THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

YEAR FIFTEEN AND YOU ARE DOING GREAT! | 2013-07-12

My Administrator reminds me that whitakeronline.org will be fifteen years old this August.

I was in Moscow when I got the site. There was already a whitakeronline.com, so I had to take .org.

WOL was part of the Southern Nationalist website. That was back when I couldn't even attack the melting pot because the official SNP line was that an independent South would be melting pot with Traditional Values.

When I attacked the Puritans, the Presbyterian theocrats who ran the SNP at the time raised hell.

The point is that it was rough going, and that today's BUGSERS are more of an improvement than you can probably imagine.

Can you imagine a Mantra Bob having to appeal to an audience like that?

More important, can you imagine how, to me, you are a dream come true?

To imagine those years could be a really excellent exercise for you. It tells you where we are and where we are going. The SNP split and both factions kept my column.

It was a great step up when I took the site, by far the top site in SNP, and went into the Stormfront audience.

The people we now refer to as AMPW, anti-Mantra Pro-Whites, were a giant relief after the SNP.

Then, as I cleared out the Opposing Views section, those shouting "racist," with the Mantra, along came a precious few, I think Lord Nelson, who began using the Mantra.

Absolutely no one could understand that white countries, and ONLY white countries, were being targeted. No one wanted to talk about that.

NO ONE.

Now the tiny working population of BUGS makes me very happy because they correct each other, after my years of having to correct each of what are now seen as obvious errors.

If you can put yourself in my shoes ten years ago, facing a solid wall of AMPWs, you might see a little of the joy I feel when you actually go out in the field and come back, not to tell us, not The Latest

News on Jews, but on what WORKS to stun anti-whites in the real world.

How many miles we have come from a hundred Southern Nationalists who insisted they were better anti-whites than anybody else to a sophisticated, practicing group fighting White Genocide as pros?

COMMENTS (20)

#1 Jason | 2013-07-12 07:43

Amazing what can be done when we are allowed to speak in an authentic voice that names facts for what they are. A tiny group like this wields far more influence than some mushy conservative group with several million members.

I find it fascinating that Bob developed the Mantra, not by talking to other pro-Whites, but by engaging the anti-Whites. There is a big lesson in that and I can't put it into words yet. Someone try!

Thank God for Lord Nelson and the early adopters. And despite our ruckus debates and various conflicts, I am grateful for ALL of you. We keep learning from each other. We truly are what the overpriced consultants call a "learning organization". Except this time we really are!

The political dynamics are coming together in a way that leads to more racialization of politics at the same time the Mantra is starting to enter the public's mind.

The next 10-15 years will be MUCH more dramatic than the previous 15 years. Buckle up. :)

#2 Epiphany | 2013-07-12 08:23

And one fine day, the brown, red, yellow, and Black masses shall no longer immigrate to America, but rather flee. They still keep coming, as if they do not know that the economy is faltering here.

Again, they envy us. They envy our accomplishments. They even envy us because we are smarter and better looking than they are. All their hatred of us is based upon envy!

#3 seapea | 2013-07-12 11:25

Congratulations to Bob and all the folks involved with WOL for 15yrs of faithful service. Milestones like this shouldn't be allowed to slip by with no fanfare. It's too bad Bob won't be showing up at this years Stormfront conference, it would be nice to celebrate the 15yrs amongst friends.

#4 Daniel Genseric | 2013-07-12 15:55

The American Dream is a lie

STOP white genocide

#5 Asgardian117 | 2013-07-12 22:14

Ohhh Daniel, I feel your anger in the comment you left. My levels of frustration are probably on par with yours if I could guess. I dont believe it was always a lie, is it a lie now? Absolutely, but we all know the only way to avenge those who had terrible fates FORCED on them is to smash the Anti White system (non violently of course) and to avenge the american dream that a few ppl had in mind for us.

This is in no wqy trying to dispute your comment im just lettin you know that you arent alone in the way you feel.

#6 steadiness | 2013-07-12 20:33

15 years?

5 years ago I was sanctimonying my girlfriend over her appreciating blue eyes and comparing rap music to Homer.

15 years ago the book The Bell Curve was considered to be thoroughly discredited and in a globalized world there weren't going to be homelands for anyone.

Having an Internet to talk about stuff without the media filter is important, and also the increasingly obvious abject failure of 50 years of integration and affirmative action.

But I wonder if I wouldn't still be cheering for a second-degree murder verdict against the guy who had the temerity to defend himself when he was assaulted by a diversity if not for Whitaker with the word 'anti-White' and the recognition that the anti-Whites want genocide.

#7 Epiphany | 2013-07-12 23:05

These days, one can get into at least as much trouble coming across as patriotic to America, as one can coming across as either a Communist or a Nazi. That is the strange thing. It is like Whites are no longer allowed to have any National feelings at all.

I really often wonder why we even allow in all those Third World peoples, and why they come? There is no such thing as a Nation of Immigrants, since most Americans hardly ever tolerate the English and Germans. And I suspect that there are those who craftily played the English and Germans against each other, way back when.

The American Dream is just that. There is nothing real about it, at least not anymore. And I am beginning to seriously wonder if most Whites would realize that they are being oppressed? The Reds, Browns, Yellows, and Blacks babble that we are somehow oppressing and tyrannizing over them, instead of the other way about. That is the idiocy of Political Correctness!

Why is it alright for the Political Left to incite and incur the envy of the Reds, Browns, Yellows, and Blacks, but somehow racist for us Whites to so much as criticize any of these non--White peoples? I often wonder about just that. We really cannot afford Diversity anymore!

#8 Bob | 2013-07-13 15:20

Nobody seems to have even noticed the term "Politically Factual."

#9 Epiphany | 2013-07-13 16:15

There is almost nothing factual about what Tim Wise babbles. And most of what the Politically Correct claim is not only not factual, but outright in defiance of logic itself. Most Whites do not know it, but Whites are the ones most oppressed these days!

#10 Daniel Genseric | 2013-07-13 16:17

I have, but only to myself.

Still trying to comprehend how it differs from "politically correct."

Wouldn't it be easier to say, "That Fact (or Truth) is politically correct."

#11 Harumphty Dumpty | 2013-07-13 16:27

I'm trying to think of how it could be used. Maybe when an anti-white recites one of their standard falsehoods that relates to our message, we could respond,

"Politically correct" doesn't mean the same thing as "correct," and politically factual doesn't mean the same thing as factual.

The actual fact is that All White countries and ONLY White countries...

"Politically correct" is a term that's already understood, but "politically factual" requires some explanation like I just gave it, I think, to be useful.

I think it could be useful...but it seems to me to go only slightly further than "politically correct" goes, and maybe what I wrote above would be better replaced by just,

"You are politically correct. But are you correct?

Of course not. The fact is that..."

I think I like that better, since it's less cluttered.

Let me try again.

Anti-white recites a standard falsehood that relates to our message, and bugster replies,

"You've opened up a brand new category: 'politically factual.'

A timely invention, since 'political correctness' is on the way out.

Do you ever do 'actual factual'?

Here's an actual fact for you, anti-white: ALL White countries..."

Lol...I like that better!

I think like "antiwhitism," and "heretic," there will be certain occasions where it's just the term that works, but that we'll be clunky with it until we've used it awhile.

Until educated otherwise, I'm regarding all such terms as side memes (well, antiwhitism is central in the same way anti-white is) that help our message and provide filler in statements that transition back to Mantra.

#12 Harumphty Dumpty | 2013-07-13 16:34

redaction:

"...side memes that help undo resistance to our message..."

#13 Jason | 2013-07-13 17:03

I noticed it too, and like Dave I've been trying to process it, comparing to terms like "social facts" and PC in general.

#14 dungeoneer | 2013-07-13 19:21

To my trainee political strategist way of thinking it seems bad to be appearing to bash politics per se, even if there is none of our politics in The Politics.

#15 dungeoneer | 2013-07-13 20:49

Forget this noise.Coach obviously sees an advantage in using Politically Factual for explanation where religion and the Party Line fall short or need to be made new.

#16 seapea | 2013-07-14 04:50

I've heard some say "Everybody is entitled to their own opinion but not to their own facts." They frequently follow that statement with a regurgitated list of "facts" they heard some "expert" pass out to the masses.

There are think tanks and research facilities staffed with "experts" who are paid to produce nothing but Paid-In-Full (Political) Facts. These "facts" are then slid into the public discourse as the rationale for whatever agenda those who paid for those "facts" wanted. Since the "facts" came from "experts", it's hard for laymen to dispute them.

Politically Factual seems to point to the question "why was this information produced?" And what happens to the information/facts that aren't desirable, convenient or don't have an "expert" stamp of approval?

#17 Harumphty Dumpty | 2013-07-14 09:40

Anti-whites' consider real facts to be "hate facts."

Statements like that, using the term "hate facts," are useful satirically in some situations.

#18 Bob | 2013-07-14 12:32

Right, seapea.

The sixteenth comment finally addressed the point of the article.

"African-American" is politically correct.

"Races differ in their innate average intelligence" is a violation of the "Politically Factual."

No one has even thought of naming that before.

#19 Frank | 2013-07-14 15:53

It's politically correct to call the Six Million Story the Holocaust. If you don't use the label "Holocaust", and with a capital H, it's a violation of politically enforced "correct" terminology usage.

To go out and critically discuss whatever things are alluded to by either the Six Million Story or the Holocaust is violation of the politically factual.

In a lot of places violating political facts will land you in jail.

That's how you know they are POLITICAL facts: you run up against a power, a truth regime which will punish you for not agreeing with their "facts".

This isn't a discussion about the six million story or whatever you want to label it. It's a discussion about how power and "the truth" are connected. Recognizing how that works is a flashlight to find the exit door.

Thanks seapea and Bob.

#20 Frank | 2013-07-14 16:18

It's politically correct to call the Six Million Story the Holocaust. If you don't use the label "Holocaust", and with a capital H, it's a violation of politically enforced "correct" terminology usage.

To go out and critically discuss whatever things are alluded to by either the Six Million Story or the Holocaust is violation of the politically factual.

In a lot of places violating the politically factual will land you in jail.

That's how you know they are POLITICAL facts: you run up against a power, a truth regime which will punish you for not agreeing with their "facts". The "factuality" of the politically factual rests on the ability to cause harm to anyone who doesn't say "yes ma'am" to these "facts"

Mommy Professor runs a politically factual truth regime. There are few facts involved, but a lot of the politically factual, all resting on her presumed authority as an "expert".

This isn't a discussion about the six million story or whatever you want to label it. It's a discussion about how power and "the truth" are connected. Recognizing how that works is a flashlight to find the exit door.

Thanks seapea and Bob.