THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

PAVLOVIAN ANTIS | 2007-07-28

The former KGB man was discussing how easy it was to get Americans to the point where "You could SHOW them the Gulag, and they still wouldn't believe in it."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaoX_SgNO70

I had a creepy experience of this.

In my Intelligence days, about 1970, I was crossing into a European Communists country, legally and openly for a change. I was on a bus and had noticed that a couple of middle-age hippies were on the bus. I was interested in how they would react to the border.

You see, ALL Communist countries had, at the least, cleared areas at the border with the skull and crossbones sign on them that said "minefields." There were guards in sight with automatic weapons to shoot anyone who tried to escape.

The hippie creed in those Vietnam days was that if we were no different from Communists, it was because Communists were for Liberation. I wondered how that aged hippie couple would deal with the reality at the border.

I repeat, it was CREEPY! It was exactly like something out of a science fiction movie about the Pod People.

As we approached the border, both of them went into a coma. They stared straight ahead, not seeing the landmines, the guards, anything. They only came back to consciousness when the guard came on the bus to check our passports and the weapons and minefields were behind us.

A pure Pavlonian reaction! And I SAW it!

We kept asking pro-Communists, "If Communism is OK, why does EVERY Communist country have to KILL people who try to escape?" They twisted and they changed the subject, exactly like antis do here when we repeat the Mantra.

Pavlov's antis simply cannot deal with this simple statement:

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

"It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries."

"The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them."

"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites."

"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY Black Country and ONLY into black countries?"

"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem? I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?"

"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"

"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."

http://whitakeronline.org/

http://www.nationalsalvation.net/

COLD EYE NAUSEA | 2009-10-13

What is the difference between a cultural outlook and a prejudice?

There is none. Not only is there no difference, but only the most nauseatingly ignorant person thinks there is.

I made my living for decades operating among highly intelligent, ruthless people who wanted my blood. That is an experience that makes you instantaneously boil things down to basics. It doesn't take long for you to stop noticing whether the person you are talking to uses big words or has an accent; all you learn to notice is whether he is buying what you say or not, whether what he is saying is drivel or not.

So almost everything that impresses other people completely disappears for you. In such a raw fight for power, you not only ignore people's pretenses, at some level you don't even notice them at all. Let me give you a shocking example of this.

Have you ever been standing in a line at a supermarket and seen a charming baby on in a crib? Us older folks do. But instead of grabbing at the child, a mature person looks it in the eyes and grins and maybe says some words. Very often this is delightful to the infant, and they grin and kick and blow bubbles.

Have you ever seen a respectable conservative when a liberal praises him for being "cultural" instead of "prejudiced." It takes a very experienced, cold, professional eye to see how exactly a Buckley reacts the reaction of that baby being smiled at by an adult.

A Buckley, senior or the departed senior, does his own version of grinning and kicking and bubbling at the mouth. So does every respectable conservative. You see, the liberals who call the shots have the same frigid professional eye that I do. This reaction to liberal praise is the sine qua non of being given the absolutely essential credentials of being labeled a "respectable" conservative by media liberals.

So a Buckley will bubble and grin and kick in an entirely different way. Me will not be wearing a diaper, but an expensive suit as approved in New York and New England. He will raise his eyebrows in the way he would expect one of his gods, an Ivy League WASP or a Jewish Intellectual, would expect him to.

Where the baby goes "Goo!" the Buckley will use big words.

But to a really cold, professional eye, all this is superficial. In fact, you learn very quickly it is fatal to let these superficial differences impress you at all.

This very hard-learned ability to see right through the superficialities becomes automatic, and it is absolutely essential if you are to be hired and trusted at high levels. People with power and money don't hire people who don't have this Cold Eye.

But, in all honesty, this Cold Eye has certain drawbacks you don't see until you have been through the mill and developed that Cold Eye.

Once again, I am not being cynical, but dead honest: One of the things that comes with this Cold Eye is nausea.

In my seemingly endless list of life experiences, I once worked in a retarded home. My stomach is churning right now as I try to write this down. No matter how hardened you are, that room full of grown men in diapers, the few extreme retards who make it to beard-growing age, makes your stomach turn. They are smiling, every one of them, delighted to see you. You CAN'T hate them.

But I will never forget that one of the most extreme bleeding-hearts I even knew saw them and said, Bob, I never thought it would be possible that I would ever agree with the Nazis about euthanasia in any case, but God help me, I would do it to these people."

Now you get an idea why the Cold Eye carries with it a threat of nausea.

It is critical to understand that there is not a bit of cynicism in what I am saying. It is a REAL problem for me. With my combined experienced and the Cold Eye I could not help developing, watching a respectable conservative react to a liberal telling him he Cultural and not Prejudiced is literally nauseating. I can't help it and I certainly don't LIKE it.

You see, a Buckley or a Hannity or a respectable conservative Southerner looks at an establishment liberal exactly the same way that baby ion the supermarket looks at me. Hannity and Buckley and a Southern apologizer have EXACTLY the same attitude to Ivy Leaguers and Jewish Intellectuals that that baby has to me. To Buckley, who is not tainted in his own mind with a Southern family but is also Catholic and IRISH, of all things, the true Yankee or the true Jewish Intellectual is the True Adult, the True Final Judge.

This was true of Buckley, it is far more true of somebody down the line like Hannity. Buckley senior must have pointed out a thousand times that he was born in NEW YORK. He and his family never allowed anyone to call their background without answering, ANGLO-Irish."

To someone with my Cold Eye, these inferiority complexes stand out like a black man at a Nuremburg Rally.

Too often, this reaction to respectable grin and bubbles at any liberal praise really reminds me of those smiling men in the diapers, and I anteing cynical and it IS a problem for me.

FARRAKHAN WARNS WHITES ABOUT WHITE GENOCIDE | 2013-04-02

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2yKm4m1dcaY

I commented:

The media always calls Mr. Farrakhan "anti-white and anti-Semitic." This speech proves he is certainly not anti-white.

The fact is that just like any other group of human beings, Jews do some things just plain wrong.

But anyone who dares mention this simple reality is attacked as "anti-Semitic" by the New, Modern Coat-and-Tie Lynch Mob.

Those who want to rule us hate Louis Farrakhan because he is the kind of man who would have stood up to the old lynch mobs and won't bow to the New Lynch Mob either.

As a former staffer I wrote what Louis Farrakhan himself is most likely to quote.

THE LAST HURRAH | 2008-12-20

I get the impression that everybody now sees that the message of the last election was,"Nobody is going nowhere, so let's elect a black guy."

In the 2008 election, the choice was between an old white Republican and a young black Democrat. Nobody even HINTS that it will make a difference.

Millions will be out there to celebrate the election of the first BLACK president.

That's IT. With a new Depression threatening, nobody has any expectation of anything really changing. The whole thing looked like exhaustion. For a major candidate to run on the meaningless word "Change" is a symptom of complete failure.

When the entire electorate can only agree on Change, the whole two-headed system has run out of steam.

This is not 1932 or 1980 or even 1960. Everybody now agrees that the medium is the message: the new president is black, and that's IT.

When we had a crises of this size in 1932 and 1980, the change was specific, a straight switch from right to left and vice-versa. Roosevelt and Reagan went in on announced swings from one side to the other.

Now both sides are discredited completely.

Something started in 2008, and has little to do with a black face.