THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

DO YOU HAVE AN "I DON'T MOLEST CHILDREN" BUMPER STICKER? | 2003-02-22

If a conservative wants to be allowed to speak on the liberal-controlled media he has to earn that "respectable" label from liberals. I keep repeating this because you cannot understand what passes for political debate in our age without reminding yourself of this overwhelming fact before listening to any political "discussion".

So when a liberal refers to an "anti-war movement" conservatives keep a straight face.

What if you and I were discussing crime and I said to you, "Well, unlike you, I don't abuse children." You would consider that a hell of an insult.

But if somebody refers to himself as being for Peace, with the clear implication that everybody else likes war, killing, bombing, orphaning children and all the rest, conservatives sit there looking respectful.

J. EDGAR HOOVER | 2010-03-25

I have stayed ahead in daily articles until this bout with flu. The last time I dropped out for a while, BoardAd kept us running with Blasts From the Past, but he became very discouraged because our numbers dropped steeply.

Lots of people say size doesn't matter.

But the competition between blogs is enormous, and if I am going to give up thinking and just repeat what I thought before, I might as well make money at it as a respectable conservative or get rich on it at the SPLC.

It is interesting how much one can tell about real history from the few times Politically Correctness shows MERCY to those it hates. They hate J. Edgar Hoover because he is seen as an enemy to the advocates of a People's Peace Loving Democracy McCarthy attacked.

He criticized Saint Martin Luther the King because he kept open Communists as advisers. He even criticized Paul Robeson, whom the New York Times described in his obituary as "a lifetime advocate of human rights and a disciple of Joseph Stalin until his (Robeson's) death."

What the media never mention is the reason why Hoover declared the Mafia to be a myth. It had nothing to do with his homosexuality. If the Mafia had a picture of his making love to his live-in Deputy head of the FBI, FBI experts would have declared it to be a made-up picture.

We are familiar enough with kept "science," like Climategate, to know about this. We all know that the Genome Project will never say one thing that does not support Political Correctness. And where do did all local police, and even Interpol, send photographs to be verified?

To the FBI in Washington, of course.

So why is the media so uninterested in why Hoover declared that the mafia was scientifically proved to be a myth, just as the Genome Project says race is?

For very simple reason: the FBI wanted to look invincible, and Organized Crime was LOT bigger than the FBI was. So the FBI bought out white trash relatives of Klansmen and made huge progress in crushing a much smaller and more divided foe.

The media don't want to criticize THAT.

But that was, for Hoover, a diversion. He knew what the media wanted, and the media didn't care whether Organized Crime died or prospered. It wanted Southern resistance crushed.

Hoover was a master politician. Like Churchill, he did not care what he did to the world so long as he kept power. And unlike Churchill he DID keep power, whereas the world spit Churchill out.

The simple fact is that any attempt to deal with organized crime in Hoover's time was doomed. So J. Edgar declared it a myth until that disastrous meeting in the mountains made it too obvious to declare mythological any more. But that was in the 50s, I believe.

Hoover was right. He couldn't deal with Organized Crime. It was not until the passage of the RICO Acts that a crime boss could be charged EFFECTIVELY with crimes committed on his orders. The Warren Court worked desperately hard to defend all criminals, especially the big ones, and you couldn't get anybody for drugs unless you found drugs ON them, and then it wasn't easy.

No big man in the Mafia ever had drugs within a football field of him. So it was obvious that all the law enforcement agencies got nothing but small fry, and it didn't look good. Hoover had been right to defend the Mafia all that time in order to keep his image.

Hoover was also as helpless against the Communists in the US as anyone else. He abandoned McCarthy. He wouldn't have been surprised to know that practically everyone McCarthy accused turned up in KGB files, but that was not his problem.

Hoover wanted to do things that showed him invincible. Preferably things to media would LIKE. So he did that by buying off white trash.

THE ADVANTAGE OF BEING WRONG | 2006-06-22

He who searches for truth is no diplomat. That's why I like flat statements. A flat statement is right or wrong. All I am interested in is whether one is right or wrong.

I have the same problem with someone who quotes the dictionary. That's French.

As an Anglo-Saxon I agree with Noah Webster:

"Usage is everything."

In order for a word to become officially a part of the French language it has to be approved by the Academie Francais. Someone talking about home schooling pointed out that, in France, every single student in the entire French school system is on the same page of the same textbook on the same day if they are the same age. This is a scandal to an Anglo-Saxon, and when some aspiring Acadamie Ingese member quotes a dictionary at me, I mentally give him the finger.

CHINESE IMPERIALISM | 2005-12-05

China, in all its thousands of years of history, has never invaded India.

Let me repeat that: China and India have existed for thousands of years right across the mountains from each other and China has never invaded India.

In my lifetime a tiny very wet little idland in the North Sea OWNED India.

Wave after wave of Aryan and pre-Aryan invaders came across the mountains west of China and conquered and OWNED India.

China has never even invaded India.

In fact, with a tiny almost unknown exception that proves the rule, China has never ruled anybody who was not racially Mongoloid.

What others refer to as "Chinese imperialism" is what Europeans would refer to as "taking over buffer areas." For the giant China to take over southeast Asis is the equivalent of Fance taking over Belgium.

It would be aggression, but it would take a real stretch of the imagination to call a conquered Belgium The French Empire.