THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

WHEN PREACHERS AND PROFESSORS AGREE ON SOMETHING, BEWARE! | 2002-01-26

It is essential that we understand the enormous similarity between the year 2000 and the year 1800.

The year 1800 introduced a century when medicine marched a hundred times farther in a single century than it had in all of previous history. In 1800, university authorities in medicine were untied against this revolution. They were defending bleeding quarts of blood from sick people as the main treatment for disease and fighting the idea that doctors need to wash their hands, along with everything else that might save lives.

In 1800 as now, the preachers and professors were on the same side. Preachers were fighting vaccinations against smallpox. In fact, I do not know of a single medical advance in the entire period from 1800 to 1900 that preachers did not use the Bible to oppose.

The same is true today, and once against the whole thing is so obviously absurd only a respectable conservative would fail to notice it.

Just a few years back all the professors were pushing moral relevance. There were no absolute rules, they said.

But then came cloning and the biological revolution. Instantly they invented a field call "Ethics." Suddenly they have PhD's who were concentrating on moral relevance yesterday and who are now "biological ethicists." And exactly as in1800, academics are standing shoulder-to-shoulder with the preachers against the coming revolution.

"WHY IS DIVERSITY ONLY IMPOSED ON WHITE COUNTRIES?" | 2014-01-10

This line is from the sign of one of the rare BUGSERS who actually got out there and held up signs.

You can find it at whiterabbit.net, about the ninth picture on the left under Googlewhitegenocide.  It's right under the picture of our beauteous Political Corrrector.

That is a GREAT line!  The best attack on "Diversity" yet! I met the guy who carried that sign but with ADD I can't remember his name.

Great artists are supposed to often be jealous of their masterpieces.  But people who are natural teachers are never more delighted than one of their students takes what they say and IMPROVES on it.

This student of mine has seen me and raised me.  I think he gets the point.

Somewhere I noticed a black and his blonde "Tasha" discussing her "racist" neighborhood. Let me give you another example of the kind of thing an expert of many decades on power like me would notice: In ancient times which in current politics and on the internet means five years ago, a picture of a black and his blonde girl would get the requisite several hundred Politically Correct readers and a ninety percent thumbs up.

Since WE hit the internet, these routine PC pieces have gotten more and more and overwhelming thumbs down.

No one is going to mention that but me, though I am sure it is common talk at SPLC.

I cannot master the mechanics of getting my comment in, but one of you few working BUGSERS might do it for me when such things appear.

"What if this black guy's blonde had plastic surgery to make here look like one of the mulatto little girls their union would produce."

"I am willing to bet money that her Black Lover Boy would fall out of love with her fast, just as Tiger Wood would never marry a girl who looked like a little brown daughter of him and his blonde Scandinavian wife."

"When you think about it, the Golden Rule pops up in some unexpected places."

That's my ante, use it or raise it.

THE LESSON OF THE TEXAS SCHOOL NON-SHOOTING | 2002-11-23

"Be afraid of no man who walks beneath the skies

As long as I am by your side I will equalize"

That poem was etched on each Colt revolver in the Old West.

The Colt came to be called "The Equalizer."

Studies show that a gun often saves women's lives today by being an equalizer

"Whereas a woman may be severely beaten, even killed, if she resists by using her fists - where the man likely has her outmatched," - says gun expert Professor Lott -- "by far the safest course of action is to have a gun. A woman who behaves passively is 2.5 times as likely to end up being seriously injured as a woman who has a gun. "

All this is the direct opposite of the establishment position. You have heard that official position a hundred times and you will hear it hundreds more: cooperate with the criminal. Give him anything he wants. Invite him home to rape your daughter.

Above all, no one should fight crime except a uniformed representative of the government. That is the liberal solution.

No liberal solution ever works.

School shootings are celebrated regularly by the media as reasons for banning any honest person from being armed. In Texas, a school superintendent walked up to a boy with a gun and took it away from him.

According the official position of the National Education Association, that superintendent should be fired. He gave his students the worst possible example. Yet no one in the NEA had the guts to criticize him.

On Flight 93, September 11, 2001, the honest passengers broke the "no resistance" rule. They attacked the hijackers and died doing it. This kept the plane from being used as a weapon against the White House or some other target.

Once again, no liberal organization has had the guts to attack the Flight 93 passengers for their "vigilante" action. But official advice insists that they should have cooperated and waited for a duly credentialed and uniformed government employee to take action.

If a single honest passenger had had a gun on Flight 93, no one would have been killed. Oddly enough, that comment never appears in the press.

The liberal-European approach to crime is to have government, and only government, DO SOMETHING! In Europe, the crime rate has skyrocketed. Anywhere liberals rule, the crime rate shoots up.

Americans leave it to honest people to do something. The last thing any sane person would do when citizens are in danger is to spend government resources on an effort to prevent them from defending themselves.

So naturally disarming honest people is the first response of liberals and Europeans.

Americans leave it to the people to do something. Our greatest contribution to history has been in teaching the world that the best things come from what our government does NOT do.

BUDARICK | 2006-08-06

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

Have just added a link to make http://whitakeronline.org findable from my site

If is found in the list under:

http://www.quatzikosahan.com/html/Links.htm

Hope you don't mind the company your a keepin there!

Will be working on it and find a way to incorporate your mantra too.

I am sorry, but my child-like brain cannot understand

what your commentor Al Parker means by "Universal Patriotism"

For me it just goes down as wordism!

Most likely i lack a sense of humour.

Best wishes as always

PGB.

MY OBERVATIONS:

You're right. What Al said was a joke.

People often accuse Germans of not having a sense of humor. But a throughgoing German like you has an overwhelming loyalty that makes you resent anything that sounds like an insult to someone you are loyal to.

You suspect that Al is joking at me, but you want to make damned sure he is not insulting me, first and foremost.

If that makes you sound like you don't have sense of humor, you say to hell with it. Loyalty first.

As the person you are giving your German loyalty to, I am flattered and grateful. I could bashfully say I don't deserve it, but that would be an insult to you.

Screw bashfulness. I am mostly German, too. Loyalty first.

I want more people to tell me how they are spreading the word.

"HEIL!' my friend and comrade, "HEIL!"