THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

SIEGECRAFT: GETTING OFF THE SUBJECT IS NEXT TO CRIMINAL | nationalsalvation.net

When I was discrediting Communism by simply pointing out, again and again, that every Communist state had to kill people who tried to escape, I would have the Commie apologists helpless.

And then someone jumped in with the Lord Jesus Christ.

The whole crowd I had cornered would rush in to talk to the guy who had invoked the Evil Atheism of Communism, and all my work fell to the ground.

Those who use the Mantra know how close the concentration has to be. You can have a whole group unable to deal with your insistent repetition of the truth, and then some idiot jumps in with a remark about Jews.

I noticed a commenter define his position on capital punishment, and then, groggily, say "Maybe I'm getting off the subject."

Good God, you are not just getting off the subject, you are acting as the enemy's Fifth Column!

UNCERTAINTY IS A PRICE OF POWER | 2012-06-05

I said in an article that our Boss here was not Bob, but whether what we try WORKS. A commenter asked, quite reasonably, "How do you know if it works?'

I am delighted that BUGSERS have already become experts at doing what it took me decades to learn: they look for OUR words, like "anti-white," to appear. Only we know they are unique, and that is how I tracked my own trend during earlier battles.

In more specific terms you can only learn to gauge whether a particular approach works if you are in the midst of a debate, and can tell what is getting through. This is difficult, but there is joy in knowing that the other side has no idea you are doing this.

You can have the joy of knowing that the anti-whites, like all my foes and hurtful allies over the years, have not the slightest idea you have a means of tracking success which has nothing to do with Bill Buckley or some other Name approving you.

In fact, as I have said repeatedly, tracing an idea to me is fatal, because very, very few people really put their cause above their ego. So I had to find the signals and see them while absolutely no one else saw them, as we do with "anti-white," "respectable conservative" and the rest of a long list..

Most people simply will not join in a cause which has no polls and no score card. This is an INTEGRAL PART of my exercise of power. I took no credit, I had no ego. All I wanted was power.

And if there is no poll or other public indicator like a national columnist naming you, people will simply refuse to do the WORK.

I just want to rule the world. The rest was for the Big Names.

If you genuinely cannot figure out, in all those exchanges, whether something is working or not, you should stick strictly to the BUGS routine. If one in a hundred of our regular readers did that, we would be on our way.

Our routine has changed the language of politics enormously already, and nobody notices it but us.

Finding out how to judge our success in general and your success in particular is learned in the field.

But a few of us have greatly changed the language already.

Don't vary it until you are sure you can judge the results.

Discussing theoretical changes with theoretical results is what makes one a Stormfronter instead of a BUGSER.

GOOD POINT, JAY! | 2005-04-14

Jay said,

"I would agree that most of the people, the Average Joe, I've met at bars, work, or in everyday life might meet this profile. However, a huge number of people associated with the pro-white "Movement", many of them very intelligent, have minds that are cluttered with all kinds of nonsense. From nazism to Christian Identity, they are all Pod People and being such, should be rocketed back into outer space from whence they came. It's time to return to good ol' fashioned Grandpa's "racism", not this skinhead Hitler worship crapola. "

YES! If we concentrated on saving our race and the fact that the respectable conservatives are demanding genocide against white people, we could win.

That's Grandpa's "racism" and it's mine.

All the freakish crapola is deadly to our real cause.

PAT BUCHANAN | 2004-06-05

Pat Buchanan really got into the kook category in the 2000 campaign when he announced that the world had to be created in six days because he didn't want to be kin to a monkey. This has nothing to do with the argument over evolution. It is just plain childish. The idea of grown man saying that is bad, the idea of a serious candidate for national office saying that puts him beyond the pale. That was the day Pat Buchanan put himself in a category with the Vegetarian Party.

Nobody in the media noticed this because they wanted to blame Buchanan's poll collapse on his limited opposition to immigration. But that was when he became totally discredited. Buchanan always ends up being a harmless religious nut.

The whole right is going that way. They demand that everybody be kept on life support until the body actually begins to stink, the family's wishes be damned. They fanatically demand the rights of mindless embryos over sick people, they want as much agony as possible for a person who is dying. The actual support for any of this among sane people who have a conscience is nil. The Spanish Inquisition has more real, serious apologists than this crap, but it is rigid conservative doctrine.

It isn't liberals who are now discrediting conservatives. It is this pseudo-Pro-Life silliness.

I am ashamed to call myself a conservative today. I am anti-liberal, but I am not an idiot or a nut or a sadist.