THE ROBERT W. WHITAKER ARCHIVE

WHITE RABBIT'S UNEXPLAINABLE NEXT MOUNTAIN TO CLIMB | 2013-05-06

            While White Rabbit was formulating AntiRacist Hitler, I heard something familiar in his voice.  It was the same as I had on the Mantra.  It was simple inability to explain a concept that was so powerful.

The ending is a great example.   It ends with Hitler having a wry smile on his face and saying, "How could that have happened?" and fadeout.

Only a BUGSER would understand what that ending entailed.   Others would feel they had the audience and it was time to smash the point home.   The Torchlight Parade, the BBC-like Social Message.

If I had had the slightest idea that White Rabbit would do anything of the sort, he would have called the South Carolina psychiatric board and demanded they get to me before I actually harmed myself.

Like that ending, our genius lies in getting it just right, like that ending.   But how could White Rabbit EXPLAIN such points to me without sounding like he considered me an idiot?

The problem is that anyone outside BUGS ACTS like an idiot.   Since that is  certainly understood by WR and by me, an explanation of subtlety is made difficult to state reminding the other BUGSER about the "Duhhhs." which is always right on the edge of an insult.

"How Europeans Took Over America" has shot upwards since "AntiRacist Hitler" came out.  People are beginning to realize that a WR  YouTube will be FUN to watch.   The beginning of "How Europeans Took Over America is longer than the entirety of many of the most popular YouTubes.  People who go there from ARH will be willing to sit through that now.

How in the HELL can anybody raised in our numbskull days make a SEQUEL to ARH?

One thing that is sure is that WR will not only have trouble making the sequel, he will have an impossible time explaining it.

COMMENTS (23)

#1 Simmons | 2013-05-06 11:18

Tell me about it, ARH rides that fine line no one can accurately define. But so what, if it were easy everyone would be doing it.

At alt-right some jew tried to degrade ARH, but not even the detail obsessed pro-white could make the jew seem smart or even relevant compared to ARH.

A quick message to our AMPW friends, "Give it up you cannot save the anti-whites."

#2 timeforfreedom | 2013-05-06 12:00

The AMPW ARE anti-Whites.

#3 dungeoneer | 2013-05-06 12:36

Branding the whole pro-white wing as anti-white is stupid.

We want those guys USING anti-white,

We only pull the anti-white card on them when they side with the anti-whites on not calling it genocide.

#4 Conrad | 2013-05-06 19:11

"Branding the whole pro-white wing as anti-white is stupid."

I agree. There is a phrase that we all must keep in mind - "NO MORE BROTHERS WARS!"

Networking and supporting one another is probably the most important thing that we can do, now and forever.

........

Jack's War

https://www.createspace.com/3820778/

#5 dungeoneer | 2013-05-07 02:24

This is an example of what Coach is saying about the difficulties of explanations. While an unhealthy percentage of AMPW`s are anti-whites in pro-white dress, we use AMPW for good reason.

The AMPW`s like to claim we`re saying all pro-whites not using the mantra are anti-white, but we point out the distinction.

#6 Jason | 2013-05-06 23:45

The AMPWs are empty heads. I mean those who are truly against the Mantra. And I'm sorry, that includes quite of few of the Old Grizzled Clowns of White Nationalism. Either due to jealousy or stupidity, they are not subject to change.

They will go to their graves against it. I'm not much interested in "coalition building" with retards. I'm not talking about pro-Whites who don't comment on the Mantra, or those who wish us well but say it's not for them. I mean the ANTI Mantra people.

They are bubble heads at best.

#7 John White | 2013-05-06 11:55

I must confess yet again that it's somewhat difficult for me to identify clearly what Mr. Whitaker is asking from us or what specific instruction he is trying to convey.

I would love to take solace in the idea that English is not my mother tongue, but I'm afraid it's not that.

I'm saying these things because I think this post elaborates on the recent instruction by Mr. Whitaker, in which he asked us to stop thinking about new plots but focus on re-thinking the basics.

I'm ashamed to admit that I'm not even sure what the basics are.

Anyway, what I get from this last post is that BUGS (or Mantra thinking for that matter) is about learning to see the obvious that everybody else is oblivious about, and to express it in an effective way. He also seems to convey the message that those obvious things that BUGSers learn to identify and point out to are actually so obvious that are difficult to explain without making the other person feel stupid.

I'm not sure if that's what Mr. Whitaker is trying to tell us, but that is what I get.

In any case, I am having a hard time with the instruction about "re-thinking the basics". Like I said, I'm not even sure what the basics are specifically, therefore I don't know what am I supposed to think about and how.

The only thing I can say is that once the Mantra "clicked in" within my mind, all the frustration and feelings of powerlessness vanished to never come back.

It's so easy for me now to deal with the anti-whites, to make a fool out of them, that I almost feel sorry for those bastards.

Other than that, I'm clueless as to the kind of mindset or mental process that made the Mantra possible in the first place.

#8 Harumphty Dumpty | 2013-05-06 20:53

I've suffered from the same frustration ever since I've been here. It's just the way things are here!

The best compilation of the basics I know of personally is Beefcake's podcasts.

http://whitegenocideproject.com/category/beefcakes-bootcamp/

I recommend starting with WE have the Moral Highground, since that sets up one's attitude nicely while listening to the others.

http://whitegenocideproject.com/beefcakes-bootcamp-episode-3-we-have-the-moral-highground/

#9 dungeoneer | 2013-05-06 11:56

The film "The matrix", should have stayed as one film.

Once Neo (white rabbits) had "the powers" everything else is a given.

#10 Dave | 2013-05-06 13:18

John White,

It is "basic" thinking to realize that attitudes are all important in determining outcomes. The whole Civil Rights debacle in the United States was due to the attitude among whites that there was something inherently evil in white history.

Your attitude can determine whether you live or die. That is what the Mantra points out. The Mantra points out that the idea of special white obligations to "mankind" means the genocide of the white race. We whites need to know that our attitudes are destroying our people and that we MUST change our attitudes.

Basic thinking also means wariness in permitting your mind to be misdirected. Learning not to "tailgate" is a life and death issue.

The hypnotist's power comes from his ability to misdirect attention. He asserts that there is this thing called "the hypnotic state" and he assumes (and you are to assume) that such a thing exists. Of course, no such thing exists. But as long as you BELIEVE it exists, your mind is misdirected. The hypnotist thereby obtains his power to influence you to do all kinds of preposterous things.

Nobody could possibly "hypnotize" me. I know the hypnotist's secret. And knowing the secret gives me the power to be a "hypnotist" myself.

Basic thinking is everything. We are fighting a religion that asserts (just like the hypnotist) that there is this thing called "mankind" that the white race owes a debt and that the white race must atone for the sins of the past by ceding white countries to "mankind".

We are fighting a religion. It is basic thinking to realize that.

#11 Jason | 2013-05-08 06:25

Well put.

Learning not to "tailgate" is a life and death issue.

That line is so important. I wish I had known it earlier, I don't how much time or how many opportunities I missed because I had a stubborn tendency to argue with someone in order to convince them they were wrong. What a waste.

Smart people size up who are they dealing with pretty fast and when they see it's not an active mind, they quit trying to "argue" with it. I haven't been so smart on that front.

#12 Epiphany | 2013-05-06 14:30

The non--Whites notice the U.S. Media's fixation on Nazi Germany, and become envious. What said non--Whites fail to notice is the most obvious thing: the U.S. Media only brings up Germany in order to condemn and vilify that country. It never occurs to them that if the U.S. Media actually brought up what usually goes on in Third World cesspools, that they, the non--Whites would feel humiliation rather than pride.

They really are that moronic!

#13 Jason | 2013-05-06 17:25

Please err on the side of insulting us by giving too much obvious explanation. Make things explicable above all else.

Some authors cover this by using a lot of heavy, confusing verbiage, which may convince the reader he hasn't been insulted, that he's actually entered some exalted state of being.

They will say something like, "the human tendency to be logocentric leads to a certain epistemic blindness when attempting to build a reliable representation of the external world, due to a reliance on almost solely linguistic modes of analysis, as opposed to fully incorporating direct perception of reality as a necessary component of mental model building."

Or, you can just say people get wrapped up in words and fail to look at facts. I think we around here get that direct is actually a compliment. You are saying the reason we don't get something isn't because we lack IQ, it is because we haven't noticed something simple. We all have blind spots.

"Obvious" means something that is easily seen. So if people are not getting something quickly, by definition it may not be "obvious". It may be right in front of us, but that doesn't make it obvious. Like they say, fish don't know they are in water.

Bob is a fish who knows he's in water.

#14 Asgardian117 | 2013-05-06 18:07

Coach, some things arent MEANT to have a sequel. I feel ARH is probably best as a stand alone entity it will be that "singular reference" i believe we can build off its momentum, but we need to look to another "property" to use as a spring board. ARH cannot have a sequel, it said everything it had to say it GOT THE POINT ACROSS, a sequel to ARH i fear would have negative unintended consequences.

#15 Harumphty Dumpty | 2013-05-06 21:05

I crave detailed explanations. No one will insult me with detailed explanations.

I don't like being left to figure out on my own things I'm not capable of figuring out. Like why Horus thinks 3 petitions max would be better than the present 7 or my contemplated 8. He said there's overlapping. That's a bit terse for me. Isn't overlapping good, even in the context of "petitions"? I want to know what Horus is thinking, not have to guess. But maybe he hasn't had time to get back to me.

I'm used to wordy Jews. The reserve of so many Whites when it comes to explaining stuff frustrates me to death.

#16 Skippy 01 | 2013-05-07 00:45

"But how could White Rabbit EXPLAIN such points to me without sounding like he considered me an idiot?"

-

It's difficult to tell Bob what you learned from him because you sound like an idiot.

The two big things I learned here are:

THE CHECK LIST!

This is my check list so I don't lock my keys inside the car or start "slipping". After I have completed my argument...

?Did I mention open borders, forced integration, and assimilation?

?Did I mention anti-racist is a code word for anti-White?

?Did I mention RACE and GENOCIDE in caps to make them uncomfortable and draw attention?

I don't stick to that consistently, but referring to it has saved me from "slipping" on many occasions.

THE THING THAT PEOPLE ARE QUOTING IS THE QUOTABLE BIT!

I used to use all kinds of formulas like "these policies are genocidal for the whites" and "this is a genocide of the whites" in arguing. I guessed it was important to use the right form of words, but I didn't know how to tell which was the right one.

After the petition got quoted, Bob said: "If you want to be quoted, be quotable." That is when the light turned on for me.

Now I always use "white genocide", which I know is quotable because it got quoted. I do not use alternative phrasings, which I know are not quotable because they did not get quoted.

The point is not, "always used 'white genocide', never use alternative phrasings', even though that is an important point.

The point is: the thing that people are quoting is the quotable bit. That's the weak point to attack, the phrase to hammer, the expression that stings or intrigues people, or else they would have quoted something else. The thing that they didn't quote, however intellectual or cool, is not the quotable version, or they would have quoted it. Throw out probes. Watch the reaction. Then you know where to attack. The thing that people are quoting is the quotable bit.

However I did not say, "thanks Bob, now I get it: the thing that people are quoting is the quotable bit." Because how retarded do you have to be for this to be a revelation to you? Of course the proof that something is quotable is that it got quoted!

Only because Bob was modest there did I say this.

Maybe the most useful instructions Bob gives are not the ones where he gets feedback because someone says, "oh, good, I get that". Maybe it's when there is silence because people are thinking, "oh my gosh I hope no-one realizes that I didn't already know that."

#17 Harumphty Dumpty | 2013-05-07 08:36

Concern with not looking stupid always rubs me the wrong way. When I was in college I was known for asking "stupid" questions. I was also known for getting straight A's. A considerable achievement considering my limitations.

There's a sort of pride among Whites that inhibits effective communication IMO.

Of course some might say, perhaps correctly, that I"m not sufficiently concerned with dignity.

#18 Harumphty Dumpty | 2013-05-07 09:05

Among many White men, there seems to be a reluctance to reveal oneself.

#19 jo3w | 2013-05-07 08:04

I think everyone on here has said that their entertainment experiences have been diminished by recurring politically correct ideas that can be found throughout movies and TV programs. The movie or show is not about political correctness; we find politically correct themes woven into the story. That may be a direction for WR or some other entrepreneur to explore. A series of short cartoons where the story will appeal to a broad group of people instead of a piece that is solely about the message. Just like the liberal propaganda interlaced in every entertaining movie and TV show, our propaganda will be sewn into a storyline which has nothing to do with our message. The biggest challenge would be the talent to write such entertaining shows. BUGSters will have no problem promoting it.

#20 jo3w | 2013-05-07 08:20

How effective would a cartoon series be about a family whose grandfather, Old Bob, drops by from time to time to share a little information about how the world really works? The bulk of the show would have nothing to do with our message, that way we can appeal to the broadest audience.

#21 H.Avenger | 2013-05-07 23:54

The whole time we were busy making AntiRacist Hitler. I was being told how difficult this would be to pull off. Hitler has quite a reputation and one wrong move ....this would not work. Well money talks BUT performance echoes.

So now, I have rabbits yapping that there can never be a sequel because AntiRacist Hitler said everything worth saying ....and said it perfectly. We have to move on. Even the coach doubts my ability to script a sequel!!!

Of course, no one has said anything about a Prequel!!

Betting against White Rabbit Radio may look enticing. The odds are always stacked against the dissidents. But remember that you are here reading and posting on BUGS. Where were you 4 years ago? Why are here now? You are here because someone exposed you to Bobs brilliance.....the Mantra.

Betting against a trend is like pissing on an electric fence. Maybe that electric fence will finally be turned off THIS TIME.......OR NOT.

#22 Harumphty Dumpty | 2013-05-08 00:44

I would never bet against White Rabbit (I might piss on an electric fence though. Just to test it, you know), because every comment White Rabbit has written on the SF thread about this video has been the kind of delight to read that is only produced by exceptionally able minds. I have the same impression of Adelheim, just from what people have told me, and from listening to the first half hour of his debate with Privot.

Petition #9 is waiting for your next video...lol!

#23 Conrad | 2013-05-08 19:46

"Betting against a trend is like pissing on an electric fence. Maybe that electric fence will finally be turned off THIS TIME.......OR NOT."

I love it!

Always there are doubters.

.........

Jack's War

www.jackswar.com