THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

MARWINGSING | 2007-07-27

Do we mark the Pope a race-traitor? In that case, do we not mark every single living 'bona-fide', elected white leader in the West a race-traitor? And what of their white electorates? Heck there's work to be done!

ME:

OK. Every single living bona-fide white leader IS a race-traitor. It's part of the job description.

I have been pointing that out on WOL since the beginning. The instant a leader says somethng pro-white he is no longer respectable and he is OUT. I am an example of that.

Pain made the only comment on my piece below about how other professinals read my writing because I am 1) kicked out and 2) a damned good source of thought respectable NEED every day to make a living. He said something abut how I am sayng a priest wrote the Sobran piece I referred to, which I assume is his brand of humor.

But I DID figure out a way to take ADVANTAGE of being kicked out. I AM a pro, I made MONEY out of my ideas, and now they're free for the taking, and nobody has to giveme credit for them. You better believe the other pros take advantage of that. I hope SOMEBODY noticed the POINT here.

BECAUSE I'm kicked out, my ideas spread BETTER than they would if I were a big name getting paid for it. Bill Rusher gave me credit for one of my ideas in a book, and THAT one didn't spread.

This is an EXAMPLE of my saying, "Yu can have the money, yu can have the fame, you can have the titles, all I want to do is rule the world." It works beautifully precisely because no one but me can SEE it working.

REPETITION | 2004-10-09

Repetition takes incredible discipline. A politician would much rather show you how smart he is and how many things he knows. He doesn't like to look like a party hack. But if he doesn't repeat and repeat and repeat, he will not win.

So do you want to look good or do you want to influence national affairs?

Someone once asked Senator Fulbright what it took to be a great senator. Fulbright replied, "First, you have to be a senator."

So if you want to be a great senator, you have to repeat your message over and over and over.

As a matter of fact this is the lifeblood of all political professionalism.

It is called "Staying on message."

If you want to influence world affairs you have to make your point. You have to use every possible opening to make your point. You have to be sure nobody is able to avoid your point.

A professor friend of mine was overwhelmed by my ability to make Communists look like idiots. The minute a person said he was a Communist, I would say, "Why is it that every Communist country has to kill people who try to escape and America has to keep people out?"

There would be a long diatribe on the Evil West or something similar.

My response?

You guessed it

"Well, that doesn't quite deal with my point. My question was why is it that every Communist country has to kill people who try to escape and America has to keep people out?"

I remember once saying, "This is the eighteenth time I have asked this, but why is it that every Communist country has to kill people who try to escape and America has to keep people out?

It always worked. The one thing everybody listening to that conversation remembered was that every Communist country has to kill people to keep them there, and America has to keep them out. There was no answer to that.

Please note people did not go away from that thinking Bob Whitaker was a genius. They went away thinking Communism is a horror when it comes to human beings.

That was my purpose and I accomplished it.

KO TERMS | 2012-04-02

It is not immodest for a coach to say he knows a lot about football. If he doesn't think his players are learning a hell of a lot, he should be doing something else.

When it comes to the only important issue on earth, you already have plenty here to teach you the general art of fisticuffs. If you have been a BUGSER for a while, the only strategy your opponents have is to avoid a fair fight.

So we who know this business are now in a position to go straight for a Knockout.

You can talk all week about "inhibiting the free flow of ideas." In fact, that is about the only language our rather desperately respectable pro-whites know. But for me, such obstruction is a great chance to use the term "Thought Police," which is what we are facing, a term everybody knows, and is a knockout punch.

Think of all the millions of words respectable pro-whites have poured out to answer the simple phrase Kennedy's speech writer put in, "A Nation of Immigrants." Those are not even light jabs in the actual match.

I use, "All nations are nations of immigrants." It normally kills their argument, exposes their ignorance of history, and they never use that slogan around me twice.

It's a KO phrase.

It is so simple that, like White Genocide, the KO is often overlooked.

Amateur propagandists naturally go through exactly the same phases early advertisers did.

It's largely an ego thing that makes amateurs want to look smart and for people to think they know the subject expertly. But to the early car makers and the pretend doctors who sold patent medicines, it was a matter of survival.

More words for less money! Every Real Businessman knew how to handle THAT!

So early ads by Practical Businessmen found that you got more words for the same money if it was in small print, so they had a whole page you could hardly read even is you tried.

And precious few people tried.

One of the first products of women's liberation was lung cancer. Instead of a long discussion of where they bought their tobacco, one cigarette company just showed a man smoking and his girl friend sitting beside him saying, "Blow some my way."

It made smoking seem attractive in men and it got millions of women smoking.

But we are STILL in the amateur age of propaganda.

It didn't sell then and it doesn't sell now.

OBEDIENCE VERSUS MENTAL DISCIPLINE | 2010-09-27

I spent my life trying to get people to see the obvious, to think about what they already knew. I am always afraid if I talk about anything but the basics, reality will slip away from them.

When he got into the spirit of the Mantra, even Lord Nelson found he was more and more slipping away from it. He found he was very successful when he talked about white countries being "overrun."

So he went that route, not considering what was happening, until I reminded him of it. If Lord Nelson can make that mistake, the average joe will veer of in the wrong direction and STAY there.

"Overrunning" can be accepted. It does not criticize the Reverend Martin Luther the King or the Holy State of Interracial Marriage. It does not attack assimilation.

The only signal Lord Nelson got as he slid down this oily path was that his argument was suddenly much easier to make. When I pointed it out to him, he recoiled from it like it was a cobra. But who else would mention it to him?

There are no sign paths. World War II vets didn't become deadly enemies of their own race because they MEANT to. They just found that the more they did it the more their papers hats were praised by the media.

So I stick to repeating and I am very encouraged when I see, especially in General Comments 4, you remind each other of the basics. You MUST learn to go back to the basics again and again and again and again.

We are always looking for ways to get our message across. But we must constantly ask ourselves if we are not succeeding by not saying what they don't want to hear.

Too many people hack off pieces of the Mantra and seem unable to get my message: I developed the Mantra from PRACTICE, not from a committee.

The Mantra is not a Declaration, it is a TOOL. It cuts them off from each pass, like the Nazi label, I know from a thousand arguments they are going to get off on. "Anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews" is extraneous to someone ticking off the points as if it were an English exercise.

The only short Mantra I have found is "Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White Countries for Everybody." But that is because I USED it.

The Obedient Generation shows us how easy it is to slip, ever so slowly, into accepting the Party Line. Principled conservatives didn't do it purposely. They don't even KNOW they're doing it.

This leftist-respectable conservative duo was never thought of by anybody. It EVOLVED. Nobody talks about it but me.

The world is much clearer to me, people who never forget the basic principle of supply and demand or Occam's Razar or other basics. If you get off reality like that, you have to be able to do your usual review of basics and laugh at yourself and correct yourself.

If someone slips, catch him quick.