THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

I AM FAR FROM A CONSERVATIVE, BUT I STILL USE THE TERMINOLOGY AS A SHORT CUT | 2012-11-27

One sure sign that a religion is ESTABLISHED is that all other points of view are seen as the same thing. So during the Inquisition, it really didn't matter whether you were a Calvinist, an theist, or a Deist. All these categories, as important as they were to themselves, came in one brand, called "heretics."

Exactly the same is true of our present established Faith. Everyone is not a Politically Correct is "on the right" or "conservative. The Only True Change is Cultural Marxism, so anyone who claims Real Progress is in any other direction if a heretic, just like the other heretics.

So at the same time we outgrow this "conservative" orientation and go to "pro-white," I am forced to use the old terminology. Otherwise I cannot describe over half a century of lessons I have learned without repeating everything I said above again and again.

Our established religion is not inventive. So everything they do they have done throughout my long, long political career. So I will often refer to how "liberals" use a certain tactic. I will not explain every time I do that. MY label has changed, but nothing they do ever changes.

I can give lots of specific examples of standard tactics used by established religion, whether I saw them in days when all opposition was "the right" or not.

So don't get all tied up in trying to get off using the term "a liberal tactic." If one doesn't understand what I mean, he isn't ready for BUGS. Our established faith uses the same old tactics against pro-white as it did against the entire world it named "conservative."

JAMES | 2006-06-20

Note what James said that his lovely young wife plans to do to honor me:

Dani has fallen in love with you. She has not stopped talking about you since Saturday night and wants to buy a dog and name it "B.W.," in your honor. Do you have this effect on all women?

- James

Since the dog will be named for a man, I assume it will be male.

So there will be another son of a bitch named Bob Whitaker.

That seems appropriate.

MARK | 2006-05-15

This is a FAMILY fight, so I have to defend myself.

Mark, a fellow Southerner, says:

"...there were exactly eleven states in the Union, the same number as the Old Confederacy."

Minor point here, but dammit man — you've done it to Missouri again! There were 13 states in the confederacy, which is why both the Stars and Bars and Southern Cross flags hold 13 stars — one for each admitted state into the Confederacy. In revisionist history, the liberals who control our public schools and universities have tried to re-write Confederate history — and you, Bob, are parroting one of their most amusing tales.

Need I remind you that when Missouri refused to send troops to aid Lincoln in his "unconstitutional, and revolutionary in its object, inhuman, and diabolical" quest to INVADE the southern states (as Missouri Govroner Clayburn Jackson wrote to Lincoln when said former tyrant requested Missouri join the murderous forces of the Union). In fact, on October 30, 1861 the Missouri legislature voted to seccede, and Missouri, my beloved home state, was then accepted into the Confederacy OFFICIALLY on November 28, 1861.

And, to counter any argument claiming illegitamacy, need I remind you, Bob, that Governor Clayborn Jackson was the "duly elected" governor of Missouri — and upon entering the Confederacy the entire "duly elected" legislature was run out of Missouri at gunpoint by Union soldiers and a puppet regime was put in place by one of Lincoln's henchmen, General Lyon. And of course, for the next four years Missouri Confederate soldiers, upon capture, were hanged or shot as traitors and not given P.O.W. status — which made us fight all the harder.

So there — pffff!!!

Comment by Mark

MY REPLY:

Mark, I used a literary device, poetic license.

"Poetic license" means a USEFUL bald-faced lie.

Look at what I wrote. If I had said "thirteen states" the entire argument would have fallen on its face.

I am NOT being disloyal to our Confederates in Missouri. Our flag claims Missouri.

But today any state outside of the what is called The Old Confederacy is not a Southern state, it is a "border" state."

In fact, the most vehemnetly anti-Southern publication in America, National Review, labelled TENNESSE "a border state" twice before I stopped that. William Buckly's sister actually corrected them in answering me.

In fact, Buckley himself recently quoted me as saying that the present National review term, "the south," is just plain bad English. I pointed out that Hawaii and Puerto Rico are more southern in a geographical sense than the South is.

In fact, if you include Southern California, the uncapitalized "south" consists at least one-third of people the writer does not mean when he talks about the segregated "south."

Here's the kicker: In "Notes and Asides" Buckley AGREED with me. The uncapitalized version of "the south" is just plain wrong.

But the Buckleys don't control the magazine any more.

Mowery does.

And Mowery HATES the South.

As a memeber of the family, I applaud your giving me hell for your Missouri Confederates.

You are not the only ones with reason to complain. After Fort Sumter the Maryland legislature met to decide which side to take. Lincold had them arrested.

He also had the NEW JERSEY legislature arrested!

A LOT of people realized that Lincoln was fighting against America, not just the South.

During the Battle of Gettysburg, one Confederate soldier was killed right on the farm where he had been born and raised.

In Pennsylvania.

Copperhead, Border Stater, Southerner, I will never fold our flag or spit on the grave of one of those who fought for America against Lincoln.

And there will always be someone who won't fold the flag on spit on MY grave.

Many families die out.

Ours never will.

YOUR CONSPIRACY | 2007-11-08

I am still trying to figure out what the opposite of "paranoid" is.

I love the feeling I get when I read the comments that people are conspiring behind my back to do me GOOD. I read things about how Bob's writings need to be put into a format, or this needs to be done with them. Not, "Bob, why don't you do this?" but "Why don't WE do this?"

Then there is BoardAd, who just flat DOES it.

This is, honestly, as good as it GETS. After a lifetime of plugging alone or with one or two indispensable people – I dedicated my first two books to my wife – it is a relief to see the baton being carried. And, of course, unlike the heroic Dr. Pierce, and heroic is the least I can say about him, I will not feel that my way of thinking will die with me.

No other compliment can be as satisfying as this one. Being told how smart you are in a lifetime of abuse is balm to the soul, but when people discuss how to extend what you devoted your life to, when they DO it, as BoardAd has – it makes my heart swell.

What I feel is the opposite of paranoia. Since it is a good thing, we naturally don't have a name for it. That shows how rare, and therefore how precious, it is.