Aldous Huxley

Observing and Then Explaining

No one can see the real world if he has to instantly explain what he observes. Science is based on observing and them explaining. Wordism insists that all things be explained within the "Great Book" before it can be observed.

Robert Whitaker

Science

Most men only care for science so far as they get a living by it, but they will worship error when it affords them a subsistence.

Johann Goethe

Orthodoxy

Donít you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? Has it ever occurred to you, Winston, that by the year 2050, at the very latest, not a single human being will be alive who could understand such a conversation as we are having now?

The whole climate of thought will be different. In fact, there will be no thought, as we understand it now. Orthodoxy means not thinking ó not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness.

Syme in George Orwellís 1984

Complexity

Complexity blurs the obvious.

Alan B

Argument

Refutation is no necessay part of argument.

Ezekiel Bulver

FAITHFUL COLORED COMPANIONS | 2004-07-31

Every year the Democratic Party spends millions to get out the black vote. They assume that one black skin equals one Democratic vote.

Blacks will sometimes give a heavy vote to a Republican when the Republican gets 70% of the rest of the vote. They joined the Eisenhower landslides in 1952 and 1956 and they joined in the last Bush landslide for governor of Texas. That's what makes Republican strategists throw away real votes to "appeal to the black vote."

But when blacks join in the landslide, it doesn't matter. The election would have been won without them.

Blacks never vote Republican when it counts. In every real electoral contest, a black skin means a Democratic vote.

**WHY** SO MANY RIGHT WINGERS GO NUTS | 1999-07-24

One of the continuing themes of Whitaker Online is that leftism is SILLY. I keep pointing out that leftism never WORKS. I keep saying that we must never, never allow leftists to scare us with labels like "racist" and "anaziwhowantstokillsixmillion Jews." Unless a right winger learns these facts, he is going to go nuts, as so many right wingers do.

The reason right wingers all seem to go nuts is because they enter into the liberals' world of delusion.

It is generally recognized that psychiatrists tend to be a bit nutty. One of the reasons for this is that people with mental problems tend to study mental problems. But there is another reason so many mental health workers tend to be a bit batty themselves. It is a problem they are continually warned against in training: Do not enter into your patients' delusions with them.

But this advice is hard to act on. After all, you are talking to mental patients all the time. You are trying to communicate with them and understand them all the time, so it is very, very hard not to absorb some of their thinking. You have to tell yourself, day after day, that these people are not making sense, though they can often be very convincing.

Which brings us right back to dealing with the political left. You MUST remind yourself over and over and over, daily, that these people are SILLY. You must remind yourself over and over and over that what they say really never WORKS in the real world. If you don't, you are going to enter into their delusions with them.

You can tell when a right winger is about to go over the edge when he gets that goofy look in his eye that says, "I am going to be SHREWD today." I remember running into it some years back at the office of the Southern Partisan magazine.

I remember seeing that goofy look come across the face of an official at the Southern Partisan magazine. "We Have Decided," He announced in capital letters, "What To Do About The Flag Issue."

"Oh, God, "I thought, "This is really going to be hopeless."

It was.

Liberals were objecting to the flag over the state capitol. Liberals pointed out that the Klan used that flag a lot. So the Southern Partisan was going to completely take them by surprise with a SHREWD move: The Southern Partisan was going to switch its support from the DIAGONAL flag over the state capitol to a SQUARE flag.

This time the Shrewd Bit was to switch to asking for a SQUARE Confederate flag on the dome. The Klan used the DIAGONAL flag.

Let me tell you why this was supposed to be SHREWD.

During the Civil War, the battle flags were almost all square.

Like every other flag living people fly in this century, OUR Confederate flag is rectangular. It is the flag of living Southerners. But the Partisan wanted to apologize for the fact that the Klan used that flag. They would do that by really surprising the liberals -- the leftists were going to be so SHOCKED and so IMPRESSED! - - by using the SQUARE flag!

Like all right wing ideas that are supposed to be SHREWD, this was so silly it was hard to know where to start pointing out how ridiculous it was.

In the first place, absolutely nobody was going to notice that the flag the Partisan was pushing was square except those of us who knew it was an apology. In the second place, absolutely nobody who is against the Confederate flag cares whether that flag is square or diagonal or round or shaped like a puppy dog.

Real national flags today are ALL diagonal. If you want a flag for living people, it must be diagonal.

I would also point out that the flag over the state capitol is also made of materials that did not exist in 1865. You could really astonish, terrify, and destroy the liberals by demanding that we only support a flag that is square AND one hundred percent cotton!

Boy, that would really make the anti-flag forces collapse into confusion, wouldn't it?

Why should people take somebody who pushes this kind of nonsense seriously?

But in the end, the point here has nothing to do with the flag. The point is that this was another case of right wingers going over the edge. They were taking liberals seriously. They were acting like the objection to the flag had something to do with reality.

They entered into the leftist delusion.

Another common characteristic of rightists going over the edge is the constant tendency of all right wing movements to turn into God R Us Stores.

Leftists keep claiming they represent Truth and Mercy and Goodness. So the rightist says, "Aha! I am going to be Shrewd. He claims to represent Truth and Brotherhood, so I'll say I represent God Himself!"

Meanwhile, back here on Planet Earth, everybody knows that liberals do not represent Love and Brotherhood, and that you do not represent God. So you look as silly as they do.

What a sane person does is stick a pin in that nonsense and point out that all Wordists claim the same thing liberals do. Point out that what they call Love is thinly veneered hatred for America, for Western Civilization, and for white people.

That's the truth, and people will believe it simply because they already know it's true. But rightists simply will not stick to what everybody already knows is true!

Leftists are always screaming "Racist!" I have never ONCE seen a SINGLE conservative have the simple guts and intelligence to ask the liberal, "What do you mean by that word?" Not ONCE! As soon as the liberal says it, all conservative spokesmen hit the floor groveling.

In other words, they take the liberal label seriously.

Another group of rightists responds to being called "racist" and Nazi" by putting on swastikas. They are saying, "I'll show THEM!" Again, they take the liberals seriously.

When rightists kept calling leftists Communists, it got to be a joke. Leftists call anybody who disagrees with them on race "anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews." And ALL rightists ALWAYS take it SERIOUSLY! If we don't question it and put it into perspective, I guarantee you no one else will.

Once again, leftists are being SILLY, and we act as if they were making a serious point.

People know leftists are ridiculous. People know leftists use labels wildly. They know that leftism never WORKS.

If we make those points, we can win!

But if we keep insisting that the left represents a highly intelligent conspiracy, we cannot win. If rightists keep claiming that they represent a Political Papacy, they will continue to get the horselaugh they deserve.

The truth is the only thing that will work.

Once again, the choice is clear: you can either tell the TRUTH or you can GO NUTS.

Sticking to the truth requires INTELLIGENCE, MENTAL DISCIPLINE, and GUTS. This is a titanic battle we are waging. If you don't have the INTELLIGENCE, MENTAL DISCIPLINE, AND GUTS to wage it, you will drift out into the never-never land of right wing crazies.

WHY WE DON'T HIRE DUCKS | 2001-03-10

One of the easiest ways to spot bias is to listen for one side's buzz terms. If you hear "pro-choice" you're listening to the pro-abortion side, and pro-life means one is on the anti-abortion side (unless the same speaker says both).

So, when the newscaster on CNN refers to "investment in education" instead of "expenditures on education," you know he is so liberal he doesn't know he's using Libspeak.

Since only Libspeakers have been reporting the news, those for more Federal spending on education get away with a really childish trick.

They know that the more years of school a person has, the more money he makes, ON AVERAGE. They then say that education alone has produced all that extra income.

Meanwhile, back on earth, you can do the same thing with almost any expenditure. The more expensive the car a person owns, the more money he is likely to make. The bigger the house he was raised in, the more likely he is to have gone to college and graduate school.

In other words, by exactly the same statistical process by which we justify "investments in education," we could justify an "investment" in a limousine or a home in Beverly Hills.

If your parents spend more money on education, it means that they are probably richer. If your parents spent more on their home, it probably means they were, ON AVERAGE, richer and just plain smarter than people who have smaller homes. Their kids will then be smarter and make more money.

It's too bad the "investment in education" logic is so silly, because it would be wonderful if it worked. It would mean that education is magic, and that any moron could be made a brain surgeon by "investing" money in training him. It would mean you wouldn't even have to be human to make millions. You could take a horse, a duck, or a puppy dog, give them the magic training and they would be able to make all that money.

It takes training to develop somebody's natural talent. But you have to have the talent first, and that is what all education statistics leave out. A psychologist writing a column was recently asked if you have to be SMART to be a "gifted child." The implication was that if he said you had to be born smart to be "gifted," he would be anaziwhowantstokillsixmilionjews".

OH, no!, said the good doctor, you could be born retarded and still stand just as good a chance of being "gifted" as one of those smart kids.

You can see that this sort of logic leads straight to silliness.

The fact is that education or training is used to develop the gifts you already have. You are paid not only for training, but for BEING TRAINABLE.

Being trainable, in turn, is a matter of genetics. Hitler believed in genetics, so our entire national policy is rooted in the idea that anyone who mentions innate intelligence is anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

For those who make their living in education or other supplements to genetics, this is a wonderful label. It means that those who sell social sciences like education or psychology or sociology can say that they can cure anything. They don't say you can hire ducks and make them brain surgeons, but they say you can do absolutely anything else by "investing in education" or financing other social programs.

And if you disagree with them, they shriek that you are anzaiwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. All of our silliest misconceptions are defended by that label.

Until we stop screaming "HITLER!" and begin to apply logic to education policy, it is going to keep failing, no matter how much you "invest" in it.