A medical specialist I go to is of Russian Jewish extraction. He was explaining to me why people like him tended to favor socialism in America. He said that his forefathers had been persecuted by the Cossacks, and I should understand that that would make him radical.

My response was, "Great, bring all your old hates over here with you, why don't you?"

He was stumped, because he had never heard HIS hates called "hate." Where would he have heard it?

But in the real world, if he brings his hatreds over here and joins the radical left, it will cause a right-wing reaction. And that reaction deserves as much attention as his leftist actions which use dead Cossacks as an excuse.

Not only is this kind of imported hatred never criticized, it is allowed to get completely silly. On October 16, 1999, in ALAN DERSHOWITZ, HATEMONGER, I told about an incident of such silliness I saw on a CNN interview with Harvard leftist Alan Dershowitz. Dershowitz was earnestly explaining how his Russo-Jewish family was afraid to speak out. He said he spoke out and his mother was quietly proud of her heroic son.

Now where did this heroic son have the courage to speak out despite the danger of the Evil Gentiles all around him? Were the Cossacks threatening him? Was it Hitler's SS?

None of the above. Deshowitz said he was defying the suppression of all liberal Jewish opinion in --- BROOKLYN!

It is easy to see why this is insane. But what is really essential here is to see why such attitudes are fatal to American freedom.

This sort of paranoid hysterics leads to a good and evil world, and a good and evil world leads straight to tyranny. Tyranny is based on the idea that there are only two groups: the good guys, who must be blindly backed, and the bad guys, who must be blindly destroyed. If you read Communist literature, you will find it justifies everything it does on the basis of "fighting the fascists." Fascist governments routinely say they are just being anti-Communist.

Our Founding Fathers recognized that both sides, no matter how extreme, usually have something to say. Everybody recognizes this when it comes to the left. If people go extreme left, we are told, it is simply because the System has failed them. Liberals say their leftist policies are necessary to keep people from radicalizing to the left.

But if someone goes extreme on the right, we are told he has nothing to say. He must be crushed, because he is nothing but a "Hater." The key term here is "nothing but."

We are in a world in which all types of genocide are denounced, except for one. There is one ongoing genocide which you must accept if you are not to be anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. Every white majority country on earth, and ONLY white countries, are REQUIRED to accept "the melting pot," or "multiculturalism." This means that ALL white majority countries, and ONLY white majority countries, must take in millions of third worlders and, above all, INTEGRATE with them.

This program is specifically aimed at solving the white problem, which is referred to by the code words "the race problem."

But it does not apply to all-black countries in Africa or all-Mongoloid countries in Asia. It is aimed at one race, and one race only, and you have to agree to it to be respectable.

Until those of us who see this reality are allowed to speak out about it, all reaction will remain underground, and only its ugliest manifestations will surface.

This leads to the radicalization of whites who see what is going on. But this is not to be regarded as a legitimate, human reaction, a reaction that deserves some attention the way leftists do.

To be respectable or a good Crawler, you must agree that those who go radical left are entitled to do so, but those who are ignored and go radical right are to be suppressed.

If legitimate complaints are given no airing, you are asking for trouble. The Founding Fathers recognized this. They also recognized that, if one side is legitimate and the other side is just "hate," you are on your way to tyranny.