THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

THE DOUBLE DEFENSE | 2010-01-26

Long before Orwell wrote 1984 there was a standard joke among lawyers about the Double Defense.

The Double Defense says that 1) "MY client didn't do it and we have witnesses to prove he was elsewhere at the time of the crime" and "We also have witnesses who were at the scene who will testify that he was justified in doing it."

Actually, some version of the Double Defense has been successfully used, but of course the lawyers consider any jury that would even consider such a defense a bunch of morons.

That is correct.

Imagine my reaction when our people routinely accept a Double Defense.

This Double Defense comes up all the time. Anti-whites say 1) we are NOT committing genocide and 2) Genocide is justifiable. Just how smart does that make US?

But I see this Double Defense in SF All The Time. The anti-whites go straight from denying genocide to repeating Mommy Professor's Evil White Man stuff. So do any of our Ego Trip pro-whites simply point out that they are JUSTIFYING what they are DENYING?

Nossir. when the witness declares he didn't do it and then goes on to say he is doing it for a REASON, Old Missing Frontal Lobe trails right along, arguing crime rates and colonization. They want to show how much they know, so it never occurs to them to put aside all their tome information and look at what the OTHER idiot, the one on the other side, just said.

It makes you tired, very, very tired.

HISTORY IS BUNK, HISTORICAL FICTION IS TRUE | 2009-11-22

Historical "fiction" is far more ACCURATE than regular history books. I have learned this through reading hundreds or thousands of both. Once again, as I keep repeating and I hope you HEAR, this goes back to the one question you must always ask yourself:

Why was this information PRODUCED?

History books are produced to satisfy academics and were trained by them. I read along and hit error after error routinely in regular history books. But I have long since stopped trying to correct them because they are not errors anyone reading these books CARES about.

For example, one book discussed Viking ships. It stated that, "surprisingly enough," the only thing that could be "traced to the Middle East" was one type of sail used. The sail could not be "traced" at all. But the writer and his readers all took it for granted that if anything existed in the Middle East and in Northern Europe, it was invented in the Middle East.

Historical fiction writers have a hard life. Their books are not being read by those who look on the New York Times Best Seller and Sophistication List. They are being read by several hundred thousand history NUTS. If you think I'm just being funny, you miss my point, which is CRITICAL.

A writer of historical fiction who is sloppy pays for it, big time. He gets a thousand letter from PAYING CUSTOMERS a lot of other historical fiction writers would love to have asking "How do you TRACE a particular sail to the Middle East from the remains of a Viking ship?"

The very idea would fascinate his readers Can you REALLY trace a Viking ship to Middle Eastern design? HOW? And they would NOT react well to his admitting it was pure horseshit.

The question would never occur to a fashionable history reader. He assumes everything was invented in the Middle East. Mommy Professor told him so. That is why he says it is "surprising" that only this part of the ship was like Middle Eastern ones.

Hey, Bozo! Both the Viking ships and Middle Eastern ships had a BOTTOM, too! Did they built boats with no bottoms until the Christian missionaries got there?

This is part of the gigantic framework of assumptions every college graduate is trained in.

Seriously, to say that early Germanic people INVENTED things is what HITLER said. No one would put this in plain English outside this blog, but the fact is that the "sophisticated" history writer, subconsciously, sees something anti-Semitic in that assertion.

So only the writer of historical fiction will have to send out a thousand disclaimers of his Middle East nonsense no one would have questioned a Mommy Professor historian about.

Every successful historical fiction has lengthy disclaimers about what is and what isn't true in his book. "History" books only cite the Mommy Professors they get the Truth from.

Before Vatican II many in the Catholic freely predicted that all Protestants were going to Hell. No one minded. But if they said JEWS were damned, all Hell, pardon the expression, would have busted loose. Even trying to convert Jews to Christianity is an act of PC anti-Semitism.

In William Shirer's The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich he declared that nothing important was invented in the Third Reich because the Jews weren't there. It sold millions of copies and was on the bookshelf out in sight in every Mommy Professor household.

Who but a Nazi would question this statement?

My family used to talk about how Hitler seemed to be talking on the radio twenty four hours a day. His voice had none of the identifiable scratch that records and wire recorders had, so the word was that he was being kept awake twenty-four hours a day with drugs.

That was how well known the German invention of the TAPE recorder was.

Both the Autobahn and the VW, for which Hitler himself gave the original bug design, were developed in Nazi Germany. Dr. Werner von Braun probably think his team invented some stuff, and when the V-1s first hit London, I doubt the Brits said, "Oh, God, it's the same old thing again."

The German jets and the first version of a Stealth bomber were a bit new in 1944. In fact, it was not until the 1980 election campaign that the public learned about the "first" Stealth bomber INVENTED, presumably, by Jewish-Americans.

The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich was required buying for any Mommy Professor product who wanted to be "with it." Some of them probably READ a lot of it. But the line about no Nazi inventions is still there.

Who but a NAZI would correct it?

Well, as a matter of fact, if it had been historical fiction, several THOUSAND readers would have demanded to know where he GOT that crap.

By contrast you are not going to see many historical fiction books on people's shelves that they have not READ. Only us historical fiction freaks HEAR of them, much less BUY them.

And we read each word. And we FASCINATED by history. A writer of historical fiction is performing in front of a TOUGH audience.

"Historians" write for manikins

MY UNCLE BOB | 2011-12-01

Fifty years ago, when I was a graduate assistant in political science at the University of South Carolina, the head of that Department, my boss, got a promotion to a Chair in Political Science at Emory University.

In his last period of Head of the Department, he said to me: "It turns out that the person who really runs Emory is the Assistant to the President, Bob Whitaker. Do you know about him?"

I replied, "He's my cousin." Which was true, but I had never met the man.

But the fact that the real head of Emory was my cousin didn't seem to make my boss feel more secure.

Titles are traitorous. At the University of South Carolina, the Assistant to the President of the University was a young man whom I knew very well, a few years older than I was. It was a nice job with no authority

In fact, he ended up being fired after being drunk for a couple of weeks.

This is a considerable contrast to my cousin, the Assistant to the President of Emory University, who ran Emory. And Emory, remember, was such a huge institution that the head of the Department of Political Science at the University of South Carolina could get a big promotion by taking a position there.

Of course, the basic difference was what the title of President meant in each case. The President of the University of South Carolina became, governor, and, briefly, self-appointed Senator. He actually presided as president.

The president of Emory, on the other hand, was an honorary position conferred on members of the Candler family which ran Coca-Cola and largely financed Emory.

My Uncle Bob Whitaker ran Emory because the President barely showed up.

All this was well known in my family. You can run things for thirty years or you can be a United States Senator for a year or two.

Power and a title are two entirely different things.

This is what I learned from MY Uncle Bob.

CHRISTMAS IN JEWPERNICA | 2006-12-03

We had to dig hard to find Hanukah. Jews simply did not have any festivals for the Winter Solstice. In the northern lands, the end of December is a critical time when the sun almost completely disappears, and, above the Arctic Circle, it does disappear. It is the end of winter, as the sun begins to come back.

So Yule was a holiday in Odinist lands and became our chief holiday more or less naturally. But how can you derive THAT from the Old Testament? December 25 was adopted by Constantine from his Mithraian faith, but that is all any student of "Christian" theology may ever learn about it.

Christmas is a NORTHERN holiday, of no importance in the Middle East where there is little difference between winter and summer. That and the fact that Mount Ararat is as far from the so-called Holy Lands as you get in the old world are the only two facts a "Christian" MAY notice that are not in the Old Testament.

None of the contradictions we always talk about that exist between "science and faith" exist outside the Old Testament. The New Testament is about souls, and, outside of the attempt in Matthew to link Joseph's ancestry – and Joseph was not Jesus' father according to Matthew – to ancient kings of Israel – the New Testament contains no cosmology, no declarations that the sun stood still, no demands that Egypt be the origin of all things civilized, nothing of that sort.

Copernicus discovered that the earth revolved around the sun, not vice-versa. But the Copernican System is as discredited as the Genesis System. The Biblical system has the earth as the fixed center of the universe. The Copernican System declared, with equal infallibility, that the sun was the fixed center of the universe. It is completely impossible to make sense of the universe using either the biblical or the Copernican System.

No one notices that mankind originally came down from Ararat, of all places. No one notices that Christmas could not possibly have come out of JEWISH thought. What we have is what I call the Jewpernican System. For "Christian," Moslem, Jew or Marxist, all history goes back to the Middle East. For rabbis and preachers, all morality goes back to the Jews. For anti-Semites, the earth revolves around the Jews as much if not more than it does for rabbis.

Now let's get back to discussing what the Bible, aka, the Old Testament, says.