THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

THE PRACTICAL WAY OF SAVING OUR RACE | 2010-05-11

So if the nationalists are going to wimp out on us the way respectable conservatives did, what is our hope for the future, and why does Bob root for them so much?

In order to save our race, we need two things: 1) a desire to do it and 2) a means to do it.

A BUGser just got 2800 hits in one day on the Mantra! More and more SFers, I am told, are making the Mantra THEIR Mantra. No matter how their leaders cower back, the MESSAGE that any Nationalist Party advances in Europe helps the Mantra hugely.

It makes the unmentionable come true. The Parties are likely to fail, not least because they are not smart enough to use the Mantra. But the more the old political certainties are violated, the easier spreading the Mantra becomes.

And there are a LOT of violations coming. Like "liberal," the word Diversity is rapidly becoming un-chic.

And that is more important than any election.

It is not political policy that will save our race, it is the OPEN DESIRE to do so.

I have been writing my fingers off about the future, so maybe someone noticed. With fusion power and space-based solar power or whatever else is coming along while they show spacemen writing on slates and solar wheels spinning, if we make saving our race a legitimate priority, it will happen.

Attempts to build all-white communities repeatedly fail because they are a major effort. But new communities will be a matter of choice with an advance of technology. Already BUGS is more of a community than most of us have with our next-door neighbors.

We must get rid of the taboo on saving our race.

The problem with predictions of the future is that they assume they know HOW things will go. That is fatal, as, if you want to read my articles then read what I write about the future again with this in mind, as I keep saying.

Have you ever noticed something about white flight? It is not conservative flight. It is not Christian Flight. It is not liberal flight. Despite the fact that many of the Negroes believe in the Book just as much as the Christian who would love to have a nice, Christian black man for his daughter's husband, white flight never checks to see what Book a guy drools about.

It is national policy not to search a young Moslem for boarding a plane any more than an eighty-year-old white woman. But everyone knows this is insane.

In 1950, at the beginning of the Korean War, the congress debated a provision that draftees be allowed to choose all-white units, mixed units or all-black units. It was defeated for a very good reason: All the whites would go to the all-white units.

Precious few of the whites who SCREAM that the color of the skin is nothing refuse to join in the White Flight.

One of the absolute requirements to be a respectable conservative is to deny that white people would not choose to live in an all-white society. This is especially required if you want to be a respectable libertarian.

If the liberal media require something for respectability, it is sure to be what Screwtape called, "A good, solid, resounding lie." Actually, C.S. Lewis was referring to "equality" in that passage, but it is the same thing.

People used to live where they worked. Technology is making it more and more a matter of choice.

It takes a LOT of DAILY pressure to keep ANYONE from having ANY openly all-white community. The Mantra legitimizes it.

And once White Flight starts,, it doesn't stop.

DRAINING THE SWAMP | 2007-06-20

The article below was, as is usually the case, not the one I sat down to write.

What I WAS going to write about was a sign of real progress. Then I made two regressions. First, I was going to explain that OUR message is showing up in every mainline article about the white movement. "A plot against the white race" now appears in every sneering article. It USED to be "Hate." Now it is a crazy idea we have about this "plot against the white race." That is a MAJOR change.

But I realized that I was going to have to wade through all the "You are looking at THAT tiny thing while we are fighting Israel's war in Iraq" or "NEWS ITEM: Illegal aliens are flooding in' or "This doesn't affect the Powers That Be" and on and on and on. My point gets lost in all that muck.

Outside the blog I cannot make a point because it gets lost in the swamp of muck, stuff others want to rant on about. So I made a SECOND regression: Why is the point I am making more important than the ten thousandth repetition of a standard theme.

Well, to begin with, I made TWO regressions, two starts, before I found the NEW points I wanted to make. That should be worth something. But I wrote the article as a result of the second regression: Why should you pay special attention to the point ***I*** am trying to make?

A change in media wording certainly isn't in the same league with someone who thinks he is going to expose and bring down a world-wide conspiracy.

How do I DARE say that my observation is so critical that you must ignore tomes of material and concentrate on it? Because I have one field of expertise, and this is a seminar on it. If you are a freshman ad the professor mentions a point, you can afford to privately obsess on it. But in a real graduate seminar, your professor is following a CHAIN OF THOUGHT. It is an IMPORTANT chain, or you would not be in his seminar.

That means I am saying that I am a valuable resource AND that your Conspiracy is not as important as my expertise. That is one HELL of a claim! So how did I get to the point where I would have the chutzpah to make a claim like that?

Which is what I ended up writing abut.

And that, boys and girls, is how a SEMINAR should be conducted. After years of trying to poke supply and demand or the fact that congress has two houses down the throats of bored, hung-over and/or horny students, he FINALLY gets a chance to talk to people who are INTERESTED in his subject and who do not have to be spoon-fed.

That's what seminars USED to be and what MINE still is.

Intentional repeat:

That means I am saying that I am a valuable resource AND that your Conspiracy is not as important as my expertise. That is one HELL of a claim! So how did I get to the point where I would have the chutzpah to make a claim like that?

Which is what I ended up writing about.

What I have to say is a result of a lot of mental WORK, as you can see. I do not APPRECIATE it when somebody decides to get off the very, very subtle and complicated track I am trying to lay out by expounding on The Grassy Knoll or something.

Today, what is called "seminar" is like any other class: You learn to repeat the Party Line. So there is no ORIGINAL anything. Your notes have everything you need to know. But HERE I am not just TEACHING. I am trying to get you to JOIN me in critical thinking. That means feeling down through all the muck and finding the POINTS.

This is not your only source of mental stimulation. You can Google up tome after tome on any subject that mucks up this intellectual swamp I am picking through. PLESE NOTE: Only HERE is Covington or evolution or anti-evolution theory an intellectual swamp. There is nothing wrong with talking biology, but you should seldom do it in a physics seminar.

What I have to say is HARD to explain. I am engaged in a seminar that results from a LIFETIME of practice. I made my living figuring this stuff out. I had to CREATE this seminar at huge expense to myself and work my doctor says is more than I should be doing.

We have changed the mass media in a way THEY are not aware of. That Village Voice article would have looked VERY different a decade ago. All the swastikas and Confederate flags are incidental to our paranoia, not the result of "Hate." The THRUST is different.

AND it so happens that a lot more readers every day find the "plot against the white race" line a lot easier to accept.

That is a PRECIOUS bit of truth. But you can't SEE it until you drain the intellectual swamp before you look at it.

THE PRACTICALLY PERFECT PRESS | 2002-11-02

The other day I was astonished when a scandal at the Associated Press was actually reported on a TV talk show. It turns out that one reporter had been handing in false news from made-up sources for three years and finally got caught doing it. Some seventy of these stories had gone out on the AP wire service and were reported as authentic news from coast to coast on every medium.

False news did not surprise me. What astonished me in this case was that someone in the media actually MENTIONED it! And the reporter was FIRED!

Think about it. You have recently heard about scandals in Congress, scandals in business, scandals in the military, even scandals in the clergy, but you NEVER hear about scandals in the media.

About twenty years ago, a black reporter for the Washington Post was awarded a Pulitzer Prize for a story she had made up completely. She left the Post but she had no difficulty finding employment. Everybody agreed that except for this little slip she was generally a fine reporter.

No one questioned that all her other stories were completely true and unbiased. Leading the pack in saying how wonderful she was were the respectable conservatives like James Jackson Kilpatrick.

Everybody, especially respectable conservatives, agreed that such a made-up story never happened in the press except for that one "slip."

Every human institution where money and power is on the line has a lot of scandals.

Except one.

The press is a multibillion-dollar industry with enormous power. But everybody in the press agrees that the press is practically perfect. All the newsmen are honest, hard-working, truthful and unbiased.

I thought I would bring that up, since nobody else will.

WHERE WAS THE YEAST? | 2008-06-17

Every tiny Medieval village contained several makers of ale. The ale had little nutritional value, but it cantained precious calories in a population on the edge of starvation.

Empty calories. Protein was out the question. They were always starved for protein.

If they had consumed the yeast which wa a natural product of the quarts of ale they drank daily, all of which is pure protein, not to mantion Vitamin D, they might have been very healthy indeed.

Then again if the distilled alcohol poured down a wounded person's throat to help ease the pain of wounds had been used on the wounds ...

But the people only listened to Intellectuals and Priests.

What they got, they EARNED.