THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

JUDGMENTAL | 2005-08-31

I do not know a single person who thinks he or she is judgmental.

That is how I know for sure that I am.

The piece below is about how nobody thinks they're cruel. They are doing it for your own good.

The word judgmental is exactly like the word cruel.

Nobody thinks he's judgmental. They are dong it for your own good or because "someone has to make a decision" or because they are not speaking for themselves but for the Cause or for God.

One of the greatest inventors of all time was the priest who first said, "You do not have to do what I say. You have to follow the Law of our Supreme God Ukka which I have revealed to you."

A more colloquial form of this phenomenon is the endless Sayings of Lincoln. As one person pointed out, "If Lincoln said half the things people quote from him he wouldn't have had time to do anything else."

What happened, of course, was that Ben down at the country store thought of something really good. But the other guys didn't want to say "Ben said this." It wouldn't impress anybody. So they described it as a Lincoln Saying.

The first priest, Ukka's boy, didn't try to enforce anything himself. he just said, "Do this or my big buddy Ukka will hit you with eleven plagues and you teenage daughter will have the biggest outbreak of zits on record."

Lenin was not judgmental. He just executed people by the millions for the sake of Marxism. A dead man's writings are as good as an unseen Ukka.

How do you tell whether you are being moral or judgmental?

It's a matter of judgment.

LOYALTY IS NOT ECONOMICALLY RATIONAL | 2006-05-01

Never try to teach an anti that he should be loyal.

I remember a sitcom where he parents were appalled to find that their son was psychopath. They suddenly discovered that he couldn't CARE if he hurt somebody.

What I loved was his common sense reply:

"You are saying I should feel bad when I hurt somebody? Why should I WANT that?"

This was statement of pure economic rationality, the position Ayn Rand took.

He was perfectly correct.

If one is born without loyalt in a society where loyalty is a mortal sin, why on earth should one want to be otherwise?

The anti has no feeling for his own race whatsoever.

He certainly has nothing to GAIN by having any such loyalty.

You can never persaude anybody that a feeling for the survival of your kind is something they should WANT.

A conscience is a burden.

If they don't have this burden, why should they WANT it?

FREE AGENT | 2006-10-27

We would do well to study the recent May Day 'boycott' / mass demonstrations that infested our major cities earlier this year. Someone ORGANIZED all those people. It had to have been fairly efficient and it was certainly effective from a p.r. standpoint. (Except for the initial marches with all the Mexican flags, but notice how quickly they learned the lesson and managed to distribute US flags the next time around.) I have read very little analysis of these marches in the media, although there was one study done which suggested that Spanish talk radio had a lot to do with the organizing, especially in L.A. We could learn from the enemy.

Comment by freeagent

ME:

Freeagent, Bob's Blog is a pretty tough group, and we wouldn't have it any other way.

Trager, a rough old warrior for the cause, came in here with a la-de-dah attitude and I hit him so hard he completely dropped out. This is what separates us from Stormfront. They are looking for numbers. We are training fighters.

So I am going to hit you pretty hard here. If you can take it, you might become a fighter. If not, you've always got Stormfront.

As I told Trager, you've got to READ the Blog before you comment on it. Mark and I just had one of those nose-to-nose exchanges we have here, and a major point Mark on which shocked me back to reality was that we are fighting a totally different battle from herding a bunch of illiterate Mexicans or blacks onto the streets.

I JUST wrote a piece entitled "What REAL Political Warfare Looks Like," and that piece made it perfectly clear that REAL warfare for us does NOT mean a street full of Mexicans.

Stormfront loves to talk about who is behind the big news stories. But, as Don Black says, Stormfront has hit a membership peak. And membership is their big thing. This blog is far, far smaller but Stormfront has done a wonderful job and, if they don't do some strategic rethinking, that job is over.

I hope you stay with us, freeagent. Each person on Stormfront hurts our rulers more than a hundred conservatives ever could.

Bu one person who stays and joins in and LEARNS in Bob's Blog is more than ten thousand of the cattle we are conspiring to herd.

GOOD NEWS FOR PRO-WHITES, BAD NEWS FOR ANTI-WHITES | 2011-01-12

These articles often begin with an example, but when I get through writing and rewriting it, it ends up illustrating something unexpected.

This one begins with my stating again that two of my professors in grad school at the University of Virginia won Nobel Prizes. So where am I going?

Will I do a piece on how the real advances in economics were finally realized to be coming from the right? How about illustrating how smart I am?

Actually the critical point of this statement has to do with an entirely different point that has come up in BUGS. I often say that I want BUGS to be able to continue after I pass away or am finally put in the dingaling ward.

Some of our readers react to this like a member of my family would: "Is something wrong, Bob?"

No, nothing is wrong. This is a fight I would give my life for. I want the points I have worked out here to continue like any other soldier wants his side to keep fighting when he might fall during the battle.

A soldier makes sure his fall will not bring defeat, but he sure as hell does not plan on falling.

So I mention those two Nobel Laureates to illustrate an entirely different point.

Very few people reaching 70 know anything about the fate of their old professors. But I have read about those two because of their status.

One of those two Nobel Laureates, Ronald Coase, just reached the age of 100. The younger one, James Buchanan, is now 91. Both are still going strong, and neither is a health fanatic of any kind.

I looked up my dissertation first reader and he is  88 and still going strong. He is not only not a health fanatic, he is actually pudgy.

If those two profs had not won the Prize I would not know this.

Old Bob will be 70 on March 31, a mere child by comparison. And medicine will be better as I get older. I will do everything I can to make this good news for you and bad news for our enemies.