#48 A Smiling Weirwood | 2013-01-16 12:30
I have not posted on one of Bob's articles since my first "activity" on this site; that was when I posted on Bob's response to the SF Conf., wherein Duke stated why he didn't use the Mantra. So bear with me. I know I'm too ****ing wordy. I try to be as concise as I can.
Dungeoneer and Old Blighty: I was not trying to "side" with Cheshire Cat, due to some cult of personality, and get on your bad side. Nor am I trying to "back away" from Cheshire now. My point purely concerned the periodic "Troll Hunt" flare ups.
My main concern in all this is THE READER. I read BUGS for about nine months before EVER creating an account. I had the idea for the STOP White GeNOcide video and had all of the girls filmed except one before EVER creating an account.
Do you not think that there are some potential, future BUGSters who are, right now, reading the threads, blog, comments, etc., just like I was?
And I might be wrong, but I think it is TERRIBLY unhelpful, when the ANONYMOUS potential future BUGster, who might be a future Horus, johnnywhiterabbit, etc., is reading BUGS and people who are obviously committed to the cause being called out as Trolls.
Now, dungeoneer and Old Blighty, I am not singling you out. This is something I noticed way back during the Coniglio Blanco "affair". Shortly after that, there were two separate people who made public posts insinuating that Dick Whitman was a troll, and one referenced his username, which I thought most people KNEW was a reference to Mad Men, assumed identities, or even the archetypal White man that ANTI-WHITES were trying to "d*ck". They said that HE picked it because it meant "d*ck the White man".
In the past two months, I have seen other people go on three or four day "hunts" calling out Jason and Peter Cottontail over comments they made that, IMO, had NOTHING to do with being anti-White. I thought the "Hunters" totally took them out of context.
So, if I am ANONYMOUS READER:
Dick Whitman = Troll
Peter Cottontail = Troll
Jason = Troll
CHESHIRE CAT, one of the most PRODUCTIVE, concise Bugsters I've ever seen = Troll
Well, why the @$#% would I EVER want to join BUGS??? Were I them, I would think, "Gods forbid I say something off hand, or mention that I have a non-White friend, or TRY using Eurocide to see if it WORKS...", and get called out publically, by the VERY PEOPLE who I view as THE BEST SHOT FOR OUR RACE, as some anti-White troll?
Why not just try to make BUGS as unattractive as possible? I mean, MCisAntiWhite introduced himself in the New to BUGS thread, and ONLY Gar5 welcomed him. I was going to, and thought, "Everyone thinks I'm too f*cking wordy anyway, so I better not". I don't even know if I ever saw "verycoolwhite" introduce himself. As far as I know, he just showed up in the Swarm one day and started being productive. But I also don't think that anyone has ever welcomed him (I could be wrong, and he could be an old member, or I may have missed the welcome). But how often do you think that "ideal case" will happen?
I KNOW that BUGsters are the 300. I have Bobs "Bugs is not for everybody" article BOOKMARKED. That being said... it also STILL happens that, periodically, EVERYONE wonders why MORE PEOPLE aren't getting on message, posting, and reporting?
Well, you know, I know some of you are nasty basterd, lone wolf, TOR using Matrix decoding Totenkopf Alpha Males... but there are a helluva lot of people that aren't, that could STILL follow the rules and be ON MESSAGE. Would you RATHER everyone be LONE WOLF Bad@$$ people who instantly get on board, STFU, and SWARM? Sure.
But isn't BUGS dealing with what IS, and seeing what IS, and not what "should be"? If there are people who need a little fellowship and kindness (AND THINK A LOT OF WOMEN, HERE...), but could stay on message and be producitve... do you want them? If there are people who really DON'T want to come to what they perceive as THE BEST SHOT FOR WHITES and be called a troll or an anti-White if they try "Eurocide" or something like that... do you want them? Do you want "wordy" people like HD & ME, who nevertheless are PRODUCTIVE to various degrees?
Because right now, it seems as if BUGS is ONLY geared towards the superbadasstorusingf*ckyouifyoucan'ttaketheheatgetoutofthekitchen types. Which is fine, if that's how people want it...
I've often thought that the difference between a SF'er and a Bugster could be summed up in a line from "White Men Can't Jump" (oh gods, I'm a troll for seeing that movie in my past), that I heard on basketball courts ALL MY LIFE from White guys, because they know it's TRUE:
"A black guy would rather look good, and LOSE. A White guy would rather look bad, and WIN."
"Likewise, a SF'er would rather look like a superintelligentTotenkopfbadass and LOSE, and a Buster would rather do what WORKS and WIN", in terms of being "hard@ss"/writing book-length tomes vs. pushing a "boring" Consistent Message.
Likewise, BUGS has a similar choice, at times, to me, to face... that is, Be a LoneWolfTORUsingCALLOUTTHETROLLSateverychance,don'twelcomenewpeople board, or actually getting a lot of White and Normal people on board and posting.
Anyway, I'm done. I've just watched Dick Whitman, Peter Cottontail, Jason, and now Cheshire Cat, of all people, being called out or implied to be "anti-White trolls" since ConiglioGate.
And I don't think it's AT ALL helpful, ESPECIALLY to potential Bugstes who aren't LeonidasCharlesMartelFeanorContraMundum types.
But, I could very well be wrong. I won't post on these articles again. Back to my video. :-)