THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

SHARI -- AND MY APOLOGY TO COMMENTERS | 2006-09-24

Not Spam

Not Spam

Well I got some help and can now copy and paste. I sent to 4 disappointed students at Catholic Universities. The mantra is on my desk top so if someone has too many sites, they could assign a few to me.

Comment by Shari

ME:

I almost congratulted Shari on finding help on her own. Then it occured to me that Shari might not take this as a compliment. After all, she is a competent adult and she might not appreciate my praise for her simply acting like a competent adult.

But all of you who have been in this movement for a while realize how the IQ of a person seems to collapse when they get in here. On Stormfront you hear constant sfreaming about things no adult would bother with. You cannot get anybody to concentrate on the real, serious battle we face every day. They want to shout about the latest news and talk about how useless doing anything now is, but when The Time Comes, they'll be out there with their machine guns in the right.

They sound like ten-year-olds playing cowboys.

Even before I met these folks, I had been exposed to the World War II cowboys.

Or apemen.

Maybe only Joe and I remember, but Tarzan movies were always advertised with the King of the Apes, Tarzan, swinging from vine to vine and giving his call. "AAAOOAAOOAHOOAHOOHAH!" It was as famous in my youth as the Lone Ranger Theme, aka, The Willaim Tell Overture.

And every time I met a World War II vet I could hear him beating his chest and screaming, "AAAOOAAOOAHOOAHOOHAH!" One could not speak to them rationally, it was always "I learned in the military that you can't buck the Government."

"That shows I'm a Tough, Practical Real Man."

I found it tough to tell the difference between a shrieking Tough, Practical Real Man and a slave.

You have all been exposed to this sudden collapse of intelligence in people who go cowboy on you. It costs you a LOT of pain to get used to it, to get resigned to it. Now, abruptly, I am surrounded by adults. But from time to time I will slip into my old habits, and you know first-hand exactly where those habits came from.

I am delighted to have this problem. It was such an astonishing delight to read Dave's step-by-step, no words wasted guide to our kind of political warfare. It is great to see Shari going out and finding help and volunteering, I WANT YOU TO TAKE HER UP ON IT, to place some Bob's Mantras for those who have a list to put them on.

But I am still going to slip from time to time and fail to respect you the way you deserve to be respected.

My habits of mind run pretty deep. Shari mentioned some disappointed Catholic university students she had contacted. This got my mind back in my old professor mode. Then Shari mentioned she had Bob's Mantra on her desktop. I am NOT joking here. I thought for several minutes that she had a page with Bob's Mantra stuck on her COLLEGE-type, desktop!

I finally shook it off and realized what she meant, but it was honestly in my mind for a minute or two that she had it pasted on her desk, the wooden classroom one!

I still get a smile from people who volunteer to give me their cell number. I used to work in a place where one's cell number was an essential piece of information, but it had nothing to do with the telephone.

And when I go into a store and see directions relating to a credit card, telling you how to "swipe" something, it has a meaning for me that one would not expect from the management.

An old guy's institution memory is useful. But it comes with some liabilities.

TIM HITS THE BULLSEYE! | 2006-02-21

The title is my reply to Tim's comment on abortion:

I always get asked about abortion. I always say: "It depends on who is getting aborted". This draws anger and awe. The usual reaction is shock. The oddest thing is that EVERYONE knows what I mean! This has come as a surprise to me. You would think someone would ask for a further explanation. It has almost never been the case. I think Katrina has solidified a few things for us Mr Whitaker. I have seen more folks interested in my remarks. I have also seen and heard WAY more folks who are much more receptive to the title RACIST. I see folks more and more that do not bat an eyelash at this stuff. Now we just have to get more parots like me. Interesting to note, folks that grew up around areas like I did (heavily minority areas) are converted already. The Suburban folks are in general stupid and naive. I see why the politicos have no respect for the masses (I hate to put it like that because it may make me seem unconcerned toward the common man–which is obviously not true –or I would not be here on this blog). The suburban soccer moms are feeling the fire and getting more protective—mother ducks are becoming LESS STUPID and Naive. Thank Gawd. I was wondering how many Haitians living next door to a person in the burbs it would take to get through to them. Lenin had White people pegged when he stated:"Worse is Better". These stupid immigration policies may be seen as the saving grace for our race.

TIM ON SOCIAL CONSTRUCTS | 2009-05-11

There are no social constructs under International Law.

Go to see the local Forensic Pathologists and pull a hair from your head. The pathologists will test it and tell you what RACE you are. However, to keep his job he will tell you that race does not exist. Social Science and Real Science are not one and the same.

The law only recognizes REAL Science. International Law only recognizes REAL Science. No one can plead "they were just a social construct" at a genocide tribunal. Don't believe me? Just ask Saddam Hussein.

There are no social constructs under International Law.

YES, SIMMONS, IT'S NECESSARY | 2009-12-08

To answer Simmons' question at the end, it happens to be what the blog at its best is all about.

Simmons replies to my last article on him and Horus:

I thought I was clear of what audience I foisted my Mantra heresy upon. Horus calls them people of the consensus trance, Caste Football calls them the "drunk white fans", and Bob calls them Mommy Prof's puppets, but one thing they have in common is that they do not think, they are conditioned and trained to hold and speak certain yiews. Debating them is like debating your TV and I mean that literally because the TV tells them what to say and how to act and what to buy and basically how to live their lives.

Your point is well taken it is about Genocide, but first I do the yeoman's work of the thin edge of the wedge that breaks down the crazy Aunt Sally level of Political Correctness which is that thin shell which protects the yolk, basically by projecting an image of out of control hysteria. (or the Blazing Saddles version, "stop or I shoot the nigger")

Break down the fear of the crazy Aunt Sallies then the Mommy Profs are ours, they are like bald baby mice, and the cat has found their nest. First, "Anti-white" then "Genocide", first we create people who can stand up to the CASs then we feed them the line of genocide then the profs feel the fangs.

Abstract polemical thought is all good and well, but remember the Simmons theorem, "Its all personal." Abstract hypothesis is just that, abstract.

If needed I will cite personal examples of how this works from my own experiences and from others on our board, but for now modesty bids me to quit.