SKIN COLOR AND INDEPENDENCE | 2002-01-19
Edward Gibbon, the eighteenth century historian, opposed American independence. Since he turned out to be wrong about that, he changed sides and started pushing Indian independence.
By the same token, those who saw what a success the Marshall Plan was decided that all that BROWN countries needed to get rich was foreign aid money.
When someone goes with the idea that whatever is good for whites is good for brown people they are wrong. This is true at least in economic development, foreign aid and probably on the subject of political independence. See
LINK: January 12, 2002 - IN THE NUCLEAR AGE SILLINESS MEANS DISASTER
LINK: January 12, 2002 - THE FATHER OF LIES LOVES THE EQUALITY MYTH
LINK: January 12, 2002 - IF YOUR SOCIETY IS BASED ON A LIE, ONLY THE FATHER OF LIES CAN BENEFIT
LINK: January 12, 2002 - DESPERATION SELLS TRUTH
Political Correctness says that you have to say all this is an accident, and that brown people are just as good at economic development as whites are.
What is funny is that Political Correctness also blames white people for economic development because economic development is unnatural and evil.
To repeat the hippie motto, "The white race is the cancer of history." We are the cancer of history because we have "ruined the world" with industrialization. Whites are evil because they brought economic development.
Brown people are good because they did not develop Evil Industry.
But if you say brown people don't bring on economic development just as naturally as whites do, you are anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
If they had an opposition that had brains, the Political Correctness crowd would be in real trouble spewing self-contradictory drivel like this. But the only anti-liberals who are allowed to speak are those with whom the liberal media feel comfortable. And a kept opposition like that is not going to make the PC crowd keep its lies straight.