SIEGECRAFT: THINK NEW! | nationalsalvation.net
One of the outstanding characteristics of BUGS is that we do not keep flopping back into the past.
Prometheus and other commenters from yesterday made me think about this. It is almost impossible to get anybody to think in terms of what is developing NOW rather than trying to make everything today into a reconstruction of the past.
You know what I mean. No matter how much lip service others give to modern technology and how the world is different, the moment they relax they start talking about The Book That Will Change History.
Another example is how nobody but us lives in the age we are in. They keep rushing to the borders to keep the Mexicans out.
The Mexicans are HERE, gang!
Others are still living in an age when whites were the top group preserving its unique position. That keeps them on the defensive. As long as whites maintain this STRATEGIC view, they will face a united front of all other groups against them. Everybody tacitly accepts this view that whites have it and others want it, which was accurate enough in 1950.
So in 1950 pro-whites were conservative. As usual, my explanation is so obvious that everyone knows where I am going and agrees with it. Then they go right back to talking in old terms. This is a painful to me because I need you to go WITH me to the NEXT stage.
I need your intellectual HELP.
When I talk about "spokesmen for white people" it is an entirely different concept from what others mean. When I say "spokesmen for white people" I am NOT speaking of helping the white race as on the defensive in white-oriented society.
This conservative approach to speaking for the white race is Republicanism, and we all know where THAT is going. It sees the world as a two-sided battle between whites and their values in power and "the others."
The Mexicans are HERE, gang! In a two-sided battle between whites and non-whites, simple arithmetic tells us the whites will lose. That is the story of politics today. We all see it, but I feel as if I'm the only political strategist who DEALS with it.
While Pat Buchanan, God bless his courageous soul, is stating the facts about political demography, Republicans, who are wailing about "the minority vote," are saying exactly the same thing.
Here is my point which, as usual, is very obvious and absolutely impossible for anybody to stay with consistently, is this:
Republicanism deals with a world where there are two sides, conservative whites and "others." Their whole hopeless emphasis is on converting some "others." They do not divide the world racially, but by those who stand for "their" values and others.
Let me repeat: this is a TWO-SIDED fight. It is a two-sided fight that arithmetic tells EVERYBODY that Republicans will lose.
I will have to repeat this hundreds of times while people loll back into some version of the two-sided fight:
In a two-sided fight whites are weak and getting weaker. BUT WHEN IT BECOMES A MULTI-SIDED FIGHT WHITE SPOKESMEN ARE IN AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT POSITION.
WHEN IT BECOMES A MULTI-SIDED FIGHT WHITE SPOKESMEN ARE IN AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT POSITION.
WHEN IT BECOMES A MULTI-SIDED FIGHT WHITE SPOKESMEN ARE IN AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT POSITION.
When I talk about "white spokesmen" I am NOT talking about a future in which the fight is two-sided. As the group holding out in a citadel against the rest of the world, Republicans are in a hopeless position.
As spokesmen concerned with the survival of our RACE, one is in the position of speaking for what is still infinitely the most powerful group in a MULTI-SIDED struggle.
Everybody sees that the arithmetic is fatal, but nobody has any idea of changing the arithmetic itself.
The bottom line is this: If you go representing Values everybody sees it is a two-sided battle you will lose. If you go into a real world with different races unapologetically representing their own, the white spokesman can be enormously powerful.
Does anybody GET this? Is anybody capable of KEEPING that outlook?