THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

CRACKING THE WHIP | 2005-01-29

One doesn't reason with animals because they aren't capable of reason. Human beings are. That is why words are important. Words must have fixed meanings if rational communication is to occur.

How could you ever build a bridge or even bake a cake if the number 4 sometimes meant 17, sometimes 3? How can you have a rational conversation with words used as weapons to bludgeon people as if they were animals?

Real Christians are bound to live by the same standard they apply to everyone else. Jesus summed it up in the "Golden Rule."

The religion called Political Correctness has no fixed standard. It grows at the whim of its priesthood, just as the Roman Caesars claimed godhood and unlimited authority, and created laws on a whim. The Christians were persecuted because they disputed the right of the Caesars to do so. The Romans didn't care what gods anyone worshipped in private, as long as they recognized Caesar's godlike authority in temporal matters.

The professor-priesthood of the religion of Political Correctness doesn't even stop at that. They want to dig into everyone's private thoughts. Where are they willing to draw the line?

They have created a monster, which feeds off the innocence of college students and the enormous taxes and tuitions siphoned out of the public. They use words as mere weapons to beat down any opposition.

Look at how fearful one of the students in the documentary was of being branded a "racist" in his permanent record. Look at what the school administration was calling racist. He was posting fliers with the title of a Black author's book. He didn't make it up.

"Conservatives" try to be respectable, ingratiating themselves to the left. They praise MLK, condemn "racism," and talk about "real diversity." When you accept the premises of Political Correctness by accepting their language and morality, you are on a very slippery slope. In fact, you've already lost the battle.

ALL ABOUT UNARMED COMBAT | 2006-04-30

A few decades ago almost nobody knew what karate was. But two decades ago my nephew took it in school.

But away back then, if anyone had heard of karate, it was what we called "the grunt and groan school."* This was the form of show karate where a person would put several bricks on two boards and then break through them with his hand.

Us real shrewd guys knew all the ins and outs, so we saw that there were several problems with using grunt and groan karate as a fighting tool.

One technical difficulty of grunt and groan karate, for example, was persuading one's enemy to put his head down between two boards in the proper position.

I was in an unarmed combat class as part of my Intelligence work. After class the instructor and an advanced student were talking about grunt and groan karate. I had a joke I had been dying to make.

In case you think I have always acted intelligently, please remember that I couldn't resist making a smartass remark to two guys who were both experts at killing people with their bare hands.

I said, "I know you start with small planks and move on to breaking bricks, but what do you break in the very first classes?"

The instructor naturally said that you have to learn the technique first, so you don't break things in the early classes.

I replied, "Hell, I must have been especially talented. In my very first class" I pointed to the side of my hand, "I broke this and this and..."

They both laughed.

But I also noticed they were looking me over very cloesly.

I got the distinct impression that they were deciding, in case I didn't shut up, which of my "vital pressure points" they were going to take out first.

THE SUBTEXT OF IM TIRED OF SWARMERS! | 2012-05-28

I quoted White Dude's report of an anti-white saying he was TIRED of us, meaning Swarmers.

You often see some mention of how TIRED anti-whites are of our message.

OK, Journeyman interrogator, what are they saying?

They are saying we are TEMPORARY.

As you move from journeyman to master, that subtext will jump out at you the way it does at me.

Step One is you have to SEE that they are referring to us as temporary. SECOND, you have to deduce, automatically, WHY they make this assumption.

I have explained that repeatedly here in articles some thoughts were off-subject. I have pointed out, over and over, that that there is a group that is ALLOWED to be "the other side" and get paid to do it. If they start to say something HURTS, it is terminated by a subtle process by which the establishment makes it clear that they will no longer tolerate this.

If it's effective, they refer to what is hurting them as ' The old argument that..." Or they get rid of it by the "extremist" route:

Some William Buckley or Rich Lowry type gets the message, and earns his paycheck by declaring that idea/slogan/concept to be "extremist."

These Mantra Whiners certainly have no idea of this process, but anti-whites are now whining to the Establishment to do this to the Mantra. They have no idea that we are actually getting around a process no one dares to mention, they just know that, when their side gets hit too hard by an argument, the argument vanishes

And they are demanding that a Rich Lowry (present NR editor) or some other Bill Buckley type make us disappear, and soon.

I have to explain the process to you.

That WORRIES me.

I NEED for YOU to connect these dots for YOURSELF.

White Dude was right, this complaint is a great sign for our effectiveness.

But there is always more to be learned through Mantra Thinking.

THE BRAVE BUT ANONYMOUS MR. WEBB | 2007-03-27

Mr. Webb may be a guy I worked with for many, many years.

Finally he became a complete Jewish Supremacist, shouting, "Resistance is useless!"

Then he came up with a newspaper scheme that would make him some money. He tried to sell it to us. He would start with how hopeless everything was with the same story of a card shark, and how the Jews were geniuses and cheated, too, so all was lost.

It was the same spiel, over and over.

BUT, he said, if someone would pay for him to start a local newspaper, all could be won. It was a good scheme, as all such schemes sound, but he had no newspaper experience, and, as I say, I have been through my share of world-saving schemes that also make money.

His first theme, like Mr. Webb's, was that all is lost unless we buy him a newspaper. If you don't accept his scheme he is a fanatical defeatist, a fighting, insulting, total defeatist like Webb.

Most people go through that stage early and outgrow it. I had the Only True Way disease a few times myself. But I didn't try to discourage my whole side to get them to go along. This guy's second childhood seems permanent.

http://www.nationalsalvation.net/