THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

SO MARCH, WILL YOU? | 2006-04-25

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What if TEN Stormfronters hit the Newsgroups with the Mantra?

Ten of thousands of people would read it!

What if HUNDRED Stormfronters hit the Newsgroups with the mantra?

What if a THOUSAND Stormfronters took four or five hours and hit a hundred Newsgroups with the Mantra?

Some idiots would start to COMPLAIN about it!

A dream come true!

All you have to do is cut and paste.

There is no need for comment.

"Liberals and respectable cosnervatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries."

"The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them."

"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites."

"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"

"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?"

"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"

"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."

KANEFROST -- LISTEN ANTONIO! | 2006-04-19

In response to "Is This Denial?" kanefromsf said:

My position: I couldn't give a darn, lol. Actually my position is that people shouldn't talk about it. It's just like negative plugging a site you don't like. People will go to it.

When Dershowitz mentioned nukeisrael, people probably went to it. So why even mention it? I see more "pro-white" people mention it than Jews mention it.

Comment by kanefromsf

MY REPLY:

Don't get too wrapped up in your OWN ego.

This whole Holocaust business is hideously embarrassing for Europeans.

I was watching a documentary about German authorites who were talking about "pornography and Nazi stuff."

They were trying to minimize it.

Which means we should maximize it.

Requiring a form of historical correctness is hideously embarrassing.

But what we need to concentrate on is not the facts onthe other side, but what embarrasses out enemies:

REQUIRING agreement unbder penalty of imprisonment.

We should talk about "French intellectuals" crying on the stand because they said something in an academic paper that they could go to prison for.

This is EMBARRASSING!

So there are two sides:

1) One group wants to get out the FACTS about the Holocaust;

2) The other side wants to put anybody who discusses the Holocaust in prison.

Then there's me.

I want to know why 2) is doing something so insane.

THAT is what makes 2) nervous.

It is not SANE to put people in prison for disagreeing with history, right or wrong.

1) argues they are right. That is the argument that does NOT embarrass the Modern Inquisitors.

Is there any way to get SANE? Is there any way to argue on precisely the point on which our enemies are weakest?

Antonio, my Great Secret is that I find out what they are embarrassed about and hit on THAT.

They can defend on facts. They cannot defend their Inquisition itself.

I have seriously thought about going out by going to Germany with a picket sign that says:

"Is this Denial?

"As a Freeborn American I say that anything the government requires you to believe is an out-and-out lie."

It would put them in a bad position.

I hate bullies.

A MEME IS A MILLION MILES FROM A PLAY ON WORDS | 2014-10-24

Anti-whites base the history of technology on all mankind. The reason you have your computer is because All Mankind accumulated that knowledge and wrote it down.Â

The white man's half-clothed barbarian ancestors discovered this accumulated knowledge and, as Newton put it, "I saw far because I was standing on the shoulders of giants."

Please remember that Newton was justifying himself to a bunch of superstitious idiots who thought they were Intellectuals.

Sound familiar?

In Newton's time, a speaker or writer was FINED for contradicting Galen in any way! Like saying you shouldn't take pints of blood out of a pneumonia patient.

Such were the "giants" Newton had to say he got his concepts from.

Our problem is that anti-white history says that "all mankind" built up, step by step, modern Western technology. So the only reason we have explosives is because the Chinese had black powder and some Chinese wrote it down and our primitive ancestors somehow got it from them.

According to anti-white history Egyptians had developed Brain Surgery before someone showed our half-naked barbarian ancestors how to take a bath. It turns out that this Egyptian neurosurgery was trepanation, opening the skull to take off pressure, a primitive procedure carried out by shaman for thousands of years.

Not only did Egyptians not invent brain surgery, they didn't know there WAS a brain. It was a spare part and they had no idea of its functions, as their animal-headed gods demonstrate.

The brain was first described in the late 17th century in the Circle of Willis. Galen put all thought in the heart.

An engineering student will try to tell you that Calculus was actually just a natural development from Euclid. Like any serious knowledge of the brain, Calculus is entirely a product, not just of white civilization, but of white WESTERN CIVILIZATION.

Try to do Calculus with Roman Numerals.

But Mommy Professor not only spreads this crap, he DEPENDS on it.

No historian has the slightest interest in how, when Great Civilizations' ships kept to the coasts or inside an inland sea, the illiterate savages of Northern Europe were navigating the open oceans. They only did that "on the shoulders of the giants" who rowed around the Mediterranean.

Romans got soap from the Gauls. But the Romans were supposed to be the Giants who taught Gauls how to bathe at all. One historian was so frustrated at this contradiction he said that "Romans found soap in ROMAN GAUL."

A meme is a very serious thing. Thinking out the implications of a meme is a productive and endless process. A meme reflects what Germans call a Weltanschauung, a world view.