THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

GEE, GUYS, WHAT HAPPENED? | 2005-05-21

Back to May 8, 1945. Roosevelt gave Stalin Berlin and half of Europe.

And, gee whiz, something else happened. Stalin and Roosevelt, with Churchill invited as a formality, met at Yalta to divide up Europe.

Churchill found that his old friend and worshiper, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, completely ignored him. He was terribly upset. What happened to the praise and glory his bosom buddy FDR had given him when he was the front guy for destroying Germany?

When two great powers are dividing up a silly-ass continent that just destroyed itself, they don't have time for a clown who is living in 1814. Churchill never figured that out.

Edward R. Murrow and the liberals gave Winnie Churchill one more shot at being a Great Prophet. After all, he had done his part for the leftist cause and he deserved a little praise.

So in 1948 Winnie said in a speech that "an Iron Curtain has fallen over Eastern Europe." Stalin, his buddy, his ally, his Hero, had taken his half of Europe and turned it into some kind of - well let's say it - some kind of a DICTATORSHIP!

Only a genius and a prophet could have figured THAT out!

I am NOT joking.

9/11: POLITICAL CORRECTNESS HAS CONSEQUENCES | 2004-09-11

Leftists have gone virtually unchallenged for forty years. They have mercilessly attacked whites, Christians, Southerners, and anyone else who was in their way. This attack has been openly promoted and encouraged by the major media, Hollywood, and the Democratic Party, and with the silent acquiescence of the Republican Party and respectable conservatives.

This is not news. Every American with half a brain knows it. Even Europeans know this, whether or not they will admit it. Every one on earth that matters knows it.

Guess what gang - "Everyone on earth" includes the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks.

Do you think that outsiders watching the left tear at the heart and soul of America, the white Christian majority that founded the country and keeps it running, don't see the opportunities this leftist assault presents them?

Any cop can tell you that muggers can spot a victim a block away. They will tell you that a criminal can sense a victim the same way that a horse can sense fear in a rider.

Does it take a CIA agent to tell you that people sharp enough to pull off the 9/11 attacks can sense these things as well?

Do you think that when a liberal makes another standard "hate whitey" appeal and has respectable conservatives climbing on top of each other to talk about what a patriotic, well meaning American he is, that others may get a different message?

Do you think that intelligence agents don't know who signs their checks? That when the liberals and respectable conservatives who pay their salaries rail endlessly about "evil whitey", that these agencies don't know they can score brownie points by telling scary stories about "religious nuts" in Waco, Texas, or "dangerous white separatists" in the middle nowhere in Idaho?

Since these threats are made up to appease liberal fantasies and avoid real work, it looks like these agencies are doing their jobs. Look how safe we have been kept from white American Christians!

9/11 caught these agencies with their pants down. No one seemed to think about what might be going on in the real world. Political Correctness does have its consequences. But don't expect to hear about them from a respectable conservative. "We don't want to play the blame game."

Only Ole Bob will play the blame game.

2008 IN HISTORICAL CONTEXT | 2009-07-06

I knew a whole cadre of young people who loved Reagan because he ended the political exhaustion of the 1970s. They are never mentioned in the press or by conservatives.

A person coming of age in the 1970s was raised on the idea that his world would see no growth. The Environmental Protection Agency and conservation were the focus of attention. No one but me seems to know where this left a young person.

He had nothing to look forward to. He was superfluous, particularly if he was a white male looking for a job.

In other words, it was just like today.

Back then the big political buzz on the right was that conservatives and conservationists should make common cause.

And, of course, the conservative buzz was also the old "to go after the minority vote."

I have been this way before.

By definition, the buzz is set up by the establishment and its conservative tagalongs.

One of the most critical signs of 1980 end of the old buzz is, AS ALWAYS, the least remembered. Reporters were climbing all over Washington trying to find conservative contacts.

They didn't **KNOW** any of us, and they said so. PBS even had ME do a couple of shows for them in the process of trying to find tame conservatives. What if the press in 1932 simply did not KNOW any liberal Democrats?

They would have been laughed at. The 1932 media was conservative, but they were also professionals. The 1980 failure was a professional humiliation, so no one mentions it now.

The 1980 media had been trapped in its own buzz, and "Republican spokesmen," right up to Election Day, meant moderates.

The reality of the 2008 election is totally opaque to anyone who keeps up with the political buzz, which means anyone who makes his living commenting on today's politics. If he worried about anything else he wouldn't be published. This is not a conspiracy. It is just that every editor knows what people want to read about, and that is things like criticism or praise of Obama. They are publishing for today's

audience, not for accuracy about the future.

Political reality is that the Democratic rank and file, which is hard left, almost always chooses someone who is too far left for political practicality. Nixon was very unpopular in 1972, but they chose MCGOVERN to oppose him.

It was HILARIOUS to watch Democrats nominate one MASSACHUSETTS lefty after another and get crushed at the polls. In 1988 Bush Sr. was so far behind Dukakis in the polls that National Review declared Dukakis' election absolutely inevitable.

I said, "He's a Massachusetts liberal. He'll lose."

Whitaker Basics again. Simplism.

The Democrats who do the nominating did not like Carter's image and they did not Clinton's image. They wanted a New England liberal. This time they hit jackpot.

McCain, like Obama, was incidental to the BUZZ Process. McCain was the Republican who had made himself beloved by the Buzzers. What astonished me during the campaign was that the media actually REMEMBERED they had once loved McCain.

Usually that sort of thing is simply forgotten by everybody, but a number of commentators actually DID mention that the McCain the entire media was damning had recently been beloved of them as the perfect liberal's conservative.

The present administration is a return to the 1970's abandonment of any real future. I came up with the certainty that space exploration and new technology would lead into an unimaginably exciting future. Older people were jealous of the great things in store for the young. Precious few older people are jealous of the young ones now.

The buzz has replaced the old time future of a Heaven of Progress and space colonization has been completely displaced by a lifetime dedicated to avoiding the Hell of the Moment. You are now a Carbon Emitter, an Earth Destroyer. If you are young, your life must be devoted to sacrifices to make up for your Original Sin of being human.

We are back in the 1970s.

So Where do we go from here?

When the 70s came, I had spent a lot of years getting ready for it. I had my fifteen minutes of fame getting Reagan elected.

I am more ready for today than anybody else, so I will START addressing that next.

A hint: the 70s malaise came from the politics of self-hatred. We're back to that.

PAIN | 2007-07-30

Bob says I need to spell out the link between cults like the JWs and our mission.

We live inside a cult, a very big cult.

Speaking the truth scares people.

The truth is white genocide and the whole thing is explained in a nutshell in the Mantra.

People who are scared don't think straight, so they do not think logically.

Thus they are easy to beat in an argument (keep it simple).

The truth scares them because they believe in lies: that it's alright for aliens to invade ALL white countries and ONLY white countries, white genocide isn't happening but white genocide isn't a bad thing either and whites do not exist.

They babble when they talk because they believe lies and that makes them easy to beat in a debate.

You can get in a sentence or two before they start screaming, plugging up their ears, calling you names, or staring straight ahead as if they do not hear you.

You know that look; it means what you said hit home.

On a forum, you will be able to write out the Mantra a few times and win a few short debates before you are banned.

Stick to the mantra.

It is often best just to take small pieces of the Mantra out at a time, so people can ingest what you are saying without plugging their ears to your "preaching."

Telling the Mantra to people is just like talking to Jehovah's Witnesses or other cultees. Although they do not want to listen to you and you scare them — another part of them wants to hear you, and wants to be free.

The truth shall set them free.

The truth that the doctor prescribes for them is the Mantra, even if it's just a blurb: "If the Mexicans don't stop coming here, you know we all will be genocided."

Or:

A: "You know, why is it that ONLY the white countries and ALL the white countries are being flooded with aliens?"

B: "Have you ever been to Mexico? How can you blame them for wanting to come here?"

A: "Yea, we sure made America prosperous. But of this flood keeps up, we'll lose our prosperity and become genocided too."

Let him chew on that. Cultees aren't used to having too much truthfulness at one time; it makes them gag.

ME:

Quote from Bud Bundy, "When you pour a gallon of knowledge into a shot glass of a brain, some of it is going to spill out."