We have all watched babies try to give us things. This is charming in a baby, because we know the baby doesn't realize that if he gives us his sucker or his doll, he no longer has it. It will be a year or so before a child realizes that when he gives something away he no longer has it.

When someone tells you you can give away American food to our enemies and come out ahead, he is being baby in a more complicated way. But he is still being a mental infant.

That's why you have to be a retard to be a conservative spokesman. A conservative spokesman has to say that if we give our country away to the third world, we will still have it.

Conservative spokesmen keep quoting the inscription on the Statue of Liberty as True Americanism. That inscription says the whole world s should dump its surplus population into the United States

"Give me your tired, your poor,

Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,

The wretched refuse of your teeming shore."

Emma Lazarus wrote that inscription.

Emma Lazarus said that the American ideal was "the melting pot." All conservative spokesmen love that "melting pot"!

Emma Lazarus preached "the melting pot" for America. Israel Zangwill invented that "melting pot" concept.

Emma Lazarus and Israel Zangwill were Jews, and both of them wanted massive immigration into America so that America would not continue to be ruled by white gentiles.

But Emma Lazarus and Israel Zangwill agreed that Jews should NOT be melted into a melting pot. They both wanted a homeland especially for Jews.

Neither Zangwill nor Lazarus was stupid enough to think that a Jewish homeland would be more Jewish if it became a melting pot.

And neither Zangwill nor Lazarus would have killed their brother for the rights of another. Zangwill and Lazarus were not mentally ill.

You have to be sicko to want your people melted into a melting pot. You have to be a sicko to consider it ideal to kill your brother for the rights of another.

You have to be a conservative to want your people melted into a melting pot. You have to be a conservative to consider it ideal to kill your brother for the rights of another.

SEPTEMBER 11, 2001

I would consider it a personal favor if you would read the special articles I wrote on September 11, 2001. Click here.

WhitakerOnline is now five years old. As you will see if you look at our Archives, our first article appeared on September 12, 1998.

I need your help. I think I make good points, and I sure work my tail off writing and rewriting and I spent a lifetime learning what I say here. But all I get in my e-mail is forwards of articles about Iraq and demands that all of us spend our time defending helpless, poverty-stricken little Mel Gibson.

You are all I've got. I need for you to PROMOTE WhitakerOnline. That means sending articles to your friends. That means posting it in Newsgroups. That means not forwarding one article about Mel Gibson and Iraq and instead finding something in my five years of hard work that is worth sending out.

Too many of my readers seem to be fixated on anything that the conservative buzz says is the Issue of The Moment. That is precisely what WhitakerOnline aims to avoid.

This relates directly to what happened on September 11, 2001. Do you remember what the Great Conservative Issue was on September 10, 2001?

Me neither.

But until Sept. 11, 2001 we spent all our time forwarding articles about whatever the buzz of the moment was while terrorists saw our weaknesses and hit them.

If you look at my articles on September 11, 2001, you will see many links to my previous articles. I had been talking about the exact problems that led to September 11 all along.

Am I a prophet or a genius? Naturally I think so, but the reality is that the reason I predict the future is because I am not sunk down into the Current Buzz.

Take a breath. Look around.

Or you can stay with The Buzz and get caught with your pants down the way we did two years ago.