THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

A finer point on what Bob is trying to tell you pros is that you are no less than the equals or even better than the "pros" who work for Coke and Cheerios. The AMPW intellectuals have a large inferiority complex, yes, their Mommy Profs succeeded in destroying them.

No one here or in a world of 7 billion people can tell me that anything has been produced that is better than "Anti-racist Hitler."

The Cheerios commercial is so bad I fell out of my chair. It was very bad, cute light skin negro being doted on by doting caring white mother angel caregiver exalted mother figure, what a fucking joke. It should have been entitled "No blue gum nigra need apply except for sperm donation in the creation of the new master race."

And I have been lectured at RADIX by an AMPW intellectual about the Coke ad, so I asked this man-child why he was so in awe of the anti-whites, and then asked this man-child to specifically tell me which anti-white he respected. Some times you just gotta get mean.

In Goethe's 'Faust,' he has the protagonist translating John 1:1 (In the beginning was the WORD).

He calls the translation into question by abstracting the logos into other possible viable alternatives, including: "Mind" (Sinn), "Force" (Kraft), and finally "Act" (Tat).

Goethe has Faust breaks down the narrative into a "White" Western understanding of reality and worldview. (Im Anfang war die TAT), translated to: "In the beginning was the ACT."

Die 'Tat' is what Bob is asking from us ... to perform, to execute, to ACT.

The Knock Out Game is nothing more than another instance of White Genocide

I often ask for other opinions if I'm considering a new step I'm unsure of. I make it plain it's something I'm thinking of actually doing.

I decided not to do a petition on the superbowl ads, since I think March is too late for them and I got some agreement on that.

But I seem to be picking up hints here and there that coca-cola has ongoing anti-white ads? Is that so? And if so, has there been discussion about those ads in the mainstream? I'll likely google and check it out for a possible petition, but if anyone knows the answer right off, please tell me.

In defense of the BUGSter that suggested it, I think they were just bouncing ideas around to see if others were in support.

To get any idea off the drawing board you need to form a small nucleus of like minded people. As you often remind us Bob, the Mantra was just a lone voice in the wilderness until Lord Nelson picked up the cause and then the snowball really started to roll.

Personally I think the Coca-Cola idea could have some real fizz in it. :)

Almost all of the multi-nationals are now engaged in pumping out a constant stream of 24/7 anti-White GENOCIDAL propaganda via their advertising departments. Too many for us to target, so we should just single out one from the herd - Coca-Cola would be an ideal candidate - and then just relentlessly target them with our memes.

"Always Coca-Cola, Always White GENOCIDE"

I'll try working up the idea over the next few weeks - for it to be effective it needs to be viral. If companies selling food products want to take the risk of associating their multi-billion dollar brands with extremist policies of social engineering, that is their choice, but it is our job to make sure the world knows about it! :)

I've used Genseric's suggestion of 'Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, Diversity for White countries?' in approximately 15-20 out of my last 50 or so mini-mantras. And mostly going w/ 'Diversity is a codeword for White GENOCIDE' to end the mini-mantra. I've been manually typing short minis (that fit both the initial youtube & yahoo comment blocks). On two fast moving Yahoo comment sections (comments coming in every 5 seconds or so), one article was on immigration the other about a mansion for sale in Sydney Australia, I saw that I got 3 thumbs-ups to 0 thumbs down after clearing them via Tor. Even though each comment got buried quickly in the sea of incoming comments, obviously, a lot of people saw it at the time just after I posted it, and no thumbs down - this is a small sample, but I don't think this would have been the case just two years ago.

I routinely comment on the so-called "knockout game". I do this not to sell a message but because I feel strongly about the wrong language being used.

What I say, with variations depending on the story and how I feel that day is:

The so-called "knockout game" is also called POLAR BEAR HUNTING.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Polar%20Bear%20Hunting

The mass media promotes the "neutral" term and hides the specific term to conceal that this is ANTI-WHITE violence.

I find that gets a lot of good reactions, but only if I use the word "anti-white", preferably in bold, all-caps or italics.

Without the word "anti-white" I've got nothing. Nobody who talks like a white needs to be told who "polar bear hunting" might be aimed at, but arguments tend to spin off at random tangents. When you tell white people it's really POLAR BEAR HUNTING, they know the target is them and their loved ones, but they still lose focus. They need more of an anchor.

With the word "anti-white" I get a lot more likes, and comments are focused on the issue, which is that whites are the target, and the mass media uses bogus "neutral" language to hide that.

"Anti-white" is a magic word.

It might be effective even to point out that the "knockout game" is ANTI-WHITE violence, and not say that it is also called polar bear hunting. But I won't try that, because it irks me that the mass media lies by omission and this falsely neutral language, and it's amazing how many people have no idea of this till you tell them.

Thank you very much and of course I approve. (And if I didn't approve you should go ahead and use the most effective words anyway - there is no sulking in Mantra!)