THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

SIEGECRAFT: LORD NELSON'S REPORT | nationalsalvation.net

Lord Nelson, we need you to give us some feedback on what happens when you use hte Mantra nose-to-nose. You need to help get us from theory to practice.

Comment by Bob

His response:

Of course I don't stand on a soapbox quoting the mantra word for word, but I slip bits in, in normal everyday conversations.

For example, if someone mentions immigration even in a positive way, I will look confused and say: "Yeah but its strange how its, always white countries and ONLY white countries."

Then I will casually point out how Japan is the second richest country in the world and is less over crowded then the Netherlands and yet, I don't see any liberals demanding mass African and Muslim immigration to that country, etc.

Surprisingly this is much easier than over the Internet because most everyday people agree with these points.

The average White, even if they go along with the present Religion, (multicultural) still does not think of himself or herself as a meaningless social construct.

However, the moderators of every mainstream English speaking website are fully trained up, indoctrinated, hard-core Marxist antis. (They could not be moderators otherwise).

And they have the power to alter or delete your posts and ultimately ban you.

It's pretty obvious when a Mod describes Whites being bred into extinction as simple evolution, that you are NOT, dealing with a normal or rational person.

While using the mantra in conversation is useful and often-good FUN, it is of course the Internet we need to use for best effect.

Here are some things that I have found useful when debating on mainstream chat forums:

NEVER, identify yourself has being associated with any particular group or movement.

If you do you will quickly be attacked for everything regarding that group instead of what YOU, are actually saying, and be labeled out of the debate.

You can be damn sure that while every Mod is a fully indoctrinated priest of the multicultural, they will never admit it.

They have been taught that its more effective to pretend to be just non political members of the public, who are simply against racism, this also protects them from being attacked in the same way.

Level that playing field by being just a non-political person, who is simply against genocide, then quote the mantra and repeat it.

If someone else in that forum is on your side, you can expect to receive friendly PMs from Mods and other key members, telling you what a nice person you are, and how its that other guy who is so mean, and causing all the trouble.

This is simply a divide and conquer tactic and your ally is probably receiving the same PMs about you. This may sound paranoid but trust me, from the grass roots, to the top, these people really are that well organized.

Make your point then post the mantra one last time before going to the next website.

Remember if a professional politician appears on TV he knows his job is to convince the viewers, not to convert the interviewer.

Always be aware that your adversary is a White person who believes (even if they wont admit it) that their race and only their race must be replaced, in order to effect diversity, and a Utopian multicultural wonderland.

In other words: They are THE DUMBEST F..KS ON THE PLANET.

One thing I have found very effective is when the anti has been cornered into admitting they have no problem with Whites becoming a minority in the particular country you are discussing, you must immediately ask them which race of people they think will be replacing us.

And what makes them think this race will share the antis views.

They are never ready for this one, and when they fumble the answer, repeat the question.

Hope this is useful.

BUGS AND VAN HELSING | 2012-02-28

As usual, a few critical words say it all:

" I keep thinking about how important BUGS is. I used to get frustrated with all the keyboard commandos we have on the net (SF) who will not engage in the real world. But you BUGSters are just Heroic. What we are doing seems extremely important, maybe it will change the world. I have loads of Hate mail / threats in my inbox from BUGsing, that tells me I am getting somewhere and displays the EVIL we are up against – their nastiness helps to keep me motivated, "

That is the critical story, all in one paragraph.

SOMEONE SEES.

After quoting that statement on, Genseric made another of his own in the Swarm:

"There is a distinct possibility that many pro-whites will be on message in Duluth on March 3. Apparently, the media caught a whiff of the Mantra after their lazy reporter mistakenly pumped BUGS on television. They say they will be boycotting the 'White Supremacist' event. It seems they don't want to risk letting the Mantra go mainstream."

That is a classical example of Listening to the Silence. People who write on public matters for a living are sleazes, including the one who whorehoused for respectable conservatives years ago name Bob Whitaker, but they get ahead because they know exactly what the power of words is.

No one on our side sees what we are doing, but professional respectables and leftists cow away from it the way a vampire does before a crucifix.

They instinctively throw a body-block on anything that hints of ONLY white countries and ALL white countries. That is worldview they cannot let an air of breath for.

But no one else will DO it. They want to spend their time getting credit for Knowing All About Evil.

You can lecture a vampire all day long, but at night he is still effective.

You have to go for him in his lair and nail him down.

WILLIAM ON WORDISM IN WHITE NATIONALISM | 2009-09-06

Recently, I stumbled across a Stormfront thread asking the question "Can non-Christians be White Nationalists?" I thought the answer was simple enough but it appears people are much more delusional than I realized. In this thread I saw bickering, arguing, and childish name calling, but really, what more could one expect from Stormfront these days? No, this isn't what got me interested in this thread, and even writing this. What sparked my interest was the sentiment that, despite one's genetics, your religion can dictate your race. This astounded me that people would believe this. Religion is an idea, people's loyalty to this idea do not change their racial make up. If I start quoting the Qu'ran, the Irish blood in my veins isn't magically transformed into Arab blood by the will of Allah. And yet, this is what people seemed to be implying.

I took this as something of a call to arms, I tried to explain that this was simply idiotic and goes against every fact about race we know. Someone's race cannot be changed; their DNA lasts with them for their lives and is furthermore passed on to the generations. Once adherence to an idea, whether it may be Islam, Christianity, Paganism, Atheism, Democracy, Communism, Socialism, or even White Nationalism, doesn't change their genetic make up. As I put it, if a full-blooded Irishman named Seamus O'Brien walks into the new Mosque down the streets and declares the words of Mohammed to be the will of Allah, can someone explain to me how he is anything other than an Irish White man?

The fact of the matter is simply this; an Irishman is all he is and all he ever will be. Regardless of what idea he clings to, his race stays the same. Now, the problem develops that by adopting this new idea, his race takes second place. In our example, Seamus now identifies as a Muslim, not a White man or an Irish man. His culture, folk, nation and family have all taken a backseat to his newfound idea. This is insanity and serves as a huge problem in recruiting Seamus for any kind of racial belief system. He has a new group, a new set of peers, a new law code, a new history. Underneath his turban Seamus is still the Irishman he's always been, but he is now a slave to the idea that is Islam. Anything short of race is just that, an idea, an abstract thought, a concept, and by clinging to an idea, you lose any sense of racial obligation.

Now after I made this point, I was immediately attacked. Apparently there is a line that once one crosses gets your status as a White person revoked. Again, this is just foolish. The issue of White youths who act like non-Whites, and that as a White Nationalist being loyal to these people was bad. Bad? It is bad to be loyal to people of your own race? Isn't this the cornerstone of White Nationalism? I then realized what we know as White Nationalism is nothing more than an idea, it's just as prone to wordism as any other ideology, and in fact all it is wordism. These White Nationalists refused to accept their fellow Whites because these youth's ideas (that of multiculturalism and diversity) clashed with their idea of White Nationalism. So in effect, what we've learned is not even White Nationalists can think racially, but rather think in terms of "my ideology vs theres". Now I will be the first person to stand against multiculturalism and diversity, these are two very sick and evil things (they are, after all White genocide), but these things are just ideas. They are silly ideas that require some form insanity to believe in. That said, to exclude Whites who believe this and somehow insinuate they are "less than White" is just as idiotic and stupid.

This may seem like common sense, but to the good people (and I use that sarcastically) at Stormfront, I had just made the greatest sin of all. The realization that the world of racial politics is simply a microcosm of the greater struggle began to set in, that these people will cling desperately to their ideas, their books, their flags, their personality cults, and be the first to ship their race up the river. What is wrong with this picture? Pro-Whites who are against Whites, simply because their ideas clash with their holy religion of White Nationalism

THANKS, DAVE | 2007-03-14

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

I'm just floating this, because I think the conversation needs to move into a more advanced domain.

Sometimes I feel that the whole trajectory that began with WWI has run its course.

Before WWI there was a very clear sense that the nonwhite world and the world of the Jews was a PRIMITVE WORLD.

It was understood that nonwhites (including Jews) were tethered to the world in a fundamentally different way, a primitive way, than they way whites are tethered to the world.

I the 19th century it was clearly apprehended that the world of nonwhites was a world of ghosts and unseen forces that ran with the land and waters and of spirits of the dead residing in soils and tides.

In the 19th century, whites understood HOW DEEPLY, HOW TRULY DEEPLY, nonwhites (including Jews) were submersed into a world of malevolent spirits and unseen forces and how their primitive tethering to the world shaped their response to life and everything about them.

Before WWI, whites had a COPING STRATEGY in dealing with the primitivism of nonwhites and Jews: Accordingly, it was clearly understood THAT NONWHITES AND JEWS WERE PRIMITIVE.

Somehow this knowledge disappeared in the trenches of WWI. After WWI, a popular pretense arose in the white world that Jews and nonwhites were capable of modernity.

That was the forerunner of political correctness and a great blindness descended upon the white world. That blindness persists today as much in white nationalism as in neoconservativism. White nationalists and neoconservatives have exactly the same inability: Both factions cannot fathom that nonwhites are tethered to the world in a fundamentally different way, a primitive way, RACIALLY FOUNDED.

THEY CANNOT SEE THROUGH THE "PRESENTING APPEARANCE" OF JEWS AND NONWHITES IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT OF OUR TIMES TO SEE THEIR FUNDAMENTAL AND IRREDUCIBLE PRIMITIVISM FOR WHAT IT IS.

Whites have long been singularly exposed to this primitivism, blinded by their own long modernity and the world wars.

Accordingly, whites cannot see that the clever media manipulations of the Jews for what these manipulations really are: a form of "putting on magic" to an adversary according to the logic of a primitive mind that now is beyond the ken of whites to scope out (unlike in the 19th century).

Or regarding Islam, for example in Mesopotamia, white nationalists and neoconservatives alike cannot fathom that the Mosques, Sunni and Shiite, their prayer rituals, etc., run WITH THE LAND and are about THEY VERY SOILS UPON WHICH THOSE MOSQUES SIT AND THE "SPIRITS" OF THE SOILS BENEATH THEM.

Islam runs with the land, regardless of where the Moslem actually resides, and try getting the blinded white of any political persuasion to understand that. Good luck! You are going to get blank dumb stares back from someone who thinks you are crazy.

And there you have our fundamental inability.

Our can white people wake up to the fact that in the rising swamp of our nonwhite and Jew tsunami the real issue is their primitivism?

We need to get our 19th century goggles back on!

Other than to avail themselves of white technology, nonwhites and Jews are not going to become modern IN ANY GUISE.

It is a fiction that is possible. If it were possible, the world would not be racial, and the world IS racial.

Accordingly, I evaluate things by my very eyes and direct experience.

For example, my community is now predominately nonwhite. I live and work among nonwhites including nonwhite Moslems every day. Gradually, I am becoming able to really understand them, Jew, nonwhite, Christian, and Moslem.

THEY ARE PRIMITIVE, REGARDLESS OF APPEARANCES.

THIS IS NOT A "MENTALITY".

INSTEAD, AT THE FUNDAMENTALLY RACIAL LEVEL, THEY ARE TETHERED TO THE WORLD DIFFERENTLY THAN OURSELVES.

I experience this fact directly in my intercourse with them everyday and everyday I say to myself, "My god, I'm back in the 19th century!"

Whites don't need "white nationalism". Instead, we need a COPING STRATEGY for dealing with the primitivism of Jews and nonwhites.

Perhaps "reservations" are the answer.

Not old style "Indian reservations", but a new system recognizing the irreducible primitivism of nonwhites, a sort of social "eco-sorting" of nonwhite people out into the structures appropriate to them and away from our structures.

This could be done with nonwhites and Jews themselves having absolutely no understanding of what we are doing. We need to recognize that we, as whites, have a huge ambit of action available to us entirely outside the apprehension of our opponents.

I'm just floating this, because I think the conversation needs to move into a more advanced domain.

We need a COPING STRATEGY for the dark primitive world remains our enemy today, just as it way in the 19th century.