THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

STAFF CATCHES HELL | 2006-11-19

A national columnist once reported that the two hardest people to work for on Capitol Hill were Bob Dole, out of 100 senators, and John Ashbrook, my boss, out of 435 congressmen. Someone asked me how I put up with it. This was my reply.

"John (Ashbrook) has some choices when he is frustrated and has to let it out."

"First, he can blow up at his financial supporters, in which case I lose my job."

"Second, he can go irrational with other congressmen, in which case he can't get things done and I lose my job."

"Third, he can blow his top at constituents, in which case I lose my job."

"Fourth, he can cuss me out, in which case I keep my job."

"I pick option four."

It would have been better if John had been perfect, but he saw how bad things are and sometimes he just blew his top. Ideally he wouldn't have needed that outlet, but the job of being Jesus Christ is already taken, so he was not always the nicest of men.

And I was more worried about his losing HIS job than I was about mine. To prevent that, I would take anything he could hand out.

Robert Dole was an entirely different animal from John. As a moderate Republican, he couldn't are less how bad things were. I can explain to you in a few words why Dole was such an S.O.B.

Robert Dole is masty little man who needed somebody to beat the hell out of him a few times. But he was a nasty little man who had gotten an arm crippled in World War II. This meant that nobody could punch him in the mouth for his insults, be they contributors, fellow senators, or constituents.

Dole's handicap also made him a "proven hero," so nobody could say he was being a bully.

Dole had a bullying license, and he used it to the hilt. His fellow senators were afraid of him, and that was one reason he got elected to the leadership.

Robert Doles was member in good standing of the Greatest Generation.

THE RACES | 2009-07-16

Don't let them get away with murder. That is what you do when you allow anyone to talk about "mixing THE races."

It allows them get away with genocide. They tell you that all the races are taking an equal part in this, that it is just "fair play." It INFURIATES me when people let this go by while they recited the latest line.

One of our spokesmen was doing an interview and the interviewer mentioned that nobody was demanding that Japan take in immigrants. Our spokesman, however, was busy talking about what an Aristocrat he was and let it slide.

Our Mantra:

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

"It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries."

"The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them."

"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites."

"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY Black Country and ONLY into black countries?"

"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem? I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?"

"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"

"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am ANAZIWHOWANTSTOKILLSIXMILLIONJEWS."

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

"ANTI-RACIST IS A CODE WORD FOR ANTI-WHITE."

THE YELLOW PERIL | 2005-12-05

I wrote in the article below that the Chinese are better at what Jews do than Jews are.

There are almost exactly one hundred times as many Chinese as there are Jews.

Nobody, pro- or anti-Semitic or neither, denies that Jews have a LOT of power. The natural conclusion would be that if twelve million Jews can have a LOT of power, one billion two hundred million Chinese would soon have ALL the power.

But there is a difference I find impossible to explain those who do not already know it.

If it were simply a matter of manpower or brainpower, the Chinese could have conquered the world long ago. This is the centuries-old Yellow Peril that is now being discussed again.

If any white country had over a billion highly organized, united people, they wold conquer the whole planet in a short time.

The problem is that you simply cannot GET a billion united, highly organized white people. When whites owned the world they promptly fought World Wars I and II and lost it.

This is NOT a coincidence.

A people cannot be both highly organized and creative. China keeps inventing things and either not using them or losing them entirely, like the mechanical clock. Aquatic rice was developed in India when it was white, but China built its whole culture around the paddies.

We have panicked over China taking over the world for centuries, but China has never even conquered its OWN highlands. China has always gone back to the paddies.

The official designation of Chinese-Americans used by the Chinese government is "Chinese living abroad." This is a continuation of China's official designation of itself under the emperors as "The Middle Kingdom."

And here is what is so impossible for whites to believe if they do not already know it:

China does not WANT the world. They want anything they can get from the world outside, but it is the world OUTSIDE.

When I say "China" here, I mean the Chinese mindset which is thousands of years old. I am sure some Communist idologues there want the world. But those are the true Marxists, and what it is impossible to explain is that Marxism, like rice, is something from outside China.

Mao-Tse Tung, for example, saw Communism as a way to return the peasant to the soil, to the paddy culture. His whole concept of economics was based on the idea that white advances, what he looked upon as capitalist advances, were based on some kind of trick which, if he could just figure it out, would make China as rich as the West was.

Mao thought he had figured out the trick when he started his disastrous Great Leap Forward. Mao decided that the West produced a lot of steel, and that the production of steel was our trick. So all of the Chinese economy was dedicated to theproduction of steel.

Yes, a grown man thought that. And yes, Western professors took it seriously.

The Chinese do not WANT the world.

The Chinese are not creative but they are great at bulding on what they get from the white man. Just like the Jews.

But better.

China is a permanent combination of the shrewdness of old age and a mentality so child-like that we cannot believe it.

The Yellow Peril begins and ends in China.

PAIN AND FINI | 2006-08-22

NOT SPAM

Incidentally I notice Buchanan's new anti immigration book is now # 1 on Amazon. At least I know Sam Francis didn't write it. Any idea who did?

Comment by Antonio Fini

MY OBSERVATION

I deeply appreciate Pain's understanding that what I say comes from REAL experience with power.

My problem with Pat is that he DID write his books.

Pat wrote this one.

Alone.

When Pat took over as White House communications officer, I recommended someone to him for his staff. He told me he was hiring NO ONE.

I supported Pat for president. But my very practical, unexciting reason for thinking that Pat would ahve made a mess of being president was precisely because he is not an executive.

Please disabuse me if I get this wrong, but my impression is that Pat has never hired ANYONE. He was the highest paid columnist in America when he quit to run for president. He is an excellent writer for the market. He has a brain for the ages.

But if you are going to be the chief EXECUTIVE, none of that is useful.

Constrat Pat with Reagan.

Reagan had been head of one of the most powerful unions in America. THEN he had spent eight years as the governor of the sixth biggest economy on earth, California. THEN he became president.

The media used to bitch endlessly about how he worked forty hours a week.

But Reagan was used to being an executive. His logic was that if you have ten thousand people working for you in the Executive Office of the President and YOU have to work more than forty hours a week, you are doing something wrong.

As Chief Executive your JOB is to be an EXECUTIVE, not to impress people with how hard you work.

People would say to me, "Reagan only works forty hours a week."

My reply was, "Look, this is a man who has a Red Phone which isn't red by him every hour of every day. He may have have to make a decision that will kill half of humanity when that phone rings."

"Now tell me," I would say, "When the President picks up that Red Phone, do you REALLY want his hand to be shaking with fatigue?"

I am biased, since my job was always top-level staff. My professional preference is that the top guys leave the fatigue to US. That's what we're for.

To answer your question, Buchanan wrote the book himself. He does everything himself. And that is one reason Buchanan cannot be a national leader.