THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

THE MONKEY GRIP | 1999-07-10

You have probably noticed that television and movies now show people holding pistols sideways. They hold the gun in the same way a monkey would grab one.

Look at all the tapes of live action shooting that have ever been taken. You will never see one single person using this monkey grip on a real gun in a real fighting situation.

In the movies, everybody who has a pistol is an expert. According to television, anyone can hit his target if it's close. Anyone can therefore afford to hold his gun sideways in a fighting situation. Actually, no matter how often you have done it, you can miss anything in a fighting situation.

That is why, in the real world, a professional will use a two-handed grip on his pistol.

That is why, in the real world, nobody uses the monkey grip.

BUT THERE IS ANOTHER MESSAGE HERE | 2001-12-07

With me the personal message is not ever the whole story. Everything has a lesson for me in terms of my worldview. That's why it's a worldview.

I did what all the authorities and experts told me to do -- exercise, diet and so forth.

But I ignored heredity, so I ended up in an Emergency Services truck with the siren blasting.

I think the world is headed for a ride in that truck, and for much the same reason.

All the education programs, social action, Family Values, Bible Studies, prayers in school and social science programs in the world, everything all the experts advise, cannot make up for the fact that we are BREEDING humanity to be ugly, retarded and mongrelized.

We have a BREEDING POLICY that is as definite as Adolf Hitler's. Pro-lifers and liberals agree that all the children should be born in the slums of Delhi and other third world swamps. White countries should be overrun and sterile.

I am putting this in plain English, which is a definite no-no, but we all know it's true.

Whether you are a pro-lifer or a Liberal Intellectual (AKA academic bureaucrat) you know very well that this is what is going on. It is an evil policy, no matter how many professional moralists embrace it.

PARTIES: NICK GRIFFIN AT CLEMSON | nationalsalvation.net

Mr. Griffin is head of the British National Party.

I drove a hundred miles or so and stayed at the motel overnight to hear Nick at Clemson, South Carolina. Nick was so tired he could hardly make the speech, but it was still worth it.

He was only able to afford to take one bodyguard with him, my buddy who looks like a Sherman tank's big brother, and they are going to Detroit next, where there will be trouble.

I listened to Nick, not just as the ideologue I am, but also as one who made his living in practical politics. There was rot in it, but the rot interested me. He said "It's not about race," but I have written the same thing in speeches for dozens of congressmen, senators, and the president.

That's politics, gang!

Lincoln can be quoted as taking every position from condoning slavery to black suffrage. Picking apart speeches is not important. Elections take place in REAL TIME, so you write for the time you are in.

Mr. Griffin said that the BNP got total of 500,000 votes recently and elected 44 local officers.

I know all about picking those figures apart.

Still, I was overwhelmed.

The American perspective can be useful to you in this respect. We are in a better position to see the progress of electoral revolution.

In your parliamentary system a party which is in the minority, even if it is enormous, appoints as many ministers as a party which consists entirely of one person in the loony bin, i.e., none. So electoral grassroots rebellion is not an ongoing theme there.

Here, everything from graduated taxes to prohibition to abolition showed up in minority parties, TINY minority parties, before it became national policy. The Free Soil Party, which was the predecessor to the Republicans, got about one percent of the votes in 1848.

Your 500,000 would be a giant in that process. I believe half the electorate stayed home, which would make the 500,000 casting a vote for SOME office for BNP as much as 3 or 4 percent of the electorate.

Remember, each person doing that is forfeiting his vote on the major parties, so it is quite a long way to go. The conventional wisdom is that if you vote for a minor party, you are "throwing away your vote."

But big parties only address marginal issues.

In American history, the only people who USED their vote to make any difference were the ones who cast it for minor parties, for those parties represent the big issues of the future. Believe me, real politicians NOTICE if one percent "throw away their votes" on a single issue!

The BNP is well on its way.

NO SHOW | 2005-06-25

In 1982, anyone who said the USSR was about to fall would have been laughed out of the room.

But what happened when the pressure was on was a game of dominoes

1) Gorbachev renounced the terror that had kept the USSR going since Lenin's Red Terror in 1918.

2) Suddenly people started saying what everybody was thinking, "This system is silly, is childish, the dream of a bunch of professors who never did a day's work in their lives."

3) People began to QUESTION. And that was the end.

Suddenly the Republics like Estonia and Ukraine started saying, "Why SHOULDN'T we be independent?"

People started asking, "Why are all other WHITE countries rich and we live at a level a third-world country would consider embarrassing?" The Confederate flag started showing up.

We all remember the crisis when Gorbachev was arrested and Yeltsin took his stand on top of a tank.

We all remember waiting for the Soviet Army to show up.

It never showed up.

NOBODY believed in the System. The Emperor was as naked as plucked chicken and had been for years.