THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

STORMFRONT REPLY | 2006-01-26

This is an exchange I had with a Stormfront member:

I am beginning to realize that someone is about to make a really great comment by the fact that it includes a lot of apologies.

So here was the inevitable apology after the excellent insight:

"I think there is a moral in there somewhere. Feel free to use it if you can figure out what it is."

What this person told me is exactly what I keep preaching: the great problem we face in dealing with the Big Lie is actually realizing, I mean realizing at the gut level, just how stupid what all these highly paid pretentious "authorities" REALLY ARE.

As if all their titles and money were not enough, they have a backup group of respectable conservatives to act like an opposition and to take them seriously.

That is the essence of the Big Lie. You cannot deal with it without ridiculing it.

But we have been taught at enormous expense that there is something TO what we see as simply ridiculous.

An adult has real difficulty saying, "But, all crap aside, the Emperor is stark naked!"

It sounds childish to let the truth out like that.

But of such, as someone better than me said, is the Kingdom of Heaven.

[QUOTE=x]What a pleasant surprise to get a private message from Bob Whitaker.

I got it as I was reading a thread about the educational level and IQ's of people on stormfront. This thread reminded me of the time I learned how high my own IQ was. Looking back I thought it could have been a Bob Whitaker story.

I was going through a divorce and custody fight and part of that was physiological testing including an IQ test. When the psychologist told me that my IQ was rather high he asked what I thought of that.

I replied "It scares the hell out of me."

He looked at me rather perplexed and asked "Why"

I said "All these years I have thought that I was just average and the people in charge were all smarter. Now you tell me that most of them are not as smart as me. We are all screwed. "

I think there is a moral in there somewhere. Feel free to use it if you can figure out what it is.

ANOTHER JOKE I MADE UP | 2009-12-18

This doesn't mean that no one else thought of the same thing. It just means that since I never heard it from others means they're probably new to you.

I seldom read links that are sent to me via email unless they have an explanation first. Being a writer, most of my emails consist almost entirely of stuff I wrote myself , so I am probably more touchy than others about someone who wants me to spend my time reading something values his own time more. I can't STAND a clown who sends out a link with no explanation to a group of people.

Having demonstrated once again that I'm a grumpy old bastard, I will now try to show that I am a grumpy old bastard with a sense of humor.

Having spent my life around fanatics, workaholics, drunks -- and me -- I am used to depression. So I made a joke about History's Greatest Depressive. Old HGD was a fine, but he saw the worst in EVERYTHING and was always miserable. The angels couldn't wait for him to die and go to Heaven where he could get rid of all that misery.

Finally the Day came. The depressive came into Paradise and the angels sang in chorus, "Welcome to the Joyous Place where you will spend the rest of eternity."

In reply, the depressive wailed, "The REST of eternity? You mean I MISSED the first half?"

Another one that probably shows my state of mental unhealth:

Do you know how to tell someone is paranoid schizophrenic?

He says:

"They're out to get us."

This one I did not make up, but it relates to an earlier article. I recognized Lord Monckton who was in Ventura's show about global warming because BoardAd quoted him to me. I have written about how all the Communists became Environmentalists the day the Soviet Empire fell.

Lord Monckton says "Greens" have "stoplight politics."

This means that they say they're Green because they are too yellow to admit they're Reds.

In my Southern Partisan Partisan Dictionary a quarter of century I defined Catholics as, "People who say some of their best friends are priests but don't want their daughter to marry one."

I got a long aggrieved letter from a Catholic guy who decided I was persecuting him with that definition. My editor, a South Carolina Irish Catholic, told me to ignore it.

Actually he said, "F... him," but it meant the same thing.

The Partisan Dictionary was an obvious rip-off of Bierce's nineteenth century work, but since Ambrose Bierce was a Texan I felt free to steal his Devil's Dictionary concept as a part of the Southern Heritage The Partisan at that time reflected.

After all, Bierce defined "Mulatto" as "A child of two races, ashamed of both."

BENEATH THE MOON | 2006-06-09

One of the three men who got an award for pushing through the original permission for The Human Genome Project (HGP) gave his entire award to The Black Panther Party.

It was a guarantee that HGP, thought it was in the forbidden area of genetics, would NEVER contradict the doctrine that race does not exist.

I think any realistic person can imagine, as the HGP slowly got its approval, how many guarantees were made that the Human Genome project would repeat and repeat and repeat and repeat that race does not exist.

My proof that race DOES exist is typical Whitaker:

Every forensic pathologist must do two things:

1) First, he must be able to determine the race of a corpse from dessicated remnants or bones and swear to the race of said corpse in court and

2) He must swear in court that race does not exist.

Practically nobody ever considers these points together. Their thinking is rigidly what Orwell called Doublethink.

Without Doublethink you don't get your degree, and you sure as hell don't get professorial tenure.

One cannot explain this routine Doublethink unless he realizes that Political Correctness is not LIKE a religion, it IS a religion. Once you realize that, today's situation fits neatly into history.

I think most people are aware of the difficulties Galileo ran into when he looked through the telescope invented in Northern Europe.

Galileo saw that the Bible was just plain wrong about earth being the center of the universe. It is not true that he was immediately condemned. He was warned repeatedly that he had to find a way to meld his ideas into the Political Correctness of the day.

As I will explain the HGP people are trying desperately to get their latest discoveries to meld into Politically Correct theology. Galileo didn't even TRY.

Moslem scholars were smarter. They had a phrase, "This is true beneath the moon." They said that the Old Testament was perfectly correct, but their observations were those of mere men, not of the Imams. They carefully separated what was true "beneath the moon" from the Revealed Truth which only the Imams were able to see.

They didn't get away with it in the long run, but they fared a lot better than Galileo, whose Nordic honesty got him shut up for life.

Recently the Human Genome Project (HGP) has discovered what is called "the benevolent gene."

Darwin's "Nature, red in tooth and claw," said that each animal is totally ruthless and fights only for its own individual survival without mercy. Contrasted to this was Civilization, which taught humans to have some mercy and some benevolence toward their fellow men.

So only the Revealed Truth from the Middle East, the Old Testament, gave barbarians the slightest hint of human decency.

Darwin was personally anti-Christian, but nobody did more to advance the concept that only Middle Eastern Civilization made man anything but a ravenous animal.

Robert Ardrey did a lot to bring this nonsense to sanity. He pointed out endless examples of social animals who sacrificed their own lives to save the troop, something I was always taught that only The Greatest Generation ever did.

It is now generally recognized among serious students of human developement that group loyalty, benevolence, is one of the strongest incentives real social beings have for survival.

Now the HGP has actually found the very gene that promotes human benevolence. It was there a LONG time before the Old Testament was. It was in our very nature long before Political Correctness supplanted the Old Testament.

A sane person from another planet would naturally assume that when humans found they had natural benevolence they would celebrate. Finding one is naturally decent would seem to be good news.

We know different. Everybody from priest to preacher to Mommy Professor would burn them alive for that discovery if the old laws prevailed.

Those who claim to have found the genetic structure that produces benevolence are in DEEP trouble.

The problem with this benevolence being in our nature is that, once stated, it is obvious to anybody but a truly determined Doublethinker or a certified moron.

But a major portion of our society, the DOMINANT, RULING part of our society,makes it LIVING by being determined morons and Doublethinkers.

Imamas, lawyers, popes, preachers and above the largest clergy of our time, Mommy Professors, make their living that way.

Meanwhile, back on the earth "beneath the moon, benevolence is a genetic survival mechanism.

It exists because any given social animal wants to preserve its own kind.

Its OWN kind.

Not humankind.

Its OWN kind.

For a few million years those who do not have PhD's or theology degrees have noticed that birds do not fight to preserve Birddom in general and humans do not preserve Humanity in general.

Alfred Hitchcock came up with the concept of a war between birddom and humanity and he was not fool enough to take it seriously.

In fact, as is true in the case of all Politically Correct dogma, precisely the opposite is not only the case, but the OBVIOUS case.

You hear birds chirping loudly to announce their territory. But, unless you look like you might steal their eggs, they have no interest in YOU.

But if another bird, a certified member of the Brotherhood of Birddom, comes anywhere inside their territory they will attack it.

This gets WORSE the more KIN that fellow member of Birddom is to the bird doing the chirping.

A robin will REALLY go after another robin who violates its territory. Chimapnzees can live comfrortably with baboons in the same area, but try to force some more chimpanzees in there and see how much blood flows.

By the same token, men do not ask birds for their passports. They ask other MEN for their passports.

I feel a little crazy having to explain this, but the whole religion of Political Correctness sees this as alien to their worldview.

So I am trying to state reality to the priesthood.

At least I'm in the best company.

The Church crushed Galileo's for merely saying what he saw when he looked through that telescope. Comparing myself to Galileo is a litle scary, but it also makes he feel good.

Why is the benevolent gene such a HORRIBLE thing for the Genome Project?

The reason is that one of the absolute bases of the Politically Correct faith is that babies are not racially prejudiced AT ALL. That has been required doctrine all my life.

The Human Genome Project has found that the natural tendency of a BABY is to prefer its own race.

Which, if you have the slightest inkling of how evolution works, is not exactly rocket science.

Now everybody has suddenly forgotten that they ever said that small children were naturally unprejudiced.

The Human Genome Project faces a crisis. It has done what it SWORE that it would NEVER do. It has heavy evidence that human beings, like any other social animal, want to preserve their own kind against interbreedable types OF THEIR OWN SPECIES!

The Human Genome Project has stuck its foot in it, big time.

So what can they do now?

What they are doing is insisting that this discovery of innate racial prejudice just makes the case for Political Correctness stronger. They are insisting that integration needs to be forced long before Kindergarten.

Yes, it is true that science tells us the obvious fact that races prefer to survive. But the HGP assures us that that is a truth that is "beneath the moon."

The Human Genome Project is saying that, in the reality which only Mommy Professor or an Imam or a Pope or some theologian of another faith can discern, the Truth Beyond the Moon is what matters.

HGP agrees that anybody who says racial prejudice is natural should be burned alive. They will gather the wood and light the fire, if no respectable conservative does it first. Those who say that man's natural feelings should take precidence over the dictates of the priesthood are naziswhowanttokillsixmilliojews, and they want to outrun William Buckley in supressing them.

It worked for Buckley. Will it work for the HGP?

Moslem scholars tried it, and they survived longer than Galileo did. If you have morals, it's a good strategy.

Buckley showed that it works for a while. The Islamic scholars made it work for a while.

The bottom line is that at no time in history has this strategy worked for very long.

History tells us that this crap won't work.

WHY AMERICA'S POPULATION IS AGING | 2005-04-21

Fed Chairman Greenspan is bemoaning the aging of America's population so USA Today had a special front-page article on it.

Let me tell you how that happened.

Eric Hoffer, who never touched political issues, mused about 1970, "There seems to be a kind of conspiracy against the birth of intelligent children."

There was.

In the 1960s and 1970s there was a full scale battle for childlessness. A motto of Women's Liberation was, "It is at least as rewarding for a woman to paint a picture as to have a child."

Zero Population Growth was at its height.

The third world had many, many children, so the media advocated that the first world be childless to make up for that. Every old conservative was saying that the problem with the world was overpopulation.

Even Wilmot Robertson, who demanded the saving of the white race in his "The Dispossessed Majority," went with the trend. He advised young white people, "Please, in this overcrowded world, have no more than three children."

Who were to have the children? Obviously the third world was having more than enough of them. Anyone who said that smart people should have children was, and this is not an exaggeration, a Nazi. National Review announced without qualification that all children were the same.

There was an organization called "No Children" which got lots of publicity. Bob Barker, the big game show host, agreed with his wife to have no children and dedicate himself to taking care of stray animals.

Jewish liberals led in this campaign, a campaign against the long-dead Hitler. Bella Abzug was head of Women's Liberation.

And guess what population is now in a state of utter collapse?

The Jews, of course.

When your life is dedicated to revenge, you destroy yourself.