THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

SARGE KICKS ME IN THE ... REMINDS ME OF SOMETHING | 2007-05-01

Mark says:

1. Good work Richard — I don't know if Bob caught the significance of your post, but I sure as hell did! It's actions like these that take our people out of the stereo-typed, knee-jerk reactions we've all been conditioned to (thanks to jew t.v.). It bothers me how many of us automatically act like the cardboard characters the media portrays us as. What you've done is broke the mold and proved we are more than what jew t.v. portrays us as.

ME:

I will very often delay discussing a comment that impresses me deeply. I want so badly for it to stick in your mind, but if you have ever written a letter protesting something you really HATED, you will know how hard it is to get started. The same is true with me of something I am overwhelmed by.

Richard has done what I dream of. He didn't just talk about what I said, or make the same point the umpteenth time. He USED my thinking in a REAL situation. Thousands of people have heard my points again and again and again. But when a real debate starts, they forget it all and go for what they're used to. Richard USED it.

I remember when Jared Taylor was on a major talk show. He was trying to show what a Real Gent he was. After Taylor talked about Immigration, the fact came up that JAPAN was not under pressure to take in the third world. Taylor just said "Yes" and went back to his "See What a Cool Dude I Am" bit.

You can imagine how I felt about that.

Richard USED my thinking when something actually came up. Sarge is right. The significance of that is enormous.

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

This doesn't fit on this thread, but I wanted to tell you something that happened recently. I was working with the BNP on a local council in England, and they were planning to call for the abolition of the council's 'Black and Minority Local Government Workers Association'. The reasoning was that it was wrong for the nonwhite workers to have their own group while the whites don't.

I was going to support their call, but then I thought, 'What would Bob do?' I realized that the answer wasn't to abolish the nonwhite group, but to establish a white group. So now the BNP councilors are going to call for a White British Local Government Workers Association to be set up alongside the nonwhite one.

The shift from being 'anti them' to being 'pro us' is a very significant one, and I think it will have a big effect on their level of support. May 3rd is the local council elections date, so keep an eye out.

Comment by richard

WHY JOHNNY CAN'T THINK IS READY TO SHIP | 2004-07-10

WOL readers are getting on board and buying copies of Why Johnny Can't Think to spread around. I wrote the book for you, and you are the ones who are making all the difference. The books will ship out from the printer next Tuesday, and once that happens, the fun really begins.

We are going to keep up the buy 100 copies for $200 offer until the last possible moment. We have to finalize our shipment list by Monday morning. My volunteer staff will be up late to process these orders.

We are selling these books at dead cost to give everyone who wants to take part the chance to do so.

Go toReadBob.com. As long as the online order form is still active there, we can take your order.

PLEASE, JUST SAY IT! | 2012-10-04

Genseric asks,

"If America is so 'free,' then why aren't whites free to live and work together?"

This is what the "civil rights" thing was all about. "Desegregation" says that if ANY white ANYWHERE is allowed to escape, the whole program is doomed. This was the basis of the 1947 Supreme Court decision which banned "covenants," a standard part of most home sales contracts which specified that the house must to sold to another white gentile.

That was when white flight began. Before that one did not have to worry about his neighbor "blockbusting" -- selling his home to black or other minority.

No one knows it.

No one mentions it.

That is why I KEEP writing about the Berlin Wall and white flight.

And no one seems to get it.

The courts ruled sixty-five years ago that integration required force. That which requires force is not natural desegregation, it is integration.

Integration, like the Berlin Wall, discredits its own system by admitting up front that government force is required to jam it down white throats -- EVERYWHERE.

That is why I have repeatedly written about the SPLC raising money to get blacks into northern Idaho. Some of us might think this is a bit extreme, but to an anti-white it is perfectly natural.

But no one but me will ever actually MENTION this.

Twenty meme articles leading to this open system thinking and not a sound but "DUHH!"

Simply stating the anti-white position in straight English and a few blunt words is enough to discredit it.

But I am tired of being the only one who DOES this.

Don't just DEFINE open systems thinking.

DO it.

THE ASHCROFT GROVEL | 2001-02-03

Ashcroft was grilled by liberals in his confirmation hearings. Teddy Kennedy led the attack. Ashcroft apologized to Kennedy for opposing a racial balance program in Missouri schools when he was state attorney general.

Ashcroft repeatedly begged Kennedy to understand that he was "for integration." He has been in the Senate with Kennedy for a long time, and he knows very well what being "for integration" means to Kennedy.

Kennedy sends his grandchildren to private schools, and he backed the imposition of busing on South Boston. It was ordered by Judge Garrity, who also sent his grandchildren to private schools, as do all judges who order busing. Kennedy fully supported the use of the National Guard to enforce busing on South Boston.

Kennedy backed busing in Louisville, where children would be out waiting for the buses at 5 am so they could be bused into dangerous inner city schools. They returned home long after dark. In other words, they had the same hours that we so deplore in child labor from the

nineteenth century.

Ashcroft apologized to Kennedy for daring to oppose "desegregation" programs in Missouri. He assured Kennedy that the ONLY reason he opposed that particular program was because of the COST. He made it clear that any cost to the children was of no importance to him whatsoever.

Needless to say, most conservatives had no problem with that, but they were sickened by Ashcroft's groveling in other areas, such as abortion. He licked Kennedy's boots clean and shiny.

I enjoyed it, because conservatives were seeing what I watched close up over the long, long years. I watched all those loudmouth conservative "heroes" do the same crawl when they were closeted with liberals.

When Mel Laird was in Congress, he was in committee with my boss John Ashbrook. He started off a negotiation by saying that pretty well anything the Democrats wanted was reasonable. Ashbrook leaned toward the microphone and said, in a stage whisper, "What a prostitute!"

Laird was rewarded by Ford with the position of Secretary of Defense. He was a true Bush-Ford Republican.

Please don't say you are disappointed in Ashcroft.

Surely no one is ignorant enough to believe that what you saw was some kind of changed man. What you were looking at was a typical conservative leader dealing with liberals.

When Mitch McConnell was fighting campaign finance "reform" legislation last year, the word went around that "He fights like a Democrat." He was that unique in not backing down on the issue most important to him.

Inside the beltway, all conservative "leaders" are wimps when they are dealing directly with liberals. I watched them cave in and crawl before the liberals year after year after weary year.

A couple of years ago, I saw Trent Lott regaling a conservative crowd with his brave criticism of liberal press bias. A couple of days later, while he was being interviewed on a network program, a reporter asked him how the press dealt with conservatives. He declared they were fair!

So all this is no secret. When faced with a real reporter or a real Teddy Kennedy, these conservative "leaders" will grovel right out there in public. Conservatives pretend they don't see it.

No matter how many exhausted children are bussed across Louisville or how many Boston working people might have to be killed for integration, Teddy Kennedy will never offer the slightest apology for anything he does. Nor will Barney Frank or any other liberal. Their liberal supporters won't stand for it.

But if a liberal shouts "racist" or "extremist" or any of the many versions of "anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews," any conservative who wants to get ahead drops on his knees instantly.