THE OCCIDENTAL OBSERVER ANTI-MANTRA PRO-WHITES ARE THE BEST OF THEM

THE OCCIDENTAL OBSERVER ANTI-MANTRA PRO-WHITES ARE THE BEST OF THEM | 2012-04-01

I can say one important thing for the anti-Mantra pro-whites who spoke up at

ww.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/03/on-the-path-to-practical-politics/?show=comments

They did not use the anti-white's cowardly method of hiding behind their editorial positions to simply IGNORE the Mantra.

I can respect people, no matter how absurd I consider the arguments they come out with, who have the guts to come out and put those arguments on record, even anonymously. From fighting anti-whites all these decades, I recognize this back-stabbing method of stopping all mention of a subject, and I recognize it clearly among those who put their influence behind it in the pro-white movement.

On that freezing out crap, I am an expert. So give the frustrating anti-Mantra group at TOO credit.

A major reason I wrote the piece referring to the Occidental Observer was that, like anti-white material, it contains so much of what I tell you about that SOUNDS as if I am exaggerating wildly.

Anti-whites really ARE anti-white. Anti-Mantra pro-white arguments really are so vacuous it's hard to overstate it.

There is no substitute for actually seeing them in action. But I defy any of the BUGSERS who got in there fighting back to deny that there is any way to describe what they say that does not sound like a careless exaggeration.

I wanted you to SEE it.

One difference between the pro-Mantra and anti-Mantra crowd that was so huge and obvious many people would have ignored it is how the BUGSERS kept talking about what they had DONE. The anti-Mantra pro-whites theorized about what would happen if they ever DID anything.

One ampw (anti-Mantra pro-white) thundered, "How do you KNOW that the Mantra works?"

The obvious answer is, "The way you know whether ANYTHING works. You TRY it."

Everything they said has already become part of the basic training of everybody in BUGS.

The Royal Prosecutor declared that the other side COULD petition Japan to open its borders.

If he had ever looked at BUGS, he would know that their entire strategy, like that of most of his pro-white allies, is to DESPERATELY, mono maniacally IGNORE the Mantra. A petition like that would be a dream come true for us.

In a FOX interview, the INTERVIEWER mentioned that Japan does not allow the immigration demanded of white countries, and Jared Taylor immediately changed the subject.

I think reading over some of this discussion would be educational for most of us, not to teach us anything new, but to demonstrate that I am NOT exaggerating.

We can find plenty of anti-whites to demonstrate that I make no exaggerations, but this is the ONLY time the ampws have come out of hiding.

COMMENTS (21)

#1 germaniajim | 2012-04-01 08:54

WTF? Did I read that correctly? Jared Taylor changed the subject at a prime opportunity like that one? Does he not know he passed on the chance of a lifetime? What was he scared of? being labeled a racist or anti semite? If whites still care about that stupid insult we are not going to get anwhere, I would die a racist rather than live a coward.

#2 Genseric | 2012-04-01 09:05

"What was he scared of?" -GJ

He couldn't find anything on his steno notepad about MASSIVE immgration in EVERY White country and ONLY in White countries, so he passed. It wasn't Scholarly Enough for someone of his stature to touch. Of course he doesn't know he passed on an opportunity of a lifetime. He's too busy weighing his favorite books. And, oh yeah, the R-word thing too.

heh...

"IN YOUR OPINION I am a 'Racist.' You're just saying that because I am White. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."

#3 Gavin | 2012-04-01 13:13

I am using, "You are just calling me the r-word because I am White. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White."

I have had a few anti-White get angry about my use of the term "r-word"

#4 shari | 2012-04-01 10:07

I see that TOO put up the mantra anthem!! Apparantly the ampw's do not reflect the opinion of the site. Ha!

#5 Harumphty Dumpty | 2012-04-01 11:52

I've found it very hard to get Mantra-resistant pro-Whites to respond to the question, "Do you believe that the word 'genocide' accurately describes what is being done to Whites?"

I think many consider "genocide" an exaggeration, or fear the term won't find the same ready acceptance among our target White audience that their own information about the Jews does! Lol!

-----------------

I see Bob is using the term "anti-Mantra"....I had thought for a few days that that term is a mistake, that it's using words that create a reality that we don't want, and that "Mantra-resistant" is a better term tactically for such pro-Whites.

But now I'm rethinking. Maybe it's better to challenge those pro-Whites with the stronger term, "anti-Mantra," just as we challenge anti-Whites with the term "anti-White." I think "anti-Mantra," like "anti-White," will likely produce a desire in the persons so named to not be so named.

Yes, I see it! Ha ha! Bob is right! What a surprise! :)

And after all, they ARE anti-Mantra.

#6 Jason Here | 2012-04-01 18:37

I think the word "genocide" does, at first blush, seem exaggerated to most Whites - and I mean pro-Whites. We think of genocide as people rounded up and killed in camps. So, I think it's imperative to explain to them as fast as possible, that we are using the term genocide as the UN defines it. That genocide can take place over many generations and involve no face-to-face killing of any kind.

Also, remember there have been many WNs tell us that blood was "just about" to be shed in the streets due to Negro hordes and economic collapse, etc. That never happens, and so some people get tired of hearing dire warnings. Talk of genocide may strike them the same way at first.

So, I think it's a matter of overcoming preconceived notions, at least among the good folks

I just mention this to show that some of the resistance isn't really from bad faith, it just take time for people to wrap their heads around it. On the other hand, some WNs have no interest in WNism succeeding, I am convinced. They want it to be a small, weird cult, that they have lots of influence over, as opposed to something that actually accomplishes anything.

#7 Harumphty Dumpty | 2012-04-01 21:20

Your remarks were helpful, especially as a person who's spent time at OO.

The word "genocide" packs a wallop, creates a sort of emotional confusion, and the reaction of most whites to emotional confusion is not to jump into the confusion and try to sort it out, but to turn away from it and let it subside.

When I post a short Mantra comment in the mainstream that just states that White countries are being flooded, etc., and..."whites blended out of existence," I almost always follow it now by the statement, "That's genocide by U.N. definition," per your suggestion.

I'm perplexed about how many pro-Whites got to be pro-Whites, they seem so set in their ways. There must be a lot of different roads to pro-Whitism.

#8 Jason Here | 2012-04-02 01:57

The "G" word sure gets people where they live! While it might seem "inflammatory" to some, the jolt is necessary. It would be nice to have an example of non-violent genocide to show people what we mean by it (besides the general White one). Is Tibet the best modern day example? It was ruled genocide I believe and it didn't require mass killing. Forced assimilation IS genocide, as I understand it, under the UN. It really does take this stuff a while to sink in, at least for me!

#9 Scythian | 2012-04-02 02:38

Someone posted a mini very similar to #39 in Sect-A of 'Mini-Mantras II' w/ a link to NationalSalvation on sports site a while back. That was my first exposure to the Mantra; I didn't get the anti-racist anti-white part, but the genocide I got and it REALLY enraged me. Try to make them understand it in Mantra terms first, before flanking them w/ the U.N. definition.

#10 Jason Here | 2012-04-02 07:15

Good advice, my problem is often trying to hit them with too much too soon, and anticipate all problems before they can speak. Sounds like every one is saying, first, start with the basics, then feed in the rest as needed by objections.

This is fun!

#11 Gavin | 2012-04-02 03:35

Killing Without Murder: Aboriginal Assimilation Policy as Genocide

http://jsaw.lib.lehigh.edu/include/getdoc.php?id=459&article=356&mode=pdf

#12 Jason Here | 2012-04-02 07:12

Excellent find on Genocide, thanks. The only thing I might prefer is one that did not involve Whites in any way. That why they can't throw the charge that "well its karma, you deserve it now" silly argument.

#13 Gavin | 2012-04-02 08:24

What?!

I LOVE it when they do that.

Really exposes them for the sick anti-White freaks they are.

Think about it. They are telling you that our race DESERVES genocide. Just THINK about that.

What kind of a person says that a race of people DESERVES genocide?!?!?!

#14 Jason Here | 2012-04-03 02:49

That's a good point - it does prove that they WANT genocide for White people. That's a good thing to throw back them. Basically, they are admitting it is bad for Whites and that is WHY they like it.

#15 Scythian | 2012-04-01 12:33

I pointed out a couple days ago in that discussion that if the mainstream ever did point out that particular "double standard" of mass immigration and assimilation of ONLY White countries by insisting the same for non-White countries, they would expose the anti-white establishment bare. Imagine O'reilly accusing the Japanese, Koreans, etc, for having a "racist" immigration policy, of accusing Japan of being "backwards", LOL!

I read a fair amount of that discussion until a couple days ago and it occurred to me after I was offline (and I meant to go back and make the comment) that everyone criticizing the Mantra were the ones who never use it and the most staunch defenders were the ones who do (even describing and giving examples of the Mantra's effectiveness) - that says it all.

#16 Gavin | 2012-04-01 13:16

The core of any successful movement (political or not) is that you do what works. You get out in the world implement a stretegy and look at the RESULTS.

#17 Gavin | 2012-04-01 15:37

The ampw crowd isn't playing to win. BUGS is.

Actually the ampw crowd isn't even playing. They're just bitching about how evil the other team is and how much they hate the game.

btw. the link at the top is wrong.

#18 Jason Here | 2012-04-01 18:44

Yes, exactly. I tried to say that in my too long post above - lol. I truly believe, some WNs have no interest in anything pro-White winning. They want WN to be a small, weird cult, that they have lots of influence over. They seem to view as a social club for venting.

#19 c-bear | 2012-04-01 22:23

When Bob mentioned "this back-stabbing method of stopping all mention of a subject" practiced by anti-whites it reinforced what I have always called a "media blackout". The fact that the Mantra hasn't even been whispered in the lamestream media, even though it has been around for several years now, proves the anti-whites are scared. In my experience, several years should be long enough for any pro-white concept to make the lamestream. Nearly every pro white concept that got ignored initially eventually does make it into the lamestream, usually within 2-3 years EXCEPT THE MANTRA. This is all the proof that we need that what we're doing is effective. When a pro-white concept is openly discussed in the anti-white media that concept is ineffective. When it is ignored,it is effective. That is a very simple gauge that THEY have unwittingly provided for us.

A little off subject, the term "lamestream" I used here is one of my new favorites. It doesn't matter where I heard it, except that it is OUR terminology. I have people actually using our terminology at work. I believe imposing OUR terminology goes hand in hand with spreading the Mantra.

#20 Gavin | 2012-04-01 22:42

I use the term "anti-White media"

It gets OUR point across.

Even kept opposition like Sarah Palin uses "lamestream."

I have noticed that they get upset at the term "liberal media" but not "lamestream media"

Lamestream is too general. Liberal accuses them of bias, so it's more virile, even if they always defelect by pointing to respecticon media.

"Anti-White media" strikes right at the core.

#21 dungeoneer | 2012-04-02 05:35

Rrabbits is laying down the law on SF:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Insurrectionist View Post

Thesytsemisantiwhite is obviously in the business of defending White people here in the UK. He just doesn't happen to think White people are being deliberately singled out for genocide.

He should be able to have his own views on this without us attacking him as anti-White.

Anyway, if you've got someone arguing over whether the anti-White geNOcide is deliberate or not, then you've already won if you think about it.

This is just the age old problem of nationalists attacking each other rather than combining forces to fight the common enemy.

Rrabbits: "No he`s not,he`s in the business of denying white genocide and thereby allying himself with the anti-whites.

Let me remind you that the Stormfront leadership and most Stormfront members and other pro-whites now agree that the anti-white regime is pushing genocide on white people worldwide.

The days of casual intellectualism and non-contention of this crucial issue are over,and no one should expect to publicly side/agree with the anti-white regime using the same non-factual "arguments" and not EXPECT to be condemned."