THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

OUR PRISON YARD | 2010-04-18

When a guy goes to prison the second time, the first thing he looks for is his own race. Even the giant population in American prisons is split between northern and southern Mexicans.

I am sure that many a hippie on drug charges his first time tried walking over to the black and Hispanic inmates and tried to Bridge the Gap, but few of them were able to walk afterwards.

Prison is a desperate situation. This gives us a guide to what will happen when REAL terrorism begins. We got a look at some of it during Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans.

By REAL Terrorism I mean the stuff that will make 9/11 look like a garden party. Atomic or biological warfare makes knocking down two buildings child's play.

When I last mentioned this, commenters said Government would just use it as an excuse to crack down. I've been in that government, and I don't think it would last long. I've worked in prisons, and I think that mentality would take over fast.

I watched a news segment on the new technology that made a suitcase atomic bomb feasible. To illustrate, the reporter put on a Russian Army uniform and left a suitcase of the right size and shape on a bench in New York City. He left it for an hour, time for him to get well out of blast range, and retrieved it on camera.

My thought was that that must have been the only thing left on a New York park bench for an hour that didn't get stolen in the meantime. The blast would probably have occurred in Harlem. That, of course, was not discussed on camera.

The important thing about that segment is that it happened forty years ago, about 1969.

In 2009 the United States Government accounted that it had developed a complete plan for dealing with a suitcase bomb incident. It took them forty years to produce it, but it was not in response to the forty-year-old problem. They didn't START on it until the Twin Towers attack in 2001.

So you could say that they didn't take forty years to deal with an emergency. It really only took eight.

They have plans to isolate the area and bring in supplies and so forth.

You may notice that the problem with the above sentence is the word "the." When the bomb goes off, how do we know it is "the" bomb? I think everybody would be looking for the next bomb to go off.

The 2009 plan was in terms of the 2001 attack. And it only deals with one potential super terror weapon.

There is an old saying, "You can't plan for total disaster." There seems to still be a lot of people who think there is a Genius Elite at work. My opinion is that if you still think that way you can't predict the real future, particularly a real future where hundreds of thousands have been killed and you don't know what is coming next.

Ever since The Obedient Generation, who learned that the Government had to tell them when and where to relieve themselves, our government has gotten stronger and our society has gotten weaker. I think the commenters who said super terrorism would just let Them take over completely are blind to who They are.

This government consists of millions of bureaucrats, some of whom wear costumes.

I believe that in OUR real world, there is a point, not very far away, when we would revert to a prison yard.

ALAN AND AL | 2006-10-01

NOT SPAM

Ok everyone lets stop kissing Bob's ass, Bob is a sharp cookie for sure and he has a way of opening our feable minds in new directions thats why he writes these posts. Remember Bob is the teacher and we are the students, lets point out each others flaws etc when we respond to one of Bob's reflections on reality.

Comment by Alan B

ME:

This is the perfect comment, in that it combines a real insight with giving me a chance to make a point I wanted to make.

Yes, Alan, I keep demanding corrections and criticisms. I want you to come at me with exactly what I am doing wrong.

On the other hand, you commenters occupy a very unique place in my life. I have done many things in my life that were abolutely great, brave true and showed true genius. But no one else can appreciate it unless they have read my hundreds of exact explanations here. Much of what I did conisisted of doing exactly the right , seemingly SIMPLE -- thing at exactly the right time. Bu the point of the exercise was often precisely that the people around me did NOT understand any of that.

So when commenters appreciate what I do, they also do the same kind of thinking. It shows. I have gotten a BUNCH of comments lately that show you chewing over my exact way of thinking and making use of it. You are thinking BASICS. Once you start using basics it is hard to remember what you thought like BEFORE you got down to them.

But I see it, and it gladdens my black old heart enormously.

According to the group that calls itself The Greatest Generation your compliments would be wasted on a really tough member of the World War II Generation. Naturally no group in history has ever been such suckers for umixed Jehovah-like praise than that same generation.

Except their twin cousins, the Jews. Jews are always talking about how "frank" and "realistic" they are, but if you say anything about them that is not truly groveling praise they start holding their breaths like infants.

You all know the results of this. We live in a society where everybody tries to act like he doesn't need praise and the debate is whether he MEANS it or not. You and I are here to grow up, to talk sense.

We all need praise and we all need sunlight. We do not need a third-degree burn. But nobody here has given me sunburn, becuase I think I DESERVE a lot of praise.

More important, only you are the people who can GIVE it to me.

But, as Alan B. points out, there is always a "BUT."

Your praise is good for me and for you.

The more distance I can put between me and "The Greatest Generation" the happier I am. As Alan makes very clear. I am NOT a person who wants you to admire what I did when I was young and therefore want YOU to exempt me from any criticism NOW. I am like the WII vet who keeps pulling his pants down in a bar and then, when the police come for him, shouts, "I was at D-Day!" so I won't get arrested.

I am more conceited than that. I think I can prove to you right now that I STILL do great things and I have a LOT to teach you. You can't see what I have to teach you if you don't understand what I did right. So it helps YOU.

It also helps ME. want you to understand how great the things I did WERE, because no one else can do it.

But I also need your corrections and criticism even MORE than I need the compliments.

I have said before that one of major secrets of interrogation is letting people TALK. You let me TALK and when someone writes as much and as deeply as I do here, there is no way I can keep you from knowing exactly who I am. You can catchme out a lot, as Joe did when he forced me to explain what I meant by professional interrogator. I completely forgot that there are people who know what "professional interrogators" are like, and Joe doesn't LIKE them. I would rather Joe make me explain that here than for an enemy to catch me at it in the middle of an interview on Fox.

A good teacher will always try to learn more from his students than they do from him. That's what SEMINARS are for.

DAVE | 2006-08-31

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

The importance of BWs mantra is not only in its explicit message and content, but it is also an instruction in a diplomacy and etiquette.

If you assume white superiority, your attitude toward racial matters must be imperative.

Therefore, when introducing BWs mantra preface it with: "Pay attention. What I have to say is very important. Consider it well. Remember it!"

Don't argue. Instruct!

The advent of political correctness was effectuated by instructing white people in an ethic (that is a diplomacy and etiquette) of submission to non-white people, non-white concerns, and non-white views.

That is how the damn thing (political correctness) was implemented!!! It needs correction.

White people need to be told to modify their personal bearing when dealing with non-whites. As a white, your personal bearing to non-whites is that of a superior to an inferior.

Learn this bearing and maintain it, always.

And for God's sake, do not adopted fascist symbols, or wear fascist uniforms.

Forget Hilter, forget Mussolini, forget WWI, and forget WWII.

Instead, regain your bearing!!!

Non-white people including all Asians (except the rare non-white intellectual) know they are inferior. Reflect their knowledge by your personal bearing towards them.

Comment by Dave

MY COMMENT:

A+

QUAKERS ALWAYS CALL THE COPS | 2014-08-23

Anti-whites who speak on campus today hide behind the thugs.  He is allowed to speak while knowing that if anyone tries to oppose him the campus thugs would threaten violence and the administration would ban any such opposition to the Heroic Anti-White as "leading to violence."

Anti-whites hide behind thugs. They are not going to take on an intelligent anti-White and they hide behind thugs. That is about as low as even a coward can get.

Teddy  Kennedy made speeches in the USSR. Once he got so lost in his illusions that he asked his truly captive audience to VOTE! As he did in campus speeches in the US, Teddy asked those members of the audience who thought too much money was spent on the military to RAISE THEIR HANDS!

The Russian listeners were furious.

Kennedy was asking people in a POLICE STATE to DISAGREE with their government!

Teddy always spoke to audiences controlled by thugs. He actually forgot he was not at Harvard or some other university where the captives would  all openly agree with him. It was probably his hundredth speech to a captive audience, and he completely forgot WHICH captives he was talking to!

Cowards are one thing.  But cowards who hide behind thugs are nauseating.

Benjamin Franklin HATED Quakers for this very reason. They were always preaching peace until THEY were in danger. Then the yellow streak came out a mile wide.

Quakers will refuse to allow their members to resist a burglar and be proud of it. But they ALWAYS call the police if they can. That is the reason Quakers can be so Idealistic. Their property is protected by people with guns.

Quakers do not  mention that they USE guns but they regularly call men WITH guns, in exactly the same way anti-whites never mention the thugs they hide behind.

In the same way, no one who argued that Communism was somehow reasonable would ever discuss the fact that every country that had that system had to kill all escapees, least of all the professional anti-Communists.

The only reason the Berlin Wall was famous was because it was not  built until 1961, and was a  major news event.

The press never mentioned all the other walls around the other Workers' Paradises and neither did conservatives.

So you may be surprised that no professional pro-white ever talks about campus thugs.

I have been watching this silence for decades on the part of those who were paid to be on my side. I would be ASTONISHED if they pointed out the obvious THIS time!