THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

LESS LINKS IN THE SWARM? | 2012-06-19

As Jason pointed out, the anti-whites are on us like they are on no other pro-white group. This brought something home to me that I, above all others, should have thought of: listing where we have put up the Mantra may now be a very bad idea. They just have to look in our own Swarm to find out where the best of us have put comments they need to take down.

So from now on, you should just say how many you've put up, tried to put up, and difficulties your comrades need to know about, as when you need help from fellow BUGSERS or, of course, a Swarm on that site.

In other words, use 'em when you need 'em, but keep in mind that they are probably paying, altogether, about ten salaries for each active BUGSER to block us. It cost Moscow five or ten dollars for every dollar that groups like Radio Free Europe spent to broadcast to Eastern Europe.

We're costing them already, and this is just a start.

They spent many millions to put David Duke in prison. I figure each ten seconds of his time in prison cost them at least a dollar.

I wish I could explain to you how great it is that we are now under the legendary fire that hits at those who start a real revolution. You are what makes history.

COMMENTS (49)

#1 Dave | 2012-06-19 12:08

Robert Whitaker is a specialist in assessing and articulating the political "militarized architecture" of the enemy and in developing methods to attack the enemy where it is weak.

If you think this doesn't scare the anti-whites, you have another think coming.

BUGS is the ONLY pro-white group that has become professional.

What the anti-whites are most scared of is spreading knowledge of the necessity for detailed, ongoing, and careful assessment of the Establishment's political "militarized architecture".

BUGS is a force multiplier for the ongoing assessment of the Establishment's "militarized architectures", whether these architectures exist physically or intellectually or both.

All other pro-white groups are amateurs. They make no assessments, are inarticulate, and attack anti-whites and the Establishment where it is strong, and most often where it is strongest.

No Establishment in history has feared an amateur political opposition. In fact, their main strategy is to make sure their opponents remain amateurs.

It is PROFESSIONALS they fear. And a professional banned political opposition is rare.

#2 Harumphty Dumpty | 2012-06-19 13:00

All other pro-white groups are amateurs. They...attack anti-whites and the Establishment where it is strong, and most often where it is strongest.

Love it! I'll consider adding to my SF signature,

All white groups other than BUGS are amateurs. They attack the anti-white Establishment where it is strong, and most often where it is strongest.

Well, I'll think twice about doing that. Maybe we should try to sidestep the prejudices at pro-white sites just as we sidestep the prejudices inculcated by anti-whites elsewhere.

#3 Gar5 | 2012-06-19 17:26

Dave, most other pro-Whites aren't amateurs...they are not even playing the game!

I have observed various pro-Whites who are opposed to the mantra on Stormfront; most of them seem to think that they are going to shame (and therefore replace) all the anti-White intellectuals with their debate skills.

Nope. "Intellectual" means someone the establishment employs as an "Intellectual", and if the establishment is anti-White...

So while they're in the middle of a debate mentally gratifying themselves, the Swarm and the anti-Whites are out playing ball.

On topic: It's tricky...The WDYPTMT? thread is the core of our community, it shows to our supporters all the good work we are doing. On the other hand, it gives anti-Whites a list of what to censor.

What about hiding posts with links in to unregistered visitors?

#4 Harumphty Dumpty | 2012-06-19 13:31

An appearance by Bob:

On Friday, 22 June at 10AM Eastern, WNN Member and The Mantra creator *Dr. Bob Whitaker *will be on RBN to explain The Mantra and why it's so effective at countering liberal/Marxist anti-White "logic."

...appearing on RBN on The Unsolicited Opinion with Maggie Roddin.

Please tune into the interviews by going to www.republicbroadcasting.org and clicking "Listen Live ONLINE."

#5 dungeoneer | 2012-06-19 13:37

The swarm going dark.

You can hear the anti-whites panicking about it,and the new people will still see some live action on the swarm page to get involved in.

Why not.

.

#6 David Joop | 2012-06-19 14:11

I think I overreacted a bit in the Swarm a few days ago. I thought anti-whites were following our links from here onto YouTube but I think a lot of the problem is that people aren't negotiating the 'spam filter' correctly.

This is a big issue, with BUGSers posting stuff that automatically gets marked as 'spam' without even showing up on YT.

I found when I posted 10 very different mini mantras, rather than 10 just superficially different ones, none of them were marked as 'spam.'

So vary your posts up a bit...

#7 backbaygrouch | 2012-06-19 14:11

There is a 'silver dollar' phrase to describe what we are doing. It is asymmetrical warfare. The Reds in Nam used to send $15 goats to get killed by $55,000 missiles. At some point victory becomes too costly. Many anti-Whites practice it.

Our resources are scant and should not be wasted. Think of the Davey Crockett story about being given as a lad one bullet per rabbit to be brought to the kitchen. It saddens me to see some anti-White troll drop a 20 word, lower east side, smartass wise crack and have WN attack dogs spend thousands of reasoned words in refuting an absurdity.

What a waste of valuable Mantra posting man hours. Return fire sparingly no matter how irked you are. But if you are red-blooded and hot-tempered it might be a good idea to keep a few drag and drop fiery retorts in your ammo belt. But do not spend too much time on trolls. The idea of asymmetrical warfare is to wear the other guy out, not get worn down.

#8 Gavin | 2012-06-19 15:00

Yeah, we are here to get our point across. Not argue with them and certainly not try to "convince" them.

#9 Genseric | 2012-06-19 15:12

"The idea of asymmetrical warfare is to wear the other guy out, not get worn down."

This is a mistake I have confessed to before. And it is VITAL to any BUGSter's longevity in the Swarm. Trust me.

Hence, my "carpet-bum" runs. And YES they are using OUR database to the best of THEIR ability.

#10 (G)host | 2012-06-19 18:13

a minor and personal transformation

#11 six gun | 2012-06-19 14:42

As I said that we advertise and it is advertise where we have been posting makes us "sitting ducks."

When I posted 20 YT posts without telling anyone and ensuring other BUGS had not posted within the last month, none of my posts were pulled.

I did make every post unique within the 20.

This should have been carried out by others to make my findings more valid. It is necessary to go back to postings a few days later. Although spammed out YT posts are still accessible and I have gone back through spammed postings, re-posting them. These appear to stay up. The swarm or a bug have moved on but the damaged work can still be repaired by replying to the spammed post with the same post. It's quick and easy.

The message is made visible again.

Work hard but more importantly work clever.

We still need to be able to communicate. I think we should be able to communicate privately.

I finally got a reply from the boss of the hive on SF. There doesn't seem to be any enthusiasm there but it doesn't mean we can't use the messaging system on SF to communicate.

#12 Genseric | 2012-06-19 15:16

Not the hive, but Swarmfront BUGS on SF is fairly active. Yet another place to circumvent the anti-white censorship.There are starting to be more on SF who are posting the Mantra and either reporting it there or not at all.

YT is clamping down. I got mine Memory-Holed and one of my gmail acct's was haxor-ed.

----------------------------

"Less LINKS in the Swarm?" - Bob

I dunno, Bob. Seems to me that we could be preventing ourselves from utilizing said database for future projects. If people were actively cataloging their links, one could search and use those videos for BUGS production(s). Obviously, the risk has already been VERY real.

#13 six gun | 2012-06-19 18:24

The point of the Hive is it could be our private place. It is in addition to this site. There are a huge number of visitors to SF. Many are the enemy.

I'm not sure if it is already, but the HIVE can be set to members of the Hive only and every member vetted.

I accept infiltrators could appear but any entry on this site is open and any entry on SF is open to everyone with a computer and an internet connection.

#14 shari | 2012-06-19 15:31

I have no idea what haxor-ed is exactly, but I tried to reply, Genseric and couldn't.

#15 (G)host | 2012-06-19 20:47

It means 'hacked.'

-G

#16 runner | 2012-06-19 16:24

The only people that should be able to see the link thread should be people who prove they have posted the Mantra before often.

#17 six gun | 2012-06-19 18:55

Agreed runner.

The only reason I do this is there is just a chance I might, just might achieve something for my people.

This is a war.

On 6/11/2012 at 6:16 pm I posted

"The malicious flaggers are tracking the sitting ducks [our youtube posts] via links posted here or [by] reviewing the activity of targeted [youtube] channels."

I found this sentence inside 10 seconds. Google has it indexed.

I fully expect as it would not be unusual that:

Every link posted on this site is indexed.

Every word is indexed.

Every page is cached.

We must be able to communicate in private.

We can compile a database of links.

We can compile a database of anything we need

But posting it all for all the world to see is not professional.

In a war it is madness.

A few days ago some burk started a thread on this website for hair treatment. This person joined the site, started the thread and posted the first post. All unchallenged.

A solution is very badly needed.

The HIVE exists on SF.

It gives the ability to have a private area to work.

This is the public face.

I don't know much about Wordpress but password protected page facilities exist but members would have to be vetted before they could get through to them. We don't want hair treatments for our private areas.

#18 (G)host | 2012-06-19 20:49

Then, YOU tell me which BUGSters are REAL and which ones are loyal to the fifth column.

If you can answer that, then you can have your lack of transparency.

By their deeds ye shall know them.

"We don't want hair treatments for our private areas." LOL that is fucking hilarious!!!!!!!!!! LOL hahah....read it again....lol

#19 six gun | 2012-06-20 06:36

(G)host the joke was intentional but I am being serious. No we don't know who is an infiltrator. I see people called Trolls. I'm surprised I haven't when I make controversial statements.

It is hard when people can't see and properly speak to those in their group but I see people like n8glenn talking about us. The guy is round the bend making up whatever he fancies but he and anyone else can see what we are saying, doing, posting. Those at the combined defending deformation headquarters can see as well as you or I. This cannot be right.

So we just don't post where we have been or we find a more private way.

I have contacted a poster here though SF. You don't know what we said. There was nothing top secret discussed, that's not important, only that if it were private it could remain so.

#20 Wolfram | 2012-06-19 16:43

Personally, I'm surrounded by constant 'noise' and distractions for long hours, from work and other stuff. So, I enjoy the luxury of "Where Did You Post the Mantra Today," for several reasons:

1- quick access, 2-hit and run Mantra posting, 3-a visual of where we have been and what was said. 4- etc, etc.

(And, yes, I know. All this info anti-whites can 'also' use against us).

So, I'm not complaining, especially since I post mostly on YT and acquiesce to the insight of Bob and many of the old time Bugsters. But- I don't see (with a few exceptions, i.e. 'How Whites Took Over America' and Genseric) that we are being targeted and followed by hordes of anti-whites or any professional anti-white organizations (at least not at this time).

Just an 'unscientific' observation and opinion. Now, back to work AND posting against 'White Genocidal' scum --before the links disappear.

#21 Harumphty Dumpty | 2012-06-19 16:45

I'll be happily surprised if the results of this change are striking or conclusive. If they are, then I guess the change is worth what we'll lose.

#22 zyzz | 2012-06-19 17:17

Spread the Mantra far and wide.

I rarely post the links where I post the Mantra but I always join in the Swarms where the link is posted.

Get out there and do work on your own, gents. I am very confident in each and every one of you to defend the Mantra using the Debate points and Mini Mantra list. Literally every scenario is covered in the Mini Mantra list.

ps: Remember, no "race-mixing." Always genocide.

#23 Wolfram | 2012-06-20 09:39

"Get out there and do work on your own"

I beg your pardon!

I take exception to your implied remark, especially since it 'missed the mark' of my response to Bob's post.

Let us NOT condescend to anyone at BUGS, concerning how much time/effort they can or 'are able' to bring to the table.

We are fighting against 'White Genocide' --not who can post or do the most work. This is not a contest but a battle for the future of our White race and children.

#24 patrickwhiterabbit | 2012-06-19 17:51

For some reason 99.9% of my comments don't appear anymore in the "where did you" thread when posting under TOR (which i do 100% of the time nowadays). So i am already doing this!

PS-Oh and the capicha images are total bitches to read! Whats going on?!

#25 BoardAd | 2012-06-19 22:40

Spam guard must be eating you. I haven't cleared it in a while.

#26 patrickwhiterabbit | 2012-06-19 17:57

Ahh so my posts are getting through here. Okay so this is a bit off topic but can someone get in touch with this guy from savewhitepeople.com and tell him to "tone down" his approach? I realize he has "balls" to get out there and spread the message but there is something about his approach and mannerisms that are as counter productive to us as naming the J words (sorry John if you are reading!)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=z7GhBKuVxZE

#27 Jason | 2012-06-20 08:50

I agree .... I appreciate the gentleman's courage, but if I could suggest anything, I would say tone it down a bit. I think he's a bit too much into impressing the enemy with his aggressiveness, and needs to focus on how he looks to neutral person more.

Also, he seems to think of homosexuality as a thing that spreads culturally. I've decided it must be pretty much biological, because most of us know with 100% certainty who we are attracted to from a pretty early age. Having signs that go on about "anal sex" seems a waste of time and again looks bad.

#28 patrickwhiterabbit | 2012-06-20 09:43

He does get too hysterical, it is a shame as he has a lot of gut to put his face on camera.

A bunch of anti-White homosexuals started a thread about him. I smacked them with the Mantra under the guise of Tim Wise and got an IP ban and my named changed to "argumentative racist" because apparently its against their regulations for a pro White to use the name Tim Wise.

PS-God these captcha's are difficult to read!!

#29 Peter Whiterabbit | 2012-06-20 22:46

Guys, don't lament a guy who is getting our message out. You might think he's a goofy guy but, guess what...people won't watch a "normal" person in a video. He is a character. As a bugster, look for ways to use this as an opportunity to reach our audience.

#30 Jason | 2012-06-21 21:29

I applaud him for getting out there, but the way we ACT is part of the message. I just think he could improve his presentation. I'm sure he wants feedback on what works and doesn't work, right? I don't want to demoralize him, this is just feedback on how it looks.

Not every style we use works to get the message out. Style is part of the message.

#31 (G)host | 2012-06-22 01:18

Jason, no offense. But, you are REALLY new here. You ought to let the man do his thing and work on you until you dry out behind those ears a little bit more.

Ya dig?

#32 Jason | 2012-06-22 02:11

Well I'm not brand new exactly, I've been here a few months, but not too long. But I can tell how someone comes across. I could have told you that 10 years ago. Some WNs step on their own message by not paying attention to how they present themselves. And we do get to coach each other and offer advice.

#33 Jason | 2012-06-22 02:17

And I would say this gentleman is using Bob's stuff and/or BUGster material, that entitles us to comment on how he is doing. If it was his own original material, that would be another thing. But on BUGster material we all coach each other all the time, I've been told to stop tailgating for example, in very direct terms - and they were right. We critique each other. That is part of the gig.

So, good for him for having courage, but feedback on how to improve comes with the territory, because guess what? We can actually do more harm than good if not careful.

#34 Peter Whiterabbit | 2012-06-22 07:21

Jason, all valid points. I actually find him entertaining in that he is a character. When he got so upset with the gays marching, I found his reaction comical. Maybe I have a warped sense of humor at times but if I found it comical, others will find it comical. In fact, i just realized he has 26,000 views in 5 days. Not too shabby. People interested will go to his site and read "AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS. ASIA FOR THE ASIANS. WHITE NATIONS FOR EVERYONE."

It is helping spread our message.

#35 Dick_Whitman | 2012-06-22 07:25

You guys have expressed my exact thoughts regarding the "Save White People" website. I've been studying it for the last 3 weeks and will post my full report later tonight.

#36 Dick_Whitman | 2012-06-22 22:28

Sorry folks, not done with my analysis on "Save White People" yet. Should be done by Sunday.

#37 Roderick | 2012-06-19 20:27

I don't know if I like this approach. To me it seems like it discourages people from posting. What about the newer people? How are we going to help improve them. I suppose we could try, just to see how it compares.

Personally I think we should take a decentralization approach where we have subforums where people make their own threads based on the kinds of videos they target. As well, Perhaps we should post our hits on other forums such as stormfront just to mix things up.

#38 c-bear | 2012-06-19 20:48

I like it. If you are new you can easily hit the swarm links we put up. Putting up every post just makes the anti-whites' job easier. This should be fun to watch the anti-whites squirm.

What if we still report, but on a delayed basis: say 2-3 days? Maybe a week? That would give us plenty of time to dig in while the comments are still hot., and still track our progress.

#39 (G)host | 2012-06-19 20:54

This might be a workable solution as well.

#40 (G)host | 2012-06-19 20:53

The ONLY way this works is if you SPLIT the work area in half.

The password-protected work area is for VETTED members and the public area is for prospects to PROVE their intent - put in work - so the rest of us see that they have what it takes. One month of solid productivity and we vote on a prospect. Either way, people are posting the Mantra. Win win.

I am suspicious of a couple existing posters already.

-G

#41 Rick | 2012-06-19 22:38

I was trolling before Anon existed. Anyone dedicated enough can be a successful troll.

#42 (G)host | 2012-06-20 00:45

Would you agree that a troll who posts the Mantra for a month is a USEFUL troll?

By any means necessary, right?

"What's the password?! .....I hear jew knockeeng, but jew can't come eeeen...."

#43 Dick_Whitman | 2012-06-19 23:23

It seemed like Youtube was where the problems arose (and Yahoo as well)? What if we reported everything except at places that can be disrupted by anti-Whites? If someone posts something at a regular news outlet (say the Wash Post or LA Times) can these places be disrupted like those at You-tube or Yahoo Answers?

IOW, can comments be marked as "spam" at all sites?

#44 (G)host | 2012-06-20 00:51

"IOW, can comments be marked as "spam" at all sites?"

YES.

-G

#45 Iceknight | 2012-06-20 14:42

I think there needs to be a balance here. People should be working independently, but the links on the SWARM are also one of the major reasons us BUGSters visit the SWARM each day.

Take them all away and it will destroy the great community and camaraderie that BUGS has built up, as we help each other out on the front lines.

We shouldn't post all our links, but we definitely still need a steady flow to keep us BUGSters engaged and entertained.

#46 Harumphty Dumpty | 2012-06-20 16:28

You've expressed perfectly a disquiet I've been vaguely feeling, and which I'll guess some others have too.

I like your suggestion, and the heavy swarmers on e.g. youtube and yahoo answers could link half of the threads they link there and not link the other half, and that might give a very good idea of the extent we're followed from this site.

If Bob wants to continue with the present plan, maybe after a while he would be agreeable to also trying that plan? Bugsers could link some of their posts, and just give a report of others as we are doing now.

#47 (G)host | 2012-06-20 23:20

My pappy used to say, "If Taint broke, don't fix it."

So, is it really broke?

#48 H.Avenger | 2012-06-21 11:18

I have a few articles coming out on the Blog. One article has been turned in already and it is about not posting "social media" links on Youtube, Facebook, Yahoo. You don't have to post any links unless you need help from the Swarm on that particular link. You can post lamestream media links and of course continue to post links you want the Swarm to help on.

The social media links are a special case. Youtube is a very special case. Of course, many of these "social media" companies have the same owners. Not posting the links will make it easier for the Swarm members to keep their names/passwords secure and free from banning for longer periods of time. They have made big adjustments in policies (esp. at Youtube). I want you guys prepared ahead of time at full strength in front of July/August/Sept. And I want you guys to have minimum hassle in your Swarming lifestyle.

Again, lamestream media links are not a problem at all IMO. Posting a link to CNN were you are smacking around AntiWhites is no problem at this time. And the Social Media links can be argued back and forth.....but I have an ace in the hole. And I want you guys to have an easier life on sites like Youtube coming into the fall. That will in turn make our enemies jobs more difficult.

There may be a time when it does not matter how many Youtube/Facebook/Yahoo links you post on the Swarm. I will let you know....but for now until well after things (like our next animation). Keep all but the necessary Youtube links off the Swarm.

#49 GregP | 2012-06-23 02:07

Something definitely needs to be done, but we have some real problems we need to deal with: morale, coaching new people, etc. etc.

One problem I haven't seen brought up is how we are going to tell whether a person claiming to have posted the mantra IS actually posting the mantra. Potentially, trolls could just post on BUGS only pretending to have posted elsewhere. Then, we take these trolls seriously when they comment or offer help on projects.

I'm not sure what the solution is, but I've heard a lot of good ideas that have potential. I'm liking the idea of private, vetted group(s), and of proportional link posting. Maybe every 3rd or 4th?

I think every 3rd or 4th would be a good compromise (in conjunction with some of the ideas expressed above). I tend to post in 3-4 different places at a time, so for me that would translate into one link per mantra run.

I like the idea of small groups working together too. Maybe groups of 5-10 people with at least 1-2 veterans could work together and post all their results on a private group forum or group chat (e.g. a group skype chat), and the trusted veteran could guide the others, and report back once or twice a week (maybe with 1/4 links or something)?

New people could be assigned to a group, and they would feel like they were working with real people, see links, etc. etc. If they don't post enough, or pull some BS, they only compromise that one cell and could easily be kicked out. It would require a hell of a lot more work on the anti-whites' part to screw with that system.

I for one, would be willing to help set up a small group via skype text chat if others don't know how to do it. I'm no vet, though, and have been inactive for the past month for personal reasons but Blackbyte can vouch for my putting good work into the FTWR #1 transcription.

Anyway, something will work. Just remember this is good news. This means we are being effective. They won't be able to stop us. Anti-whites are only spurring us into more creativity and professionalism.

@PatrickWhiteRabbit you said,

"For some reason 99.9% of my comments don't appear anymore in the "where did you" thread when posting under TOR (which i do 100% of the time nowadays). So i am already doing this!"

I've had the same problem. Here's how I get around it:

1. Copy and paste whatever you are planning to post onto the SWARM into a word doc (preferably first, so you don't accidentally hit submit before copying it).

2. If it doesn't go through the first time. Shut down Tor and open it again.

3. Sign in.

4. Copy and Paste from word doc.

This has never failed me. I know it sounds a bit like a pain in the ass but it's really not as bad as it sounds. It also helps if you do bigger posts instead of lots of little one. This way you just amass all your links in the word doc. and if you have to restart Tor then, it's not such a big deal b/c you're done anyway.

Don't know why I need to restart Tor. But it's better than trying to post the same thing 16 times and getting all miffed about it.

@Horus

Good to know. I wasn't aware of that distinction between youtube/facebook/yahoo and MSM sites.

@anyone

Does the one comment rule still apply? I'm not trying to get on anyones case, I'm just not sure since I've been out of the loop for a minute. I think this one may kind of be an exception, given the level of importance etc.