THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

THE CENTER IS COLLAPSING | 2013-01-08

The paycheck right will not resign anytime soon, and after the 2014 election they will announce, as they did after 2010, that they are sill relevant.

But the center collapsing is of historical importance. Kerensky jumped into that gap for a few months after the fall of the Czar. The socialist German government set up by the revolt that unseated the Kaiser was replaced by a German kind of Normalcy under Hindenburg.

That German Normalcy collapsed with the election of 1932, when, between them, Nazis and Communists held a majority in the German Parliament, the Reichstag.

So the next stage is on its way.

And only we know it. Reality will be completely covered for at least four years.

So now we may concentrate on brilliant predictions of exactly what is going to happen or you can listen closely, VERY closely, to the advice of Ole Bob, who has been here before.

COMMENTS (14)

#1 Simmons | 2013-01-08 08:52

This long piece deals mainly with gun control, but section 8 of it deals with whites being made scapegoats and genocide.

http://westernrifleshooters.wordpress.com/2013/01/07/bracken-dear-mr-security-agent/

#2 Dave | 2013-01-08 10:30

Distill the Establishment. And that includes academia too. Suck out every drop of imagination that is there. Turn it into fuel. You might get enough to run an ant's motorcycle around the inside of a Cheerio. You are not going to get two trips around the loop.

No matter what, they wear the same old boring suits - no different than the fat mammy stuffed into Sheriff's pants working her shift at the court house door. She was there in 1950. She is there today. The only thing different is the metal detector.

The center doesn't hold for a reason: It dies of senility.

#3 Dick_Whitman | 2013-01-08 22:38

"So now we may concentrate on brilliant predictions of exactly what is going to happen or you can listen closely, VERY closely, to the advice of Ole Bob, who has been here before." (Bob)

OK we're listening! What advice can you give us Bob? Seems to me that all we can do at this point is do what we've been doing.

Spread the message and then spread it some more.

#4 Jason | 2013-01-08 23:30

Oh yes, I will be listening to Bob, as I am sure everyone here will be. I am curious what will happen when we finally do get to the next stage ... say when White spokesman start to appear. I sense the first protest we will hear will be from White Liberals or White Anti-Whites, who say, "you don't speak for us".

How is that to be handled?

#5 OldBlighty | 2013-01-09 03:20

White Anti-White says:

"you don't speak for us".

You are 100% right, Mr White anti-White. As Pro Whites, we do not represent you at all.

As a White anti-White, you not "with" us, you are not "with" anyone at all.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

#6 OldBlighty | 2013-01-09 03:23

This is something we need to make very clear, to those that wish to call it the generic, "White Movement".

We are the Pro White Movement. We do not represent the interest of Whites that are against Whites.

#7 Harumphty Dumpty | 2013-01-17 12:01

I call it "the White movement" when the context makes it clear that I mean "the pro-white movement." In those cases I think it beneficial to appropriate the word "white" to mean "white and normal."

It looks like I'll have skype within a few weeks, and will finally be able to get Bob's answers about this sort of thing as he offered many many weeks ago.

In your context, I would have done the same as you, referred to ourselves as "pro-whites."

#8 dungeoneer | 2013-01-09 07:11

This came up yesterday when an anti-white gun grabber said "We need to ban guns for public safety reason"

I said: "As an anti-white you have no business talking of "we" in relaton to white and normal people because your genocidal anti-white agenda is to destroy us"

It`s comical how these anti-whites "forget" they`re standing on millimetre thick ice.

#9 Harumphty Dumpty | 2013-01-17 12:03

That beautiful reply copied for future use, thanks!

#10 dungeoneer | 2013-01-09 07:32

"I am curious what will happen when we finally do get to the next stage ... say when White spokesman start to appear. "

How can you forget about Horus Avenger, Don and Derek Black, Trucker Roy, the student organiser Matt Heimbach, just off the top of my head... there are plenty of others as well.

#11 Jason | 2013-01-09 09:14

Excellent points - thanks Old Blighty and dungeoneer. I like both those answers. I really like saying, in effect, no, we DON"T represent you, you anti-White White (AWWs). It will be fun when these AWWs realize their brown buddies don't need them anymore. Needless to say, my heart will hold zero pity. In fact, I think it is important that we don't let weasels worm their way in later.

And yes, you are right, dungeoneer, we already have a strong team of spokesmen. I am just wondering how the situation will change for them and others in the coming years, when they go from being dissidents, to perhaps accepted spokesmen. Exciting times!

We have much work to do. I have posted Mantras and Minis at least two or three thousand times. I figure I will need to post it 10,000 times before things reach a tipping point. I am hearing more and more from anti-Whites who are TIRED of hearing the Mantra - lolol. We are beating them down. Invading their space and love it.

I enjoy going on Yahoo sports and dropping Minis. It seems to really ruffle some feathers. I'm afraid sports is a place where white males go and hide from what is happening, so I've been invading it. Let me know if it's not a good idea for some reason.

But to me, part of their rehab is getting them to face the truth of White Genocide and not hide in a game. Sorry, I dribbled verbally here. Cheers!

#12 Undercover Lover | 2013-01-09 02:21

I don't think so Jason. If anti-whites start saying "you don't speak for us" then we've already been in power for several years (maybe even several elections in several countries). It would only be in a society that's ASSUMED to be pro-white where anti-whites would feel the need to say "you don't speak for us."

I think they will continue trying to claim the establishment as theirs (by calling us "racists") right up till the point people start voting large chunks of them out of office. They'll probably try to switch to another word in those elections. Probably something like "discriminator."

Other racial groups will begin to stop using the anti-white family of words and switch to our family of words like pro-black, anti-black, etc... I think racial groups will begin to segregate themselves at that point.

Then some of the anti-whites will begin to shift in our direction while others start IDENTIFYING AS "anti-white."

The first group will start to openly condemn the second for being anti-white and start saying things like "I'm not anti-white but..." -- followed by something anti-whites like.

The second group will start feeling the need to rationalize their position like "mixed race people are better" and will purposefully choose non-white partners. They will be gone in a generation and will be remembered like people think of "Nazis" today; their own non-existence as proof of their genocidal plans.

The other option is that anti-whites start to get desperate and violent. Civil wars (that would be called unrest) would start popping up all over white countries, followed by wars everywhere else.

The only reason I think this is a possibility is because we are entering a racial era and it does seem like things are heating up over the gun issue in the U.S. Neither side seems to be backing down. There also seems to be a lot of people/political bodies arming themselves.

However I'm starting to think that's less and less likely as our message spreads. There wasn't a civil wars when the berlin wall came down. There wasn't a civil war when anti-whites imposed their terminology on us in the 60's. The side without a consistent message just backed down and gave in.

At least that's my understanding of what Bob is explaining to us.

#13 Jason | 2013-01-09 09:18

Interesting points and something to think about, thanks

#14 Harumphty Dumpty | 2013-01-17 12:17

Re your first paragraph: I still listen to commie radio here in Berkeley frequently, and the hard left feels just as it felt back in the 60s, namely, that they are marginalized and persecuted, and that the establishment and the racial right are spiritual allies in the oppressive system, ethos, that persecutes them.

When another bugster and I briefly ran the experiment in swarm posts of somewhat subtly appropriating "white" to refer to ourselves, I'm pretty sure I remember that the two anti-whites we were engaging with protested very angrily that we didn't speak for them.

Ah, that day is a fond memory! I must get skyped so I can finally talk with Bob about that.