I keep reading about how "racists" are taking over the Internet, which is a complaint I did not hear when only the Names ran our movement.
The reason used for blocking the racists is because they insult the anti-racists.
In other words you can't be an anti-racist unless you openly insult other people.
We are racists because we criticize people who insult us.
It's human nature to disagree and argue, but this "controversy" is all made possible by a single made-up word.
Racist vs. Anti-racist is simply an anti-White wordset to control the field of argument.
I like the phrase, "the Names". I guess that refers to some of the "luminaries" of the White Nationalism's past. I like our namelessness. Much more powerful.
It's a beautiful thing, Bob; this thing of ours.
"Don't call it a revolution."
"[W]e want to convey the sense that the bigots are isolated, embittered individuals, rather than permit them to contact and coordinate with one another." --Professor Jeremy Waldron, NYU Law, "The Harm in Hate Speech", Harvard University Press, 2012
Hat tip to AmRen for the article about this book, which is mostly about how "vulnerable minorities" might have get cancer if toxic hatespeech isn't banned. But it did have that one choice quote that gave away the game.
When they apply their soviet-style censorship, now we have a quote from one of theirs instead of having to argue by ourselves.
Thanks, excellent find. That shows their strategy.
I put in a review over there and it got through mod easy. We should leave a few good anti-genocide mantrastic reviews over there.
God I can only imagine AmRen's thread is full of whiny complaints by some beta intellectuals fearing that their pet tail gate project will be declared hate speech?
I almost dread going there, at times it is like a free way accident in the fog with people piling up.
Mr. Waldron is just another anti-white commiting another crime against us. If he singles us out as many do then technically he is in violation of many a good country's laws. I think in Canada he can be arrested for denigrating a racial group.
Those laws were never intended to protect our race from racial denigration. Whites are constantly denigrated in educational textbooks and other media in Canada and no one does a thing about it. Those laws were only ever intended to prevent Whites from criticizing non-White racial groups. Not to help Whites resist our own racial denigration. Everyone knows this.
Please Gavin do not respect the unwritten rules of PC.
Mention the "laws" next time you are jamming some anti-white from a non free speech country, shuts em up good, real good.
The anti-racist laments:
"We are double in ourselves, so that what we believe we disbelieve, and cannot rid ourselves of what we condemn." Michel de Montaigne (15331592)
"Once you refuse to believe what your senses tell you, you become captive of the words of others." ---written by another Bugster whose name escapes me.
I think it's just worth reminding ourselves to ----> DEMAND! < ---- a definition of the word 'racism' or 'racist' whenever that word is used against Pro-Whites who are simply speaking out against the genocide of a whole race of people.
Remember: ----> Ask the questions! ----> Take control! ----> Nail these sick brainwashed Anti-White bast@rds!
;)
Thanks for the reminder ---- we ask the questions. Just remembering that keeps us on the right track.