THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

THE NEXT STEP? | 2013-09-18

Note the question mark.

The reason for the question mark is to make you hesitate.

By our efforts, and God knows our efforts alone, confidence in their main and often most used weapon, "anti-racism," has been badly shaken.

We have won a major engagement.

It is time for me to begin to think in terms of a next step, after twenty years on this one.

But first, you have to read over the last article again, hammering on the difference between newbies and vets.

Our tiny force is, like all grassroot guerrilla forces after a while, divided into the vets and the newbies.   When you mention "Next Step" to such a group, it is the newbies who adopt it as the Law of Moses.

They want to destroy the enemy tomorrow and have their Torchlight Parade the next day.

The vets will not willingly change tactics that work and with which they have been learned to work successfully over years in thousands of direct battles with the enemy.

If we are to try a next step, it is strictly for the vets.

Newbies must stick with the Mantra until they begin to learn what winning is -- like it is NOT winning an argument -- and eventually constructing minis enough times to SEE which ones REALLY work  versus the ones that give them a satisfactory shock and awe.

COMMENTS (13)

#1 Jason | 2013-09-18 06:13

Vets and Newbies, please keep pushing the Mantra even if we explore more. It's the Goose laying golden eggs. It makes everything else possible.

Now, what is meant by the Next Step? I assume we have the same big goal - forcing a public discussion of White Genocide. So, are we just talking about new tactics to bring that about?

#2 Daniel Genseric | 2013-09-18 18:38

Jason,

We are talking about EVERYTHING. Nothing is off the table when it comes to stopping our genocide, white genocide.

If I have to call it Eurocide, I will do that.

#3 Daniel Genseric | 2013-09-18 18:41

If I have to put a team on that message, I will do that.

If I have to produce videos marrying both sets of terminology, I will do that.

If I have to wear a hat that says "RACIST!"....

You get the idea. We stop at nothing until THIS WAR is decided.

#4 Daniel Genseric | 2013-09-18 18:36

"Newbies must stick with the Mantra until they begin to learn what winning is"

"Newbies must stick with the Mantra until they begin to learn what winning is"

"Newbies must stick with the Mantra until they begin to learn what winning is"

#5 Daniel Genseric | 2013-09-18 18:44

There is no next step for you until you understand the parameters of this game and how it is won.

There is no next step for you until you understand the parameters of this game and how it is won.

There is no next step for you until you understand the parameters of this game and how it is won.

There is no next step for YOUuntil you understand the parameters of this game and how it is WON!

#6 Harumphty Dumpty | 2013-09-18 18:36

"We have won a major engagement."

Bob, I agree with that, if you're thinking of the Oregon overpass banner. The head of the local NAACP said "anti-racial" to avoid saying "anti-racist," it appeared to me.

I don't agree with the following though, as it's worded:

"...confidence in their main and often most used weapon, 'anti-racism,' has been badly shaken."

Jimmy's action wasn't one of many. It was the FIRST placing of our signature phrase where it would get major media attention to the extent of getting the FIRST-ever televised response from mainstream anti-white groups like the NAACP, as far as I know.

So it's just a beginning, a first step.

It shows the potential of the weapons you've given us to "badly shake" anti-whites' confidence in their main weapon, "anti-racism." It doesn't show that we've already shaken it, except in that one locale.

Jimmy's action shows us where our next step should be if there are those of us willing and able to do it: simply do what Jimmy did.

In cyber-space I try to place our message on what seems to me a very prominent cyber-billboard: a site at the White House.

But it would be so much more effective if I could plant it on the White House lawn.

That's sort of what Jimmy did. He changed the physical appearance of a familiar local structure in a way that made it worthwhile to TV stations to send images of it into viewers' homes. He did something that was "visually quotable."

Above, I'm guessing that I'm mainly just responding to your wording, and that I'm not too far removed from your own thinking...but just in case! :)

#7 Jason | 2013-09-18 19:18

I've wanted to say this for a while, so I'll stick it here: Please remember that the kind of spokesmen Whites in America will embrace are different the ones European or Russian will like.

Americans don't go for fearsome, stoic, stone-faced "men of steel". Almost every American leader I can think of is a bit of a smiling back-slapper (in style).

Huey Long and FDR both had great power, but I can't imagine either one posing like Mussolini. And God knows I can't see them in a military uniform in front of a crowd. LOL.

They seem to like their "strong men" more than we do overseas. Just something for the future, don't go thinking that some Russian or Spanish or German model of leadership is the one that will work in America.

It'll be different for different regions of Whites. Viva la Difference!

#8 Jason | 2013-09-18 19:22

Sorry HD, I meant to put that as a regular post, not a reply to yours!

#9 Daniel Genseric | 2013-09-18 18:59

"He did something that was "visually quotable."

Exactly. Write the news for them and the rest is history. Victory

#10 Harumphty Dumpty | 2013-09-18 23:03

A radio personality on the left during the 60s was famous for saying, "If you don't like the news, go out and make your own."

#11 Kanintass | 2013-09-19 07:33

I am a newbie so I guess thats mean I'm supposed to just get in line and learn the basics.

But, if anyone is interested in a newbie's opinion I will tell you about what some of us are doing in Sweden.

Background: One by one all the MSM took down their comment sections, or just kept them open on issues that couldn't even remotely be connected to immigration abortion feminism etc. Why? Because every sigle time the non-PC comments were dominating until they shut it down, and they had to have fulltime working censors to avoid getting the head of the newspaper convicted for allowing hate speech. So the only place where comments are allowed now is alternative media (ranging from counter jihad to national socialists). Every one of these sites getts more readers a day than any pro-white party has ever gotten, so thats a great place to reach a big audience that isn't all in to PC but still not convinced pro-whites.

Now, to avoid running east-to-west, and getting blocked, we can't just put the full mantra up on every single article. So what we do is commenting like the rest of the AWPW:s, but as far as possible try to sneak in the terminology (pro/anti-white, anti-whiteism) and connect the subject to genocide.

Result: Most of the openly pro white writers have adopted these terms and many point out genocide. "Anti-racist" is now used with the "". And even the counter jihad place have started to use "anti-white" in stead of just PC, covard, leftie etc.

Is that a good thing or would you rather have us back to post full mantra on facebook and youtube?

Side note: this is even more necessary in non-english speaking forums since the full mantra doesn't easily translate (no respectable conservatives, people identifying as (real) Swedes rather than white, no good eq. for "White" genocide etc)

Thoughts?

#12 Jason | 2013-09-19 07:50

Well for what it's worth, my opinion is you are doing a good job in getting Mantra points past the censors and influencing others. So, I say keep up the good work!

You don't sound like Newbie by the way, you know all the terminology, so you must be a fast learner.

I do think using Minis on YouTube and where ever you can is very good practice though, in addition to getting the word out.

#13 Kanintass | 2013-09-19 08:01

Not totally new, but no where near the rest of you guys usually posting here. And, I'm ashamed to say, I read far more than I post. The point is though, the tactic I'm describing comes with a shit load of tailgating - but the goal is beginning with what ever the topic is on and trying to get is closer to genocide. From what some of you are saying it seems tailgating is a capital crime but I think it could be means to an end if it you can start of topic - and end on topic - in stead of the other way around. That way you can avoid pissing of the news and jews crowd, but still influense them IMO.