THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

AN OPEN LETTER FROM BOB WHITAKER TO DONALD TRUMP | 2016-09-02

Dear Mr. Trump,

There is a beautiful young lady whose entire career is being destroyed by the man who was elected to protect the rights of West Virginians.Â

This young lady, Carrie Bowe, as we know was in the white genocide video. I think what she said was anyone else can date who they want to, blacks can say they only want to date blacks, Asians can say they only want to date Asians and so forth. But because of this video, her career has been destroyed by the Attorney General of the state of West Virginia, Mr. Patrick Morrisey.

This is a weapon that any half way decent politician could use to DESTROY the opposition.

It will not be used. You wont touch it. In fact, on instruction from your respectable conservative adviser, if you're pressed on this issue you will apologize and support the people who are burning this young lady at the stake.

Mr. Trump, if you were to put this injustice front and center, you could win the Presidency of the United States.

The only thing between you and the Presidency is another piece of pure respectable stupidity.

Bob Whitaker

COMMENTS (13)

#1 Laura | 2016-09-02 19:49

For Twitter:

Patrick Morrisey Attorney General West Virginia - @MorriseyWV

He was elected to protect rights, but here he is destroying her rights #Antiwhite

@MorriseyWV @realDonaldTrump http://tinyurl.com/juuq8us

An Open Letter From @BobWhitaker to @realDonaldTrump on how to WIN the presidency #Trump2016 http://tinyurl.com/juuq8us

Email/distribute this letter/link to letter where ever possible. Lets see if we can get it some attention

#2 Fred R | 2016-09-02 19:54

I tweeted something similar at him and was blocked.

BTW, Wikipedia says he is a republican, not a democrat.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Morrisey

#3 Laura | 2016-09-02 20:20

Thanks, Fred, we had thought he was a democrat!!

I used your tweet as an example. :)

#4 Yankee Rebel | 2016-09-03 08:17

Maybe Trump would rather lose the precidency in a "respectable" manner than win by going against all the PC advisors around him?

#5 Jason | 2016-09-03 09:17

That is the million dollar question. Trump "softened" on the deportation plan because of advisors, but then caught hell from his base, so he went back harder.

At least he listens.

#6 -scythian- | 2016-09-04 16:47

Politics is a racial sport. Political correctness prohibits any truth about race and prohibits pro-white speech. To say that it's anything different is an attempt to conceal what the religion really is: anti-white. It has nothing to do with social niceties, being honest for the purpose of insulting a person is not being politically incorrect, it's just being an a-hole. That's why you see the media, especially the respectable media talking about political correctness as though they aren't completely bound by it, just as they talk about the anti-white establishment as though they aren't a part of it.

A black football player on the job speaks on behalf of his own race in a way that is anti-white as it doesn't take a genius to figure out who the "oppressors" are. As we've all come to expect, the media makes a hero out of him, tells us he's "taking a stand" while ensuring his right to free speech and saying "that's what makes our country great". A white woman speaks on behalf of her own race before she even got the job she was fired from in a way that is not at all anti-non-white, not only does not one single person from the entire so called "free press" defend her right to free speech, they attack her for it and justify the suppression of it. Does that "make our country great" too you two faced rats?

Defending pro-non-white speech and anti-white speech takes no balls whatsoever, call me when just one person in the entire so called "free press" in a country of 315 million people defends pro-white speech. Even priests sometimes speak out against their church.

Even if you don't understand what genocide is, don't agree with what she said, what kind of low life rat scum of the earth would attack a person for being AGAINST the genocide of her own race? The excuse is always "a white supremacist said that", as though the black panthers, nation of islam, LaRaza never say anything on behalf of their races.

You couldn't have scripted a more golden opportunity for Trump to STICK IT to the anti-white establishment and their religion. How can you go wrong as a presidential candidate REALLY defending free speech, of a woman especially who's got no one else defending her?

When Trump was asked to "disavow" right wing groups, he asked the media WHO the groups were and WHAT they stand for - that shut the media up. He can ask the media exactly what this woman stands for, not the media spin on it, but tell us EXACTLY what she said, what we stand for.

I would think this TRUE defense of Free Speech would get that huge population of unlikely white voters to vote.

#7 Henry Davenport | 2016-09-04 19:42

Let's get the 150 initials on this one that will make it visible on the White House's website for the remainder of the next 30 days (click on the title, and only initials are needed in the two name boxes).

Indict W. Va. Attorney General Patrick Morrissey for chasing down Whites and firing them if they exercise free speech

Mr. Morrissey fired his assistant Carrie Bowe for explaining "anti-racist is a code word for anti-White" (goo.gl/AQr3Fq):

"If a Black woman wants to date inside her race, that's acceptable. If an Asian woman wants to date inside her race, that's acceptable. But if I want to date and marry within my race, the White race, I'm called the r-word."

"Throughout elementary school, junior high, high school, and college, I was told that my race, the White race, was the cause of all the world's problems. This conditioning is done only to White people."

"Now, many of you have jobs where minorities say things that would get you, as a White person, instantly fired."

Mr. Morrissey instantly fired her.

Give him enough jail time to write one million times,

"White self-hatred is SICK!!!"

~~~~~

And please don't forget to add needed initials also to our one that was submitted a few days ago, Clarify if Secretary Clinton's remarks imply administration support of WHITE GENOCIDE.

~~~~~

Scythian:

Agreed!

#8 Henry Davenport | 2016-09-04 19:56

I'm not sure if the present title,

Indict W. Va. Attorney General Patrick Morrissey for chasing down Whites and firing them if they exercise free speech,

is best, or if it would have been better to use

Indict W. Va. Attorney General Patrick Morrissey for chasing down Whites and firing them if they oppose White Genocide.

I always hate to sacrifice a meme (since our long term goal is always to get those memes into Whites' heads and into public discourse), but the top title seemed slightly preferable to me since I think it works very well with the text.

#9 Benjamin Newells | 2016-09-05 02:17

"exercise free speech" instead of "White Genocide" in the title is fine, but you didn't include "White Genocide" in the body of the petition which isn't good. But you included ARIACWFAW, which is really good, so not including White Genocide (here and there) is ok.

#10 Henry Davenport | 2016-09-05 17:27

And we shouldn't forget "White self-hatred is SICK!!!"

Bob, last time I checked, is as fired up about that one as "chasing down."

I'm super fired up about both of them.

#11 Henry Davenport | 2016-09-12 18:22

I would appreciate very much your quick opinions on this:

When you first read the petition above, was your reaction that calling for indictment and prison time was going overboard, thus casting a silliness over the petition as a whole?

Would it have been better (since there's probably nothing he's indictable for) if I'd done as Bob did and had been more general, just pointing out that Morrissey was elected to protect the young lady's rights and so he committed a monstrous injustice?

#12 Jason | 2016-09-12 19:39

That part sounds facetious but I wouldn't say it undercuts the rest.

But now that you've brought it up, it might be better to leave that part out, in this case.

But it could work in other cases quite well.

#13 Henry Davenport | 2016-09-13 22:36

Thanks for the feedback.

I guess it's facetious, but in a sane world it wouldn't be.

But I guess we won't get to hammer it over and over to normalize it as we're doing with our memes.

But I think it does grab attention.