THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

For what it's worth, I've been using this response and it is very effective. My favorite thing about it, other than its being the simple truth in as few words as possible, is that it shuts down the tailgate bait.

"You are justifying genocide," or "All you're doing is justifying White genocide," etc., is the perfect response to any anti-White retort which an amateur pro-White would take to argument (i.e., lose control).

An anti-White had asked me, "What about the good resources that whites exploit from third world countries?" And I nailed 'em with this response. No need to say, "third worlders exploit the labor and tax dollars of White people every day," etc. That's tailgating, even if true.

This is perfect. And it seems so obvious once you use it. Bob, you're a wizard. You'd think that's absurd, I'm sure. :)

Bob, where is the link to that??

I will swarm it.

I ALWAYS tell them that they're justifying White genocide. Because they ALWAYS do. PERIOD.

On the new BUGS Buddy Pro I am currently making sure that we are always pointing out they are justifying genocide - in plain and simple language.

http://bugsbuddy.co.nf/

It's not done yet.

When BUGS was fewer in number, there was a stricter discipline.

I STRONGLY RECOMMEND TO NEWER BUGSTERS THAT YOU POST SOME OF YOUR COMMENTS ON THE WORKING THREAD!

ESPECIALLY THE COMMENTS YOU ARE PROUDEST OF!...ha ha!...those were the ones of mine that were my very best tailgating efforts, and after I posted them on the working thread, an older bugster would post how HE would have done it (often without a word of criticism, which is sometimes the best way...just SHOW THE RIGHT WAY), and this was absolutely critical to my finally learning after many months how to make a proper Mantra response, how to always bring it back to the Mantra, instead of (brilliantly, of course) tailgating.

We forget how hard this stuff is to really do properly, and don't realize how much guidance newcomers need. Newcomers don't understand what tailgating is, and often don't understand why it's bad when they do learn what it is.

(For just one thing, the very act of tailgating carries the implication that the acceptability of White Genocide is up for discussion, and that if you are mistaken on what you're tailgating about, then White Genocide may be okay).

Doing it right is so hard, in that it's so different from what we've been doing all our lives, that to not let this group slip back into more accustomed habits we should devote almost as much attention to maintaining the correct way of doing it as we devote to doing it.

LET'S ALL OF US POST MORE OF OUR SWARM COMMENTS ON THE WORKING THREAD (especially any comments that we are uneasy about or especially proud of...the latter will turn out to be models of either how to do it right or how to do it wrong, and both are needed to become skilled and to maintain skill).

"I feel like I am back when I couldn't get anyone to use the Mantra!"

This makes me feel terrible, as it should.

I've sensed this slippage happening, even while I haven't been here enough.

All of us who've been here awhile and feel like we have a clue (even if we may still slip, as I know I often do) need to critique more. Newcomers should too...sometimes you'll be right, and when you (or the rest of us) are wrong, we all LEARN.

As long as we are wrong where all the other bugsters can see us, and there are at least some who can and will correct us. Best place for that is the working thread...that's where I was mainly taught.

Sigh, Gavin was the very best at that IMO (I owe that guy so much), and he seems to have disappeared. Just yesterday I sent him a PM at SF...I have no idea if he'll get it. If anyone has his email, it would be a comradely thing to do to inquire of him how he's doing. Please tell him hello from me.

I see people asking "why are you justifying genocide". I use it myself quite a bit. When/Where is it not being used?

I think we should also have a working 'anti-white head explodes' thread for the most amusing anti-white responses.

'What is WRONG with the team ?'

Aspergers syndome, lack of self confidence, inability to hold down a steady job and the list goes on and on and on.

I'm guessing there's maybe a little over half a billion White people on the planet. 250 thousand signed up on Stormfront, 100 or so comprise the team.

Don't overestimate our abilities, you are dealing with the most marginal of the marginalised.

Even the Stormfront crowd thinks we are 'odd' and 'differant'.

If the team isn't getting it then you are probably using too many words.

Please use a short single sentance to get across your instructions i.e "When somebody tries to justify Genocide I want you to respond 'You are Justifying Genocide' "

If that doesn't work then consider using finger painting.Seriously.

Whenever someone responds with a litany of how bad Whites were in history, that is pure justification of genocide. Why else would they say that?

Flip it around. What if a Black man protested some genocide of his people, and someone responded by saying "yeah but what about in 1568, ya'll were so mean to so-and-so", well we would all know the person was justifying genocide against Blacks.

Or if a Jew talks about the Holocaust and someone brings up past bad things Jews did, everyone knows the purpose is to say, "You deserved it."

So, the MOMENT someone responds to our talking points about White Genocide with a list of "bad things" Whites did, that is purely an attempt to justify genocide. They don't have to say the words, "you're genocide is justified". They seldom openly say that.

I do use "you are attempting to justify or you are justifying white genocide" then the anti says no im not...then i say " all your policies tht u champion lead to a world without white children" i see alot of other ppl saying that as well on youtube...in the heat of battle when i see someone not doing properly in this context what is the best way to right the ship without blantly correcting him/her in front of the antiwhite?

"What is WRONG with my team?" - Bob

Complacency has set in and resting on our laurels isn't doing us any good either. This only sets us up to parallel the system's mode of stagnancy. We can't have that.

Cleric Preston is out of line and so was Harumpty Dumpy for having said the same thing a while back. For shame.

HD- #5, 2nd line "STRONGLY RECOMMEND TO NEWER BUGSTERS THAT YOU POST SOME OF YOUR COMMENTS ON THE WORKING THREAD!" Is an excellent idea. ------------- A new bugser can cause more harm than good if they're not careful. We can ALL use criticism from our fellow bugsers at times.

Would have really been nice to know where exactly this thread or threads was.

But now we have histrionics, great.

But since this is all guess work at who what where, my guess is that it is someone not within our core group or a new guy who wandered back into "wisdom" or Mommy Prof talk. I deal with these types all day long its why I don't report back on every move I make.

In these situations when a person goes back to Mommy talk a BUGser can be the dominate person, and quite frankly should be.

What is this solid, stupid resistance to the smashing response?

It's because the historical facts they produce are so incredibly one sided or completely wrong. It is very very tempting to excercise historical knowledge on somebody who only has the mommy professors perverted view of events. When somebody says something so incredibly wrong it is compelling to correct them. That's why many people find themselves here; because they have spent so much time learning that we are in fact NOT evil, just the opposite. That is the temptation. That is the lure to get off track. For many I bet responding with," you are justifying genocide", feels like your saying, "your right my ancestors were evil, but that's no excuse for genocide now." The teaching of how to use the mantra should address this feeling or tendency directly and specifically.

I say thankyou to Robert Whitaker for this blog. I have read here for several months now and I have learned very much. In my neighbourhood some weeks ago I started to do it this way:

I choose the time and place for the action. When I met the person, I told him rather accidentally (unprovoked, but planned by me earlier), that I would prefer that in the future, in case we meet in a group, that we both will not speak about politics. Because he knows that we have different political opinions and I told him that in my view he and his wife by the things that they do they are in fact killing our people, I think that this murder. He asked back: you mean murder? My replay: Of course, if we Germans will be disappeared from the world or mixed with Africans, how will you call it?

Then we parted and I think that he has got the message: In case this subject of conversation (=human rights, foreigners, immigrants, and millions of poor people of other races might come to Germany and stay here and so on) comes again in a conversation, I only shall say: I want that our people shall live, and I do not want that someone is killing our people, never mind the method or words he uses. If you disagree with this opinion, I can not help you, because I can not sell oder give away the life of our children.

The antiWhites do not only justify genocide, but they are actually committing genocide.

Bob: " Say flatly that they are JUSTIFYING genocide"

Whenever I see BUGSers in action, "you are justifying white genocide" is there, so it must be the period walking away part which Coach is not seeing enough from us, and THAT part I admit I have not done enough of, and nor have I seen it used enough, so the chair is rightfully thrown.

Note to self and Swarmers: Anti-whites must be hit periodically with: "You are justifying white genocide" then full stop, period, disengage, onto the next target.

Anti-whites justifying white genocide struck a heavy chord with me the first time I saw it was pointed out in one of Bob's articles, so I've used it a lot since my early Swarming days. Unfortunately, I can't say I'm batting .1000. For example, I've used the first line in my mini-Mantra above w/o the 'justifying genocide' line a few times; and I assume there's some 'history mini-Mantras' that don't point out 'justifying genocide' that I've used.

Also, in one of Bob's more recent articles, he reminded us "you aren't denying genocide, you are justifying it".

So there can't be any more excuses for not driving our short swords right thru their guts every single time we see them exposed.

The one thing I hate seeing is the line "you shouldn't punish white children for things that happened 50 years ago or 500 years ago."

That's weak, especially w/o pointing out they are justifying genocide. It's a back peddling defensive position that yields to mommy professor's bullshit history.

"You are justifying genocide" has got to be one of the most important sentences in the English language!

Exactly, Old Man!

Pretty much every Bugser i see posting points out the anti-White is justifying genocide.

This made me laugh. We have a group of anti-White stalkers that like to read this blog (even though White genocide isn't happening according to them.)

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=626592994024858&set=a.438343519516474.122597.361225900561570&type=1&theater

ATTENTION FELLOW BUGSTERS!

I DONT KNOW IF THIS IS THE NORM...but i need help

I am at the youtube video BLACK MEN DISCUSSING WHITE GENOCIDE, i have been beating this anti white that goes by the name MARGRET CLOVERS from pillar to post she is now going to attempt to have my account banned from youtube, if ANYONE has the time (i know we all put alot of time into this) i would greatly appericate it if you could help me show this lunatic the true definiton of what a SWARM is...

Not a problem will do from now on thnk u