THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

EXPRESSING THE NEW REALITY | 2014-04-08

In the confusion following my most recent screwup, I briefly had an article here which stayed in only long enough for Genseric to post a single comment on it, which comment was lost in the confusion.

Generic pointed out that, from his EXPERIENCE, there might be certain weakness in our Diversity = White Genocide slogan. I may be misquoting him, but he feels that anti-whites are far more able to deal with that than our old approach.

I may be misquoting him. God knows that one impression we are all over is that Bob is always right.

But I have some of the same feeling.

I keep repeating that Diversity = White Genocide is NOT complete.

And, as so often happens in propaganda, an incomplete statement can be, repeat, CAN BE, more damaging than no statement at all.

Simply saying, "Diversity = White Genocide" reminds them of the old statement that "Integration will end the white race."

Yes, it turns out we old segregationists were perfectly right about that, but that is not the way they react to it. In fact, they may be able to get the psychology of the discussion back to the days when segregationists were supposed to have said that simply because they opposed "Mixing THE races."

It is vital that we get in The New Reality, that ONLY the white race is threatened.

We MUST include:

"Asia for the Asians

Africa for the Africans

White countries for everybody."

Or some better version of the same statement.

If possible, when they say, "What is white?" we must actually SAY, "Defining white is no problem when you say: 'Whites took America from the Indians.'"

We must actually SAY these things.

Too often I see a good start but no follow-up.

Yes, I know follow up is often blocked. Where the hell do you think I've been all these years?

But if that is the problem, why not say the WHOLE MINI-Mantra in the first place, complete with the Asia for Asians bit?

As Genseric says, one gets the feeling that anti-whites are too comfortable with Diversity = White Genocide ALONE.

Yes, this is a FEELING. Real propaganda is learned in practice and by FEEL.

COMMENTS (52)

#1 Secret Squirrel | 2014-04-08 10:30

I still prefer "code word". It makes people think about their intent and thinking is dangerous.

Look at the pattern this makes. The eye wants to follow it all the way to the bottom.

Asia for the Asians

Africa for the Africans

White Countries for Everyone.

Diversity is a code word for White Genocide

#2 Jason | 2014-04-08 10:46

I think (not certain) that the line works best as you present it, as part of series of statements. I can't say that I've gotten reaction that I can truly judge yet. I will be paying more attention.

#3 Hidden In Plain Sight | 2014-04-08 12:35

I would be very interested in your thoughts on how to judge effectiveness based on reaction. I have tried to do this but I fear that I lack a theory on how to do so. Thanks

#4 Jason | 2014-04-08 12:49

Ha! I have the same issue. I would say anything that gets a reaction which gives us a chance to add new talking points is a win. Especially if they are using our terminology (White Genocide, anti-white, etc).

The greatest win is when they ADMIT White Genocide is going on. They hardly ever know they've done it. They say things like "well it's Karma, you shouldn't have colonized us", or "how does it feel to be on the receiving end".

They've just confessed it's real. Real discipline is to just leave it there for others to see, or maybe, depending on context, point out what they've just admitted if it isn't totally obvious and then leave.

I would like to say Normal Whites speak up and agree, but that is still pretty rare for me to get. I am tired now and haven't given a great answer, but I will think about this more.

#5 Benjamin Newells | 2014-04-08 13:55

Good point Jason. Most of the time, anti-whites don't realize they're displaying genocide intent. Put up a mini and they'll respond with "Whites colonized non-white countries, enslaved, raped and killed non-whites." Basically what they're saying is: White Genocide is a "payment" for things which happened centuries ago. So I simply point this out to the audience by asking the question: Anti-white, you're saying White Genocide is a "payment" for things which happened centuries ago? Or I say: Anti-white, is that how you justify White Genocide?

As for Normal Whites speaking up and agreeing, I had someone respond to my mini today saying (not quote-on-quote): Non-whites go to White countries because their own countries are poor. I responded: Does that justify White Genocide? He responded: No, I guess it doesn't.

#6 Hidden In Plain Sight | 2014-04-08 14:23

Good answer, it all comes back to the checkmate. Pretty simple after all probably although it is something to ponder on. All too often I think I get distracted by thumbs ups and what not, which is usually just a function of where you write it. Today put up what I thought was a good presentation of the points in an appropriate context but I got only one thumb up, ten down and no attempt at rebuttal. Even this I guess must be considered a victory if no one had anything to say against it. Generally though I seem to get slightly more thumbs up.

#7 Mark WN | 2014-04-08 15:50

NEVER forget we're dealing with absolute vermin that can be demeaned w/o insults.

Had excellent results prefacing certain words with "so-called"... followed by the word. Examples:

If so called "diversity & multiculturalism" are such a strength, why aren't asian & african countries deliberately flooded with mass foreign immigration & govt FORCED / SUBSIDIZED integration?

Re "what is White" we obviously want to avoid tailgaiting.

White countries are the ONLY countries that you so called "anti-racists" demand be flooded with mass foreign immigration and govt FORCED / SUBSIDIZED integration.

Also experimented with the very effective "Diversity is a codeword for White genocide". During back-&-forth with the anti's, I will say something like -

You so called "anti-racists" will never understand the real world. Can't you realize that so called "diversity" is in reality just an Orwellian codeword for White genocide?

Judging by the amount of hostile emails, I seem to have hit a nerve. Also received many positive emails about use of "Orwellian", saying it stuck with them and made them think about it.

All in the spirit of TESTING what works.

And of course, I like to throw in -

You're obviously struggling...have you yet seen the "Anti-racist Hitler" YT video? It's an internet sensation. It will clear up all your misconceptions about White genocide.

(There I go again...bitching about how we must promote a sledgehammer of a video that make our points...)

#8 Horus | 2014-04-08 16:49

don't forget the original staple Mantrastic mini the Anti-White's HATE to deal with

Anti-Racism is a Code Word for Anti-White

Just because they are saying:"I am not Anti-White BUT"

does not mean we should neglect it....That was the original Mantra Mini that got em and still has em sweating

#9 Bob | 2014-04-08 10:56

Good stuff, SS!

Good reply, Jason, the only thing to do is to go TEST it!

#10 The Seeker of Truth | 2014-04-08 12:14

I have previously used "Diversity is a codeword for less White people" with good results. It was not until Bob stated that he thought we had killed anti racist that I started saying "Diversity is a codeword for White genocide". Which is a good attack for anti Whites but if you are talking to the unconverted fencesitters the first is more demonstrable.

#11 Hidden In Plain Sight | 2014-04-08 12:32

I would agree that "Diversity" = white genocide is somewhat truncated, it's only saving grace is the quotation marks. If a mathematical formula is desired maybe "diversity"+"integration"=genocide may be more complete?

I believe that the key difference between the segregation era and now is that the blacks were enslaved and therefore their cause is more sympathetic than todays immigrants who are freely enticed here. Also, the idea of "destroying the white race" would have appeared laughably alarmist in those days. In todays world of integrated kindergartens and early antiracist" education it can no longer appear that way.

#12 Horus | 2014-04-08 14:18

Diversity = White Genocide was born by the White Man March out of necessity of having something FIT on a banner. Nothing else would fit on those particular banners. It did serve the purpose of getting out the phrase White Genocide into a trending a hashtag. Basically that phrase was used NOT by choice but by necessity of that particular event. And not everyone used it.

However I have been saying non stop that CodeWord is the heavy hitter in the Mantra. CodeWord means that someone is hiding something. Something nefarious is going on. And it draws in and ON the subconscious. Very important

"Diversity is a CodeWord for White Genocide" is the standard and far superior.

I agree with Daniel wholeheartedly and have recommended it non stop. Even Kyle Hunt from the WMM does the same. Their tshirts for the WMM do not say Diveristy = White Genocide. They actually say the full correct meme on their tshirts.

Diversity is a CODEWORD for White Genocide. Very important to note.

I did not notice the enemy being comfortable with it as much as other ProWhites (but Daniels point is accurate as well). That rang my alarm bell. That has historically been a warning for yours truly. Comfort kills in propaganda. The phrase was a necessity of the day. More and more will put the full phrase on their signs etc as they understand the importance. And as they come to understand and use the Mantra to good effect.

Very important post and discussion

#13 seapea | 2014-04-08 18:06

Let's not forget that "DIVERSITY" IS A CODEWORD FOR WHITE GENOCIDE did make it on the same material the WMM banners were made from but obviously the layout and letter sizing were different. I wasn't privy to the discussions leading to the final WMM choice but I thought the Knoxville banner looked pretty good. A run of those banners might be an option to consider in the future.

http://whitegenocideproject.com/white-genocide-sign-appears-in-knoxville/

#14 Daniel Genseric | 2014-04-08 22:09

@ Horus and others

Allow me to preface this comment by reiterating my unique and disquiet-causing "gift". I harbor not concern for the delicate sensibilities or image of our proverbial Big Brains. I have no check valve when it comes to speaking the truth as I see it. Leverage it as you see fit, or don't. No skin off my bag.

"Even Kyle Hunt from the WMM does the same."

This speaks to me in so many different (negative) ways I'm unsure where to begin. It reads like Bob's warnings on 'ratification'. http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/03/12/respectable-conservatives-are-critical-to-our-rulers-as-thought-police-ratifiers/

It's difficult to consider a rewrite here, having worked so hard on this one. Nevertheless, I digress and I did warn Kyle about this.

So, did it really work? If the goal was to solely hammer-in our bread and butter meme, white genocide, well then good. That being said, I don't think we did anything TO the psychology of "Diversity Now - Diversity Wow!" with this campaign. At least not like we did and are doing to "Racist!" with the war hammer #ARIACWFAW.

Diversity = white genocide is as complete as ANTI-RACIST = ANTI-WHITE.

Abort. N&J Fail. abort

#15 Horus | 2014-04-08 23:53

Not certain I understand what you are getting at in regards to talking with Kyle or warning. I was referring to Kyle adjusting the phrase via tshirts. Which means he understands the convo. somewhat. I do not have a problem with "Diversity is a CodeWord for White Genocide." He has that on the tshirts and I prefer STRONGLY the full phrase.

There was a limitation on letters in regards to the banners. So they had make some decision with the sign maker. Are you saying, he should not have went through with the event? I don't know about that. Most people are only going to remember "White Genocide" from that first event. We can always nit pick after the fact and make things better. That is why were here. :-) But it was not bad first public intro the phrase "White Genocide". With a trending hashtag and all.

I only consider it a public introduction to the phrase "White Genocide". I don't see anything more that was achieved. Nor do I think anymore could have been achieved in the first event. But I do think it could have been better obviously with the full phrase.

With that being said. I talked with other rabbits (like Truck Roy etc etc) right after the event. Even on a podcast or two. We are sticking to the codeword from here on out. And definitely would have preferred the CodeWord inclusion. So I guess I agree with you. The more I looked at the Diversity = White Genocide phrase that day on box trucks etc etc. The more I wanted the complete phrase. I made a point in talking about it and will do so again.

I expect more people will be making their own signs in the future. And maybe the vinyl sign maker can figure out bigger and better ways to achieve the inclusion. They could not for the 1st event and He is one of OURS. I know the folks making their own signs/billboards (which is the trend) are obviously not having the same problems as those ordering vinyl in certain sizes. On a box truck you can paint anything .....

#16 Hidden In Plain Sight | 2014-04-08 15:17

This point about fully expressing the mantra points on banners gets me to thinking about the importance of graphic work in getting the message across, particularly if there is to be more street activism. This is a powerful way to more fully control the message and target it for a wider demographic. to my way of thinking the mantra needs to be associated with a new iconography and the failed "white pride" claptrap needs to be left behind or reworked completely to make it resonate with "the new generation of urban hipsters".People need to have the message presented within their own cultural frame.

I once stumbled onto a thread on this site with all kinds of graphics and there was a lot of great stuff in there but I would have no idea how to find it again in here. I wish this effort would be put more front and centre and subjected to some of the rigorous critique that all other matters are here. I have a few images of my own that I would not mind sharing if I knew how.

#17 Jason | 2014-04-08 15:58

The Anti-Whites keep telling me there is NO point in our posts because they will get them deleted anyway, so why do something futile!

That smells of desperation. I'm almost of the opinion that Anti-Whites can be handled easier than Normal Whites, many of whom seem to be fully neutered.

Even in private, anonymous settings, it is hard to get Whites to say they have a right to exist. I know they are out there, but they need to start making a few noises.

#18 Fred Richthofen | 2014-04-08 21:23

I agree, this does not stand on its own. It's more of a template, and must have the lead in.

Examples:

Forced assimilation of Africans or Asians = genocide

Forced assimilation of Whites = "Diversity" ??

"Diversity" = White genocide

Forced assimilation of Africans or Asians = genocide

Forced assimilation of Whites = "Multiculturalism" ??

Multiculturalism = White genocide

Forced assimilation of Africans or Asians = genocide

Forced assimilation of Whites = "Inclusion" ??

"Inclusion" = White genocide

#19 Daniel Genseric | 2014-04-08 21:27

What happened to the immigration component, Fred?

#20 Fred Richthofen | 2014-04-08 21:45

Nice catch.

It must be short. I was trying to keep it short, but it was too short apparently. I need some time to think about this.

#21 Daniel Genseric | 2014-04-08 22:31

Honestly, I do too.

#22 Cleric_Preston | 2014-04-08 22:36

I've still got my banner from WMM (it arrived on the Monday following the event, no blame to Laura she posted it in plenty of time)

If we're going with 'Diversity' is a codeword for White Genocide I'll just class the banner as expendable and use it for the biggest publicity stunt I can think of, take some photo's and let the Anti-Whites tear it down just to see what happens.

I've been taping posters saying 'Diversity' means White Genocide around the local area ( also 'anti-racist is a codeword for Anti-White), I'll switch them out for the updated version over the next few days.

#23 Daniel Genseric | 2014-04-08 22:37

"White" is the adjective anti-whites use when they describe which countries must have "Diversity" forced upon them until there are no more white children left.

Diversity is a code word for white genocide.

#24 -4MyNation- | 2014-04-08 22:57

Hidden in Plain Sight lives up to his name.

I see people criticizing DIVERSITY=WHITE GENOCIDE. Like everything else, discuss it, and if it's wrong it shouldn't be used.

But that's not what was on those banners.

DIVERSITY=WHITE GENOCIDE wasn't on those banners. And DIVERSITY=WHITE GENOCIDE wasn't what Kyle Hunt promoted. DIVERSITY=WHITE GENOCIDE wasn't the message for the White Man March. This is a simple fact. Anyone saying otherwise is incorrect.

"DIVERSITY"=WHITE GENOCIDE is what was on the banners.

If quotation marks aren't important, I wonder if Bob and others would be okay with people taking the quotes out of the Mantra itself, and not reciting them when they go through the quote assimilation unquote phrase that I have heard strongly emphasized so many times. Because I can hear the shouting already. lol

One more time folks, the banners didn't say DIVERSITY=WHITE GENOCIDE.

They said "DIVERSITY"=WHITE GENOCIDE.

So, if we want to poo-poo a slogan, let's at least restate it accurately first. No?

Just sayin.

Also, Horus mentions an important point. If you put twice as many words on a banner, it becomes twice as much work to read. Not hard to do when you are leisurely reading a computer screen. But, imagine driving 70mph down a freeway and trying to see a sign that's being held 40 feet up in the air on an overpass. You think maybe there is a difference? Additionally, putting twice as many words on a banner necessitates cutting the font size in half (unless you have money to buy twice as much material) cutting the legibility in half, yet again. So, you have therefore decreased the legibility times four. Typing sentences on the Internet is free. Contrarily, 14 foot banners (or should we say 28 foot banners then?) are in fact not free.

Something tells me this had something to do with the decision process for the banner campaign.

#25 c-bear | 2014-04-09 00:48

Regarding my last post, I meant no offense to the WMM. It was a spectacular success, of which we all played a part.

I still stand by my words. In my opinion using the = sign is plain laziness.

Perhaps an alternative next time could be:

__________________________

|CODEWORD: "DIVERSITY"|

|MEANS WHITE GENOCIDE|

-----------------------------

or,

_____________________________

|"DIVERSITY" IS A CODEWORD|

|___FOR WHITE GENOCIDE ___|

Regardless of what we choose, from my experience, CODEWORD is absolutely essential simply because it drives anti-whites NUTS.

#26 Steadiness | 2014-04-09 02:44

wow, I missed that. The quote marks make it perfect.

#27 Hidden In Plain Sight | 2014-04-09 08:59

Please note that I did put "diversity" in quotation marks. I also only said that it was somewhat truncated; forced assimilation is the other side of the pincers without which it is not totally genocidal.

#28 -4MyNation- | 2014-04-09 11:43

I kept seeing it again and again in an altered form without the quotation marks, the reason I mentioned you is because you DID say it correctly.

I think forced assimilation is part of the "Diversity" agenda. "Diverse" workplace, "Diverse" neighborhood, "Diverse" school, let's promote "Diversity", etc. Assimilation.

But again, I personally prefer the "code word" version.

Yet, I'll still state that the quotes were important, they were there for a reason, and that with them, the WMM slogan isn't nearly as bad as it's being made out to be without them. Just my opinion, but if it's going to be criticized, it should at least be in the form that was actually on the banners.

#29 -4MyNation- | 2014-04-09 12:26

Steadiness,

Right?

Is it just me or is there a difference in these phrases?

My boss is going to have a talk with me.

My boss is going to "have a talk" with me.

My girl is coming over to watch movies.

My girl is coming over to "watch movies".

LOL! IMO, the quotation marks obviously imply that what is written within them is code. The sentences have a completely different meaning with the quotes. At least, to me. That's why I'm raising a stink here about the quotation marks. Yes, yes, the "code word" phrase spells it out more clearly. But, I think that should communicate what I'm trying to get across here, so I'm done.

#30 -4MyNation- | 2014-04-08 23:40

Also, personally I tend to agree that "Diversity is a Code Word for White Genocide" is preferable. But I did want to make the distinction about the quotes and explore reasons why Kyle might have opted for the other version.

#31 Horus | 2014-04-09 00:06

4MyNation,

My understanding was that the whole phrase was unworkable on the vinyl banner size. So they had to cut it down by necessity. That is what I was told.

I did say at first that it may work better at 70 mph. I was thinking in terms of people at least seeing White Genocide at high speed. But I changed my mind after seeing the event etc and the tweets/emails. You could have a sign that emphasizes White Genocide and even codeword and do just as well. Different drivers are going to read and pick up different words at high speed anyhow. A certain number will try to read the whole thing and slow down. I got many reports of people slowing down to read the signs from those holding. That is what I do to read a sign ...slow down a concentrate a bit. So we might as well fire our best shot mantra mini if we got'em slowing down. And especially after talking via email with the Box Truck Rabbit. They would not have had a problem with the full phrase on that truck at a good speed or even high speed. They kept slowing down or speeding up gawking to read it. Live and Learn

"diversity is a codeword for white genocide"

the good experiment will be on different word emphasis..especially codeword (maybe different color contrast etc)

#32 c-bear | 2014-04-08 23:53

I use "code word" every chance I get. It drives anti-whites absolutely NUTS. When we first started hitting YouTube hard, anti-whites would invariably leave out the "code word" in when attempting to quote us in their debates.

I still hear flimsy anti-white arguments like,

"If anti-racist = anti-white, then that must mean racist = white." where they deliberately leave out "code word" in an attempt to make an argument.

In my opinion, using the = sign is plain laziness.

It's best to stick with the original that's tried and true:

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

>

Here is the only thing I would entertain changing: Since we are forcing our own terminology, why don't we make "code word" one word: CODEWORD.

#33 Horus | 2014-04-09 00:12

c-bear,

CodeWord is the heavy hitter. I link the words the words together and I think the best is put in caps the whole thing or the C &W. (tho in the UK they do not say codeword at all for whatever reason....but just "code" supposedly over there it is the same thing??...where is Lord Nelson)

The below phrase should axed to the abyss. In fairness, I have never seen anyone use it BUT the enemy.

"anti-racist = anti-white"

#34 Steadiness | 2014-04-09 00:29

the reason "anti-racist is a code word for anti-White" pisses them off so much is that for years they've been talking about how various phrases spoken by respectable conservatives are codewords and dog whistles. Suddenly we slap them in the face with the concept they've used to call our supposed leaders cowardly, bigoted, and unserious.

What makes that slogan so damaging is it destroys their most important word while mocking them, and it's completely true.

Diversity isn't just a code word for White genocide. We live under democracies where White traitor politicians can promise diversities special favors in exchange for votes, and those diversities fully expect to be better off living in their diverse multiculture without us. Bob expects that, as soon as the diversities fully take control of the Democratic Party, the Republican Party will finally become pro-White and advocate for our interests as the single largest bloc. I expect that the Federal government will melt away and citizenship will become meaningless. Regardless.

I don't think diversity is a code word for White genocide. I agree with diversity = White genocide more, however, the phrasing is awkward. It's the closest I can think of, though.

So here's my favorite mini:

Africa for the Africans,

Asia for the Asians,

White countries for everyone!

diversity = White genocide

anti-racist is a code word for anti-White

#35 Denounce Genocidists | 2014-04-09 02:11

"I don't think diversity is a code word for White genocide"

You might as well say you "think" the sky is purple instead of blue.

Anti-whites prove "diversity" is a code word for white genocide every time they open their pieholes calling for white countries to be always-more "diverse".

#36 jo3w | 2014-04-09 10:01

Who am I? I am a participant in a pro-white anti-violence group who feel the benefits of diversity are being used as an excuse to commit genocide on my people.

I've been using this to combat the word diversity. I haven't been using it very long though, I'll report back when I have more experience on how well it's working.

#37 Bob | 2014-04-09 11:44

BUGSERS are becoming real interrogators.

Interrogation is a matter of FEEL.

AMPWs will brag about what they SAID. Whether it got across or not is none of their concern.

But an interrogator is very aware of his listener. He sees every reaction.

In our case, we have a few moments to be sure that the people we are addressing CANNOT UNHEAR the clear point we are making.

That is not a matter of "saying" something.

AMPW is like artillery without a spotter.

Our ammunition supply is small and precious, and no one should use it unless he knows how to make it effective.

#38 Bob | 2014-04-09 12:08

c-bear, that is professional level observation.

#39 Lord Nelson | 2014-04-09 13:39

Here is a suggestion, I think we can delete 'word' from 'code word' and just use 'code'.

I mean like this: Diversity is 'CODE' for White Genocide!

I noticed Nick Griffin of the BNP did it this way on his twitter and I think this shortens and tightens it up even better.

Diversity is code for White Genocide!

#40 Mimmy Jarr | 2014-04-09 16:53

Lord Nelson :

Here is a suggestion, I think we can delete 'word' from 'code word' and just use 'code'.

I mean like this: Diversity is 'CODE' for White Genocide!

I noticed Nick Griffin of the BNP did it this way on his twitter and I think this shortens and tightens it up even better.

Diversity is code for White Genocide!

I'll be honest with ye, Lard Nelson. What ye say may ring true to the Bryiddish ear, but it's pure bollocks to a Yank like Bob.

#41 seapea | 2014-04-09 17:57

I've used 'code' in place of 'codeword' in many o'mini. When dealing with character limits on sites like YouTube and Twitter, that type of modification has been going on for awhile. It may not be "official" but some of us have already been doing it. CODE is also a useful substitute when dealing with code-phrases instead of code-words.

Ex: White Privilege is code for...

#42 Lord Nelson | 2014-04-09 17:59

Bob is a Southerner not a Yank. :)

Maybe it does not work in the US. I do think it could be a useful change. Makes it even sharper and tighter.

Either way, it's a small detail.

How about this: Multiculturalism is a load of Genocidal Bollocks!

#43 Mimmy Jarr | 2014-04-09 19:12

What's a lad to do with this bunch of Bryidds, Yanks and Code-monkeys around here?

#44 Ice Knight | 2014-04-11 06:04

'Diversity is a GENOCIDAL SCAM!' is a favorite meme of mine. It needs backing up with Africa for the Africans...or ALL White countries and ONLY White countries etc but it pretty much boils down the whole Mantra into five words - blunt and to the point.

I know a lot of other BUGSters use this meme, but I don't think Bob has ever given it official sanction. Would be interested to hear your thoughts on this Bob if you are reading.

#45 Jason | 2014-04-09 23:57

Off topic: Bob said that Brown people would get tired of being the faithful companions to their White Liberal leaders.

Asians recently got mad at uber liberal smart-aleck comedian Stephen Colbert. He sent out a tweet offensive to Asians in the guise of his fake conservative persona. Some Asians created the #CancelColbert hashtag on Twitter to demand he be fired.

White liberals have been beside themselves trying to explain this is just satire and saying these Asians should just relax. Asians considered that condescending. The fun part is that it shows the coalition of White Race-Traitors and various Non-Whites have nothing in common.

#46 Steadiness | 2014-04-10 01:34

no, one Asian "creative writer" started the #cancelcolbert hashtag because that's the kind of creative writing people learn in college (way to break the stereotype of Asians being smart, lol).

It was all a misunderstanding, but Colbert's groveling was sickening. They deserve each other.

It wasn't an "Asians get mad" moment. I expect Asians to keep to their place in the anti-White coalition for longer than anyone else.

Gays are actually doing the most damage right now.

#47 Bob | 2014-04-10 09:02

Cutting "code word" to "code" is economizing in the WRONG PLACE.

#48 Lord Nelson | 2014-04-10 11:10

Point taken Bob. It was only a suggestion.

#49 Ice Knight | 2014-04-11 05:52

In support of Lord Nelson, in the UK we would normally use the term 'code' therefore 'code word' is definitely an Americanism and sounds unfamiliar my British ears.

That said, our language constantly changes and has been heavily influenced by the US - the term is self explanatory so I don't see a problem with pushing it into our vocabulary.

In fact I'm fairly sure I've seen it's usage by the British press a few times recently - something I think we may be largely responsible for. My ears have become very sensitive these days to the use of any Mantra terminology by the mainstream press.

#50 Yankee Rebel | 2014-04-10 17:40

I have used the shortened version: Anti-Racist is Code 4 Anti- White on a sign. It is easily read and understood I think. Interestingly, I have come across a few instances where the slogan, Diversity = White Genocide has been misunderstood to mean Diversity = White people killing (genocide) non-Whites. Has anyone else encountered this?

#51 Ice Knight | 2014-04-11 05:36

Yes I've had similar from the anti-Whites. "Diversity = White Genocide" is definitely a weaker meme than Diversity is a codeword for White GENOCIDE.

#52 Yankee Rebel | 2014-04-11 17:17

It has happened twice to me that someone thought "Diversity = White Genocide" meant that Whites were trying to kill or genocide non-Whites through diversity! I think there might be a lot of not too bright people out there who do not even know what the word "genocide" means. Do we need to dumb it down even more? Here is one: "Diversity" = White People Die.