THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

THANKS, SNAPPERS! | 2010-03-27

My Catholic BUGSers let me criticize the Catholic Church without going to pieces.

But if one is going to discuss institutions, one MUST discuss the Church. In fact, it is hard for someone not raised in Western society to understand what I mean by an institution, because they have instant recognition of what an institution, meaning an institution with a separate existence from other aspects of society, really is.

I have discussed the outright queer nature of British "public" schools, and everybody knows about that. But, as with the Mantra, you have a problem with them that only occurs to one who has spend his life, and made his living, explaining things to people.

Sure the British "public" schools are protected by an institution, but WHICH one are you referring to? The British Clahss system? The political left, which in this case is busy denying the origin of much of its own politics?

As I explained recently, even the Orthodox Church does not have the instant institutional identity we understand because of our familiarity with Catholic Church history. Since Constantine, it has been hard or impossible to separate Church and State in the Orthodox world.

This is a practical problem, and if you can come up with a pure institution to compare with the Catholic Church, I could sure use it.

People not familiar with legal history do not realize what a pure invention the corporation was. The Norman Invasion was a Joint Stock Operation. So was Iceland. So we had the mentality. But anyone connected with THAT Joint Stock Operation took the liabilities home with him.

If you were part of a joint venture, it was taken for granted you could be tried for what it did, and that every person in it was liable for its debts. The idea of having a SEPARATE ENTITY, an institution in which people risked only what they invested, was a completely new thing on the world stage.

The corporation is a PURE institution, but the corporation is made up of PARTS of different people. It is made up of different parts of different people.

The Church is the only institution I know that has its own existence, whole people, and the same part of the those who are not full time religious. So not only do I think the Church is the only example of as pure an institution as I need, but I don't think the whole idea of corporate institutions would have been invented if it weren't.

BBG doesn't have to recite to me the reasons for anti-Catholic bigotry on Mommy Professor's part. Hell, man, anti-Catholicism was called The Anti-Semitism of the Intellectuals even before we were BORN.

GUESS WHO THE NAZIS ARE NOW? | 2002-06-28

So now Palestinians are waving swastikas in the Israelis' faces and calling them Nazis. Guess who developed THAT tactic?

Richard Herrnstein was a Jewish psychology professor at Harvard who co-wrote "The Bell Curve." "The Bell Curve" discussed the importance of HEREDITY to intelligence in general and specifically the huge gap between the INNATE (inborn) intelligence of whites and blacks.

Herrnstein was promptly accused by the left of being a Nazi. The fact that he was a Jew did not cause them one moment's hesitation. HITLER believed intelligence was inherited, so anyone who says intelligence is inherited is instantly anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews (but see June 22, 2002 - SUPREME COURT SAYS THAT IQ IS A LIFE AND DEATH MATTER).

One guy told me Herrnstein was just writing about heredity to get in good with the rightists. Why a Harvard professor would want right wing credentials is beyond me. I once protested Herrnstein's treatment at Harvard in a book, and he wrote me to quiet down.

Another minor point: when Herrnstein coauthored "The Bell Curve," he was dying of cancer and he knew it. So I doubt he was trying to get in good with anybody.

So everybody has been free to use Hitler's anti-Semitism for anything from gay rights to women's lib or anything else that might reduce the number and power of the white gentile-dominated right.

But now -- surprise surprise! -- that same "Nazi" label is the rallying cry of anti-Israelis around the world!

Which is exactly what Christ warned the Jews about two thousand years ago.

EUROPE'S CLINTON YEARS | 2004-12-22

In the Clinton years, I wrote an article called "Superterrorism" (11-21-98). When September 11, 2001 came around, we reprinted it.

It seemed prophetic, but if you look at it, "Superterrorism" was just common sense. Maybe common sense is what real prophecy is based on.

The Euro is going up. Europe is out of the Iraq War and all the problems.

But common sense says that Europe is terribly weak and terribly vulnerable.

Iran's new missiles might reach Europe, but they won't reach us. North Korea's new missiles can reach the West Coast.

But they won't.

Why?

Because if they did South Korea would suddenly be an island.

And if Iran threatens Europe, what exactly is Europe going to do about it? Throw croissants?

America is stupid, but it is also extremely dangerous. Europe is stupid and nobody is scared of it.

Under Clinton, America had a boom like one that Europe is enjoying today. Terrorism? Clinton just ignored it. And it worked out fine.

Until 2001.

Europe is cruising into something that will make 2001 look like a tap on the cheek. Europe is ready to be slapped around. There is always somebody who wants to do the slapping.

Europe is not just stupid, it is hopelessly stupid. There is nothing as dumb as a dumb man who thinks he's smart.

All that brilliant sophistication Europeans think they have got Europe ripped to pieces twice this century. It nearly wiped out two generations of Europeans.

And Europeans honestly believe they are diplomatic geniuses.

That attitude is more dangerous than any nuclear missile.

WE ARE THE ONLY ONE IN THE REAL, EPOCH-MAKING FIGHT. PART I | 2012-02-22

Senator Joseph McCarthy was dead right. In fact, the little time spent looking into the temporarily opened KGB NKVD files showed that not only was almost every one of McCarthy's accused a Communist, but there were even MORE of these people in high places working for the Soviets.

Lately even the media broke stories about Teddy Kennedy meeting with Soviet leaders abroad in secret to work against the United States.

But the fact it is true doesn't mean it is a truth you should throw in when you have the enemy cornered with the Mantra.

There is no secret about "Jews" being anti-white. Look at the definition of "Jewish opinion" in the mainline media and, by their definition, they have led the anti-white crusade.

They SAY so.

In fact, you will only get criticism if you use exactly the same term, "Jewish opinion," that Jews do. Like calling blacks niggers, the reply is "That's OUR word!"

The standard ADL discussion about whites in history is exactly the same as Goebbels would have made about Jews.

All that this now matters is that THEY knew how to do it. They did what BUGS is doing a century ago. They did not put out anti-white tracts.

NAACP types began their campaign by getting the word "negro" capitalized. You can tell about what year a book is published by when the writer puts in Negro instead of negro. That sounds exactly like our combing sites to see where "anti-racist is a code word for anti-white" or other key phrases.

No one could say that their aim in capitalizing a word was to destroy the white race.

But it was.

And so far it has WORKED.

So when you get specific about stopping the genocide, you are being a fool. We are just stating the legitimacy of our concern and demanding it be discussed openly. We know that once he concern is general, our race will be saved.